Pitfalls of social media for aesthetic eye surgery patients: assessing YouTube's aesthetic canthoplasty content.

PURPOSE: YouTube, a popular source for diverse information, hosts a wealth of content on aesthetic canthoplasty. Yet, concerns linger about the accuracy and reliability of these videos, with potential for inaccuracies, biases, or misleading information. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube content on this sought-after facial enhancement procedure. METHODS: The study employs four distinct scoring tools: the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET), the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), and the Video Power Index (VPI). RESULTS: Analysis of a total of 173 YouTube videos relevant to aesthetic canthoplasty revealed scores that were primarily indicative of poor quality and reliability.(Mean score ± SD, PEMAT A/V: 30.75 ± 28.8, MQ-VET: 28.57 ± 12.6, GQS: 1.7 ± 1) Notably, these videos were predominantly uploaded by healthcare professionals (82.1%), and they focused more on advertisements (46.2%) than on scientific or educational information. Their elevated viewership and engagement metrics (likes, comments, and shares) attest to their significant popularity and influence. (Mean VPI score: 176.6 ± 635.8). CONCLUSION: YouTube's influence on aesthetic eyelid surgery is undeniable, shaping patient choices and expectations. However, unrealistic beauty ideals, heightened body dissatisfaction, and social comparisons lurk within its content, potentially harming psychological well-being and surgical decisions. Prioritizing qualified medical guidance and critical evaluation of online information are crucial for patients. Authors and platforms must act responsibly: authors by producing high-quality content, platforms by tackling misinformation.

Association of Retinal Vein Occlusion With Serum Osmolality and Hydration Status.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate serum osmolality and hydration status in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of 79 patients with RVO and 81 age- and sex-matched peers without ocular disease. Data were collected from patient records and included a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, laboratory data of fasting blood test results, and internal medicine outpatient examination. Complete blood count and levels of fasting glucose, sodium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, HbA1c, and serum osmolality were evaluated. BUN/creatinine ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Mean serum sodium and serum osmolality levels were 142.53 ± 2.13 and 139.74 ± 2.16 mEq/L and 286.58 ± 4.40 and 280.57 ± 4.39 mOsmol/kg H2O in the RVO and control groups, respectively. Serum osmolality and serum sodium levels, and BUN/creatinine ratio were significantly higher in the RVO group than in controls (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: We found that serum osmolality, sodium levels, and the BUN/creatinine ratio increased significantly in the RVO group. The results suggest dehydration status may affect the genesis of vessel occlusion in RVO. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:130-135.].

Is serum vitamin D associated with diabetic retinopathy and its severity or with diabetes itself ?

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency, which is found in approximately one-third of the population of the world, may play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Physicians following diabetes patients should be aware of this relationship and should refer patients to for ophthalmic care for control in a timely manner. BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy is one of the most common complications of diabetic microvascular disease. VitD deficiency has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetes and may have a role in development and severity of diabetic retinopathy. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of serum VitD and some laboratory parameters with the presence of diabetes and retinopathy. METHODS: In this study, which has a retrospective epidemiological study design, comprehensive ophthalmologic examination data from the eye clinic, laboratory data from fasting blood tests, and internal medicine outpatient clinic examination data were reviewed. All participants were divided into four groups: 109 healthy controls, and 165 patients with type 2 diabetes of whom 54 did not have retinopathy, 64 had proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and 47 had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Participants were also divided into four groups according to their serum VitD levels. Serum 25(OH)D, HbA1C, creatine, calcium, phosphate, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein levels were evaluated. RESULTS: In the whole study cohort, 152 (55.5%) were female and 122 (44.5%) were male. A statistically significant difference was observed in VitD between the healthy group and the diabetic and proliferative diabetic retinopathy groups (p ≤ 0.001). However, no significant correlation was observed between the presence of diabetes and retinopathy and serum VitD in logistic regression analyses (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients have lower 25(OH)D than non-diabetic patients and there is no direct relationship between 25(OH)D and the development of diabetic retinopathy.