Mitotic rate as an important prognostic factor in cutaneous malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the quantification of mitoses in cutaneous melanoma has been discharged from the main prognostic variables of the TNM classification. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of the presence of mitoses in primary cutaneous melanoma and to establish the number of mitoses per mm2 that may have prognostic significance. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on 141 patients treated for cutaneous melanoma, who were assessed by the same pathologist, and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical, epidemiological, histopathological and follow-up variables were gathered and compared with the number of mitoses to distinguish the significance of differences by means of univariate, multivariate, and survival analyses. RESULTS: The cut-off level related to a better sensitivity and specificity was 1.50 mitoses per mm2. The presence of two or more mitoses/mm2 showed a better relationship with prognostic variables and both the overall and disease-free survival than the presence of 1 or more mitoses/mm2. This happens especially in melanomas thicker than 0.8 mm and it could affect the staging in cases with Breslow between 1 and 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A mitotic rate of two or more mitoses per mm2 in cutaneous melanoma should be considered as a more accurate prognostic factor than one or more mitoses per mm2, particularly in tumors equal or greater than 0.8 mm in thickness.

Tumor suppressor SET9 guides the epigenetic plasticity of breast cancer cells and serves as an early-stage biomarker for predicting metastasis.

During the course of cancer progression, neoplastic cells undergo dynamic and reversible transitions between multiple phenotypic states, and this plasticity is enabled by underlying shifts in epigenetic regulation. Our results identified a negative feedback loop in which SET9 controls DNA methyltransferase-1 protein stability, which represses the transcriptional activity of the SET9 promoter in coordination with Snail. The modulation of SET9 expression in breast cancer cells revealed a connection with E2F1 and the silencing of SET9 was sufficient to complete an epigenetic program that favored epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the generation of cancer stem cells, indicating that SET9 plays a role in modulating breast cancer metastasis. SET9 expression levels were significantly higher in samples from patients with pathological complete remission than in samples from patients with disease recurrence, which indicates that SET9 acts as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer and that its expression may serve as a prognostic marker for malignancy.

Evaluación del coste económico de la técnica de la biopsia selectiva del ganglio centinela en melanoma / Cost Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVO: La técnica de la biopsia selectiva del ganglio centinela (BSGC) es la mejor herramienta para la estadificación ganglionar en el melanoma, permitiendo la realización de una linfadenectomía selectiva, es decir, reservada solo a aquellos pacientes que muestran el GC positivo para metástasis. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el coste económico de la técnica de la BSGC, ya que se ha convertido en el procedimiento recomendado como estándar en la atención al paciente con melanoma, y es necesaria para la inclusión de los pacientes en los ensayos clínicos. Existe además escasa bibliografía en nuestro medio sobre su relevancia económica. MÉTODO: De forma prospectiva se recogieron 100 pacientes a los que se realizó la técnica entre los años 2007-2010 con un procesamiento histológico transhiliar bivalvo multisecciones. Realizamos un cálculo aproximado del precio de la técnica utilizando las tarifas de precios oficiales de la Región de Murcia. RESULTADOS: El porcentaje de positividad de nuestra serie fue del 20%, con un número medio de ganglios de 1,96 y un 44% de melanomas delgados. El precio total de la técnica es de 9.486,57- 10.471,29 euros, siendo una parte muy importante de la misma atribuible al procesamiento histopatológico (5.769,36 euros). DISCUSIÓN: La técnica de la BSGC tiene un precio muy considerable, aunque en consonancia con otras referencias americanas previamente descritas. La optimización de la técnica vendrá dada en función de la selección cada vez más adecuada de los pacientes que deben someterse a ella, y a la estandarización de un modelo histopatológico sensible en la detección, pero a la vez sencillo en el procesamiento

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the most useful tool for node staging in melanoma. SLNB facilitates selective dissection of lymph nodes, that is, the performance of lymphadenectomy only in patients with sentinel nodes positive for metastasis. Our aim was to assess the cost of SLNB, given that this procedure has become the standard of care for patients with melanoma and must be performed whenever patients are to be enrolled in clinical trials. Furthermore, the literature on the economic impact of SLNB in Spain is scarce. METHOD: From 2007 to 2010, we prospectively collected data for 100 patients undergoing SLNB followed by transhilar bivalving and multiple-level sectioning of the node for histology. Our estimation of the cost of the technique was based on official pricing and fee schedules for the Spanish region of Murcia. RESULTS: The rate of node-positive cases in our series was 20%, and the mean number of nodes biopsied was 1.96; 44% of the patients in the series had thin melanomas. The total cost was estimated at between D 9486.57 and D 10 471.29. Histopathology accounted for a considerable portion of the cost (D 5769.36). DISCUSSION: The cost of SLNB is high, consistent with amounts described for a US setting. Optimaluse of SLNB will come with the increasingly appropriate selection of patients who should undergo the procedure and the standardization of a protocol for histopathologic evaluation that is both sensitive and easy to perform

Cost analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the most useful tool for node staging in melanoma. SLNB facilitates selective dissection of lymph nodes, that is, the performance of lymphadenectomy only in patients with sentinel nodes positive for metastasis. Our aim was to assess the cost of SLNB, given that this procedure has become the standard of care for patients with melanoma and must be performed whenever patients are to be enrolled in clinical trials. Furthermore, the literature on the economic impact of SLNB in Spain is scarce. METHOD: From 2007 to 2010, we prospectively collected data for 100 patients undergoing SLNB followed by transhilar bivalving and multiple-level sectioning of the node for histology. Our estimation of the cost of the technique was based on official pricing and fee schedules for the Spanish region of Murcia. RESULTS: The rate of node-positive cases in our series was 20%, and the mean number of nodes biopsied was 1.96; 44% of the patients in the series had thin melanomas. The total cost was estimated at between €9486.57 and €10471.29. Histopathology accounted for a considerable portion of the cost (€5769.36). DISCUSSION: The cost of SLNB is high, consistent with amounts described for a US setting. Optimal use of SLNB will come with the increasingly appropriate selection of patients who should undergo the procedure and the standardization of a protocol for histopathologic evaluation that is both sensitive and easy to perform.

Utilidad de la tinción con laminina-332 para diferenciar queratoacantoma, queratoacantoma con áreas de carcinoma epidermoide y carcinoma epidermoide crateriforme / The Value of Laminin-322 Staining in Distinguishing Between Keratoacanthoma, Keratoacanthoma With Areas of Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and Crateriform Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Introducción: El queratoacantoma (QA) es un tumor cutáneo crateriforme, de crecimiento rápido; aproximadamente el 25% de los QA presentan transformación maligna (QAm), observándose áreas de carcinoma epidermoide (CE). La laminina-332 se ha relacionado con progresión a fases invasoras en diversos CE. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar si la tinción con laminina-332 es útil para distinguir QA, QAm y CE. Material y métodos: Seleccionamos 74 casos del archivo de Anatomía Patológica. Se analizaron 4 grupos: 20 QA sin CE, 20 QAm con áreas evidentes de CE, 20 CE invasores sin relación con QA (8 con morfología crateriforme) y 14 casos «problema» (QA con «dudosas» áreas de CE). Posteriormente se realizó tinción inmunohistoquímica para laminina-332 a todas estas lesiones. Resultados: En las áreas de CE asociado a QAm y en los CE invasores, la tinción con laminina fue positiva de forma intensa, habitualmente en el frente invasor del CE, a diferencia de los QA, en que la tinción fue positiva solo de forma débil y focal, en células aisladas o en pequeños «grupos» celulares. Los casos «problema» se reexaminaron tras valorar la tinción con laminina-332 (8 se diagnosticaron de QA con CE incipiente, 6 de QA sin CE). Conclusiones: La tinción con laminina-332 es diferente en los QA respecto a los CE, por lo que ayudaría a diferenciar los QA de los CE invasores y de las áreas de CE en QAm, así como en el diagnóstico de QA con «dudosas» áreas de CE y QA con CE incipientes (AU)

Introduction: Keratoacanthoma is a fast-growing crateriform skin tumor. Approximately 25% of such tumors undergo malignant transformation and develop areas of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The presence of laminin-322 has been associated with progression to invasive forms of SCC. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not immunohistochemical staining for laminin-322 would be of value in distinguishing between keratoacanthomas, keratoacanthomas with areas of squamous cell carcinoma, and SCCs. Material and methods: Seventy-four lesions were selected from the pathology archives of our hospital and divided into 4 groups: 20 keratoacanthomas without SCC, 20 keratoacanthomas with areas of squamous cell carcinoma, 20 invasive SCCs (8 with crateriform morphology) unrelated to keratoacanthoma, and 14 problem lesions (keratoacanthomas with areas suggestive of SCC). All 74 lesions were stained for laminin-322. Results: Laminin-322 staining was strongly positive both in areas of SCC in keratoacanthomas with malignant transformation and in invasive SCCs (mostly at the invasive front of the SCC). However, in benign keratoacanthomas, it was only weakly positive and furthermore it was confined to isolated cells or small groups of cells. The 14 problem lesions were reexamined after laminin-322 staining and 8 were diagnosed as keratoacanthomas with incipient SCC and 6 as keratoacanthomas without SCC. Conclusions: Laminin-322 staining is different in keratoacanthomas and SCCs and would thus be a useful test for differentiating keratoacanthomas from both invasive SCCs and keratoacanthomas with areas of squamous cell carcinoma. It would also be of value in diagnosing keratoacanthomas with areas suggestive of SCC or with incipient SCC (AU)

[The value of laminin-322 staining in distinguishing between keratoacanthoma, keratoacanthoma with areas of squamous cell carcinoma, and crateriform squamous cell carcinoma]. / Utilidad de la tinción con laminina-332 para diferenciar queratoacantoma, queratoacantoma con áreas de carcinoma epidermoide y carcinoma epidermoide crateriforme.

INTRODUCTION: Keratoacanthoma is a fast-growing crateriform skin tumor. Approximately 25% of such tumors undergo malignant transformation and develop areas of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The presence of laminin-322 has been associated with progression to invasive forms of SCC. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not immunohistochemical staining for laminin-322 would be of value in distinguishing between keratoacanthomas, keratoacanthomas with areas of squamous cell carcinoma, and SCCs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four lesions were selected from the pathology archives of our hospital and divided into 4 groups: 20 keratoacanthomas without SCC, 20 keratoacanthomas with areas of squamous cell carcinoma, 20 invasive SCCs (8 with crateriform morphology) unrelated to keratoacanthoma, and 14 problem lesions (keratoacanthomas with areas suggestive of SCC). All 74 lesions were stained for laminin-322. RESULTS: Laminin-322 staining was strongly positive both in areas of SCC in keratoacanthomas with malignant transformation and in invasive SCCs (mostly at the invasive front of the SCC). However, in benign keratoacanthomas, it was only weakly positive and furthermore it was confined to isolated cells or small groups of cells. The 14 problem lesions were reexamined after laminin-322 staining and 8 were diagnosed as keratoacanthomas with incipient SCC and 6 as keratoacanthomas without SCC. CONCLUSIONS: Laminin-322 staining is different in keratoacanthomas and SCCs and would thus be a useful test for differentiating keratoacanthomas from both invasive SCCs and keratoacanthomas with areas of squamous cell carcinoma. It would also be of value in diagnosing keratoacanthomas with areas suggestive of SCC or with incipient SCC.

Tinción inmunohistoquímica p16 en carcinomas epidermoides del área genital y extragenital / Immunohistochemical Staining of p16 in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Genital and Extragenital Area

Introducción: La proteína p16 es una proteína supresora tumoral. El objetivo del estudio era comprobar si la tinción p16 se relaciona con la presencia de papilomavirus (subtipos mucosos o α, VPH-mc) en carcinomas epidermoides (CE) extragenitales (como ocurre en el cérvix y en CE genitales). Material y método: Se realizó tinción inmunohistoquímica con p16 a diversas lesiones incluidas en parafina del área genital (8 condilomas, tres CE intraepidérmicos y 7 CE invasores) y del área extragenital (20 CE intraepidérmicos tipo enfermedad de Bowen [EB] y 10 CE invasores). La detección de VPH-mc se realizó mediante reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR). Resultados: En el área genital la tinción p16 fue negativa en los condilomas y positiva en los tres CE intraepidérmicos y en dos CE invasores (29%). Se detectó VPH-mc en 6 condilomas y dos CE intraepidérmicos (100%, excluyendo tres lesiones que no se pudieron estudiar con PCR) y en los dos CE invasores positivos para p16. En el área extragenital la tinción p16 fue positiva en 19 EB (95%) y en dos CE invasores (20%). Se detectó VPH-mc en 4 EB (tinción p16 positiva) y en un CE invasor (p16 negativa). En los CE intraepidérmicos la tinción p16 fue útil para objetivar si existían focos de microinfiltración dérmica o invasión de estructuras anexiales normales. Conclusiones: Según nuestros resultados la positividad de p16 es independiente de la detección de VPH en los CE extragenitales, al contrario de lo observado en CE genitales. En el área extragenital la pérdida de proteína p16 en los CE invasores respecto a los CE intraepidérmicos indicaría progresión tumoral (AU)

Background and objectives: Positive immunostaining for the tumor suppressor protein p16 is associated with the presence of mucosal or alfa subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical and genital squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to determine whether p16 immunostaining is also associated with mucosal HPV in extragenital SCC. Material and methods: Paraffin sections of lesions located in the genital region (8 genital warts, 3 intraepidermal SCCs, and 7 invasive SCCs) and extragenital area (29 intraepidermal SCCs corresponding to Bowen disease and 10 invasive SCCs) were stained for p16 by immunohistochemistry. Mucosal HPV was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: In the genital area, p16 immunostaining was negative in genital warts and positive in all 3 intraepidermal SCCs and 2 invasive SCCs (29%). Mucosal HPV was detected in 6 genital warts and 2 intraepidermal SCCs (100% after exclusion of 3 lesions that could not be analyzed by PCR) and in the 2 invasive SCCs that were positive for p16. In the extragenital area, 19 intraepidermal SCCs (95%) and 2 invasive SCCs (20%) were immunopositive for p16. Mucosal HPV was detected in 4 intraepidermal SCCs (p16 immunopositive) and 1 invasive SCC (p16 immunonegative). In intraepidermal SCCs, p16 immunostaining facilitated the identification of dermal microinfiltration or invasion of normal skin appendages. Conclusions: According to our results, unlike in genital SCCs, p16 immunopositivity is independent of the presence of HPV in extragenital SCCs. Compared with intraepidermal SCCs, the absence of p16 protein in invasive SCCs in the extragenital area would indicate progression of the disease (AU)