RESUMEN
AIMS: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is one of the main causes of neonatal deaths. The objective of this study was to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) in neonatal rats with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, as well as its effect on neuronal apoptosis through histopathological and biochemical tests. METHODS: Forty-seven-dayold rats with induced hypoxiaischemia (HI) were randomly separated into four groups. Half an hour after the induction of hypoxic-ischemia, serum physiological (SF), 50 µmol/kg NaHS, or 100 µmol/kg NaHS were intraperitoneally given to the rats. RESULTS: Apoptotic cells in the brain tissue of rats in HI + NaHS 50 µmol/kg, and HI + NaHS 100 µmol/kg groups decreased compared to HI group (p = 0.00). While HI + NaHS 50 µmol/kg and HI + NaHS 100 µmol/kg groups yielded no difference in TNF-α, IL-6, and iNOS levels as compared to the HI group, an increase in NGF was detected in the 50 µmol/kg and 100 µmol/kg NaHS groups (p = 0.34, p = 0.24, p = 0.26, p = 0.026, p = 0.017). When TOS, TAS and OSI levels were compared, an increase in TAS and OSI and a decrease in TOS were observed in the treatment groups as compared to HI group. CONCLUSIONS: NaHS given to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy model significantly decreased apoptosis in neurons and had a neuroprotective efficacy with an increase in NGF levels (Tab. 1, Fig. 3, Ref. 25).
Asunto(s)
Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica , Fármacos Neuroprotectores , Sulfuros/farmacología , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Apoptosis , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuronas/efectos de los fármacos , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , RatasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the use of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) with postoperative autologous transfusion (PAT) in terms of blood loss, need for allogeneic blood transfusion, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Records of 25 men and 125 women (mean age, 67 years) who underwent primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and were randomised to the PAT group (n=50), topical TXA group (n=50), or routine drainage group (control) [n=50] were reviewed. Pre- and post-operative haemoglobin level, total postoperative drainage volume, and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion were recorded. RESULTS: The 3 groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, and preoperative haemoglobin level. The total postoperative drainage volume was lower in the TXA group than the PAT or routine drainage groups (174.48 vs. 735 vs. 760 ml, p<0.001). The postoperative haemoglobin level was lower in the routine drainage group than the PAT or TXA groups on day 1 (11.67 vs. 12.33 vs. 12.40 g/dl, p<0.001) and day 3 (9.9 vs. 10.7 vs. 11.14 g/dl, p<0.001). The number of patients who received allogeneic blood transfusion was higher in the routine drainage group (12 and 4 patients received 1 and 2 units of blood, respectively) than the PAT group (4 patients received 1 unit of blood) or the TXA group (none required transfusion) [p<0.001], and the respective total transfusion cost was $1200, $240, and $0. The total cost was lowest in the TXA group followed by the routine drainage group and PAT group ($200 vs. $1200 vs. $12 390). No patient developed acute infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, or stroke. CONCLUSION: Compared with PAT, topical TXA was more cost-effective and resulted in less total postoperative drainage volume and less need for allogeneic blood transfusion.