Postreceptoral adipocyte insulin resistance induced by nelfinavir is caused by insensitivity of PKB/Akt to phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate.

Adipocyte insulin resistance can be caused by proximal insulin signaling defects but also from postreceptor mechanisms, which in large are poorly characterized. Adipocytes exposed for 18 h to the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir manifest insulin resistance characterized by normal insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate proteins, preserved in vitro phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) assay activity but impaired activation of PKB/Akt and stimulation of glucose uptake. Here we aimed to assess whether impaired PKB/Akt activation is indeed rate limiting for insulin signaling propagation in response to nelfinavir and the mechanism for defective PKB/Akt activation. Nelfinavir treatment of 3T3-L1 adipocytes impaired the insulin-stimulated translocation and membrane fusion of myc-glucose transporter (GLUT)-4-green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter. Phosphorylation of PKB/Akt substrates including glycogen synthase kinase-3 and AS160 decreased in response to nelfinavir, and this remained true, even in cells with forced generation of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphohphate (PIP(3)) by a membrane-targeted active PI 3-kinase, confirming that impaired PKB/Akt activation was rate limiting for insulin signal propagation. Cells expressing a GFP-tagged pleckstrin homology domain of general receptors for phosphoinositides 1, which binds PIP(3), revealed intact PIP(3)-mediated plasma membrane translocation of this reporter in nelfinavir-treated cells. However, expression of a membrane-targeted catalytic subunit of PI 3-kinase failed to induce myc-GLUT4-GFP translocation in the absence of insulin, as it did in control cells. Conversely, a membrane-targeted and constitutively active PKB/Akt mutant was normally phosphorylated on S473 and T308, confirming intact PKB/Akt kinases activity, and induced myc-GLUT4-GFP translocation. Collectively, nelfinavir uncovers a postreceptor mechanism for insulin resistance, caused by interference with the sensing of PIP(3) by PKB/Akt, leading to impaired GLUT4 translocation and membrane fusion.

Depot-specific adipocyte cell lines reveal differential drug-induced responses of white adipocytes--relevance for partial lipodystrophy.

Intra-abdominal (IA) fat functionally differs from subcutaneous (SC) adipose tissue, likely contributing to its stronger association with obesity-induced morbidity and to differential response to medications. Drug-induced partial lipodystrophy, like in response to antiretroviral agents, is an extreme manifestation of the different response of different fat depots, with loss of SC but not IA. Investigating depot-specific adipocyte differences is limited by the low accessibility to IA fat and by the heterogenous cell population comprising adipose tissue. Here, we aimed at utilizing immortalized preadipocyte cell lines from IA (epididymal) or SC (inguinal) fat to investigate whether they differentially respond to the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir. Preadipocytes were readily amenable to adipogenesis, as evidenced by lipid accumulation, expression of adipose-specific genes, measurable lipolysis, and insulin responsiveness. Leptin secretion was higher by the SC line, consistent with known differences between IA and SC fat. As previously reported, nelfinavir inhibited adipogenesis downstream of C/EBPbeta, but similarly in both cell lines. In contrast, nelfinavir's capacity to diminish insulin signaling, decrease leptin secretion, enhance basal lipolysis, and decrease expression of the lipid droplet-associated protein perilipin occurred more robustly and/or at lower nelfinavir concentrations in the SC line. This was despite similar intracellular concentrations of nelfinavir (23.8 +/- 5.6 and 33.6 +/- 12.2 microg/mg protein for inguinal and epididymal adipocytes, respectively, P = 0.46). The cell lines recapitulated depot-differential effects of nelfinavir observed in differentiated primary preadipocytes and with whole tissue explants. Thus, we report the use of fat depot-specific adipocyte cell lines for unraveling depot-differential responses to a drug causing partial lipodystrophy.