RESUMEN
Purpose: Breast brachytherapy (BB) represents an important radiation therapy modality in modern breast cancer treatments. Currently, BB is mainly used for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), local boost after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), and as salvage re-irradiation after second lumpectomy (APBrl). Two multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) techniques can be offered: intra-operative (IOB) and post-operative (POB) brachytherapy. The aim of this article was to summarize current available data on these two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer. Material and methods: A literature search was performed, and different experiences published by BB expert teams were analyzed and compared. These two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer have also been presented and discussed during meetings of the GEC-ESTRO BCWG. In addition, expert recommendations were defined. Results: A comprehensive description and practical comparison of both the techniques, i.e., IOB and POB, considering the latest available published data were presented. Different technical, logistic, and clinical aspects of both the methods were thoroughly examined and analyzed. This detailed comparison of the two breast brachytherapy techniques was supported by scientific data from extensive experience of experts, facilitating an objective analysis that, to our knowledge, has not been previously published. Conclusions: Based on the comprehensive analysis of both the brachytherapy techniques available, this article serves as a valuable resource to guide breast teams in selecting the optimal BB technique (POB or IOB), considering hospital environment, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and patient logistics.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multicatheter breast brachytherapy is a standard technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer patients. Intraoperative multicatheter breast implant (IOMBI) followed by perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRBT) offers a novel and advantageous approach. We present long-term oncological, toxicity, and cosmesis outcomes for a well-experienced single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible women aged ≥ 40 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed unifocal invasive or in situ ≤ 3 cm breast tumors underwent IOMBI during breast-conserving surgery. Patients meeting APBI criteria by definitive pathologic results received 3.4 Gy × 10fx with PHDRBT. Patients not suitable for APBI received PHDRBT-boost followed by WBRT. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients underwent IOMBI during BCS, 120 patients (70.1 %) were suitable for APBI and 51 (29.8 %) for anticipated PHDRBT-boost. The median age was 61 years (range: 40-78), the median tumor size was 1.1 cm (range: 0.2-3.5), with a histological diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma in 78.9 % and ductal in situ in 21.1 %. A median of 9 catheters (range: 4-14) were used. For APBI, the median CTV and V100 were 40.8 cc (range: 8.6-99) and 35.4 cc (range: 7.2-94). The median of healthy breast tissue irradiated represents 7.2 % (range: 2.3-28 %) and the median local treatment duration was 10 days (range: 7-16). With a median follow-up of 8.8 years (range: 0.3-16.25), the 8-year local, locoregional, and distant control rates were 99 %, 98.1 %, and 100 %. G1-G2 late-toxicity rate was 53.4 %. Long-term cosmetic evaluation was excellent-good in 90.8 %. CONCLUSION: IOMBI&PHDRBT program reports excellent long-term oncological outcomes, with a reduction from unnecessary irradiation exposure which translates into low long-term toxicity and good cosmesis outcomes, especially on well-selected APBI patients.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Braquiterapia/métodos , Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adulto , Implantes de Mama , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Given the high rate of complete nodal response, the role of axillary lymph node dissection on staging the axilla has been questioned. This survey, addressed to breast cancer surgeons in Spain, has the objective of assessing current clinical trends on axillary staging of cN + patients treated with NAC. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among breast surgeons from the Spanish Society of Surgery (AEC), Spanish Surgical Oncology Society (SEOQ), Spanish Breast Cancer Surgeons Society (AECIMA) and Spanish Gynecology and Obstetrics Society (SEGO). It was structured in 5 sections: general information and clinical practice, knowledge of clinical trials, diagnosis work-up and nodal marking, axillary staging, and axillary treatment. RESULTS: 150 breast cancer surgeons completed the full survey (96.7%). 81.8% of respondents performed SLNB or targeted axillary dissection in cN1 patients treated with NAC. Radiological axillary response was the preferred parameter guiding the surgical strategy. The excision of the clipped node (92.0%), use of dual tracer (73.2%), and axillary US (65.9%) after treatment were the most important variables considered by respondents, to increase the accuracy of SLNB in cN + patients. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms a trend toward a less invasive approach for axillary staging in cN + patients treated with NAC among breast cancer surgeons in Spain. While there is widespread agreement in less invasive approaches to axillary staging, there is, however, a lack of consensus around treatment strategy. Further, it shows a wide heterogeneity in their clinical practice. This study highlights the need for clear evidence concerning less invasive staging procedures and their oncological safety, to ensure consistent recommendations in surgical practice.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Cirujanos , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , España , Axila , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and surgery are accepted as treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), some authors have highlighted the risks of delaying surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of prolonging the time interval between NCRT and surgery (NCRT-TTS) in PDAC. METHODS: patients treated with NCRT and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) were identified. Clinical, histopathological variables were analyzed about whether NCRT-TTS was greater or less than 50 days. Five- and ten-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed depending on whether the delay was greater than 50 days or not. RESULTS: one hundred (8.3 %) of 120 eligible patients underwent PD (61 male, median age of 63.7 years). In 71 (71 %) patients, the median NCRT-TTS was 39 (24-50) days and in 29 (29 %) 61 days. There were no differences between the two groups except for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels, the incidence of cholangitis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, intraoperative blood transfusions and degree of histopathologic response (all p < 0.001). Median DFS when the NCRT-TTS was less than 50 days was higher than when the interval exceeded 50 days (51.0 months [95 % CI: 20.3-81.6] vs 17.0 months [95 %: CI 10.9-23.0]; HR [95 % CI 1.08-3.46], p = 0.026). Five-year DFS was higher in the subgroup with NCRT-TTS of less than 50 days compared to the group with an interval of more than 50 days (43.5 % vs 23.65 % [HR 1.812, 95 % CI: 1.001-3.280], p = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: an increase in the NCRT-TTS > 50 days is associated with poorer OS and DFS in patients with localized PDAC treated with NCRT and PD.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Quimioradioterapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
Background: although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and surgery are accepted as treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), some authors have highlighted the risks of delaying surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of prolonging the time interval between NCRT and surgery (NCRT-TTS) in PDAC. Methods: patients treated with NCRT and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) were identified. Clinical, histopathological variables were analyzed about whether NCRT-TTS was greater or less than 50 days. Five- and ten-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed depending on whether the delay was greater than 50 days or not. Results: one hundred (8.3 %) of 120 eligible patients underwent PD (61 male, median age of 63.7 years). In 71 (71 %) patients, the median NCRT-TTS was 39 (24-50) days and in 29 (29 %) 61 days. There were no differences between the two groups except for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels, the incidence of cholangitis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, intraoperative blood transfusions and degree of histopathologic response (all p < 0.001). Median DFS when the NCRT-TTS was less than 50 days was higher than when the interval exceeded 50 days (51.0 months [95 % CI: 20.3-81.6] vs 17.0 months [95 %: CI 10.9-23.0]; HR [95 % CI 1.08-3.46], p = 0.026). Five-year DFS was higher in the subgroup with NCRT-TTS of less than 50 days compared to the group with an interval of more than 50 days (43.5 % vs 23.65 % [HR 1.812, 95 % CI: 1.001-3.280], p = 0.050). Conclusions: an increase in the NCRT-TTS > 50 days is associated with poorer OS and DFS in patients with localized PDAC treated with NCRT and PD (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios Retrospectivos , PancreaticoduodenectomíaRESUMEN
Background and aim: fifty to 70 percent of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are diagnosed incidentally. The objective of this study was to compare the phenotype and oncological outcomes of incidental versus symptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Methods: a retrospective study was performed, identifying all incidental and symptomatic tumors resected between 2000 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, operative variables and pathological stage were all recorded. Patterns of recurrence and overall and disease-free survival were analyzed in both groups.Results: fifty-one incidental and 45 symptomatic pancreatic tumor resections were performed. Symptomatic tumors were more frequent in females (29 vs 17; p = 0.005) and younger patients (median years; 50 vs 58; p = 0.012) and were detected at a more advanced stage (p = 0.027). There were no differences in location and most resections (n = 49; 51 %) were performed laparoscopically. There were no operative mortalities and 17 (17.7 %) severe complications (≥ IIIb on the Clavien-Dindo classification) were recorded with no differences between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 64.4 months (range 13.5-90), overall survival at five and ten years was 89.7 % and 72.8 % for the non-incidental tumors and 80.9 % and 54.6 % for the incidental tumors (p = ns), respectively. Disease-free survival in both groups (excluding M1a) was 71.2 % and 47.5 %, and 93.7 % and 78.1 %, respectively (p = ns).Conclusions: symptomatic tumors are more frequent in females and present at more advanced pathological stages. There were no significant differences in overall and disease-free survival between the two groups. Resection of incidental tumors ≥ 1.5-2 cm seems advisable, although each case should be assessed on an individual basis. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Hallazgos Incidentales , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pancreatectomía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, early toxicity, and clinical outcomes of early-breast cancer patients in a single-arm, phase I/II study of an ultra-accelerated, four-fraction schedule of minimal breast irradiation (4f-AMBI) using a multicatheter, minimally-invasive, intraoperative tumor bed implant (MITBI) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible women aged >40 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed, unifocal invasive or in situ ≤3 cm tumors were considered as potential candidates for MITBI during BCS. After the pathology report, patients who met APBI criteria received ultra-accelerated four-fractions irradiation (6.2 Gy BID x 4fx over 2 days) with perioperative HDR-brachytherapy (PHDRBT). Early complications, toxicity, clinical outcomes, and cosmetic results were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 89 patients initially implanted, 60(67.4%) were definitively included in the 4f-AMBI-protocol. The median age was 64.4 years; the median CTV was 32.1 cc (6.9-75.4 cc), and the external-V100 was 43.1 cc (12.87-107 cc), representing 5% of the breast tissue irradiated with a median CTV D90 of 6.2 Gy (5.6-6.28 Gy). The entire local treatment (BCS&MITBI-4f-AMBI) was completed at a median of 8 days (4-10 days). The rate of early complications was 11%. There were no major complications. Acute skin-subcutaneous G1 toxicity was reported in 11.7%, and late G1 toxicity on 36.7%. After a median follow-up of 27 months (11-51 months), the local, elsewhere, locoregional and distant-control rates were 100%, 98.3%, 100%, and 100% respectively. The early-cosmetic evaluation was excellent-good in 94.5% of patients evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-accelerated, four-fraction, minimal breast irradiation (4f-AMBI) using a minimally-invasive tumor bed implant procedure is safe, dosimetrically feasible, and shows small irradiated volumes. This program provides low toxicity rates and excellent short-term clinical and cosmesis outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: fifty to 70 percent of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are diagnosed incidentally. The objective of this study was to compare the phenotype and oncological outcomes of incidental versus symptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: a retrospective study was performed, identifying all incidental and symptomatic tumors resected between 2000 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, operative variables and pathological stage were all recorded. Patterns of recurrence and overall and disease-free survival were analyzed in both groups. RESULTS: fifty-one incidental and 45 symptomatic pancreatic tumor resections were performed. Symptomatic tumors were more frequent in females (29 vs 17; p = 0.005) and younger patients (median years; 50 vs 58; p = 0.012) and were detected at a more advanced stage (p = 0.027). There were no differences in location and most resections (n = 49; 51 %) were performed laparoscopically. There were no operative mortalities and 17 (17.7 %) severe complications (≥ IIIb on the Clavien-Dindo classification) were recorded with no differences between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 64.4 months (range 13.5-90), overall survival at five and ten years was 89.7 % and 72.8 % for the non-incidental tumors and 80.9 % and 54.6 % for the incidental tumors (p = ns), respectively. Disease-free survival in both groups (excluding M1a) was 71.2 % and 47.5 %, and 93.7 % and 78.1 %, respectively (p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: symptomatic tumors are more frequent in females and present at more advanced pathological stages. There were no significant differences in overall and disease-free survival between the two groups. Resection of incidental tumors ≥ 1.5-2 cm seems advisable, although each case should be assessed on an individual basis.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Femenino , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Fenotipo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer. Rates of conversion to open surgery range between 7% and 30% and controversy exists as to the effect of this on oncologic outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze what factors are predictive of conversion and what effect they have on oncologic outcomes. METHODS: From a prospective database of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between 2000 and 2018 a univariate and multivariate analyses were made of demographic, pathologic, and surgical variables together with complementary treatments comparing purely laparoscopic resection with conversions to open surgery. Overall and disease-free survival were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of a total of 829 patients, 43 (5.18%) converted to open surgery. In the univariate analysis, 12 variables were significantly associated with conversion, of which left-sided resection [odds ratio (OR): 2.908; P=0.02], resection of the rectum (OR: 4.749, P=0.014), and local invasion of the tumor (OR: 6.905, P<0.01) were independently predictive factors in the multiple logistic regression. Female sex was associated with fewer conversions (OR: 0.375, P=0.012). The incidence and pattern of relapses were similar in both groups and there were no significant differences between overall and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Left-sided resections, resections of the rectum and tumor invasion of neighboring structures are associated with higher rates of conversion. Female sex is associated with fewer conversions. Conversion to open surgery does not compromise oncologic outcomes at 5 and 10 years.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Colectomía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
COVID-19 is associated with severe coagulopathy. We present three cases of colonic ischemia that can be attributed to the hypercoagulable state related with SARS-CoV2 and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Three males aged 76, 68 and 56 with respiratory distress presented episodes of rectal bleeding, abdominal distension and signs of peritoneal irritation. Endoscopy (case 1) and computed tomography angiography revealed colonic ischemia. One patient (case 2) in which a computed tomography (CT) scan showed perforation of the gangrenous cecum underwent surgery. D-dimer levels were markedly increased (2,170, 2,100 and 7,360 ng/ml) in all three patients. All three patients died shortly after diagnosis
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Pandemias , Colitis Isquémica/virología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Colitis Isquémica/diagnóstico , Resultado Fatal , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
COVID-19 is associated with severe coagulopathy. We present three cases of colonic ischemia that can be attributed to the hypercoagulable state related with SARS-CoV2 and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Three males aged 76, 68 and 56 with respiratory distress presented episodes of rectal bleeding, abdominal distension and signs of peritoneal irritation. Endoscopy (case 1) and computed tomography angiography revealed colonic ischemia. One patient (case 2) in which a computed tomography (CT) scan showed perforation of the gangrenous cecum underwent surgery. D-dimer levels were markedly increased (2,170, 2,100 and 7,360 ng/ml) in all three patients. All three patients died shortly after diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Colitis Isquémica/virología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Anciano , COVID-19 , Colitis Isquémica/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract. For cancers detected at an advanced stage or intraperitoneal relapse, the prognosis is poor. Optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the most accepted treatment; however, patients with advanced intraperitoneal disease might benefit from hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study was to analyze recurrence-free survival (RFS) after CRS and HIPEC in a large series of patients with peritoneal metastases from endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of endometrial cancer with primary or recurrent peritoneal dissemination were included. All patients underwent CRS plus HIPEC. Data were prospectively collected in the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Oncological Surgery (GECOP) database. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with endometrial cancer and peritoneal metastasis were included. Fifteen patients (35%) were diagnosed with G3 endometrioid carcinomas and 28 (65%) with other non-endometroid histologies. A completeness of cytoreduction score of CC-0 was achieved in 41 patients (95%). RFS at 5 years was 23%, being factors related to worse RFS: treatment with preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.027), resection of more than three peritoneal areas (p = 0.010), cytoreduction of the upper abdominal space (p = 0.023), HIPEC treatment with paclitaxel (p = 0.013), and the presence of metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Better RFS rates after CRS and HIPEC were observed for patients with the following characteristics: cytoreductive surgery without preoperative chemotherapy, complete surgery performed with limited surgical maneuvers, treated with cisplatin, and no lymph node metastases. SYNOPSIS: Endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis when diagnosed at advance stage. Patients with intraperitoneal metastases from endometrial cancer may benefit from CRS plus HIPEC with improvement in the recurrence-free survival results.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Endometrioide/terapia , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Anciano , Carcinoma Endometrioide/secundario , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundarioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: the objective of the present study was to analyze the characteristics of resected incidental lesions of the pancreas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective study was performed of pancreatectomies due to incidentalomas between 1995 and 2018. RESULTS: one hundred pancreatectomies were performed due to incidental lesions; 64 (64%) were solid and 36 (36%) were cystic lesions. The cytological analysis agreed with the diagnosis in 67/71 (88.7%) cases. Thirty-six tumors were cystic, 48 were neuroendocrine and 16 were adenocarcinomas. Disease-free survival for patients with cystic, neuroendocrine tumors and adenocarcinomas was 100%, 79% and 57.7% (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: pancreatic incidentalomas have a heterogeneous phenotype and should be treated in experienced centers
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Hallazgos Incidentales , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pancreatectomía , FenotipoRESUMEN
Objective: "En-bloc" resection of pelvic tumor in ovarian cancer (OC) is still controversial. The aim was to analyze results in an OC series from a single center, all of whom underwent "en-bloc" resection as part of cytoreductive surgery. Material and Methods: Clinical and surgical records from sixty patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent "en-bloc" resection surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Patients' mean age was 56 years; 36 patients had primary disease and 24 had recurrent disease. Carcinomatosis was present in 46.7% of patients. Primary surgery was performed in 49 and interval debulking surgery in eleven. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 55.0% and optimal in 38.3% of patients. Carcinomatosis significantly decreased the probability of complete cytoreduction [odds ratio (OR): 0.22; p=0.021]. Mesorectal infiltration occurred in 83% of patients. Risk of death was non-significantly higher (hazard ratio: 1.9) in women with mesorectal infiltration. Median overall survival was longer for patients without infiltration (46.1 vs 79.1 months; p=0.15). Eighty-five percent suffered from mild to moderate complications and colorectal anastomosis (CRA) leak occurred in two patients (3.6%) with CRA below 6 cm. Diaphragm resection had >5 times the risk for major complications (OR: 5.35; p=0.014). There was no three month mortality. Conclusion: When contiguous gross extension of disease to pelvic peritoneum and sigmoid colon is found, in patients with advanced OC, microscopic involvement of the mesorectum and intestinal wall is present in most cases making "en-bloc" resection necessary if complete cytoreduction is to be achieved. The associated morbidity is acceptable.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate our institutional experience of minimally invasive tumor bed implantation (MITBI) during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to deliver peri-operative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRBT) as accelerated minimal breast irradiation (AMBI) or anticipated boost (A-PHDRBT-boost). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients older than 40, with clinical and radiological unifocal DCIS < 3 cm were considered potential candidates for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and were implanted during BCS using MITBI-technique. Patients who in final pathology reports showed free margins and no other microscopic tumor foci, received AMBI with PHDRBT (3.4 Gy BID in 5 days). Patients with adverse features received A-PHDRBT-boost with post-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). RESULTS: Forty-one patients were implanted, and 36 were treated and analyzed. According to final pathology, 24 (67%) patients were suitable for AMBI and 12 (33%) were qualified for A-PHDRBT-boost. Reoperation rate for those with clear margins was 16.6% (6/36); this rate increased to 33% (4/12) for G3 histology, and 66% (4/6) were rescued using AMBI. Early complications were documented in 5 patients (14%). With a median follow-up of 97 (range, 42-138) months, 5-year rates of local, elsewhere, locoregional, and distant control were all 97.2%. 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates (IBTR) were 5.6% (2/36), 8.3% (2/24) for AMBI, and 0% (0/12) for A-PHDRBT-boost patients. Both instances of IBTR were confirmed G3 tumors in pre-operative biopsies; no IBTR was documented in G1-2 tumors. Cosmetic outcomes were excellent/good in 96% of AMBI vs. 67% in A-PHDRBT-boost (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The MITBI-PHDRBT program allows selection of patients with excellent prognoses (G1-2 DCIS with negative margins and no multifocality), for whom AMBI could be a good alternative with low recurrence rate, decrease of unnecessary radiation, treatment logistics improvement, and over-treatment reduction. Patients whose pre-operative biopsy showed G3 tumor, presents with inferior local control and more risk of reoperation due to positive margins.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: the objective of the present study was to analyze the characteristics of resected incidental lesions of the pancreas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective study was performed of pancreatectomies due to incidentalomas between 1995 and 2018. RESULTS: one hundred pancreatectomies were performed due to incidental lesions; 64 (64%) were solid and 36 (36%) were cystic lesions. The cytological analysis agreed with the diagnosis in 67/71 (88.7%) cases. Thirty-six tumors were cystic, 48 were neuroendocrine and 16 were adenocarcinomas. Disease-free survival for patients with cystic, neuroendocrine tumors and adenocarcinomas was 100%, 79% and 57.7% (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: pancreatic incidentalomas have a heterogeneous phenotype and should be treated in experienced centers.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Páncreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
El linfoma anaplásico de células grandes asociado a implantes mamarios (BIA-ALCL según sus siglas en inglés) es un tipo raro de linfoma no Hodgkin que se ha descrito en el contexto de la cirugía reconstructiva y estética de mama mediante implantes. Estos artículos presentan un consenso de la Sociedad Española de Senología y Patología Mamaria (SESPM) con la idea de unificar, en esta primera parte, los criterios de diagnóstico de esta enfermedad describiendo asimismo la epidemiología y la etiopatogenia
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has been described in the context of reconstructive and aesthetic breast implant surgery. These articles present a consensus of the Spanish Society of Senology and Breast Disease (SESPM). In this first part, the aim is to unify the diagnostic criteria of this disease and describe its epidemiology and etiopathogenesis
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/diagnóstico , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Consenso , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/patología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Biopsia/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en MedicinaRESUMEN
El linfoma anaplásico de células grandes asociado a implantes mamarios (BIA-ALCL según sus siglas en inglés) es un tipo raro de linfoma no Hodgkin que se ha descrito en el contexto de la cirugía reconstructiva y estética de mama mediante implantes. Este segundo artículo presenta la parte del consenso de la Sociedad Española de Senología y Patología Mamaria (SESPM) sobre el tratamiento quirúrgico, médico, radioterápico, pronóstico y seguimiento
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has been described in the context of breast implant reconstructive and cosmetic surgery. This second article presents the consensus of the Spanish Society of Senology and Breast Disease (SESPM) on the medical and surgical treatment of this disease, radiotherapy, prognosis and follow-up
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/terapia , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Radioterapia/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Consenso , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/patología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of preoperative breast MRI remains controversial despite being the most sensitive technique for the detection of breast malignancies. PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefit of preoperative breast MRI after performing the three conventional techniques (DM, US, DBT). To analyze the influence of breast density in the sensitivity of the different imaging techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 280 histologically confirmed breast cancers in 192 women. We reviewed the medical records and evaluated the change of treatment induced by MRI. Also, we assessed the reports of DM and the combination of the different imaging techniques, and categorized them according to ACR density (a-d) and as negative (BI-RADS 1-3) or positive (BIRADS 4 or 5). The gold standard was the pathologic assessment of the surgical specimen. The sensitivity of the different techniques was compared using McNemar test. RESULTS: Among these 192 women the use of MRI did not significantly increase the mastectomy rate (from 16.6% to 17.6%; pâ¯=â¯0.5). The addition of any technique demonstrated a higher sensitivity than DM alone. The sensitivity of DM alone was 52.5% while using all the techniques, including MRI, was 94.3% (pâ¯<â¯0.001). Regardless of breast density pattern, the addition of any technique significantly increased the sensitivity of DM (pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MRI to the three conventional techniques increased the sensitivity but did not significantly modify the rate of mastectomies. Additional techniques increased the sensitivity of DM in both dense and non-dense breasts.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Mamografía , Ultrasonografía Mamaria , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Mama/patología , Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Purpose: the aim of this study was to compare overall and disease-free survival among patients with colorectal cancer detected via a screening program as compared to those with symptomatic cancer. Material and methods: patients diagnosed via colonoscopy (screening group) and those with clinical symptoms (non-screening) were identified from 1995 to 2014. Demographic, clinical, surgical and pathologic variables were recorded. Stage I, II and III cancers were included. Overall and disease-free survival were calculated at five and ten years after tumor resection and survival was calculated by matching both groups for cancers at stage I, II and III. Results: two hundred and fifty patients were identified as a result of screening procedures and 1,330 patients presented with symptomatic cancers. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Pathologic stage, degree of differentiation, perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion were lower in the screening group (p < 0.01). Overall and disease-free survival at five and ten years were higher in the screening group (p < 0.01). However, when the subjects were matched for pathologic stage, significant differences were found between the two groups with regard to stage I and III tumors. Disease-free survival in stage III at five years (79.1 vs 61.7%; p < 0.001) and ten years (79.1% vs 58.5%; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the screening group. Conclusions: patients with stage I and III tumors that were diagnosed via a screening program have a higher overall and disease-free survival at five and ten years
No disponible