Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 10(3): 353-66, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23668707

RESUMEN

Since their introduction 60 years ago, penile prostheses have remained the standard therapy for the management of refractory erectile dysfunction, with multiple long-term series reporting outcomes. A PubMed search was performed from 1990 to present, and outcomes of penile prosthetics were reviewed. Studies with <12 months follow-up were excluded. Overall mechanical survival of three-piece prostheses range from 81-94, 68-89 and 57-76% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Contemporary infection rates following recent device modifications are 1-2% (low risk) to 2-3% (high risk). Patient satisfaction ranges from 75-100% and varies by prosthetic device. Outcomes are further reviewed among specialized populations (revision surgery, Peyronie's disease, priapism, corporal fibrosis and neurologic impairments). Penile prostheses remain a viable surgical treatment option with excellent mechanical reliability, low infection rates and significant patient/partner satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/terapia , Prótesis de Pene , Animales , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Masculino , Prótesis de Pene/historia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...