Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 104
Filtrar
1.
Neurology ; 78(13): 976-84, 2012 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22377815

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of adding propranolol to topiramate in chronic migraine subjects inadequately controlled with topiramate alone. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted through the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Clinical Research Collaboration, expected to randomize 250 chronic migraine subjects inadequately controlled (≥10 headaches/month) with topiramate (50-100 mg/day) to either propranolol LA (long acting) (240 mg/day) or placebo. Primary outcome was 28-day moderate to severe headache rate reduction at 6 months (weeks 16 to 24) compared with baseline (weeks -4 to 0). RESULTS: A planned interim analysis was performed after 48 sites randomized 171 subjects. The data and safety monitoring board recommended ending the trial after determining that it would be highly unlikely for the combination to result in a significant reduction in 28-day headache rate compared with topiramate alone if all 250 subjects were randomized. No safety concerns were identified. At study closure, 191 subjects were randomized. The 6-month reduction in moderate to severe 28-day headache rate and total 28-day headache rate for combination therapy vs topiramate alone was not significantly different: 4.0 vs 4.5 days (moderate to severe 28-day headache rate; p = 0.57) and 6.2 vs 6.1 days (total 28-day headache rate; p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide evidence that the addition of propranolol LA to topiramate adds benefit when chronic migraine is inadequately controlled with topiramate alone. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that propranolol LA, added to topiramate, is ineffective in chronic migraine patients who fail topiramate monotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Fructosa/análogos & derivados , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/patología , Propranolol/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fructosa/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Topiramato , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Neurology ; 69(9): 821-6, 2007 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17724283

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan 5 mg and 10 mg nasal spray (ZNS) vs placebo in the acute treatment of cluster headache. Design/ METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, three-period crossover study using ZNS 5 mg, ZNS 10 mg, and placebo. Headache intensity was rated by a 5-point scale: none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe. The primary efficacy measure was headache response (pain reduced from moderate, severe, or very severe at baseline, to mild or none) at 30 minutes. Logistic regression was used to account for treatment period effect as well as for cluster headache subtype effect. RESULTS: A total of 52 adult patients treated 151 attacks. For the primary endpoint, both doses reached significance at 30 minutes (placebo = 30%, ZNS 5 mg = 50%, ZNS 10 mg = 63.3%). For headache relief, ZNS 10 mg separated from placebo at 10 minutes (24.5% vs 10%). Zolmitriptan 5 mg separated from placebo at 20 minutes (38.5% vs 20%). For pain-free status, ZNS 10 mg was superior to placebo at 15 minutes (22.0% vs 6%). Both doses had higher pain-free rates than placebo at 30 minutes (placebo = 20%, ZNS 5 mg = 38.5%, ZNS 10 mg = 46.9%). Side effects were mild and seen in 16% of those attacks treated with placebo, 25% of attacks treated with ZNS 5 mg, and 32.7% treated with ZNS 10 mg. CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE: Zolmitriptan nasal spray, at doses of 5 and 10 mg, is effective and tolerable for the acute treatment of cluster headache.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica/tratamiento farmacológico , Oxazolidinonas/administración & dosificación , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Triptaminas/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Aguda/terapia , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Efecto Placebo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Int J Clin Pract ; 60(6): 698-706, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16805756

RESUMEN

Most of the data on triptan use are from clinical trials in which patients were instructed to wait until migraine headache pain was moderate/severe in intensity. In the real world, patients may hesitate to use a triptan until headache pain is moderate/severe because of the cost of these agents or limited supply allowed by their health service organisation. However, accumulating data indicate that early intervention with an oral triptan when headache pain is still mild may be the most effective acute treatment strategy. Economic analyses also support early triptan intervention in migraine attacks. Tolerability is expected to be particularly important in early intervention, as patients treating mild migraine pain may be more reluctant to risk adverse events. Thus, an agent selected for use as early intervention should have both a demonstrated efficacy in treating mild migraine headache and placebo-like tolerability. This article reviews retrospective and prospective clinical trials which investigated the use of triptans for early acute migraine therapy.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Triptaminas/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Neurology ; 60(4): 630-3, 2003 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12601104

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current evidence-based acute treatments of cluster headache are limited to oxygen inhalation and subcutaneous sumatriptan. Intranasal sumatriptan is a new formulation with better tolerability than the subcutaneous route. Two open-label studies suggested efficacy of intranasal sumatriptan in cluster headache. METHODS: In a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial, patients with episodic or chronic cluster headache whose attacks lasted at least 45 minutes each treated one attack with 20 mg sumatriptan nasal spray and another one, at least 24 hours later, with matching placebo. They scored their headache on a five-point scale (very severe, severe, moderate, mild, or none) at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes. The primary outcome measure was headache response (a decrease in pain from very severe, severe, or moderate to mild or none) at 30 minutes. Secondary outcome measures included pain-free rates, relief of associated symptoms, and rates of adverse events. Multilevel multivariate analysis was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Five study centers enrolled 118 patients in whom 154 attacks were treated: 77 with sumatriptan and 77 with placebo. The responder rates at 30 minutes were 57% for sumatriptan and 26% for placebo (p = 0.002). Pain-free rates at 30 minutes were 47% for sumatriptan and 18% for placebo (p = 0.003). Sumatriptan was also superior to placebo considering initial response, meaningful relief, and relief of associated symptoms. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Sumatriptan nasal spray is effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of cluster headache attacks of at least 45 minutes' duration.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Sumatriptán/uso terapéutico , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/administración & dosificación , Agonistas de Receptores de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Sumatriptán/administración & dosificación , Sumatriptán/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Cephalalgia ; 23(1): 43-9, 2003 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12534580

RESUMEN

This paper will discuss evidence which supports a link between 'side locked' migraine (SLM) and the trigeminal autonomic cephalgias (TACs). Recent papers brought strictly unilateral primary headaches into focus, proposing new classification and discussing pathophysiological mechanisms. We reviewed those proposals and present evidence that SLM falls in between the well-defined TACs and side shifting migraine (SSM). It is difficult to differentiate SLM from the recently proposed headache subtype called hemicrania generis incerti (i.e. hemicrania continua unresponsive to indomethacin). We also present cases that may exemplify the considerations made in the paper.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Neuralgia del Trigémino/diagnóstico , Animales , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/clasificación , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/clasificación , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Reflejo Anormal/fisiología , Neuralgia del Trigémino/clasificación , Neuralgia del Trigémino/fisiopatología , Vasodilatación/fisiología
6.
Headache ; 41(7): 704-9, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11554959

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate blood flow velocity and pulsatility in unilateral migraine without aura during the headache-free period using transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography. METHODS: Patients with unilateral headache were recruited during the headache-free period. Maximum mean flow velocity (MFV) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the middle cerebral (MCA) and basilar arteries. Controls were headache-free individuals without cerebrovascular disease. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with right-sided migraine, 25 patients with left-sided migraine, and 19 controls were studied. The MCA PI was higher on the right headache side versus the left headache side (0.97 +/- 0.2 versus 0.86 +/- 0.1 cm/s, P =.02) and versus controls (0.9 +/- 0.2 cm/s, NS). The basilar artery MFV was higher in patients with right-sided headache versus left-sided headache (39.5 +/- 5.6 versus 34.7 +/- 8.2 cm/s, P =.02) and versus controls (38.2 +/- 8 cm/s, NS). No decrease in MFV with age was observed in patients with migraine. CONCLUSIONS: Middle cerebral artery flow pulsatility and basilar artery velocity are higher in patients with right-sided migraine compared with left-sided migraineurs, during the headache-free period. Although these parameters were similar to controls, the differences found during the headache-free period in migraineurs may indicate vascular involvement predisposing to the unilateral headache recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Dominancia Cerebral , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Pulso Arterial , Adulto , Arteria Basilar/fisiopatología , Arterias Cerebrales/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Headache ; 41(2): 119-28, 2001 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11251695

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare gabapentin with placebo for use as a prophylactic agent in patients with migraine (with or without aura). STUDY DESIGN AND TREATMENT: After screening, a 4-week, single-blind, placebo baseline period was followed by a 12-week, double-blind, treatment period. The 12-week treatment period consisted of a 4-week titration phase and an 8-week stable-dosing phase. During the 4-week titration phase, patients were started on one 300-mg capsule of gabapentin or matching placebo. Patients were titrated weekly from 900 mg/day (end of week 1) to 2400 mg/day (end of week 4) and had to be receiving a stable dose of study medication by the end of the titration period. Study medication was to be given on a three-times-a-day dosing regimen. METHODS: The study hypothesis was defined a priori as a lower 4-week migraine rate during the second stabilization period for the gabapentin-treated patients as compared with the placebo-treated patients. The analyses were performed with the 4-week migraine rate at baseline as a covariate and center as a blocking factor. RESULTS: At seven participating centers, 143 patients with migraine were randomized in a 2:1 ratio and received either gabapentin (n = 98) or matching placebo (n = 45). Thirty-three patients (24.1%) discontinued prematurely from the study, including 24 (24.5%) of 98 gabapentin-treated patients and 9 (20.0%) of 45 placebo-treated patients; the majority of patients discontinued due to adverse events (16 [16.3%] of 98 gabapentin-treated patients; 4 [8.9%] of 45 placebo-treated patients). Patients included in the analysis were evenly balanced for age, sex, race, weight, and height. The majority of these patients were white (80 [92.0%] of 87) and women (72 [82.8%] of 87), with a mean age of approximately 39.4 years and a history of migraine episodes for a mean of about 21 years. At the end of the 12-week treatment phase, the median 4-week migraine rate was 2.7 for the gabapentin-treated patients maintained on a stable dose of 2400 mg/day and 3.5 for the placebo-treated patients (P =.006), compared with 4.2 and 4.1, respectively, during the baseline period. Additionally, 26 (46.4%) of 56 patients receiving a stable dose of 2400 mg/day gabapentin and 5 (16.1%) of 31 patients receiving placebo showed at least a 50% reduction in the 4-week migraine rate (P =.008). The average number of days per 4 weeks with migraine was also statistically significant and favored gabapentin (P =.006) during stabilization period 2. The median change in 4-week headache rate was statistically significant as well (P =.013). The most frequently reported adverse events for both treatment groups were asthenia, dizziness, somnolence, and infection. Adverse events determined by the investigator to be associated with study drug resulted in patient withdrawal in 13 (13.3%) of 98 gabapentin-treated patients and 3 (6.7%) of 45 placebo-treated patients. Somnolence and dizziness accounted for many of the premature withdrawals among those taking gabapentin. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin is an effective prophylactic agent for patients with migraine. In addition, gabapentin appears generally well tolerated with mild to moderate somnolence and dizziness.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Aminas , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Ciclohexanocarboxílicos , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico , Acetatos/farmacología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/farmacología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Gabapentina , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Headache ; 41 Suppl 1: S18-24, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11903536

RESUMEN

Migraineurs may continue to experience attacks, despite daily use of one or more agents from a wide range of drugs, including beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, serotonin antagonists, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and antiepileptic agents. Divalproex sodium is the only antiepileptic drug approved for migraine prevention. Gabapentin, topiramate, and other antiepileptic agents are being evaluated for migraine prevention and treatment. Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of divalproex, gabapentin, and topiramate for migraine prevention generally were composed of a prospective baseline period, a dose titration period, and a fixed-dose treatment period. The primary efficacy variable was a reduction in the 28-day frequency of migraine headache. Patients receiving divalproex for 12 weeks at doses up to 1500 mg/day achieved significant decreases in the migraine frequency (P<.05), corresponding to reductions of 30% to 40% compared with baseline. Nearly half of the divalproex-treated patients had a 50% or more reduction from baseline in headache frequencies (P< or =.05). Asthenia, vomiting, somnolence, tremor, and alopecia were common adverse events associated with divalproex. Significant reductions in migraine frequency were also observed with gabapentin (1800 to 2400 mg/day) when compared with placebo (P<.01), and nearly half of all patients treated at the highest dose experienced a reduction in headache rate of 50% or more. Somnolence was the most commonly reported adverse event among the gabapentin-treated patients. Two single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluated topiramate for migraine prevention. A lower 28-day migraine frequency was seen during 18 weeks of administration at a maximum daily dose of 200 mg (P =.09). In a second study, a significantly lower mean 28-day migraine frequency was observed during 16 weeks of treatment with topiramate (P =.0015). Mean reduction in migraine frequency was also significantly greater in topiramate-treated patients (P =.0037). Paresthesias, diarrhea, somnolence, and altered taste were commonly reported adverse events in the topiramate-treated patients. Unlike some patients given divalproex or gabapentin, some given topiramate reported weight loss. Large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials may prove the effectiveness of novel antiepileptic drugs in migraine prevention.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Aminas , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Ciclohexanocarboxílicos , Fructosa/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Fructosa/análogos & derivados , Gabapentina , Humanos , Topiramato
9.
Clin Cornerstone ; 4(3): 1-17, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12739312

RESUMEN

Despite a decade of progress, migraine headache remains prevalent, disabling, underdiagnosed, and undertreated in the United States. Migraine affects approximately 12% of the population, and the economic burden in terms of annual cost of labor lost to migraine disability is between $5.6 and $17.2 billion. The threshold for migraine may be genetically determined, although recent genetic and neurophysiologic studies point to migraine as possibly a channelopathy. Cerebral cortical and brain stem changes occur in migraine. Head pain and associated symptoms of migraine can be explained by activation of the trigeminal vascular system. Evidence has also been accumulated that suggests the release of nitric oxide is an important trigger mechanism. Introduction of the triptans has dramatically advanced acute migraine pharmacotherapy, and preventive therapy has greatly improved; however, public health initiatives may be needed to further advance diagnosis and treatment of this common and disabling disorder.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Tronco Encefálico/fisiopatología , Canales de Calcio/genética , Canales de Calcio/metabolismo , Corteza Cerebral/fisiopatología , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Hormonas Esteroides Gonadales/metabolismo , Cefalea/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/economía , Migraña con Aura/fisiopatología , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Prevalencia , Nervio Trigémino/fisiopatología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Headache ; 40(9): 720-3, 2000 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11091289

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous valproate in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown oral valproate therapy to be effective in preventing migraine. To date, no published studies have explored the use of valproate in the acute treatment of migraine. DESIGN/METHODS: After obtaining written informed consent, 61 patients presenting to a clinic with acute migraine were infused with 300 mg of intravenous valproate sodium. Sixty-six attacks were treated. The time at the beginning of infusion; the time at the end of infusion; the time to onset of relief of headache, nausea, and other associated symptoms; the time to meaningful relief; and the time to complete relief were recorded. Patient's pulse, blood pressure, and respiration were monitored. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Mean time to onset of relief was 8 minutes, mean time to meaningful relief was 16 minutes, and mean time to complete relief was 25 minutes. A reduction in pain from severe or moderate to mild or no pain in 30 minutes was reported in 37 of 66 attacks; in 11 attacks, a reduction of more than 50% in headache severity in 30 minutes was reported. Thus, 48 (73%) of 66 attacks had significant improvement. After treatment with valproate, headache severity was significantly decreased (P<.0001); nausea, disability, and photophobia decreased; and patients became more alert. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Intravenous valproate appears to be safe and effective for the acute treatment of migraine. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies to further investigate the use of this agent in acute treatment of migraine attacks are warranted.


Asunto(s)
GABAérgicos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA