RESUMEN
Like most organizations, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) generates a lot of data of varying types, from clinical to staffing and operations. However, these datasets are separated, preventing effective analytics. To improve workforce management and care delivery, CHOP's Nursing department collaborated with the Data & Analytics team to create a dashboard-based platform for analyzing workforce metrics and patient outcomes, aiding nursing leaders in decision-making. This project involved multiple phases with contributions from Nursing, Data & Analytics, CHOP's Data Trust Office, and Human Resources. Key performance indicators were identified, and a variety of data sources were aggregated to provide a comprehensive view of the nursing enterprise. The resulting platform offers automated, current, and reliable analytics on various aspects, including nursing demographics, education, survey results, staffing actuals by job group, and patient and family experience data. The platform's usability was assessed using a modified Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale survey, with a 29% response rate primarily from senior directors and managers. The findings showed high usability and satisfaction, indicating the dashboard is a valuable decision-support tool. Lessons learned include the need for analytics education for nurses and mid-managers, the inclusion of critical nursing-specific metrics (and development of the data pipelines making them possible), and the integration of multidisciplinary team metrics for comprehensive nursing analytics.
Asunto(s)
Liderazgo , Philadelphia , Humanos , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Hospitales PediátricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exponential increases in Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program enrollment have come with a rapid rise in the number of capstone projects conducted in clinical environments. However, misaligned priorities between students, faculty, and clinician leaders have created significant challenges. PURPOSE: Identify opportunities to strengthen collaboration between academic and clinical stakeholders to better support DNP projects and education. METHODS: Experienced hospital-based nurse leaders engaged in scholarly discourse supplemented by policy and research in DNP education. FINDINGS: Facilitating a DNP project requires significant investment of time, resources, and funds from the healthcare institution. Discord has arisen due to unclear responsibilities or decision-making ability for clinical stakeholders, ethical dilemmas for students who are also employees of the clinical site, and mismatched priorities between clinical need and student/academic project desires. Clinical leaders have raised significant concerns about DNP project proposals that are research-focused, diverge from healthcare institution goals, and lack a sustainability plan. DISCUSSION: Fortification of academic-practice partnerships and clarification of roles in the DNP student project are necessary to ensure that the project is of educational value to the student, a demonstration of learning for faculty, and of sustained clinical value to the healthcare system.
RESUMEN
Demonstrating impact is essential for hospital-based centers for pediatric nursing research and evidence-based practice. To meet this aim, the Center for Pediatric Nursing Research & Evidence-Based Practice at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia created a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database as a project engagement tracker to (1) capture all requests for consultation, and (2) summarize the Center's multi-professional consultants' engagement in diverse projects across our large pediatric health system. We implemented our REDCap project engagement tracker six years ago and continue to utilize it as a living database. Customized reports allow us to effectively manage our daily operations and communicate our reach and value to stakeholders internal and external to our organization. With REDCap's flexibility and ease of use, this project engagement tracker can be easily shared with like organizations. And with strong partnerships, we hope to see the development of common metrics to communicate the impact of centers of nursing inquiry on a national scale.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For years, nurse researchers have been called upon to engage with "big data" in the electronic health record (EHR) by leading studies focusing on nurse-centric patient outcomes and providing clinical analysis of potential outcome indicators. However, the current gap in nurses' data science education and training poses a significant barrier. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the viability of conducting nurse-led, big-data research projects within a custom-designed computational laboratory and examine the support required by a team of researchers with little to no big-data experience. METHODS: Four nurse-led research teams developed a research question reliant on existing EHR data. Each team was given its own virtual computational laboratory populated with raw data. A data science education team provided instruction in coding languages-primarily structured query language and R-and data science techniques to organize and analyze the data. RESULTS: Three research teams have completed studies, resulting in one manuscript currently undergoing peer review and two manuscripts in progress. The final team is performing data analysis. Five barriers and five facilitators to big-data projects were identified. DISCUSSION: As the data science learning curve is steep, organizations need to help bridge the gap between what is currently taught in doctoral nursing programs and what is required of clinical nurse researchers to successfully engage in big-data methods. In addition, clinical nurse researchers require protected research time and a data science infrastructure that supports novice efforts with education, mentorship, and computational laboratory resources.
Asunto(s)
Ciencia de los Datos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Investigación en Enfermería , Humanos , Ciencia de los Datos/métodos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Macrodatos , Investigadores/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Clinical units and their nursing staffs are heterogeneous. Advances in data and analytics provide opportunities to better match patient needs with nurse competencies. Building upon a previous publication on a unit profile dashboard, team members now describe development of a nursing dashboard aggregating characteristics of staff on each clinical unit of the hospital. This article describes methods, challenges, and future directions for nurse leaders to use the dashboards to optimize care delivery and patient and nurse outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Atención de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería , Humanos , Competencia Clínica , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nursing professional organizations and media sources indicated early in the pandemic that the physical and psychological effects of COVID-19 might be distinct and possibly greater in nurses than in other types of healthcare workers (HCWs). OBJECTIVES: Based on survey data collected in Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO), a national registry of U.S. HCWs, this study compared the self-reported experiences of nurses with other HCWs during the first 13 months of the pandemic. METHODS: Nurse responses were compared to responses of nonnurse HCWs in terms of viral exposure, testing and infection, access to personal protective equipment (PPE), burnout, and well-being. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between nurse and nonnurse roles for the binary end points of viral testing and test positivity for COVID-19. We also examined differences by race/ethnicity and high-risk versus low-risk practice settings. RESULTS: Of 24,343 HCWs in the registry, one third self-identified as nurses. Nurses were more likely than other HCWs to report exposure to SARS-CoV-2, problems accessing PPE, and decreased personal well-being, including burnout, feeling tired, stress, trouble sleeping, and worry. In adjusted models, nurses were more likely than nonnurse HCWs to report viral testing and test positivity for COVID-19 infection. Nurses in high-risk settings were more likely to report viral exposure and symptoms related to well-being; nurses in low-risk settings were more likely to report viral testing and test positivity. Black or Hispanic nurses were most likely to report test positivity. DISCUSSION: Differences were identified between nurses and nonnurse HCWs in access to PPE, physical and mental well-being measures, and likelihood of reporting exposure and infection. Among nurses, testing and infection differed based on race and ethnicity, and type of work setting. Our findings suggest further research and policy are needed to elucidate and address social and occupational disparities.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal , Personal de Salud/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Nurse leaders need real-time, accurate data to design care delivery models and make decisions that reflect the patient populations they serve. To support nurse leader practice and optimize patient care, we developed a unit profile dashboard to describe the unique characteristics of patient populations cared for on each clinical unit at our hospital. In this article, we describe dashboard development, challenges, use cases, and plans for data analytics to further advance nursing practice.
Asunto(s)
Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Unidades Hospitalarias , Atención de Enfermería , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Humanos , Atención de Enfermería/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Nurses experience stress in the workplace. We evaluated the feasibility and effect of Reiki to relieve stress of staff nurses during a work shift. All Reiki treatments were completed without interruption and lasted 30 minutes. Stress scores, respiratory rate, and heart rate were significantly decreased immediately following the Reiki treatment.
Asunto(s)
Tacto Terapéutico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hospitales , Humanos , Estrés Psicológico/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deciding on a disease modifying therapy (DMT) for the treatment of pediatric onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) often presents a challenge to families. Parents are often overwhelmed by DMT choices, but they desire to be an integral part of the decision making process for their child. There is no standard approach for how best to involve families in this process. The aim of this study was to describe the experience of decision making related to the use of disease modifying therapy in parents of children and adolescents with POMS. METHODS: The research aim was addressed using a descriptive survey design. Participants were recruited from the Pediatric MS and Related Disorders Program at Boston Children's Hospital as well as from the Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Alliance online Facebook group. RESULTS: Overall, fewer than half of parents felt very satisfied with the DMT they chose for their child with POMS (44%). Parental satisfaction with the decision making process increased with a high level of control of the process (p < 0.0001), satisfaction with communication (p < 0.0001), and feeling supported by the healthcare provider (p < 0.0001). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare providers should recognize the importance of the role of the family in the decision making process and how this directly impacts health outcomes. An open discussion at the time of DMT education should involve identification of family values and preferences. The use of online decision support tools have a valuable role in determining family preferences. CONCLUSION: There is an opportunity of healthcare providers to foster shared decision making practices to improve satisfaction among parents of children and adolescents with POMS. Healthcare providers should work closely with families to identify and incorporate their personal preferences for their role in the decision making process. Future research should include the testing of decision support tools for decision making in POMS.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Esclerosis Múltiple , Adolescente , Niño , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Padres , Relaciones Profesional-FamiliaRESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in hospitals' proportion of specialty certified nurses and to determine whether and to what extent individual nurse characteristics and organisational hospital characteristics are associated with a nurse's likelihood of having specialty certification. BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown that patients in hospitals with high proportions of specialty certified nurses have better outcomes including lower mortality and fewer adverse events, yet less is known about what motivates nurses to obtain specialty certification. METHODS AND DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of paediatric nurses in 119 acute care hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the association between individual nurse characteristics, organisational hospital characteristics and an individual nurses' likelihood of holding a specialty certification. STROBE was followed. RESULTS: The proportion of certified nurses varies substantially among hospitals, with Magnet® hospitals being significantly more likely, on average, to have higher proportions of certified nurses. Nurses in children's hospitals were no more likely than paediatric nurses in general hospitals to be certified. A nurse's years of experience and bachelors-preparation were significantly associated with higher odds of having certification. The strongest predictors of certification were favourable nurse work environments and Magnet® -designation of the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: While individual attributes of the nurse were associated with a nurse's likelihood of having a specialty certification, the strongest predictors of certification were modifiable attributes of the hospital-a favourable nurse work environment and Magnet® -designation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Hospital administrators seeking to increase the proportion of specialty certified nurses in their organisation should look to improvements in the organisation's nurse work environment as a possible mechanism.
Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Pediátricas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Certificación , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
A notable challenge faced by pediatric hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic included the need to decrease inpatient census and socially distant non-clinical hospital employees to alternative work arrangements. In doing so, nurses and other clinical care services employees were reassigned to new roles, while others continue to work from home. This paper aims to describe how during the COVID-19 pandemic, a pediatric hospital-based center for nursing research and evidence-based practice used this opportunity to virtually engage staff across the department in topics of clinical inquiry through education sessions, office hours, and individualized/team consultation. Therefore, elevating and increasing the presence of nursing research and evidence-based practice while providing opportunities for the continued professional development of nurses, respiratory therapists, clinical dietitians, child life specialists and employees in neurodiagnostics.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Investigación en Enfermería , Niño , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
This paper describes how, as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, one hospital-based center for nursing research and evidence-based practice capitalized on its unique skill mix to quickly pivot to provide hospital administrators and staff with timely, relevant evidence regarding the care of patients and families, as well as the protection of direct care providers and all support staff. The products produced by this center, both proactive and in direct response, contributed to clinical operations decision-making and thus, tangibly impacted practice. The positive outcomes described speak not only to the clinical environment, but also to the presence and specialized contributions of a multiprofessional center for nursing research and evidence-based practice in such a way that was not possible prior to COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/organización & administración , Hospitales , Investigación en Enfermería , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate quality and safety of care in acute pediatric settings from the perspectives of nurses working at the bedside and to investigate hospital-level factors associated with more favorable quality and safety. METHODS: Using data from a large survey of registered nurses in 330 acute care hospitals, we described nurses' assessments of safety and quality of care in inpatient pediatric settings, including freestanding children's hospitals (FCHs) (n = 21) and general hospitals with pediatric units (n = 309). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of being a FCH on favorable reports on safety and quality before and after adjusting for hospital-level and nurse characteristics and Magnet status. RESULTS: Nurses in FCHs were more likely to report favorably on quality and safety after we accounted for hospital-level and individual nurse characteristics; however, adjusting for a hospital's Magnet status rendered associations between FCHs and quality and safety insignificant. Nurses in Magnet hospitals were more likely to report favorably on quality and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Quality and safety of pediatric care remain uneven; however, the organizational attributes of Magnet hospitals explain, in large part, more favorable quality and safety in FCHs compared with pediatric units in general acute care hospitals. Modifiable features of the nurse work environment common to Magnet hospitals hold promise for improving quality and safety of care. Transforming nurse work environments to keep patients safe, as recommended by the National Academy of Medicine 20 years ago, remains an unfinished agenda in pediatric inpatient settings.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales Generales , Hospitales Pediátricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Unidades Hospitalarias , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This article aims to provide perspectives on the establishment of a consortium for nurse scientists with similar career trajectories interested in cancer-related symptoms (CRS) research. Hereby, we describe the development of and recent outcomes from the CRS consortium, the lessons learned in establishing the consortium, and future directions to advance the science of CRS. MODEL AND METHODS: New and innovative strategies are needed to address the complexity of CRS research. A CRS consortium was created to allow a mechanism for oncology nurse scientists with varying expertise to collaborate to advance CRS research. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Symptom Science Model (SSM) guides the research of the CRS Consortium. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A need for improved CRS assessment and management has been identified. The CRS consortium was created as a collaborative think tank to begin to address this need. Guided by the NIH SSM, CRS consortium members have worked to define symptom phenotypes, enhance understanding of the biologic mechanisms that can contribute to symptom phenotypes, and develop tailored interventions to improve symptom management. Dissemination of the CRS consortium efforts involve publications and presentations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nurse scientists interested in symptom science and biobehavorial research face many challenges on how to initiate and sustain independent programs of research. Through the formation of a CRS consortium, oncology nurse scientists can work together to address identified issues in symptom measurement and management.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/enfermería , Investigación en Enfermería/organización & administración , Enfermería Oncológica/organización & administración , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Desarrollo de ProgramaAsunto(s)
Hospitales Pediátricos , Investigación en Enfermería/normas , Niño , Humanos , Enfermería Pediátrica , PhiladelphiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parents of children with cancer are predisposed to psychological distress symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and uncertainty. This vulnerability may exacerbate underlying mood disturbances, including trait anxiety and depression, and influence parents' perception of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in their children. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between parental uncertainty and parent proxy reports of HRQOL in newly diagnosed children with cancer. METHODS: A longitudinal descriptive approach was used to examine the relationship between parental uncertainty and parent proxy reports of HRQOL in 55 parent-child dyads. Parental trait anxiety, depression, and perceived social support were evaluated as potential predictor variables. FINDINGS: Parents of newly diagnosed children with cancer reported lower parent proxy HRQOL scores. Parental uncertainty was prevalent and affected parents' perceptions of HRQOL three months following diagnosis; however, higher social support scores buffered these negative effects.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicología , Padres/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Incertidumbre , Adolescente , Ansiedad/psicología , Niño , Preescolar , Depresión/psicología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
: Background: Clinical research nursing is an emerging specialty practice. Clinical research nurses (CRNs) work to make protocol-related care safe for the research subjects while simultaneously maintaining protocol fidelity. They must continuously balance the needs of the research subjects and the study requirements. PURPOSE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe CRNs' perceptions of the value of their role. METHODS: Two focus groups were conducted with a purposive sample of 18 CRNs. An interview guide consisting of eight open-ended items was used. Data analysis used critical elements from Krueger's systematic steps for analyzing focus group data. RESULTS: Five major themes emerged from 168 coded statements contained within the focus group transcripts: comprehensive nursing care of research subjects, training and education of research subjects and staff, contributions to clinical science, unique combination of clinical and critical thinking skills, and CRN practice attributes. Subcategories were also identified. In general, participants felt strongly about the value they added.Clinical research nursing requires the use of a variety of abilities and skills, including critical thinking and problem solving, as well as clinical and research knowledge. The CRNs in this study described incorporating these and other elements into their practice, which they associated with their specialized role. The five themes that emerged help elucidate the importance and utility of including CRNs on research teams. CONCLUSIONS: The unique combination of applied research knowledge and expert clinical skills sets the specialty of clinical research nursing apart. The study findings, in particular the five themes, provide an evidence-based framework that will be useful in the development of competencies for CRN specialty practice. In helping to bring research findings to bear on clinical care, the impact of CRNs' practice extends beyond the individual patient to larger patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Investigación en Enfermería Clínica/educación , Educación Continua en Enfermería/organización & administración , Rol de la Enfermera/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Autoimagen , Adulto , Curriculum , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based nutrition policy is a key mechanism to promote planetary health. In the USA, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans are the foundation of nutrition policy and guide more than US$80 billion in federal spending. Recent attempts have been made to incorporate sustainability into the development of the Dietary Guidelines. However, the sustainability of the 2015-20 Dietary Guidelines remains unclear; research has not yet assessed the environmental impacts of the distinct healthy patterns recommended by the policy. METHODS: In this modelling study done at the University of New Hampshire (Durham, NH, USA), we analysed the healthy US-style (US), healthy Mediterranean-style (MED), and healthy vegetarian (VEG) patterns recommended in the 2015-20 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Food groups and subgroups consisted of 321 commonly consumed foods, with group composition predetermined by the US Department of Agriculture. We compiled and used multiple datasets to assign environmental burdens to foods, focusing on six impact categories of policy importance: global warming potential, land use, water depletion, freshwater and marine eutrophication, and particulate matter or respiratory organics. We did life cycle impact assessments for each of the three diet patterns and compared the six impact categories between the patterns. We also analysed the proportion contribution of the food groups to each impact category in each of the diet patterns. FINDINGS: The US and MED patterns had similar impacts, except for freshwater eutrophication. Freshwater eutrophication was 31% lower in the US pattern than the MED pattern, primarily due to increased seafood in the MED pattern. All three patterns had similar water depletion impacts, with fruits and vegetables as major contributors. For five of the six impacts, the VEG pattern had 42-84% lower burdens than both the US and MED patterns. Reliance on plant-based protein and eggs in the VEG pattern versus emphasis on animal-based protein in the other patterns was a key driver of differences, as was a lower overall protein foods recommendation in the VEG pattern. INTERPRETATION: The recommended patterns in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans might have starkly different impacts on the environment and other dimensions of human health beyond nutrition. Given the scale of influence of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans on food systems, incorporating sustainability into their development has the potential to have great benefit in terms of long-term food security. FUNDING: None.
Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable , Política Nutricional , Desarrollo Sostenible , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) IV-V cerebral palsy (CP) have significant spasticity and frequently develop scoliosis. Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps are effective in managing spasticity. The effect of ITB therapy on the postoperative course following spinal fusion in patients with GMFCS IV-V CP has not been described. This study sought to compare postoperative recovery, including complications, in patients using ITB therapy with those with no ITB therapy. PURPOSE: Evaluate the effect of ITB on the postoperative recovery for patients with GMFCS IV-V CP who undergo spinal fusion for scoliosis. METHODS: Health records for patients with GMFCS IV-V CP who underwent a spinal fusion for scoliosis at a major quaternary-care children's hospital from January 2009 to October 2015 were reviewed and relevant data were abstracted. Descriptive statistics and regression models were used to compare patients. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included-19 ITB therapy and 50 no ITB therapy. Demographic and operative characteristics were similar across groups. The mean length of stay for patients in the ITB therapy group was 11.2 days and 14.3 days for the no ITB therapy group, with no difference between groups (p = .12). Pain scores in both groups decreased at the same rate, with scores in the ITB therapy group averaging one-half point lower (p = .32). The average amount of morphine equivalents (p = .71) and benzodiazepine equivalents (p = .53) used were similar between groups. Complication rates were significantly different between groups. Four (21%) of the ITB therapy patients had 1 or more complications whereas 28 (56%, p = .01) in the no ITB therapy group had 1 or more complications. The average number of complications per patient in the ITB therapy group was 0.3 (SD: 0.075, range: 0-3) and the no ITB therapy group was 1.1 (SD: 1.1, range: 0-6, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in length of stay, pain scores, or pain/spasticity medication use between groups after spinal fusion, but there was a significantly lower incidence of complications in the ITB therapy group.
Asunto(s)
Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Catéteres de Permanencia , Parálisis Cerebral/fisiopatología , Espasticidad Muscular/terapia , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/administración & dosificación , Dolor/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escoliosis/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and initial testing of the Braden QD Scale to predict both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure injury risk in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolling hospitalized patients, preterm to 21 years of age, on bedrest for at least 24 hours with a medical device in place. Receiver operating characteristic curves using scores from the first observation day were used to characterize Braden QD Scale performance, including areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Eight centers enrolled 625 patients. A total of 86 hospital-acquired pressure injures were observed in 49 (8%) patients: 22 immobility-related pressure injuries in 14 (2%) patients and 64 medical device-related pressure injuries in 42 (7%) patients. The Braden QD Scale performed well in predicting immobility-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in the overall sample, with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.84). At a cutoff score of 13, the AUC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.78), providing a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.92), specificity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.55-0.63), positive predictive value of 0.15 (95% CI 0.11-0.19), negative predictive value of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.09 (95% CI 0.95-4.58). CONCLUSIONS: The Braden QD Scale reliably predicts both immobility-related and device-related pressure injuries in the pediatric acute care environment and will be helpful in monitoring care and in guiding resource use in the prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injuries.