Long term clinical outcomes in DES implantation for unprotected left main disease.

AIM: Generate a long term follow-up and evaluate the impact of clinical and procedural characteristics on long term events in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients who underwent PCI with DES, either sirolimus (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), for de novo lesions in ULMCA were analyzed. No patients were excluded. Mean follow-up was 3 years (range 1-6.7 years). RESULTS: Technical and procedural success rate were 100% and 95.9%. According to the Academic Research Consortium definitions, cardiac death occurred in 6.1% of patients, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) occurred in 6.1%, 17.5% and 4.2% of patients respectively. Definite stent thrombosis (ST) incidence was 1%, whereas possible ST occurred in 4.2% of patients. Postdilation was performed in 49.5% of patients and was, among all clinical and procedural characteristics, the only factor at multivariate analysis significantly related to lower MACE (25% vs. 46.9%, P=0.024, CI: 0.202 to 0.889) and TVR (8.3% vs. 26.5%, P=0.03 CI: 0.096-0.895). CONCLUSION: Long term follow-up in PCI of ULMCA disease shows favorable clinical results. Stent postdilation seems to have a protective role in DES PCI for ULMCA disease.

Effects of EPC capture stent and CD34+ mobilization in acute myocardial infarction.

AIM: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with the main limitation of in-stent restenosis for BMS and late stent thrombosis (ST) for both BMS and DES. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) CD34+ capture stents, promoting vascular healing, may be advantageous in preventing ST. Aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of AMI patients treated with EPC CD34+ capture stent and describe the mobilization kinetics of CD34+ and their clinical correlation. METHODS: Fifty AMI patients underwent primary PCI with EPC CD34+ capture stent. Serial assays of CD34+ were performed by flow-cytometric analysis. RESULTS: Procedural success rate was 100%. At six-months follow-up cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) occurred respectively in 2%, 4%, 10% and 12% of patients. No case of ST was observed. The MACE-free survival was 81,2%. The mean peak value of plasmatic CD34+ was 4.69±3.76 cells/µL. A positive correlation was found between CD34+ concentration, age and infarct area. No correlation was detected between CD34+ concentration and occurrence of TVR, TLR and MACE. CONCLUSION: EPC capture stent implantation seems to be safe and effective in the clinical setting of AMI, representing a possible alternative to BMS and DES. CD34+ cells plasmatic concentration seems not to correlate to coronary restenosis and atheromasic disease progression.

Impact of drug-eluting stent selection on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the sirolimus vs paclitaxel drug-eluting stent for left main registry (SP-DELFT).

AIM: To compare the long-term relative efficacy and safety of SES and PES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease and to evaluate the role of lesion location and stenting technique in determining outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2002 to April 2004, 288 consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI with DES implantation for de novo lesions on ULMCA have been retrospectively selected and analyzed in seven European and US tertiary care centers. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 3 years. SES was used in 152 patients while 136 received PES. Isolated ostial-shaft disease was present in 27% of patients. Distal LM disease (73%) was treated with single and double stent approach in 29.5% and 43.4% of patients respectively. After 3 years, rates of survival free from any of the events investigated, were independent from lesion location and stenting approach and did not differ significantly between SES and PES groups. Freedom from MACE (SES vs. PES) was 76.3% vs. 83.1% in the ostial/shaft group, 80.3% vs. 72.8% in the distal-single stent group and 67.1% vs. 66.2% in the distal-double stent group. Definite stent thrombosis occurred only in 1(0.3%) patient at 439 days. CONCLUSIONS: In elective patients who underwent PCI for de novo lesions in the ostium, shaft or distal ULMCA, long-term clinical outcomes with SES and PES use were similar independently of lesion location and stenting technique.

Acute effects of alcohol septal ablation on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) often leads to heart failure, severe symptoms and death. Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation (PTSMA) by alcohol injection efficiently reduces left ventricular (LV) outflow tract pressure gradient and improves symptoms. We determined acute changes in haemodynamics and systolic and diastolic LV function after PTSMA. METHODS: In 17 consecutive patients with symptomatic HOCM referred for PTSMA, the target vessel was determined by myocardial contrast transthoracic echocardiography. An over-the-wire balloon was inflated in the target vessel and multiple 0.5-ml alcohol injections were performed. LV systolic and diastolic function was assessed by online pressure-volume loops obtained by conductance catheter at baseline and acutely after the procedure. RESULTS: In all patients except two, a single septal branch was treated using a total of 2.0 (0.5) ml ethanol per patient. The rest and post-extrasystolic gradient were significantly decreased after PTSMA (79 (38) to 14 (16) mm Hg and 130 (50) to 34 (33) mm Hg, respectively, both p<0.001). Ejection fraction decreased (78% (9%) to 67% (13%), p<0.001). Cardiac output, heart rate and stroke work were unchanged, but systolic and diastolic volume increased. End-systolic and end-diastolic pressure significantly decreased (166 (27) to 129 (26) mm Hg, p<0.001 and 25 (6) to 21 (7) mm Hg, p = 0.049, respectively). Significant rightward shift (p<0.001) and decreased slope (p = 0.041) of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation indicated reduced contractility, whereas diastolic stiffness, -dP/dt(MIN), and tau were significantly improved after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: PTSMA acutely reduced systolic function but promptly improved diastolic function with maintained cardiac output and stroke work. Improved diastolic function and increased end-diastolic volume compensated for the systolic loss and resulted in maintained haemodynamics.

Surgical revascularization in the ischemic heart disease. Long-term results in a series of consecutive patients selected according to the principles.

AIM: Ischemic heart disease can be treated with drugs, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and surgical revascularization (CABG). In our institution the therapeutic decisions for non emergent cases have been regularly taken during a daily meeting attended by clinicians, interventionalists, and surgeons, who all adhere to the principles of Evidence Based Medicine. The purpose of the present report is to investigate the long-term results in a series of consecutive patients to whom surgical revascularization has been recommended following the abovementioned approach. METHODS: We selected 597 patients with no prior interventions, who were referred to our institution for coronary angiography between January 1991 and December 1997 and to whom surgical revascularization was recommended. The Kaplan-Meier method was adopted to evaluate survival and freedom from: non fatal acute myocardial infarction, PCI, repeat CABG. RESULTS: The results were compared to those of the randomized trials or of large follow-up reports. The mean observation period was 6.8 years. The results at 5 and 10 years were: overall survival 95.5% and 90.2%; freedom from acute myocardial infarction 95.5% and 90.2%; freedom from surgical reintervention 98.6% and 97.1%; freedom from PCI 91.2% and 79.8%; survival free from all events 79.3% and 58.1%. These rates were comparable to those reported by the most important clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: If surgical treatment for patient with coronary artery disease is recommended according to the suggestions of the leading clinical trials and pertinent guidelines, the results in terms of mortality and morbidity are comparable to those of the trials themselves, even in the non selected patients of daily clinical practice.