RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Do the number and the position of meshes in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy influence anatomical or functional postoperative results in genital prolapse treatment? PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety patients were treated for genital prolapse by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between January 1998 and 2007. Eleven had an anterior single mesh, 36 a single posterior mesh and 43 a double mesh. RESULTS: Four patients with late postoperative complications needed a new surgical procedure. Three of them had a double mesh. Thirteen anatomical recurrences (14 %) were found. Eleven recurrences had a single posterior mesh and eight needed a new surgical procedure. Two other recurrences had a double mesh. Only one needed a new surgical procedure. No recurrence was noticed in the anterior single mesh group. The observed pelvic floor dysfunction rates were respectively for the single anterior mesh group, posterior single mesh group and double mesh group: constipation 20 % 64 % 35 %, anal incontinence 0 % 14 %/2 %, urgency 0 %/8 %/12 %, stress urinary incontinence 27 % 14 %/31 %. CONCLUSION: Double mesh reduced anatomical recurrence, but increased surgical complications and postoperative dysfunctions.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Invasive lymph nodes are an independent factor of prognosis and essential for the survival of patients with cancer of the penis. The aim of this article is to analyse published research results on the diagnosis and treatment of lymph nodes in cancer of the penis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Bibliographic research on Medline was carried out using the terms penile carcinoma, lymph node dissection, lymphadenectomy, survival, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RESULTS: The risk of lymph node metastasis depends on the stage of the primitive tumour, its histological grade, the presence of venous and lymphatic embolus and the presence of palpable lymph nodes (classification into risk groups by the European Association of Urology [EAU]). A diagnosis of suspected adenopathy based on clinical examination associated with FNA biopsy is essential. No medical imaging (tomodensitometry, NMR, PET-scan) has proven to be superior to clinical examination. The search for the sentinel lymph node although interesting remains to be defined, especially in patients who have no palpated adenopathy but are at risk of metastasis. Not only is surgery on inguinal lymph nodes the only reliable way of confirming an invasive metastatic lymph node, it also plays a therapeutic and prognostic role for patients who have a tumour of the penis which risks spreading to lymph nodes (intermediate or high risk according to EAU). The act should always be two-fold. The type of dissection is in function with the clinical examination: a radical inguinal dissection is recommended in the case of palpated adenopathy and a modified inguinal dissection is recommended if there is no palpated adenopathy, this should be radicalised in the case of metastatic adenopathy on histological examination. Neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy would appear to play a interesting role when combined with surgery for certain patients without there being currently being precise consensus because of the lack of documented cases. The same goes for external radiotherapy on inguinal lymph nodes which seems to play a role in local controls of the lymph node disease though increases morbidity risks of surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Lymph node dissection alone has a therapeutic role in patients who have reached metastasis of lymph nodes (stage pN1). However, it remains insufficient for patients who have metastatic infiltration of more than 2 lymph nodes (stage > or =pN2). Consequently, it would seem important to develop multimodal approaches in the treatment of these patients in order to increase the rate of response to treatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Neoplasias del Pene/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Francia , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias del Pene/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Sociedades Médicas , UrologíaRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate predictive factors and long-term carcinogenic results for patients who had had a total cystectomy for cancer of the bladder and whose final histological results did not show evidence of a residual tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 2002, 192 patients had a total cystectomy for a bladder tumor. No residual tumor (pT0) was evident in the specimens of cystectomy of 22 patients (11.5%). None of the patients had distant metastasis or ganglions at the time of the initial examination. RESULTS: Predictive factors for having no residual tumors based on the specimen of cystectomy (pT0) were an antecedent of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.0079), an interval between the resection of the bladder and the cystectomy of more than 12 weeks (p=0.0014) and a resection of the initial bladder considered complete (p=0.0036). The average treatment of these 22 patients was 70+/-46 months. During treatment, two patients (9%) had a recurrence in the pelvis and 10 patients died including one from the development of his cancer of the bladder. Global, specific and non-recurrence survival at five years were 75%, 100% and 94%, respectively. We revealed better specific survival (p=0.0007) and without relapse (p<0.0001) in patients who no longer had a tumor on the specimen of cystectomy (pT0) compared with patients who had a residual tumor (pT+) but with no difference in global survival (p=0.0574). CONCLUSION: The absence of residual tumors (pT0) on a specimen of total cystectomy for cancer of the bladder was a good factor for prognosis regarding long-term survival even if tumor development was observed. Complete resection and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy probably played a beneficial role in the future of these patients.