Sleep disturbance after burn injury.

This study describes sleep disturbance and related factors in a group of 74 patients at 1 week after discharge using a sleep problems questionnaire developed by the authors. Results indicated that a significant proportion of patients reported a problem with their sleep (73%). Several items were identified as highly prevalent, including frequent nighttime awakenings (87%), napping during the daytime (65%), sleeping alone (64%), experiencing pain during the night (62%), and difficulties with sleep onset (62%). Results suggest numerous possible interventions to improve patients' sleep quality. The usefulness of a more extensive questionnaire was also indicated.

Psychological principles of burn wound pain in children. II: Treatment applications.

The pain involved in acute burn care can be excruciating and intractable. Even the best pharmacologic pain control efforts often fail to adequately control pain, especially procedure-related pain, in pediatric patients with burn injuries. Nonpharmacologic interventions have been found to be effective in reducing pain in both children and adults and can be extremely important adjuvants to standard pharmacologic analgesia in the burn care setting. In the first article in this series, we outlined psychological factors that influence the emotions, cognitions, and behaviors of children during wound care. Building on this theoretical framework, we now present a detailed discussion of the implementation of nonpharmacologic intervention strategies in the burn care setting. Because accurate measurement of discomfort is imperative for the development of interventions and for the evaluation of their efficacy, we begin with a brief review of pain measurement techniques. We follow this with suggestions for tailoring interventions to meet specific patient needs and conclude with a detailed and practical discussion of specific intervention techniques and the implementation of those techniques.

Psychological principles of burn wound pain in children. I: theoretical framework.

Burn injuries and the care of burn injuries are punishing experiences for hospitalized children. Pain, novelty, and altered reinforcement schedules elicit instinctive escape and avoidance behaviors that complicate wound care. An understanding of the psychological principles that underlie these complex, complicating behaviors paves the way for effective cognitive and behavioral interventions. In this first article of a two-part series, we use the principles of classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and control coping to describe the developmentally normal emergence of avoidance behaviors that are incompatible with burn wound care. Then, using brief case examples, we outline how classical conditioning transforms neutral stimuli into anxiety-producing, fearful stimuli, how operant behaviors are intentionally or unintentionally reinforced, and how the umbrella of reduced control in the novel hospital environment makes coping difficult for children. We conclude by discussing obstacles to effective application of cognitive and behavioral strategies for the enhancement of control and of compliance with wound care.

Recurrent headache in adolescents: nonreferred versus clinic population.

OBJECTIVE: To compare headache activity, psychosocial measures, and cold pressor response between referred and nonreferred adolescents with frequent headache. DESIGN: Thirteen boys and 19 girls with a mean age of 13.4 +/- 0.9 years who had been referred to a hospital-based behavioral treatment program for recurrent headache were compared with an age- and sex-matched school-based population of nonreferred students consisting of 31 adolescents with frequent headaches and 32 adolescents with infrequent or no headaches. All subjects completed the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/Trait form, the Children's Depression Inventory, the Childhood Somatization Inventory, and measures of headache activity and related functional disability. Additionally, all subjects reported interval discomfort scores on a 40-second cold pressor test with arm immersion in a 10 degrees +/- 1 degree C cold water bath. RESULTS: Subjects from both headache groups reported significantly more anxiety than those with infrequent or no headaches. The school-based nonreferred adolescents reported more depressive symptoms than the clinic-based referred subjects. In addition, the latter group reported headaches of longer duration and more school days missed due to headaches than both other groups. Whereas school-based subjects and those with infrequent or no headaches reported relatively low initial cold pressor test scores and gradually reported increasing scores with time, clinic-based subjects rated their discomfort as high at the initial interval report and maintained high levels throughout the test. No differences in somatization were found among groups. CONCLUSION: Although adolescents who seek behavioral treatment for recurrent headache do not report more psychological symptoms than nonreferred adolescents with frequent headaches, they report headaches of longer duration, miss more school days due to headache, and report higher initial sustained discomfort scores to a standardized noxious stimulus.

Comparison of pain control medication in three age groups of elderly patients.

There are no published reports of burn pain management in the elderly population. To assess the range of requirement and use of opioids among elderly patients with burns of different age categories, a retrospective review of 89 consecutive admissions of patients over 55 years of age (January 1995 through July 1996) was conducted. Complete data were available on 44 patients with a burn mean total body surface area of 17.2%. Patient ages ranged from 55 to 92 years. Individuals were divided into three age categories: Group I (55 to 65) n = 20; Group II (66 to 75) n = 14; and Group III (76 to 92) n = 10. Use of commonly prescribed opioids for procedural pain and breakthrough pain were evaluated. We compared the opioid equivalents of medications prescribed versus the actual amount administered. Paired t tests comparing minimum amount of medication ordered with that given revealed Group I patients received significantly more procedural medication than the minimum prescribed (t = 3.88, p = 0.001), and that Group III patients were given significantly less as needed medication than the minimum prescribed (t = 2.58, p < 0.05).