Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 17(3): 832-45, 1999 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10071274

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: From 1986 to 1992, "eight-drugs-in-one-day" (8-in-1) chemotherapy both before and after radiation therapy (XRT) (54 Gy tumor/36 Gy neuraxis) was compared with vincristine, lomustine (CCNU), and prednisone (VCP) after XRT in children with untreated, high-stage medulloblastoma (MB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred three eligible patients with an institutional diagnosis of MB were stratified by local invasion and metastatic stage (Chang T/M) and randomized to therapy. Median time at risk from study entry was 7.0 years. RESULTS: Survival and progression-free survival (PFS) +/- SE at 7 years were 55%+/-5% and 54%+/-5%, respectively. VCP was superior to 8-in-1 chemotherapy, with 5-year PFS rates of 63%+/-5% versus 45%+/-5%, respectively (P = .006). Upon central neuropathology review, 188 patients were confirmed as having MB and were the subjects for analyses of prognostic factors. Children aged 1.5 to younger than 3 years had inferior 5-year estimates of PFS, compared with children 3 years old or older (P = .0014; 32%+/-10% v 58%+/-4%, respectively). For MB patients 3 years of age or older, the prognostic effect of tumor spread (MO v M1 v M2+) on PFS was powerful (P = .0006); 5-year PFS rates were 70%+/-5%, 57%+/-10%, and 40%+/-8%, respectively. PFS distributions at 5 years for patients with M0 tumors with less than 1.5 cm2 of residual tumor, versus > or = 1.5 cm2 of residual tumor by scan, were significantly different (P = .023; 78%+/-6% v 54%+/-11%, respectively). CONCLUSION: VCP plus XRT is a superior adjuvant combination compared with 8-in-1 chemotherapy plus XRT. For patients with M0 tumors, residual tumor bulk (not extent of resection) is a predictor for PFS. Patients with M0 tumors, > or = 3 years with < or = 1.5 cm2 residual tumor, had a 78%+/-6% 5-year PFS rate. Children younger than 3 years old who received a reduced XRT dosage had the lowest survival rate.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cerebelosas/patología , Meduloblastoma/patología , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/radioterapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Meduloblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Meduloblastoma/radioterapia , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/radioterapia , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia
2.
Cancer Pract ; 7(5): 248-56, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10687594

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate parents' knowledge and perceptions about randomization in clinical trials for children with cancer, and to determine whether parents' decisions were influenced by demographic factors, randomization circumstances, the clinical characteristics of the child with cancer, or a combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study collected information from 192 parents of patients with various forms of childhood cancer who either accepted or refused randomization. A comparative case-control design was used. The Clinical Investigation Randomization Scale was administered to all participants. This scale included 32 questionnaire items (QIs) pertaining to randomization as well as a mixture of open-ended questions to obtain information about demographic and other factors. RESULTS: A predictor model was developed that accurately predicted acceptance or refusal of randomization 87% of the time. Demographic information was found to have less influence than expected on parents' decisions regarding randomization. Knowledge deficits were found among both groups of parents, those who accepted and those who refused randomization. CONCLUSIONS: What most distinguished parents who refused from those who accepted randomization was not their knowledge and information about randomized clinical trials. By far, the majority of QIs that accurately predicted acceptors and refusers involved parents' beliefs, values, and perceptions. Further research is needed to determine interventions that may enable the healthcare team to provide information and decisional support most effectively to improve the informed consent process.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Toma de Decisiones , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias/terapia , Padres/educación , Padres/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/psicología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Psicológicos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
J Neurosurg ; 89(1): 52-9, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9647172

RESUMEN

OBJECT: One hundred seventy-two children with high-grade astrocytomas were treated by members of the Children's Cancer Group in a prospective randomized trial designed to evaluate the role of two chemotherapy regimens. Seventy-six percent of the patients (131 children) in whom a diagnosis of either anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme was confirmed by central pathological review are the subject of this report. METHODS: Patients were stratified according to the extent of tumor resection (biopsy [< 10%], partial resection [10-50%], subtotal resection [51-90%], near-total resection [> 90%], and total resection) as determined by surgical observation and postoperative computerized tomography scanning. Information on contemporary neurosurgical management was obtained from the patient's operative records and standardized neurosurgical report forms. The vast majority of tumors were supratentorial: 63% (83 tumors) in the superficial cerebral hemisphere, 28% (37 tumors) in the deep or midline cerebrum, and only 8% (11 tumors) in the posterior fossa. A significant association was detected between the primary tumor site and the extent of resection (p < 0.0001). A radical resection (> 90%) was performed in 37% of the children: 49% of the tumors in the superficial hemisphere and 45% of tumors in the posterior fossa compared with 8% of midline tumors. Tumor location could also be used to predict the need for both temporary and permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Half of the deep tumors and 8% of the hemispheric astrocytomas ultimately required a permanent CSF shunt. Improvement in preoperative neurological deficits and level of consciousness was seen in 36% and 34% of the children, respectively. New or increased deficits were present in 14% of the children, with 6% experiencing a diminished sensorium after surgery. Postoperative nonneurological complications were rare: infection, hematoma, and CSF fistula each occurred in 1.7% of the children. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that radical tumor resection (> 90%) was the only therapeutic variable that significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates. For all patients with malignant astrocytomas, the distributions of PFS rates were significantly different (p = 0.006) following radical resection compared with less extensive (< or = 90%) resection. The 5-year PFS rates were 35 +/- 7% and 17 +/- 4%, respectively. The differences in the distribution of PFS rate were significant for the subsets of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (p = 0.055) and glioblastoma multiforme (p = 0.046). The 5-year PFS rates for anaplastic astrocytoma were 44 +/- 11% and 22 +/- 6% for cases in which the tumor was radically resected and less than radically resected, respectively; whereas the 5-year PFS rates for glioblastoma multiforme were 26 +/- 9% and 4 +/- 3% for cases in which the tumor was radically resected and less than radically resected, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstration of a survival advantage provided by radical resection should prompt neurosurgeons to treat malignant pediatric astrocytomas with aggressive surgical resection prior to initiation of radiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Corteza Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Corteza Cerebral/efectos de los fármacos , Corteza Cerebral/cirugía , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Niño , Preescolar , Estado de Conciencia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Examen Neurológico , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
4.
J Neurosurg ; 88(4): 695-703, 1998 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9525716

RESUMEN

OBJECT: Ependymomas in children continue to generate controversy regarding their histological diagnosis and grading. optimal management, and possible prognostic factors. To increase our knowledge of these tumors the authors addressed these issues in a cohort of children with prospectively staged ependymomas treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. METHODS: Children between the ages of 2 and 17.3 years harboring an intracranial ependymoma confirmed by a central review of the tumor's pathological characteristics were treated according to Children's Cancer Group Protocol 921 from 1986 to 1992. Treatment following surgery and postoperative tumor staging (including brain computerized tomography or magnetic resonance [MR] imaging, spinal MR imaging or myelography, and cerebrospinal fluid cytological investigation) included craniospinal irradiation with a local boost to the primary tumor and patient randomization to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either 1) CCNU, vincristine, and prednisone, or 2) the eight-drugs-in-1-day regimen. Centralized review of the tumor pathological characteristics revealed 20 ependymomas and 12 anaplastic ependymomas in the 32 children included in the study. Diagnoses made at the individual institutions included anaplastic (malignant) ependymoma (15 patients), ependymoma (four patients), ependymoblastoma (nine patients), ependymoastrocytoma (one patient), and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (three patients), which were discordant with the centralized review diagnosis in 22 of 32 cases. Only three of the 32 patients had metastatic disease (two with M and one with M3 stages). At surgery, 47% of tumors were estimated to be totally resected. Among the 14 of 17 patients who suffered a relapse and were evaluated for site of relapse, 10 (71%) had an isolated local relapse, three (21%) had concurrent local and metastatic relapse, and only one (7%) had an isolated metastatic relapse. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 50 +/- 10% and 64 +/- 9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of PFS duration included an estimate of the extent of resection made at surgery (total compared with less than total, p = 0.0001) and the amount of residual tumor on postoperative imaging as verified by centralized radiological review (< or = 1.5 cm2 compared with > 1.5 cm2, p < 0.0001). No other factors, including centrally reviewed tumor histopathological type, location, metastasis and tumor (M and T) stages, patient age, race, gender, or chemotherapy treatment regimen significantly correlated with PFS duration. The pattern of predominantly local relapse and the important influence of residual tumor or the extent of resection on PFS duration confirms a prevailing impression that local disease control is the major factor in the prediction of outcome of ependymoma. Survival rates were comparable with those reported by other investigators who have treated patients with similar doses of radiation and no chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Ependimoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Ependimoma/radioterapia , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Ependimoma/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 13(7): 1687-96, 1995 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7602359

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine clinical characteristics and response to treatment for children with supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (S-PNETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After surgery and staging, 55 patients aged 1.5 to 19.3 years with S-PNETs were randomized to receive craniospinal radiotherapy (RT) followed by eight cycles of 1-(2-chloro-ethyl)-3-cyclohexylnitrosourea (CCNU), vincristine (VCR), and prednisone (standard treatment) or two cycles of 8-in-1 chemotherapy followed by RT and then eight additional cycles of 8-in-1. RESULTS: Three-year Kaplan-Meier estimates (estimate +/- SE) of survival and progression-free survival (PFS) rates for patients with confirmed diagnoses of S-PNET were 57% +/- 8% and 45% +/- 8%, respectively; survival and PFS rates for children with PNETs located in the pineal region were 73% +/- 12% and 61% +/- 13%, respectively, and were significantly different from the other S-PNETs (P < .03). The 8-in-1 arm had greater toxicity than the standard-treatment arm. Distributions of PFS between the two treatment groups were not significantly different (P > .5). Other univariate prognostic factors that influenced PFS included metastasis (M) stage (P < .03: M0 50% +/- 9% v M1-4 0%) and age (P < .02: 1.5 to 2 years 25% +/- 13% v > or = 3 years 53% +/- 9%). CONCLUSION: In this first randomized treatment trial for S-PNETs in children, no significant differences were detected between the two treatment groups. M0 and pineal site of involvement were independent predictors of a better outcome. However, survival was better than previously reported.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/terapia , Glándula Pineal , Pinealoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Lomustina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/mortalidad , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/radioterapia , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/cirugía , Pinealoma/mortalidad , Pinealoma/radioterapia , Pinealoma/cirugía , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...