Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
ISRN Pediatr ; 2014: 734689, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24693446

RESUMEN

Background. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) noncompliance is associated with increased risk of seizures and morbidity in seizure disorder patients. Objective. To identify risk factors that correlated to higher levels of morbidity, measured by emergency room (ER) utilization by seizure disorder members taking AED. Methods. Patients with primary or secondary diagnosis of seizures, convulsions, and/or epilepsy and prescribed AEDs during an 11-month period were included in the study. Variables were analyzed using multivariate statistical analysis including logistic regression. Results. The study identified 201 members. No statistical significance (NS) between age, gender, number of tablets, type of drug, or other risk factors was associated with increased mortality. Statistical significance resulted with medication compliance review of 0-14 days, 15-60 days, and 61+ days between refills. 68% of patients with ER visit had noncompliance refill between 0 and 14 days compared to 52% of patients in non-ER group (P = 0.04). Contrastingly, 15% of ER group had refills within 15-60 days compared with 33% of non-ER group (P = 0.01). There was NS difference between two groups when noncompliance was greater than 60 days (P = 0.66). Conclusions. The study suggests that careful monitoring of pharmaceutical refill information could be used to identify AED noncompliance in epileptic patients.

2.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 19(3): 280-6, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21150890

RESUMEN

The widespread clinical utilization of array comparative genome hybridization, has led to the unraveling of many new copy number variations (CNVs). Although some of these CNVs are clearly pathogenic, the phenotypic consequences of others, such as those in 16p13.11 remain unclear. Whereas deletions of 16p13.11 have been associated with multiple congenital anomalies, the relevance of duplications of the region is still being debated. We report detailed clinical and molecular characterization of 10 patients with duplication and 4 patients with deletion of 16p13.11. We found that patients with duplication of the region have varied clinical features including behavioral abnormalities, cognitive impairment, congenital heart defects and skeletal manifestations, such as hypermobility, craniosynostosis and polydactyly. These features were incompletely penetrant. Patients with deletion of the region presented with microcephaly, developmental delay and behavioral abnormalities as previously described. The CNVs were of varying sizes and were likely mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination between low copy repeats. Our findings expand the repertoire of clinical features observed in patients with CNV in 16p13.11 and strengthen the hypothesis that this is a dosage sensitive region with clinical relevance.


Asunto(s)
Deleción Cromosómica , Duplicación Cromosómica , Cromosomas Humanos Par 16/genética , Fenotipo , Anomalías Múltiples/genética , Anomalías Múltiples/patología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/genética , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Microcefalia/genética , Microcefalia/patología , Duplicaciones Segmentarias en el Genoma
3.
J Child Neurol ; 23(9): 999-1001, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18344458

RESUMEN

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 typically presents in adulthood with progressive ataxia, dysarthria, tremor, and slow saccadic eye movements. Childhood-onset spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 is rare, and only the infantile-onset form has been well characterized clinically. This article describes a girl who met all developmental milestones until age 3(1/2) years, when she experienced cognitive regression that preceded motor regression by 6 months. A diagnosis of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 was delayed until she presented to the emergency department at age 7 years. This report documents the results of her neuropsychologic evaluation at both time points. This case broadens the spectrum of spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 presentation in childhood, highlights the importance of considering a spinocerebellar ataxia in a child who presents with cognitive regression only, and extends currently available clinical information to help clinicians discuss the prognosis in childhood spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/genética , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/genética , Regresión Psicológica , Ataxias Espinocerebelosas/complicaciones , Negro o Afroamericano , Factores de Edad , Edad de Inicio , Ataxia/genética , Ataxia/fisiopatología , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Niño , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/fisiopatología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Humanos , Trastornos del Movimiento/genética , Trastornos del Movimiento/fisiopatología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Ataxias Espinocerebelosas/fisiopatología , Ataxias Espinocerebelosas/psicología
4.
Curr Treat Options Neurol ; 9(4): 256-67, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17580006

RESUMEN

Children with epilepsy, particularly infants, differ from adults not only in the clinical manifestations of their seizures but also in the presence of unique electroencephalographic patterns, etiologies, and response to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). There is a growing list of newer AEDs and nonpharmacologic therapies available to manage childhood epilepsy. These newer AEDs may not be overall more efficacious than the older drugs, but they do appear to be safer, better tolerated, and to have fewer drug-drug interactions. Selection of the AED for initial therapy must be based upon clinical judgment and patient-specific circumstances, such as the specific epilepsy syndrome being treated, anticipated duration of treatment, presence of comorbidities, ability to use certain formulations, and overall cost effectiveness. In some cases, seizures may be aggravated by the use of certain AEDs. Overall, oxcarbazepine is the first-line treatment for localization-related epilepsy with partial-onset seizures. For generalized epilepsies, the AED choice is highly dependent upon which specific syndrome is being treated. For generalized epilepsies with primarily absence seizures, lamotrigine is the AED of first choice. For mixed generalized epilepsies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, zonisamide or topiramate are the first-line agents. For infants with West syndrome, treatment is based upon the underlying etiology: vigabatrin for tuberous sclerosis; adrenocorticotropic hormone for children with no specific etiology uncovered (cryptogenic); and zonisamide for those with a severe symptomatic etiology other than tuberous sclerosis. Single drug therapy (monotherapy) is the goal of epilepsy treatment because this is associated with better compliance, fewer adverse effects, and lower cost. If the seizures prove intractable or adverse effects are encountered with the first AED, then a second monotherapy trial is undertaken. Once three appropriate medications at therapeutic doses have failed, other modalities should be considered, including epilepsy surgery, vagus nerve stimulation, and the ketogenic diet.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...