Clinical Outcomes of Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with Cortical Button Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OSBT) with cortical button fixation can deliver acceptable results for long head of the biceps (LHB) pathology with the benefit of smaller bone tunnel diameter and a potential reduced risk of postoperative humeral shaft fracture. However, functional outcomes and complications of a button-only technique with a small diameter tunnel in the subpectoral region have not been studied sufficiently. PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether OSBT with cortical button fixation results in significant functional improvements from preoperative to final follow-up. The secondary purpose was to determine whether there is a lower risk of major postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent OSBT with cortical button fixation at one institution was conducted with objective measurements and clinical outcomes collected with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Surgical data was collected for analysis. Objective measures obtained at follow-up included physical exam, strength testing using a handheld dynamometer, and Long-Head of the Biceps score. Clinical outcomes were measured using the following validated questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with mean age of 53.1 ± 10.1 years at the time of surgery were enrolled in the study. Mean follow-up time was 42.4 ± 16.9 months (range: 24 to 64 months). The postoperative LHB score was 95.5 ± 6.1 (range: 77 to 100). All functional outcome measures (ASES, DASH, and OSS) demonstrated statistically significant improvements at final follow-up (p < 0.05 for each). At total of 92.5% of patients stated they would have the procedure again if necessary. Mean elbow flexion strength on the operative side measured 98.7% ± 15.9% (range: 74.1% to 142.3%) of the contralateral arm. The mean LHB tendon diameter was 5.7 ± 0.8 mm and mean tunnel diameter was 5.9 ± 0.7 mm. There were no cases of intraoperative or postoperative fracture, infection, or Popeye deformity noted during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with cortical button fixation is a safe and effective surgical treatment option to relieve pain and restore function.

Mycobacterium phlei Vertebral Osteomyelitis.

A report of an instance of vertebral osteomyelitis secondary to an uncommon pathogen, Mycobacterium phlei. SUMMARY: Mycobacterium phlei is a rapidly growing nontuberculous osteomyelitis which is typically nonpathogenic with only four reported cases of human infection. Diagnosing infections related to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is difficult and can often be delayed as conventional microbiologic tests are inadequate. Currently, there are no consensus guidelines concerning the treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis caused by NTM. A 45-year-old man presented with chronic back pain and bilateral lower extremity radicular symptoms status-post lumbar fusion with previous deep infection. CT scan demonstrated incomplete union after fusion. He underwent irrigation and débridement on March 15, 2016, with tissue culture and biopsy. Given negative cultures and completion of a 6-week course of intravenous antibiotics, on May 3, 2016, he went for implant removal and repeat instrumentation. During the same hospitalization, deep spinal fluid acid-fast bacilli culture from March 15, 2016, came back positive at 8 weeks, identified as Mycobaterium phlei. He was started on an empiric 4-drug regimen for NTM which he continued for 12 months. There has been no recurrence of infection to date. DISCUSSION: This case serves as the first description of M. phlei osteomyelitis of the spine and as a reminder that proper diagnosis of infectious etiologies is necessary for adequate treatment.

Correction to: The relationship of pelvic incidence to post-operative total hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients with lumbar fusion.

The original publication of this paper contain an error. The author name "Alan S. McGee Jr" is incorrect for it should have been "Alan W. McGee Jr".

The relationship of pelvic incidence to post-operative total hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients with lumbar fusion.

PURPOSE: To determine if lumbar fusion increases the risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a posterior approach and to investigate anatomic variables associated with this increased risk. METHODS: Five-year retrospective review of THAs performed through a posterior approach identifying cases of post-operative dislocation. Patients were grouped into those with or without previous lumbar spine fusion. Lumbar fusion patients were then further analyzed in terms of cup position, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt to determine if there were specific variables associated with the increased risk of dislocation. RESULTS: Five hundred nine primary THAs in 460 patients (non-simultaneous bilateral THAs in 41 patients) met inclusion criteria with a dislocation rate of 5.5%. Thirty-one patients were identified as having prior lumbar fusions. The dislocation rate was significantly higher in fusion patients (29 vs 4%; p = 0.009) yielding a relative risk (RR) of dislocation of 4.77 (p = < 0.0001). Additionally, cup anteversion was significantly different between groups (26.8 vs 21.42; p = 0.009). Dislocators in the fusion group were also at greater risk of requiring subsequent revision (RR = 3.24; p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis of fusion patients revealed that dislocators had lower pelvic incidence and sacral slope compared to non-dislocators (45.2 vs 58.6 [p = 0.0029] and 26.3 vs 35.6 [p = 0.0384] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lumbar fusion are at increased risk for post-operative dislocations requiring revision. Together, lower pelvic incidence and decreased sacral slope are associated with increased risk of dislocation in these patients.

Coracoid Fracture Following Latarjet Failure A Case Report.

The Latarjet procedure involves the transfer of the coracoid process with its soft tissue attachments, thereby providing both bony and soft tissue articular reinforcement for glenohumeral stabilization. Most studies show positive outcomes with this procedure and complications at rates as low as 1%, predominately secondary to technical error. We present a case of recurrent anterior instability after two attempts at soft tissue stabilization (arthroscopic labral repair followed by open inferior capsular shift) in which an open Latarjet procedure was performed followed by subsequent revision secondary to coracoid autograft fracture. The case presented specifically highlights the need to appropriately identify the "bony margins" of the coracoid prior to drilling to make certain that drill holes are not eccentrically placed.

The management of meniscal pathology: from partial meniscectomy to transplantation.

The management of meniscal pathology continues to evolve as researchers gain a better understanding of the role of the meniscus in normal knee kinematics. Evidence now supports retention or transplantation of meniscal tissue to maintain homeostatic knee mechanisms because the removal of meniscal tissue changes the contact stresses and leads to structural and biomechanical changes in the articular cartilage and the subchondral plate that predisposes the knee to the development of degenerative arthritis. Advances in repair techniques, biologic adjuvants, and progressive tissue-engineering strategies are rapidly adding to the surgeon's armamentarium when dealing with meniscal injury and insufficiency. Early clinical data support many of these advanced techniques. It is helpful to explore meniscal function, pathology, and current treatment modalities, with a focus on meniscal repair and transplantation as well as adjuvants to biologic healing and future directions in this field.

The effect of shoulder immobilization on driving performance.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of sling immobilization on driving performance with use of a driving simulator. METHODS: This is a prospective trial with a cohort of 21 healthy volunteers comparing their driving ability with and without sling immobilization on their dominant (driving) extremity. Multiple variables, including number of collisions, off-road excursions, and centerline crossings, were measured with a validated driving simulator. Trials were separated by 2 weeks to control for "adaptations" to the simulator. Statistical significance was found in collisions between sling and no-sling tests. RESULTS: The total number of collisions for trial 1 (no sling) was 36 (mean, 1.7 ± 1.2) compared with 73 (3.7 ± 1.6) (P < .01) for trial 2 (sling immobilization). Approximately 70% of participants with upper extremity immobilization were involved in ≥3 collisions; approximately 70% of no-sling participants were involved in ≤2 collisions. There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to overall vehicle road position and control. CONCLUSION: Sling immobilization of the dominant driving arm results in a decrease in driving performance and safety with respect to the number of collisions in a simulated driving circuit (P < .01). There were no significant differences in driving parameters that are indicative of overall vehicle position and control. The decrease in driving performance with respect to the number of collisions is likely to be related to the effect the immobilized arm has on effectively performing evasive maneuvers during hazardous driving conditions.

Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

The study reported here examined patient safety and satisfaction in 56 patients with cervical radiculopathy secondary to foraminal stenosis or a herniated disc who underwent a total of 58 outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures with iliac crest bone graft or fibular allograft. Patients were discharged 0.8 hour to 6.5 hours (mean, 2.4 hours) after surgery and received 3 home health care visits over 24 hours. Of the 45 satisfaction questionnaires that were completed, 43 (95.6%) indicated patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery, and 35 (77.8%) indicated patients would have the procedure performed on an outpatient basis again. Eleven (19.6%) of the 56 patients did not respond to a satisfaction questionnaire. Outpatient ACDF has high patient satisfaction but does not compromise patient safety.