RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High-risk programs provide recommendations for surveillance/risk reduction for women at elevated risk for breast cancer development. This study evaluated the impact of high-risk surveillance program participation on clinicopathologic breast cancer features at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: Women followed in the authors' high-risk program (high-risk cohort [HRC]) with a diagnosis of breast cancer from January 2015 to June 2021 were identified and compared with the general population of women undergoing breast cancer surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK; general cohort [GC]) during the same period. Patient and tumor factors were collected. Clinicopathologic features were compared between the two cohorts and in a subset of women with a family history of known BRCA mutation. RESULTS: The study compared 255 women in the HRC with 9342 women in the GC. The HRC patients were slightly older and more likely to be white and have family history than the GC patients. The HRC patients also were more likely to present with DCIS (41 % vs 23 %; p < 0.001), to have smaller invasive tumors (pT1: 100 % vs 77 %; p < 0.001), and to be pN0 (95 % vs 81 %; p < 0.001). The HRC patients had more invasive triple-negative tumors (p = 0.01) and underwent less axillary surgery (p < 0.001), systemic therapy (p < 0.001), and radiotherapy (p = 0.002). Among those with a known BRCA mutation, significantly more women in the HRC underwent screening mammography (75 % vs 40 %; p < 0.001) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI: 82 % vs 9.9 %; p < 0.001) in the 12 months before diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Women followed in a high-risk screening program have disease diagnosed at an earlier stage and therefore require less-intensive breast cancer treatment than women presenting to a cancer center at the time of diagnosis. Identification of high-risk women and implementation of increased surveillance protocols are vital to improving outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of chemoprevention for breast cancer risk reduction has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials; however, use remains low. We sought to determine whether uptake differed by risk factors, and to identify reasons for refusal and termination. METHODS: Women seen in a high-risk clinic from October 2014 to June 2017 considered eligible for chemoprevention (history of lobular carcinoma in situ, atypia, family history of breast/ovarian cancer, genetic mutation, or history of chest wall radiation) were retrospectively identified. Breast cancer risk factors were compared among those with and without chemoprevention use, and compliance was noted. RESULTS: Overall, 1506 women were identified, 24% with prior/current chemoprevention use. Women ≥ 50 years of age were more likely to use chemoprevention than women < 50 years of age (28% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Chemoprevention use by risk factor ranged from 7 to 40%. Having multiple risk factors did not increase use. Significant variation by risk factor was present among women ≥ 50 years of age (p < 0.001), but not among women < 50 years of age (p = 0.1). Among women with a documented discussion regarding chemoprevention (575/1141), fear of adverse effects was the most common refusal reason (57/156; 36%). The majority of women (61%) who initiated chemoprevention completed 5 years. CONCLUSION: Chemoprevention use among women at increased risk for breast cancer remains low, with more frequent use among women ≥ 50 years of age. These data highlight the need for ongoing educational efforts and counseling, as the majority who begin therapy complete 5 years of use. Given the fear of adverse effects as well as low uptake, particularly among women < 50 years of age, alternative risk-reducing strategies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Mama in situ/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Carcinoma Lobular/prevención & control , Quimioprevención/métodos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/patología , Carcinoma de Mama in situ/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Carcinoma Lobular/patología , Carcinoma Lobular/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop and optimize a rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening protocol for pancreatic cancer to be performed in conjunction with breast MRI screening in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)-positive individuals. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective study was conducted. The rapid screening pancreatic MR protocol was designed to be less than 10 min to be performed after a standard breast MRI protocol. Protocol consisted of coronal NT T2 SSFSE, axial NT T2 SSFSE and axial NT rFOV FOCUS DWI, and axial T1. Images were acquired with the patient in the same prone position of breast MRI using the built-in body coil. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists with 12 and 13 years of MRI experience, respectively. The imaging protocol was modified until an endpoint of five consecutive patients with high-quality diagnostic images were achieved. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed. RESULTS: The rapid pancreas MR protocol was successfully completed in all patients. Diagnostic image quality was achieved for all patients. Excellent image quality was achieved for low b values; however, image quality at higher b values was more variable. In one patient, a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was found and the patient was treated surgically. In four patients, small pancreatic cystic lesions were detected. In one subject, a hepatic mass was identified and confirmed as adenoma by liver MRI. CONCLUSION: Rapid MR protocol for pancreatic cancer screening is feasible and has the potential to play a role in screening BRCA patients undergoing breast MRI. KEY POINT: ⢠Develop and optimize a rapid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening protocol for pancreatic cancer to be performed in conjunction with breast MRI screening in BRCA mutation positive individuals.
Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Mutación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Proteína BRCA1/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: BRCA mutation carriers have an elevated lifetime breast cancer risk and remain at risk for interval cancer development. We sought to compare BRCA mutation carriers with screen-detected versus interval breast cancers. METHODS: Women with a known BRCA mutation prior to a breast cancer diagnosis were identified. Clinical and pathologic factors, and imaging within 18 months of diagnosis were compared among screen-detected versus interval cancers. Interval cancers were those detected by physical exam among women undergoing regular screening. RESULTS: Of 124 breast cancers, 92 were screen and 22 clinically detected, of which 11 were interval cancers among regular screeners, and 10 were incidentally found on prophylactic mastectomy. Women with interval cancers were younger, had lower body mass indexes, and were more likely to be Black than those with screen-detected cancers (p < 0.05). Interval cancers were all invasive, larger, more likely to be node positive, and more likely to require axillary lymph node dissection and chemotherapy (p < 0.05). No significant differences were seen by BRCA mutation, mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement, tumor grade, or receptor status between cohorts. Women screened with both mammogram and MRI had significantly lower proportions of interval cancers compared to women screened with only mammogram or MRI alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Interval breast cancers among BRCA mutation carriers have worse clinicopathologic features than screen-detected tumors, and require more-aggressive medical and surgical therapy. Imaging with mammogram and MRI is associated with lower interval cancer development and should be utilized among this high-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Heterocigoto , Mutación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is a new breast imaging technology increasingly used in the diagnostic setting but its utility in the pure screening setting has not been reported. The goal of this pilot study is to prospectively compare screening CEDM to breast MRI in women with an increased risk for breast cancer. METHODS: In this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant study, 318 women at increased breast cancer risk were consented (December 2012-May 2015) to undergo CEDM in addition to their scheduled MRI. CEDM was performed within 30days of screening MRI. CEDM was interpreted blinded to MRI. The reference standard was defined as a combination of pathology and 2-year imaging follow-up. RESULTS: Data from 307/318 patients were evaluable. Three cancers (two invasive cancers, one ductal carcinoma in situ) were detected at first round screening: MRI detected all three and CEDM detected the two invasive cancers. None of the three cancers was seen on the low energy mammograms which are comparable to conventional mammography. At 2year imaging follow up, there were 5 additional screen detected cancers and no palpable cancers. The positive predictive value 3 (PPV3) for CEDM was 15% (2/13, 95% CI: 2-45%) and 14% for MRI (3/21, 95% CI: 3-36%). The specificity of CEDM and MRI were 94.7% and 94.1% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both CEDM and MRI detected additional cancers not seen on conventional mammography, primarily invasive cancers. Our pilot data suggest that CEDM could be valuable as a supplemental imaging exam for women at increased risk for breast cancer who do not meet the criteria for MRI or for whom access to MRI is limited. Validation in larger multi institutional trials is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Mama/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Mamografía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women with a BRCA mutation have significantly elevated breast cancer risk, which can be reduced by >90% with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM). We sought to compare a cohort of BRCA mutation carriers choosing BPM versus breast surveillance to better elucidate factors that may impact decision making. METHODS: Women with a BRCA mutation were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. The surveillance cohort (n = 313) consisted of women seen in a high-risk clinic between 2014 and 2016, while the surgery cohort (n = 142) consisted of women who underwent BPM between 2010 and 2016. Clinical and familial factors were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Women choosing BPM were more likely to have a BRCA1 than BRCA2 mutation compared with the surveillance group (57 vs. 45%, p = 0.02) and were less likely to have a personal history of ovarian cancer (10 vs. 20%, p = 0.01). Furthermore, women undergoing BPM were more likely to be married (78 vs. 62%, p = 0.01), to have more children (median 2 vs. 1, p < 0.001), and to have undergone a prophylactic oophorectomy (61 vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Women choosing BPM had more first-degree relatives (63 vs. 48%, p = 0.01) or a sister (23 vs. 14%, p = 0.02) with a history of breast cancer and were more likely to have a family member with ovarian cancer under the age of 40 years (9 vs. 4%, p = 0.03). There was no difference in the number of prior breast biopsies or history of atypia/lobular carcinoma in situ. CONCLUSION: The decision to undergo BPM appears multifactorial, with gene mutation, family history, and relationships appearing to have the strongest influence on decision making.
Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Carcinoma Lobular/cirugía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Mutación , Mastectomía Profiláctica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico , Carcinoma in Situ/genética , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Heterocigoto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe imaging findings, detection rates, and tumor characteristics of breast cancers in a large series of patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to potentially streamline screening strategies. METHODS: An IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective analysis of 496 BRCA mutation carriers diagnosed with breast carcinoma from 1999 to 2013 was performed. Institutional database and electronic medical records were reviewed for mammography and MRI imaging. Patient and tumor characteristics including age at diagnosis, tumor histology, grade, receptor, and nodal status were recorded. RESULTS: Tumors in BRCA1 mutation carriers were associated exhibited significantly higher nuclear and histological grade compared to BRCA2 (p < 0.001). Triple-negative tumors were more frequent in BRCA1 mutation carriers, whereas hormone receptor-positive tumors were more frequent in BRCA2 mutation carriers (p < 0.001). BRCA2 mutation carriers more frequently presented with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) alone 14% (35/246) and cancers more frequently exhibiting calcifications (p < 0.001). Mammography detected fewer cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers compared to BRCA2 (p = 0.04): 81% (186/231) BRCA1 versus 89% (212/237) BRCA2. MRI detected 99% cancers in each group. Mammography detected cancer in two patients with false-negative MRI (1 invasive cancer, 1 DCIS). Detection rates on both mammography and MRI did not significantly differ for women over 40 years and women below 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers are associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics compared to BRCA2 and are less well seen on mammography. Mammography rarely identified cancers not visible on MRI. Thus, the omission of mammography in BRCA1 mutation carriers screened with MRI can be considered.
Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Femenino , Tamización de Portadores Genéticos , Heterocigoto , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The phrase "high-risk for breast cancer" is used to identify various groups at elevated cancer risk, and the appropriate surveillance and risk-reducing strategies differ based on the etiology of risk. Here, we review the utility of patient-reported data to capture women with modifiable lifestyle risk factors and those suitable for genetic counseling referral. METHODS: Patient-reported data from a web-based survey were used to capture personal history, multi-generational family history, and lifestyle factors (body mass index, alcohol consumption, physical activity). Responses were tabulated, and percentage of patients who met criteria for possible intervention calculated. RESULTS: 1277 women completed the survey from October 2014 to December 2015. Women were considered high risk for a combination of the following: family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (77%), history of atypical hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ (35%), known breast cancer-related gene mutation (11%). Based on self-reported data, 65% qualified for genetic evaluation but 40% reporting no prior testing. Only half of the population met national physical activity recommendations, nearly 40% were overweight/obese, and 18% reported consuming ≥1 alcoholic beverage per day. CONCLUSIONS: Among women followed in a high-risk breast surveillance program, there is considerable opportunity for improved genetic referral and awareness of modifiable lifestyle factors based on self-reported data as 60% of respondents reported a possible area for intervention. While risk reduction associated with lifestyle changes is modest in comparison to chemoprevention or surgery, such changes are practically without risk, minimally expensive, and provide innumerable secondary health benefits.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Asesoramiento Genético , Estilo de Vida , Autoinforme , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Etnicidad , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Vigilancia de la Población , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Some macrolides have been found to exert anti-inflammatory effects. Lung diseases such as asthma, panbronchiolitis, cystic fibrosis, and bronchiectasis are thought to respond to the immunomodulatory properties of macrolides. We report three cases of idiopathic bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia, now called cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and three cases of radiation-related bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia that responded to macrolide therapy. An explanation of why macrolides may have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with these syndromes is discussed. These cases help to reinforce accumulating data that macrolides are beneficial as anti-inflammatory agents and organizing pneumonia may be another pulmonary disease that can benefit from such therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/tratamiento farmacológico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/diagnóstico por imagen , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/etiología , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Tos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tos/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Although asymptomatic lytic bony lesions of the phalanges of the hands and feet are not uncommon in patients with sarcoidosis, involvement of the vertebral bodies is rare. Because these lesions can mimic other diseases of the bones on radionuclide scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), this case emphasizes the importance of obtaining tissue and excluding malignancy and infection before the diagnosis can be established with confidence