Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 93(7): e31, 2011 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21471411

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increased funding for graduate medical education was not provided during implementation of the eighty-hour work week. Many teaching hospitals responded to decreased work hours by hiring physician extenders to maintain continuity of care. Recent proposals have included a further decrease in work hours to a total of fifty-six hours. The goal of this study was to determine the direct cost related to a further reduction in orthopaedic-resident work hours. METHODS: A survey was delivered to 152 residency programs to determine the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) physician extenders hired after implementation of the eighty-hour work-week restriction. Thirty-six programs responded (twenty-nine university-based programs and seven community-based programs), encompassing 1021 residents. Previous published data were used to determine the change in resident work hours with implementation of the eighty-hour regulation. A ratio between change in full-time equivalent staff per resident and number of reduced hours was used to determine the cost of the proposed further decrease. RESULTS: After implementation of the eighty-hour work week, the average reduction among orthopaedic residents was approximately five work hours per week. One hundred and forty-three physician extenders (equal to 142 full-time equivalent units) were hired to meet compliance at a frequency-weighted average cost of $96,000 per full-time equivalent unit. A further reduction to fifty-six hours would increase the cost by $64,000 per resident. With approximately 3200 orthopaedic residents nationwide, sensitivity analyses (based on models of eighty and seventy-three-hour work weeks) demonstrate that the increased cost would be between $147 million and $208 million per fiscal year. For each hourly decrease in weekly work hours, the cost is $8 million to $12 million over the course of a fiscal year. CONCLUSIONS: Mandated reductions in resident work hours are a costly proposition, without a clear decrease in adverse events. The federal government should consider these data prior to initiating unfunded work-hour mandates, as further reductions in resident work hours may make resident education financially unsustainable.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/economía , Ortopedia/economía , Asistentes Médicos/economía , Tolerancia al Trabajo Programado , Carga de Trabajo/economía , Adulto , Citas y Horarios , Control de Costos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Transversales , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Masculino , Ortopedia/educación , Pennsylvania , Asistentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Carga de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...