Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 22(4): 243-7, 2001 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11379715

RESUMEN

As infection control evolved into an art and science through the years, many infection control practices have become infection control dogmas (principles, beliefs, ideas, or opinions). In this "Reality Check" session of the 4th Decennial International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infections, we assessed participants' perceptions of prevalent infection control dogmas. The majority of participants agreed with all dogmas having evidence of efficacy, except for the dogma on the frequency of changing mechanical-ventilator tubing. In contrast, the majority of participants disagreed with dogmas not having evidence of efficacy, except for the dogma on perineal care, umbilical cord care, and reminder signs for isolation precaution. As for controversial dogmas, many of the responses were almost evenly distributed between "agree" and "disagree." Infection control professionals were knowledgeable about evidence-based infection control practices. However, many of the respondents still believe in some of the non-evidence-based dogmas.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Profesionales para Control de Infecciones , Control de Infecciones/normas , Congresos como Asunto , Recolección de Datos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Profesionales para Control de Infecciones/psicología , Competencia Profesional , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 28(3): 222-7, 2000 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10840341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess whether selected recommendations in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "Guideline for Prevention of Nosocomial Pneumonia" were being implemented and having an impact on the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) at US hospitals, we surveyed hospitals participating in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system. METHODS: We mailed a questionnaire to the infection control practitioner of each NNIS hospital in 1995 and used data from the NNIS system to calculate annual rates of VAP. RESULTS: Of the 188 hospitals surveyed, 179 (95%) returned completed questionnaires. Of these, 175 (98%) had implemented the recommended change of mechanical-ventilator breathing circuits at 48-hour or greater intervals. Of 110 hospitals using the hygroscopic condenser-humidifiers or heat-moisture exchangers with ventilators, 102 (93%) changed the hygroscopic condenser-humidifiers or heat-moisture exchangers routinely, and of 98 hospitals using bubbling humidifiers, 96 (98%) used sterile water to fill these humidifiers. Other practices for which the guideline provides no recommendation and their frequency of use by NNIS hospitals include use of hygroscopic condenser-humidifiers or heat-moisture exchangers (110/179 [61%]) and use of bacterial filters in anesthesia machines (128/171 [61%]). There was a significant decrease in the VAP rate from 1987 to 1998. CONCLUSION: Most NNIS hospitals had implemented selected recommendations in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "Guideline for Prevention of Nosocomial Pneumonia" before the final publication of the revised guideline. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of these recommendations on the occurrence of VAP.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/prevención & control , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Anestesiología/instrumentación , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Neumonía/etiología , Respiración Artificial/instrumentación , Unidades de Cuidados Respiratorios , Estados Unidos
4.
Chest ; 117(2): 380-4, 2000 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10669678

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare trends in nosocomial tuberculosis (TB) prevention measures and health-care worker (HCW) tuberculin skin test (TST) conversion of hospitals with HIV-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) patients and other US hospitals from 1992 through 1996. DESIGN AND SETTING: Surveys in 1992 and 1996 of 38 hospitals with PCP patients in four high-HIV-incidence cities and 136 other US hospitals from the American Hospital Association membership list. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven hospitals with PCP patients and 103 other US hospitals. RESULTS: In 1992, 63% of PCP hospitals and other US hospitals had rooms meeting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria (ie, negative air pressure, six or more air exchanges per hour, and air directly vented to the outside) for acid-fast bacilli isolation; in 1996, almost 100% had such isolation rooms. Similarly, in 1992, nonfitted surgical masks were used by HCWs at 60% of PCP hospitals and 68% at other US hospitals, while N95 respirators were used at 90% of PCP hospitals and 83% of other US hospitals in 1996. There was a significant decreasing trend in TST conversion rates among HCWs at both PCP and other US hospitals; however, this trend varied among all hospitals. HCWs at PCP hospitals had a higher risk of TST conversion than those at other US hospitals (relative risk, 1.71; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: From 1992 through 1996, PCP and other US hospitals have made similar improvements in their nosocomial TB prevention measures and decreased their HCW TST conversion rate. These data show that most hospitals are compliant with CDC TB guidelines even before the enactment of an Occupational Safety and Health Administration TB standard.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/tendencias , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/prevención & control , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/prevención & control , Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Predicción , Hospitales Urbanos/tendencias , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Aislamiento de Pacientes/tendencias , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/prevención & control , Neumonía por Pneumocystis/transmisión , Factores de Riesgo , Prueba de Tuberculina , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/transmisión , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/transmisión , Estados Unidos , Ventilación
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 20(5): 337-40, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10349950

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine trends in compliance with the guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in healthcare facilities among New Jersey hospitals from 1989 through 1996. DESIGN: A voluntary questionnaire was sent to all 96 New Jersey hospitals in 1992. The 53 that responded were resurveyed in 1996. RESULTS: Of the 96 hospitals surveyed in 1992, 53 (55%) returned a completed questionnaire; 33 (64%) were community, nonteaching hospitals. In 1991, patients with tuberculosis (TB) were admitted at 38 (72%) of 53 hospitals, and from 1989 through 1991, patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB were admitted at 15 (29%) of 52 hospitals. Twenty-nine (57%) of 51 reported having rooms meeting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) isolation. A nonfitted surgical mask was used as a respiratory protective device by healthcare workers (HCWs) at 28 (55%) of 51 hospitals. Attending physicians were included in tuberculin skin-testing (TST) programs at 5 (11%) of 45 hospitals. In the 1996 resurvey, 48 (94%) of 53 surveyed hospitals returned a completed questionnaire; 34 (81%) of 42 had TB patient admissions, and 4 (9%) of 43 had MDR TB patient admissions in 1996. Forty-five (96%) of 47 reported having rooms that met CDC criteria for AFB isolation. N95 respiratory devices were used by HCWs at 45 (94%) of 48 hospitals. Attending physicians were included in the TST programs at 22 (54%) of 41 hospitals. CONCLUSION: New Jersey hospitals have made improvements in availability of AFB isolation rooms, use of proper respiratory protective devices, and expansion of TST programs for HCWs from 1989 through 1996.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Guías como Asunto , Hospitales/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/tendencias , New Jersey/epidemiología , Aislamiento de Pacientes , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prueba de Tuberculina , Tuberculosis/epidemiología
8.
Arch Intern Med ; 158(13): 1440-4, 1998 Jul 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9665353

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of tuberculosis (TB) in hospitals have occurred when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline recommendations for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were not fully implemented. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether US hospitals are making progress in implementing the CDC guidelines for preventing TB. METHODS: In 1992, we surveyed all public (city, county, Veterans Affairs, and primary medical school-affiliated) US hospitals (n = 632) and 444 (20%) random samples of all private hospitals with 100 beds or more. In 1996, we resurveyed 136 random samples (50%) of all 1992 respondent hospitals with 6 or more TB admissions in 1991. RESULTS: Of the 1076 hospitals surveyed in 1992, 763 (71%) respondents returned a completed questionnaire. Among these, 536 (71%) of 755 reported having rooms that met CDC criteria for acid-fast bacilli isolation, ie, negative air pressure, 6 or more air exchanges per hour, and air directly vented to the outside. The predominant respiratory protective device for health care workers was nonfitted surgical mask and attending physicians were infrequently (50%) included in tuberculin skin-testing programs. In the 1996 resurvey, 103 (76%) of 136 respondents returned a completed questionnaire. Of these, 99 (96%) reported having rooms that met CDC criteria for acid-fast bacilli isolation. The N95 respiratory protective devices were predominantly used by health care workers, and attending physicians were increasingly (69%) included in the hospitals' tuberculin skin-testing programs. CONCLUSIONS: Most US hospitals are making progress in the implementation of CDC guidelines for preventing the transmission of M tuberculosis.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Hospitalaria/normas , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Administración Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Arquitectura y Construcción de Hospitales , Hospitales Privados/normas , Hospitales Públicos/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Aislamiento de Pacientes/tendencias , Personal de Hospital , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Prueba de Tuberculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Tuberculosis/transmisión , Estados Unidos
9.
Am J Infect Control ; 26(2): 111-2, 1998 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9584804

RESUMEN

In response to a reported hospital outbreak traced to the use of contaminated ice in 1968, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed an advisory regarding the sanitary care and maintenance of ice-storage chests and ice-making machines. CDC has revised this unpublished advisory several times during the years to respond to requests for guidance from infection control professionals. Because CDC continues to receive inquiries about this topic from infection control professionals, this advisory is being published.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Alimentos/prevención & control , Hielo , Control de Infecciones/normas , Servicio de Mantenimiento e Ingeniería en Hospital/normas , Refrigeración/instrumentación , Saneamiento/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Saneamiento/métodos , Estados Unidos
10.
Am J Infect Control ; 25(3): 229-35, 1997 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9202819

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paralleling the resurgence of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States, the reported number of persons with TB in Texas increased by 33% during 1985 through 1992, the third largest rise among all the states. This increase prompted us to survey hospitals in Texas to determine their degree of compliance with recommendations in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention TB guidelines. METHODS: In April 1992, we mailed a voluntary questionnaire about TB infection control practices, health care worker tuberculin skin testing procedures, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis laboratory methods to a convenience sample of hospitals in Texas. RESULTS: Of 180 hospitals surveyed, 151 (83%) returned completed questionnaires. Of these, 90 (60%) were nonteaching community hospitals; 28 (19%) were teaching community hospitals; 13 (9%) were university-affiliated hospitals; and 20 (13%) were other hospitals. The number of hospitals to which patients with TB were admitted increased from 98 (65%) in 1989 to 122 (81%) in 1991. Respondent hospitals had a mean of 183 acute care beds (median 100, range 5 to 999), 6 acid-fast bacillus isolation rooms (median 2, range 0 to 57) and 7.5 admissions/year of patients with TB (median 2, range 0 to 202). Of hospitals responding to specific questions, 20% (27/137) admitted patients with multidrug-resistant TB, 18% (25/140) reported not having any acid-fast bacillus isolation rooms, and 28% (35/125) had no rooms meeting all of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for acid-fast bacillus isolation (negative air pressure, > or = 6 air changes per hour, and air directly vented to the outside). The tuberculin skin test conversions among health care workers rose from 246 (0.6%) in 1989 to 547 (0.9%) in 1991. CONCLUSION: Although the number of Texas hospitals admitting patients with TB increased during 1989 through 1991, many facilities still did not have infection control practices consistent with the 1992 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention TB guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Hospitales/normas , Control de Infecciones/normas , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Recolección de Datos , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/patogenicidad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Texas , Estados Unidos
11.
Am J Infect Control ; 24(6): 463-7, 1996 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8974172

RESUMEN

In December 1990 the Investigation and Prevention Branch, Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), developed the Hospital Infections Program infection control information system (HIP ICIS) to respond more efficiently to more than 200 public inquiries (telephone or written) that HIP receives daily. The HIP ICIS allows anyone with a Touch-Tone telephone, fax machine, or computer to access CDC information that answers the most commonly asked questions from infection control practitioners and other health care workers. The HIP ICIS has received approximately 56,608 inquiries; of these, 33% were about CDC guidelines on prevention and control of nosocomial infections, 25% about issues related to HIV, 16% about sterilization and disinfection of medical devices, 8% about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 3% about long-term care facilities, and 17% miscellaneous topics (e.g., nosocomial infection rates, infection control courses, and ventilation, construction, and renovation of hospitals). The HIP ICIS is an efficient method of providing infection control guidance to the infection control community. In this article, we a) review the history of the HIP ICIS, b) present data on HIP ICIS usage, c) summarize the current HIP ICIS contents, and d) present step-by-step instructions on how to access the HIP ICIS.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Servicios de Información/organización & administración , Sistemas de Información/organización & administración , Redes de Comunicación de Computadores , Guías como Asunto , Hospitales , Humanos , Servicios de Información/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Información/estadística & datos numéricos , Teléfono , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA