RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: generic, preference-based Health- Related Quality of Life instruments are receiving growing attention in health-care decision-making process. In spite of this, to our knowledge, EQ-5D and SF-6D have never been compared in a Parkinson´s disease population sample. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this paper was to assess the psychometric properties of both instruments in a Spanish PD population sample. METHODS: a total sample of 133 patients were interviewed using EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D. The validity, level of agreement and sensitivity of both instruments were computed and then compared. The Spanish tariff has been used in both instruments. RESULTS: utilities of EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D have shown a strong correlation (r >0.50 and p<0.001) with the summary score of the PDQ-8 and the EQ-VAS score. Significant differences were observed in the stages III-IV of the Hoehn & Yahr stage. SF-6D had 51% higher efficiency than EQ-5D at detecting differences in symptoms severity. DISCUSSION: both EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D seem to be adequate generic Health-Related Quality of Life measures in terms of validity and sensitivity. CONCLUSION: EQ-5D-3L presents greater ceiling and floor effects than the SF-6D instrument in this sample. Besides, the instrument SF-6D was better at detecting changes in symptoms severity compared with EQ-5D-3L.
Introducción: el uso de cuestionarios de calidad de vida basados en preferencias poblacionales están recibiendo cada vez más atención en el proceso de toma de decisiones en el ámbito sanitario. Sin embargo, a nuestro entender, EQ-5D y SF-6D nunca han sido comparados en una muestra de población con la enfermedad de Parkinson. Objetivo: el objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de ambos instrumentos en una muestra de población española con enfermos de Parkinson. Métodos: un total de 133 pacientes fueron entrevistados utilizando EQ-5D y SF-6D. La validez, el grado de acuerdo y la sensibilidad de ambos instrumentos fueron calculados para su posterior comparación. Las preferencias de la población española fueron utilizadas en ambos instrumentos. Resultados: las utilidades de EQ-5D y SF-6D han mostrado una fuerte correlación (r> 0,50 y p.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , España , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective was primary to evaluate the safe use of a new calcium channel blocker, lercanidipine, in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). The secondary objective was to study the protective effect of calcium channel blocker on renal function in CRF patients previously treated with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study recruited 203 CRF patients (creatinine >1.4 mg/dL for males, creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL for females, or creatinine clearance <70 mL/min). All patients were receiving ACE inhibitors (63.4%) or angiotensin II antagonist (36.6%) therapy, but they had higher blood pressure than recommended for CRF (130/85 mmHg). No patients were under diuretic treatment. Patients were clinically evaluated 1, 3, and 6 months after starting treatment with lercanidipine. Samples for urine and blood examination were taken during the examination. When needed, a third drug was added to the treatment, excluding diuretics. Creatinine clearance was measured using 24 h urine collection. RESULTS: 175 patients rendered valuable for the study (age 63.9+/-11.9 years, 52.9% males and 47.1% females). Blood pressure (BP) significantly decreased from 162+/-17/93+/-8.3 mmHg to 132+/-12/78+/-6 mmHg. 89.2% of patients showed a significant BP reduction, and 58.1% achieved optimal BP control (<130/85 mmHg). Seven patients (3.4%) showed untoward effects. Not one case of edema was detected, and the prevalence of adverse effects related to vasodilatation was extremely low (three patients, 1.48%). Plasmatic creatinine did not change (1.9+/-0.5 baseline versus 1.9+/-0.6 mg/dL), but creatinine clearance increased at the end visit (41.8+/-16.0 baseline versus 45.8+/-18.0 mL/min, p=0.019). Plasmatic cholesterol also decreased from 221+/-46 to 211+/-35 mg/dL (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lercanidipine showed a high antihypertensive effect in CRF patients. It has a good tolerability profile and showed an interesting effect on plasmatic lipids. An improvement in renal function, measured through creatine clearance, was detected.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Dihidropiridinas/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A total number of 640 staphylococci isolated from cows' milk were tested by latex agglutination and coagulase tests. About 50% of coagulase positive and 5% of coagulase negative staphylococci were positive to the latex agglutination tests. Latex agglutination tests were found to be not satisfactory for determining the coagulase status of staphylococci isolated from cows' milk.