RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: U.S. breastfeeding outcomes consistently fall short of public health targets, with lower rates among rural and low-income people, as well as participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). The U.S. Department of Agriculture funded a subset of local WIC agencies in Minnesota to implement Breastfeeding Peer Counseling Programs (BFPCs) aimed at improving breastfeeding rates. We examined the impact of BFPCs on breastfeeding rates among WIC participants in Greater Minnesota (outside the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area). METHODS: We used data from the Minnesota WIC Information System for the years 2012 through 2019 to estimate the impact of peer counseling on breastfeeding duration using difference-in-differences models. Additionally, we examined results among rural counties and assessed the possibility of spillover effects by stratifying whether a county without BFPCs bordered one with BFPCs. RESULTS: Availability of BFPCs resulted in a 3.1 to 3.4 percentage-point increase in breastfeeding rates at 3 months and a 3.2 to 3.7 percentage-point increase in breastfeeding rates at 6 months among WIC participants in Greater Minnesota. Among rural counties, results showed a statistically significant 4.1 to 5.2 percentage-point increase in breastfeeding duration rates. Both border and nonborder counties experienced positive impacts of BFPCs on breastfeeding rates, suggesting wide-ranging program spillover effects. CONCLUSIONS: BFPCs had a significant positive impact on breastfeeding duration. Findings indicate an opportunity for improving rural breastfeeding rates through increased funding for WIC BFPCs.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Consejo , Asistencia Alimentaria , Promoción de la Salud , Grupo Paritario , Población Rural , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Minnesota , Femenino , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistencia Alimentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Pobreza , Lactante , Madres/psicología , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite research showing substantial weight disparities along the rural-urban continuum, little work has attempted to identify differences in prepregnancy weight status or gestational weight gain (GWG) outcomes between rural and urban birthing people. As such, the goals of this research were to 1) document the prevalence of prepregnancy overweight and obesity and excessive GWG in rural and urban birthing people and 2) examine changes in rural and urban prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive GWG over time. METHODS: Birth certificate data provided sociodemographic variables, prepregnancy body mass index, GWG, and rurality status on 465,709 respondents who gave birth in Minnesota from 2012 to 2019. A series of regression models estimated risk differences in 1) prepregnancy weight status and 2) excessive GWG between rural and urban respondents over time, controlling for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Rural individuals had a 4.9 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 4.5-5.3) higher risk of having prepregnancy overweight or obesity compared with urban individuals, and a 2.6 percentage-point (95% confidence interval, 1.9-3.3) higher risk of gaining excessive gestational weight. The disparities in prepregnancy overweight or obesity and excessive gestational weight between rural and urban individuals widened over time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to accumulating evidence documenting notable health disparities between rural and urban individuals during the perinatal period and support the need to develop prevention and treatment efforts focused on improving the weight-related health of individuals living in rural communities.
Asunto(s)
Sobrepeso , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Minnesota/epidemiología , Población Rural , Aumento de Peso , Obesidad/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Using the positive deviance approach, the purpose of this study was to identify parent feeding practices that might be protective against early childhood obesity among children with lower weight status (BMI percentile ≥5th-<85th) relative to higher weight status (BMI percentile ≥85th). Qualitative interviews were conducted with 71 parents of children aged 2-5 years old (48% girls) enrolled in the Minnesota Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infants and Children (WIC). Children were identified as having lower weight status (defined as 'positive deviants') (n = 36) or 'higher weight status' (n = 35), and were African American [n = 22], Hispanic [n = 23], or Hmong [n = 26]). Parents were asked about approaches to child feeding and health- and weight-related practices. Findings indicated that relative to caregivers of children with higher weight status, parents of children identified as positive deviant were more likely to report having a consistent routine for providing meals, using a guided choices approach, serving small portions of food during mealtimes, and trusting their child hunger and satiety cues. Moreover, parents of children identified as positive deviant were more likely to promote healthful eating and physical activity engagement and implement clear rules and limits for screen time than parents of children with higher weight status. Results suggest specific parent feeding behaviors and health-related practices that may influence child weight status among children living in low-income and racialized households. The findings of this study also provide research evidence and support the tenets of the Satter Division of Responsibility in Feeding framework. Parenting practices and strategies among parents of children identified as positive deviant are expected to be feasible and should be explored and communicated in future interventions to support age- and sex-recommended weight and health-related outcomes among young children to promote health equity.