RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Continuity of care and access to primary care have been identified as important contributors to improved health outcomes and reduced reincarceration among people who are justice-involved. While the disproportionate burden of health concerns among incarcerated populations is well documented, less is known about their health service utilization, limiting the potential for effective improvements to current policy and practice. This study aims to examine health status and health care utilization among men recently released from a superjail in a large metropolitan area to better understand patterns of use, risk factors and facilitators. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Participants included adult men (n = 106) matched to a general population group (n = 530) in Ontario, Canada, linked to medical records (88.5% linkage) to examine baseline health status and health utilization three-months post-release. The authors compared differences between the groups in baseline health conditions and estimated the risk of emergency department, primary care, inpatient hospitalization and specialist ambulatory care visits. FINDINGS: Superjail participants had a significantly higher prevalence of respiratory conditions, mental illness, substance use and injuries. Substance use was a significant risk factor for all types of visits and emergency department visits were over three times higher among superjail participants. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This empirical case is illustrative of an emerging phenomenon in some regions of the world where emergency departments serve as de facto "walk-in clinics" for those with criminal justice involvement. Strategic approaches to health services are required to meet the complex social and health needs and disparities in access to care experienced by men released from custody.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Canadá , Registros MédicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Continuity of primary care (CPC) is associated with reduced mortality and improved health status. This study assessed the level of CPC and changes in CPC over 6 years among adults with experience of homelessness and mental illness who received a Housing First intervention. METHODS: Participants were adults (≥18 years old) with a serious mental disorder and experiencing chronic homelessness enrolled between October 2009 and June 2011 in the Toronto site of the Canadian At Home/Chez Soi study and followed until March 2017. Participants were randomized to Housing First with intensive case management (HF-ICM), Housing First with assertive community treatment (HF-ACT), or treatment as usual. For this report, 280 intervention group participants (HF-ICM, n = 193 and HF-ACT, n = 87) were analysed using data from health records. The main outcome was CPC measured by the Continuity of Care Index as a continuous and categorical variable among participants during 3 consecutive 2-year periods. RESULTS: Most HF-ICM participants had low levels of CPC, with 68%-74% of this group having low CPC across all time periods. Similarly, most HF-ACT participants had low levels of CPC, with 63%-78% of this group having low CPC across all time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Among this group of individuals with mental illness who were experiencing homelessness, CPC remained low over 6 years of follow-up. This study highlights that housing and mental health interventions may need to place greater emphasis on improving CPC using effective strategies that are specifically geared towards this important goal among their clients.
RESUMEN
When people leave correctional institutions, they face myriad personal, social and structural barriers to reentry, including significant challenges with mental health, substance use, and homelessness. However, there are few reentry programs designed to support people's health, wellbeing, and social integration, and there are even fewer evaluations of such programs. The purpose of this article is to report the qualitative findings from an early process evaluation of the Reintegration Centre-a peer-led service hub designed to support men on the day they are released from custody. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews and examined quantitative service intake data with 21 men who accessed the Reintegration Centre immediately upon release. Participants encountered significant reentry challenges and barriers to service access and utilization. The data suggest that the peer-led service hub model enhanced the service encounter experience and efficiently and effectively addressed reentry needs through the provision of basic supports and individualized service referrals. Notably, the Reintegration Centre's proximity to the detention centre facilitated rapid access to essential services upon release, and the peer-support workers affirmed client autonomy and moral worth in the service encounter, fostering mutual respect and trust. Locating reentry programs near bail courts and detention centres may reduce barriers to service access. A peer-led service hub that provides immediate support for basic needs along with individualized service referrals is a promising approach to reentry programs that aim to support post-release health, wellbeing, and social integration. A social system that fosters cross-sectoral collaboration and continuity of care through innovative funding initiatives is vital to the effectiveness and sustainability of such reentry programs.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Servicios de Salud Mental , Masculino , Humanos , Cárceles Locales , Salud Mental , ConsejoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Homeless adults represent a marginalized group with numerous psychiatric and physical illness risk factors for poor functional outcomes. This study investigated bidirectional associations between housing stability and neurocognitive functioning in homeless adults using a longitudinal study design. METHOD: Participants were homeless adults with serious mental illness from the At Home/Chez Soi study Toronto site who participated in a randomized control trial of Housing First. Participants underwent a comprehensive structured baseline interview and clinical evaluation. Up to four brief cognitive evaluations were completed over a period of up to 6 years. Housing status was ascertained every 3 months during the study period. RESULTS: The analysis included 283 participants with at least one follow-up evaluation (Mage = 41 years, 70% men). In an adjusted time-lagged mixed-effects logistic regression model, higher verbal learning and memory performance (OR = 1.71, 95% CI [1.16, 2.52], p = .007), but not cognitive flexibility and processing speed, was associated with an increased likelihood of being stably housed in the subsequent 3 months. In a test of reverse associations, mixed-effects linear models did not reveal associations between housing stability in the preceding 3 months and neurocognitive functioning in either domain. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest verbal learning and memory functioning is a key contributor to housing stability among homeless adults with serious mental illness. This work has important implications for health services that support individuals transitioning into stable housing and for the attainment of long-term functional independence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Vivienda , Estudios Longitudinales , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the critical role of Housing First (HF) programs and frontline workers in responding to challenges faced during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine HF frontline workers from three HF programs between May 2020 and July 2020, in Toronto, Canada. Information was collected on challenges and adjustments needed to provide services to HF clients (people experiencing homelessness and mental disorders). We applied the Analytical Framework method and thematic analysis to our data. RESULTS: Inability to provide in-person support and socializing activities, barriers to appropriate mental health assessments, and limited virtual communication due to clients' lack of access to digital devices were among the most salient challenges that HF frontline workers reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Implementing virtual support services, provision of urgent in-office or in-field support, distributing food aid, connecting clients with online healthcare services, increasing harm reduction education and referral, and meeting urgent housing needs were some of the strategies implemented by HF frontline workers to support the complex needs of their clients during the pandemic. HF frontline workers experienced workload burden, job insecurity and mental health problems (e.g. distress, worry, anxiety) as a consequence of their services during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Despite the several work-, programming- and structural-related challenges experienced by HF frontline workers when responding to the needs of their clients during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, they played a critical role in meeting the communication, food, housing and health needs of their clients during the pandemic, even when it negatively affected their well-being. A more coordinated, integrated, innovative, sustainable, effective and well-funded support response is required to meet the intersecting and complex social, housing, health and financial needs of underserved and socio-economically excluded groups during and beyond health emergencies.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Poblaciones Vulnerables , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Vivienda , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Skin cancer incidence has been increasing worldwide, representing a particularly high burden for populations of European ancestry. Outdoor and indoor tanning using ultraviolet (UV) radiation devices are major risk factors for skin cancer. While tanning behaviours can be modified by targeted interventions to reduce skin cancer rates, there is insufficient evidence on the motivations for tanning preferences and their relationship with pigmentation phenotypes. The present observational and genetically-informed study investigates motives for tanning and the role that pigmentation phenotypes play on outdoor and indoor tanning behaviour in British young adults. This study included 3722 participants from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children in South West England, with data on pigmentation features, tanning ability and preferences, and SNP genotypes. Liking to tan and outdoor tanning were strongly influenced by pigmentary traits and tanning ability. However, the association of these phenotypes with UV indoor tanning was weaker. Our results provide evidence to support the implementation of skin cancer preventative interventions that consider individual biological characteristics and motives for undergoing outdoor and indoor tanning.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cutáneas , Baño de Sol , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Fenotipo , Pigmentación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The effects of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the lives of underserved populations are underexplored. This study aimed to identify the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health responses on the health and social well-being, and food security of users of Housing First (HF) services in Toronto (Canada) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This qualitative descriptive study was conducted from July to October 2020 in a subsample of 20 adults with a history of homelessness and serious mental disorders who were receiving HF services in Toronto. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect narrative data regarding health and social well-being, food security and access to health, social and preventive services. A thematic analysis framework guided analyses and interpretation of the data. The COVID-19 pandemic and response measures had a variable impact on the health, social well-being and food security of participants. Around 40% of participants were minimally impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Conversely, among the remaining participants (impacted group), some experienced onset of new mental health problems (anxiety, stress, paranoia) or exacerbation of pre-existing mental disorders (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder). They also struggled with isolation and loneliness and had limited leisure activities and access to food goods. The pandemic also contributed to disparities in accessing and receiving healthcare services and treatment continuity for non-COVID-19 health issues for the negatively impacted participants. Overall, most participants were able to adhere to COVID-19 public health measures and get reliable information on COVID-19 preventive measures facilitated by having access to the phone, internet and media devices and services. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic and associated response measures impacted the health, social well-being, leisure and food security of people with experiences of homelessness and mental disorders who use supportive social and housing services in diverse ways.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Investigación Cualitativa , Salud Pública , Seguridad AlimentariaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To conduct a multi-dimensional and time-patterned analysis to identify distinct well-being trajectory profiles over a 6-year follow-up period among adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness. METHODS: Data from 543 participants of the At Home Chez Soi study's Toronto site were examined over a 6-year follow-up period, including measures of quality of life, community functioning, housing stability, and substance use. Well-being trajectories were identified using Group-Based Trajectory Modelling. Multinomial regression was used to identify predictor variables that were associated with each well-being trajectory profile. RESULTS: Four well-being profiles were identified: low well-being, moderate well-being, good well-being, and high well-being. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of following a better well-being profile included receiving Housing First, reporting female gender and non-white ethnicity, having post-secondary studies, and reporting a high resilience level. Concurrently, factors associated with a lower likelihood of better well-being profiles were having a history of chronic homelessness, experiences of discrimination in the healthcare setting, having comorbid mental disorders and a high level of symptom severity, and reporting a history of traumatic brain injury and childhood adversity. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals experiencing homelessness follow distinct well-being profiles associated with their socio-demographic characteristics, health status, trauma history, resilience capabilities, and access to housing and support services. This work can inform integrated housing and support services to enhance the well-being trajectories of individuals experiencing homelessness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: At Home/Chez Soi trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN42520374, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN42520374 .
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adulto , Canadá , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Housing First (HF)-based interventions have been implemented in North America and beyond to help people exit homelessness. The effect of these interventions on access to primary and specialist care services is not well-defined. This study assesses the long-term effects of an HF intervention for homeless adults with mental illness on primary care physician (PCP) and non-primary care physician (non-PCP) visits. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the At Home/Chez Soi study, a randomized trial of HF for homeless adults with mental illness in Toronto, Canada. High-need (HN) participants were randomized to HF with assertive community treatment (HF-ACT) or treatment as usual (TAU). Moderate needs (MN) participants were randomized to HF with intensive case management (HF-ICM) or TAU. The primary outcomes were the incidence and the number of visits to a PCP and non-PCP over 7-years post-randomization, compared to the 1-year pre-randomization. RESULTS: Of 575 enrolled participants, 527 (80 HN and 347 MN) participants were included in the analyses. HN participants who received HF-ACT had a significant reduction in the number of visits to a PCP compared to TAU participants (ratio of rate ratios (RRR): 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.93) and a significant reduction in the number of non-PCP visits compared with TAU participants (RRR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.97) in the 7-years post-randomization compared to the 1-year pre-randomization. MN participants who received HF-ICM had a significant increase in incident visits to a PCP compared to TAU participants (RRR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.10-2.50). No effect of HF-ICM was observed on the incidence or number of non-PCP visits. CONCLUSION: HF has differing effects on visits to PCPs and non-PCPs among homeless people with high and moderate needs for mental health supports. HF does not result in a consistent increase in PCP and non-PCP visits over a 7-year follow-up period. The At Home/Chez Soi study is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN, ISRCTN42520374).
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Canadá , Estudios de Seguimiento , Vivienda , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
We assessed the effects of the Toronto Site Housing First (HF) intervention on hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits among homeless adults with mental illness over 7 years of follow-up. The Toronto Site is part of an unblinded multi-site randomized pragmatic trial of HF for homeless adults with mental illness in Canada, which followed participants up to 7 years. Five hundred seventy-five participants were recruited and classified as having high (HN) or moderate need (MN) for mental health support services. Each group was randomized into intervention (HF) and treatment as usual groups, and 567 (98.6%) consented to link their data to health administrative databases. HF participants received a monthly rent supplement of $600 (Canadian) and assertive community treatment (ACT) support or intensive care management (ICM) support based on need level. Treatment as usual (TAU) participants had access to social, housing, and health services generally available in the community. Outcomes included all-cause and mental health-specific hospitalization, number of days in hospital, and ED visit. We used GEE models to estimate ratio of rate ratios (RRR). The results showed HF with ACT had no significant effect on hospitalization rates among HN participants, but reduced the number of days in hospital (RRR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.63) and number of ED visits (RRR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.95). HF with ICM resulted in an increase in the number of hospitalizations (RRR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.09-2.60) and ED visit rates (RRR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.01-2.01) but had no effect in days in hospital for MN participants. Addressing the health needs of this population and reducing acute care utilization remain system priorities. Trial registration: http://www.isrctn.com/identifier: ISRCTN42520374.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Canadá , Vivienda , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Purpose: We examined the housing trajectories of homeless people with mental illness over a follow-up period of 6 years and the association of these trajectories with food security. We then examined the modifying role of psychopathology and alcohol and substance use disorders in this association. Materials and Methods: We followed 487 homeless adults with mental illness at the Toronto site of the At Home/Chez-Soi project-a randomized trial of Housing First. Food security data were collected seven times during the follow-up period. Psychopathology (Colorado Symptom Index score) and alcohol and substance use disorders were assessed at baseline. Housing trajectories were identified using group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between housing trajectory groups and food security. Results: Three housing trajectory groups were identified: rapid move to consistent stable housing (34.7%), slow and inconsistent housing (52.1%), and never moved to stable housing (13.2%). Individuals included in the rapid move to consistent housing trajectory group had higher odds of remaining food secure compared with those in the never moved to stable housing trajectory group over the follow-up period [AOR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.3-6.6, P-value: 0.009]. However, when interactions were considered, this association was significant among those with moderate psychopathology but not severe psychopathology. Individuals with substance use disorder and in the never moved to stable housing group had the lowest food security status. Discussion: Severe psychopathology and substance use disorders modified the association between housing trajectories and food security. International Standard Randomized Control Trial Number Register (ISRCTN42520374).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Homelessness constitutes a traumatic period that adversely impacts health and quality of life outcomes. The potential mitigating effects of resilience on quality of life levels in people experiencing homelessness are underresearched. This study assesses the longitudinal associations between resilience and quality of life scores among adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected over 6 years from participants (N = 575) of the At Home/Chez Soi study on Housing First, Toronto site. Repeatedly measured resilience scores are the primary exposure and repeatedly measured global quality of life scores and mental health-specific quality of life scores are the primary outcomes. Mixed effect models were used to assess the association between the exposures and the outcomes. RESULTS: The majority of the participants were men (69.2%) and were on average 40.4 (± 11.8) years old at baseline. The average resilience score ranged between 5.00 to 5.62 over 8 data collection points across the 6-year follow-up period. After adjusting for gender, age, ethno-racial background, Housing First intervention, physical and mental comorbidities, and lifetime homelessness, higher resilience scores were positively associated with higher Global quality of life (Adjusted-coefficient: 0.23, 95% CI 0.19-0.27) and mental health-related quality of life values (Adjusted-coefficient: 4.15, 95% CI 3.35-4.95). CONCLUSION: In homeless adults with mental illness, higher resilience levels were positively associated with higher global and mental health related quality of life values. Further interventions and services aimed to enhance resilience mechanisms and strategies are warranted to enhance better mental health and quality of life outcomes of this population group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: At Home/Chez Soi trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN42520374. Registered 18 September 2009, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN42520374.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Resiliencia Psicológica , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The associations between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and psychopathology have been well-established in the general population. Research on ACEs in the homeless population has been limited. This study examined whether ACE exposure is associated with specific mental health outcomes among a national sample of homeless adults with mental illness and whether this association varies according to ACE dimension and gender. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized data from a national sample of 2,235 homeless adults with mental illness in Canada to evaluate their sociodemographic characteristics, exposure to ACEs, and mental health outcomes. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to identify and confirm ACE dimensions (maltreatment, sexual abuse, neglect, divorce, and household dysfunction) from individual ACE items. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations between total ACE score and ACE dimensions with mental illness diagnoses and psychopathology severity. RESULTS: The mean total ACE score among all study participants was 4.44 (standard deviation [SD]: 2.99). Total ACE score was positively associated with several mental illness diagnoses and psychopathology severity. Unique associations were found between specific ACE dimensions and poor mental health outcomes. The prevalence of almost all ACEs was significantly higher among women. Yet, associations between several ACE dimensions and poor mental health outcomes existed uniquely among men. CONCLUSIONS: There are unique and gender-specific associations between specific ACE dimensions and mental health outcomes among homeless adults. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying these associations is needed to inform screening, prevention, and treatment efforts, particularly given the very high prevalence of ACEs among this vulnerable and marginalized population.
Asunto(s)
Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This review summarises and synthesises the existing literature on the relationship between food insecurity (FS) and mental health conditions among adult individuals experiencing homelessness. DESIGN: Scoping review. Papers published between 1 January 2008 and 2 November 2018, searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, using homelessness, food security and mental health keywords. SETTING: Global evidence. PARTICIPANTS: Homeless adults aged 18 years or more. RESULTS: Nine articles (eight cross-sectional and one longitudinal) were included in the present review. FS was measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale, the United States Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module, as well as single-item or constructed measures. Depression and depressive symptoms were the most common mental health conditions studied. Other mental health conditions assessed included alcohol and substance use, emotional disorders, mental health problems symptoms severity and psychiatric hospitalisations. Composite measures such as axis I and II categories and a cluster of severe mental conditions and mental health-related functioning status were also analysed. FS and mental health-related problems were considered as both exposure and outcome variables. The existing evidence suggests a potential association between FS and several mental health conditions, particularly depression, mental health symptoms severity and poor mental health status scores. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests the potential association between some mental health conditions and FS among homeless adults. However, there is a need for more longitudinal- and interventional-based studies, in order to understand the nature and directionality of the links between FS and mental health in this population group.
Asunto(s)
Inseguridad Alimentaria , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a Housing First (HF) intervention and health-related risk factors on incarceration among adults with experiences of homelessness and mental illness. METHODS: Participants (N = 508) were recruited at the Toronto site of the At Home/Chez Soi study. The outcome was incarceration in Ontario from 2009 to 2014. Exposures were intervention group (HF vs. treatment as usual), Axis I mental health diagnoses, emergency department (ED) visit, and history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Logistic regression was used to examine the association between exposures and incarceration. RESULTS: Of 508 participants, 220 (43.3%) were incarcerated at least once during the study period. Among those incarcerated, 81.9% were male, 52.7% had been diagnosed with alcohol dependence/abuse, 60.9% had been diagnosed with substance dependence/abuse, 65.1% reported having visited an ED within the last 6 months, and 66.4% had a history of TBI. After adjusting for demographic covariates, substance dependence/abuse (aOR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.40, 3.03), alcohol dependence/abuse (aOR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.22), ED visit (aOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.32), and history of TBI (aOR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.75, 3.85) were associated with incarceration. We found no significant effect of the HF intervention on incarceration outcome (aOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.55). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with experiences of homelessness and severe mental illness, those with substance and alcohol dependence/abuse disorders, history of TBI, and recent ED visits were at increased odds of incarceration. Strategies are needed to prevent and reduce incarceration for this population, including treatment of mental illness in the community.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Examiner l'effet d'une intervention de Logement d'abord (LD) et de facteurs de risque liés à la santé sur l'incarcération d'adultes ayant vécu des épisodes de sans-abrisme et de maladie mentale. MéTHODE: Les participants (N = 508) ont été recrutés sur le site torontois de l'étude At Home/Chez-Soi. L'issue à l'étude était l'incarcération en Ontario entre 2009 et 2014. Les expositions étaient le groupe d'intervention (LD vs. traitement habituel), les diagnostics de troubles de santé mentale de l'axe I, les visites aux services d'urgence (SU) et les antécédents de traumatisme cranio-cérébral (TCC). Nous avons procédé par régression logistique pour examiner l'association entre les expositions et l'incarcération. RéSULTATS: Sur 508 participants, 220 (43,3 %) avaient été incarcérés au moins une fois durant la période de l'étude. Chez les personnes incarcérées, 81,9 % étaient des hommes, 52,7 % avaient un diagnostic de dépendance à l'alcool ou d'abus d'alcool, 60,9 % avaient un diagnostic de dépendance à des substances ou d'abus de substances, 65,1 % ont dit avoir visité les SU au cours des 6 mois antérieurs, et 66,4 % avaient des antécédents de TCC. Après ajustement en fonction des covariables démographiques, la dépendance aux substances/l'abus de substances (rapport de cotes ajusté [RCa] : 2,06; IC de 95 % : 1,40, 3,03), la dépendance à l'alcool/l'abus d'alcool (RCa : 1,52, IC de 95 % : 1,04, 2,22), les visites aux SU (RCa : 1,54; IC de 95 % : 1,02, 2,32) et les antécédents de TCC (RCa : 2,60; IC de 95 % : 1,75, 3,85) étaient associés à l'incarcération. Nous n'avons observé aucun effet significatif de l'intervention de LD sur l'issue d'incarcération (RCa : 1,08; IC de 95 % : 0,76, 1,55). CONCLUSIONS: Chez les adultes ayant vécu des épisodes de sans-abrisme et de maladie mentale grave, ceux qui avaient des troubles de dépendance/d'abus de substances et d'alcool, des antécédents de TCC et qui avaient visité les SU récemment présentaient une probabilité accrue d'incarcération. Il faut des stratégies pour prévenir et réduire l'incarcération dans cette population, y compris des stratégies de traitement des maladies mentales hors du milieu carcéral.
Asunto(s)
Vivienda , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Prisioneros/psicología , Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Stigma and discrimination are negatively associated with social and health status. People who are homeless often experience systemic stigma and discrimination. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we analyze the longitudinal interrelationships between the trajectories of housing (housing stability) and well-being outcomes (i.e., recovery, quality of life, and community functioning) and the trajectories of discrimination and stigma in a sample of adults with mental illness and recent experiences of homelessness in Toronto, Canada. We also examined the effect of the Housing First (HF) intervention on these interrelationships. METHOD: The Group-Based Trajectory Model was used to estimate the interrelationship (or intersections) between discrimination and stigma with housing stability, recovery, quality of life, and community functioning in 274 participants of the At Home/Chez Soi, phase 2, Toronto site randomized trial over a two-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Three distinct trajectory groups were observed for discrimination (Low,Moderate decrease, and moderate increase), stigma (Low, Moderate, and High), recovery (Low, Moderate, and High), and the quality of life (Low, Moderate, and High). Two-trajectory groups (Low and High) were identified for housing stability and community functioning. The analyses showed that the trajectory groups for discrimination and stigma are strongly and contemporaneously interrelated with thetrajectory groups for housing stability, recovery, quality of life, and community functioning ability. The HF intervention had a mitigating effect on the changes across select trajectory groups, particularly for members of the Low and High discrimination and stigma trajectories group. CONCLUSION: Persistent mental health-related discrimination and stigma trajectories are longitudinally and contemporaneously interrelated with housing and well-being outcomes in persons experiencing mental illness and recent homelessness. These findings indicate the need for interventions and actions to reduce stigma toward thispopulation. Such interventions may improve housing stability, quality of life, mental health recovery, and community functioning.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Canadá , Vivienda , Humanos , Salud Mental , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: People experiencing homelessness have a high prevalence and incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to violence. Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions to reduce TBI in this population. This study assessed the effect of Housing First (HF) on violence-related TBI in adults with experiences of homelessness and mental illness. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised trial. PARTICIPANTS: 381 participants in the Toronto site of the At Home/Chez randomised trial. INTERVENTION: HF participants were provided with scattered-site housing using rent supplements and supports from assertive community treatment or intensive case management teams (n=218, 57.2%). Control participants had access to treatment as usual (TAU) in the community (n=163, 42.8%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were an incident physical violence-related TBI event and the number of physical violence-related TBI events during the follow-up period (January 2014 to March 2017). Interval-censored survival time regression and zero-inflated negative binomial regression were used to assess the effect of HF on primary outcomes. RESULTS: Among study participants, 9.2% (n=35) had an incident physical violence-related TBI event, and the mean physical violence-related TBI events was 0.16 (SD ±0.6). Compared with TAU participants, HF participants did not have a significantly lower risk of an incident violence-related TBI event (adjusted HR : 0.58 (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.14)), but they had a significantly lower number of physical violence-related TBI events (unadjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.22 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.78); adjusted IRR: 0.15 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.48)). CONCLUSION: HF may be a useful intervention to reduce the burden of TBI due to physical violence among homeless individuals with mental illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN42520374.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Canadá , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , ViolenciaRESUMEN
Early paternal involvement in infant care is beneficial to child and maternal health, and possibly for paternal mental health. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between fathers' involvement in early infant parenting and their depressive symptoms during the infant's first year in a sample of 881 low-income Black, Hispanic, and White fathers recruited from five sites in the United States (urban, mixed urban/suburban, rural). Home interviews at 1 month after birth assessed three concepts based on prior research and community input: (1) time spent with the infant, (2) parenting self-efficacy, (3) material support for the baby. Paternal depressive symptoms at 1, 6, and 12 months after the birth of a child were assessed with the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale. Generalized estimating equations tested whether the three indicators of father involvement at 1 month after birth predicted lower subsequent paternal depressive symptoms controlling for social and demographic variables. For fathers, greater time spent with the infant, parenting self-efficacy, and material support were all significantly associated with lower paternal depressive symptoms during the first year. When risk of depression (scores > 9) was examined, only parenting self-efficacy among fathers was associated with higher likelihood of clinical depression. Findings have implications for future research on mechanisms linking paternal involvement and paternal mental health, and for possible paid paternal leave policies in the future.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined how food insecurity changes over time when living with severe mental disorders or substance use disorders. This study identifies food insecurity trajectories of homeless adults participating in a trial of a housing intervention and examines whether receiving the intervention and having specific mental and substance disorders predict food insecurity trajectories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 520 participants in the Toronto site of the At Home/Chez-Soi project. Food insecurity data were collected at seven times during a follow-up period of up to 5.5 years. Mental and substance use disorders were assessed at baseline. Food insecurity trajectories were identified using group based-trajectory modeling. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the effects of the intervention and mental and substance use disorders on food insecurity trajectories. RESULTS: Four food insecurity trajectories were identified: persistently high food insecurity, increasing food insecurity, decreasing food insecurity, and consistently low food insecurity. Receiving the intervention was not a predictor of membership in any specific food insecurity trajectory group. Individuals with major depressive episode, mood disorder with psychotic features, substance disorder, and co-occurring disorder (defined as having at least one alcohol or other substance use disorder and at least one non-substance related mental disorder] were more likely to remain in the persistently high food insecurity group than the consistently low food insecurity group. CONCLUSION: A persistently high level of food insecurity is common among individuals with mental illness who have experienced homelessness, and the presence of certain mental health disorders increases this risk. Mental health services combined with access to resources for basic needs, and re-adaptation training are required to enhance the health and well-being of this population.