Effect of repeated microwave disinfections on bonding of different commercial teeth to resin denture base.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the influence of repeated microwave disinfections on the shear bond strength of two commercial types of teeth to acrylic resin, when the ridge lap surfaces were unmodified, bur abraded, bur grooved or etched by monomer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty specimens (n = 10) were adhered to the tooth ridge lap surface, polymerised in a water bath at 74°C for 9 h. Microwaved specimens were individually immersed in 150 ml of water and submitted to five simulated disinfections in a microwave oven calibrated at 650 W for 3 min. Control specimens were not microwave treated. Shear bond strength tests were performed in an Instron machine with a cross-speed of 1 mm/min. The fracture load values were transformed into shear bond strength as a function of the bonding area (0.28 cm(2)). Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Fractured areas were classified as adhesive, cohesive (resin or tooth) or mixed failures. RESULTS: Repeated microwave disinfections increased the shear strength of the tooth/resin bond. Mechanical retention in microwaved and non-microwaved procedures improved the shear bond strength. CONCLUSIONS: The different commercial types of teeth influenced shear bond strength values, with Biotone teeth showing the lower values.

Effect of ridge-lap surface treatments on the bond of resin teeth to denture base.

PURPOSE: To test in vitro the shear bond strength of resin teeth to an acrylic resin denture base given different ridgelap surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety rectangular dies were made with wax and traditionally invested in metallic or plastic flasks. The stone molds were covered with silicone, in which were included an acrylic molar with a wax stick fixed on the ridge lap surface. After deflasking, the wax sticks were removed, the teeth were cleaned with detergent, the ridge lap surface was submitted to different treatments (unmodified, bur-cut grooves, aluminum oxide particle sandblasting, monomer swelling, and primer swelling), and the teeth were replaced in the silicone molds. Metallic flasks were placed in a thermopolymerizing unit to polymerize heat-curing denture-base polymer, and plastic flasks were placed in a domestic microwave oven at 900 W to polymerize microwaveable denture base polymer. After deflasking, the specimens were submitted to the shear bond test in an Instron machine at a cross-speed of 1 mm/min. Results were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). RESULTS: Shear bond strength values were influenced by the ridge-lap surface treatments only in the microwaved polymer. Sandblasting + monomer swelling and sandblasting + primer swelling interactions yielded lower strengths for microwaved polymer. Only the unmodified surfaces presented a significant difference when the resins were compared, where the microwaved polymer showed a higher value. CONCLUSION: Different tooth ridge-lap surface treatments promoted different strengths of the tooth/resin bond.

Effect of repeated simulated disinfections by microwave energy on the complete denture base adaptation.

This study evaluated the effect of repeated microwave disinfections on the adaptation of the maxillar denture base using 2 different flask closure methods. Twenty stone cast-wax base sets were prepared for flasking by traditional cramp or RS system methods. Five bases for each method were submitted to 5 repeated simulated disinfections in a microwave oven with 650W for 3 minutes. Control bases were not disinfected. Three transverse cuts were made through each stone cast-resin base set, corresponding to canine, first molar, and posterior region. Measurements were made using an optical micrometer at 5 points for each cut to determine base adaptation: left and right marginal limits of the flanges, left and right ridge crests, and midline. Results for base adaptation performed by the flask closure methods were: traditional cramp (non-disinfected = 0.21 +/- 0.05mm and disinfected = 0.22 +/- 0.05mm), and RS system (non-disinfected = 0.16 +/- 0.05 and disinfected = 0.17 +/- 0.04mm). Collected data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test (alpha=.05). Repeated simulated disinfections by microwave energy did not cause deleterious effect on the base adaptation, when the traditional cramp and RS system flask closure methods were compared.