Role of central cholinergic receptor sub-types in spatial working memory: a five-arm maze task in mice provides evidence for a functional role of nicotinic receptors in mediating trace access processes.

A delayed-matching spatial working memory protocol in a 5-arm maze was used to test the hypothesis of differential roles for central nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in mediating task performance. In experiment 1, using a within subjects-repeated design, groups of C57Bl/6 mice, previously trained to criterion with a 4 h retention interval separating presentation and test phases, received i.p. injections of either saline, scopolamine (0.8 mg/kg), mecamylamine (8.0 mg/kg), or the combination of scopolamine and mecamylamine before re-testing. Injections were given either, a) 15 min pre-presentation or, b) 30 s, c) 15 min, d) 3 h 45 min post-presentation in order to differentially affect the acquisition, trace maintenance and recall phases. Significant decreases in correct responses were observed for each drug treatment but the effects were a function of the time of treatment. Results of condition d), (i.e.15 min before retention test) confirm previous reports of severe disruption by each antagonist and their combination on retention. However, conditions a-c) show a constant disruption by scopolamine, increasing disruption by mecamylamine, whereas the combined treatment was without effect. Although the data show that central nicotinic and muscarinic antagonists both modulate working memory performance, they indicate first, that scopolamine-induced "amnesia" results, not from selective post-synaptic M1 muscarinic blockade but from indirect over-activation of nicotinic receptors. Second, the observation of high levels of retention although nicotinic and muscarinic receptors had undergone combined blockade during a large part of the retention interval is incompatible with the concept that test-induced activation of central cholinergic neurones mediates memory trace maintenance. Finally, taken with data from experiment 2, using a short (20 min) treatment-to-test interval, we conclude that central nicotinic receptors play a key role in attentional processes enabling working memory trace access during retrieval.

A 5-arm maze enables parallel measures of sustained visuo-spatial attention and spatial working memory in mice.

A 5-arm maze has been developed to provide parallel tests of sustained visuo-spatial attention and spatial working memory in mice. C57Bl/6 mice were trained to select, either by immediate response (attention) or by delayed-matching response (working memory), one target arm among the five open arms. For attention testing, mice were first trained to acquire the basic task in which one randomly selected baited arm remained lit until a choice was made. Criterion of >80% correct with a response latency <5 s was attained in 52-56 trials. Following this, attention was tested by using trials wherein light signal durations of 2, 1 or 0.5 s were intermixed to vary attentional load. In the working memory test, mice were submitted to a forced visit to a randomly selected baited arm during a presentation phase. Following a variable retention interval (R.I.), mice were replaced into the maze and rewarded for choosing this arm. Criterion of >80% correct was attained in 35-40 trials and mice exhibited high levels of retention for R.I.s up to 4 h. Results validate the 5-arm maze for evaluation of both sustained visuo-spatial attention and spatial working memory in mice. Both the tasks are rapidly acquired and the 20% chance level provides high resolution for evaluating performance. This comparative strategy allows to dissociate attention and memory and to reveal deficits in these processes during ageing or in knockout strains. The high level of retention performance over R.I.s of 4 h enables studies using pharmacological treatments differentially affecting the acquisition, encoding, retention or retrieval phases of working memory. Furthermore, functional brain imaging studies may be used to identify neuronal networks which are differentially activated during these distinct phases.