Grinding efficiency of abutment tooth with both dentin and core composite resin on axial plane.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate grinding efficiency in abutment teeth comprising both dentin and core composite resin in the axial plane. Grinding was performed over 5 runs at two loads (0.5 or 0.25 N) and two feed rates (1 or 2 mm/sec). The grinding surface was observed with a 3-D laser microscope. Tomographic images of the grinding surfaces captured perpendicular to the feed direction were also analyzed. Using a non-ground surface as a reference, areas comprising only dentin, both dentin and core composite resin, or only core composite resin were analyzed to determine the angle of the grinding surface. Composite resins were subjected to the Vickers hardness test and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparison tests. Multiple regression analysis was performed for load, feed rate, and Vickers hardness of the build-up material depending on number of runs. When grinding was performed at a constant load and feed rate, a greater grinding angle was observed in areas comprising both dentin and composite resin or only composite resin than in areas consisting of dentin alone. A correlation was found between machinability and load or feed rate in areas comprising both dentin and composite resin or composite resin alone, with a particularly high correlation being observed between machinability and load. These results suggest that great caution should be exercised in a clinical setting when the boundary between the dentin and composite resin is to be ground, as the angle of the grinding surface changes when the rotating diamond point begins grinding the composite resin.

Time course analysis of influence of food hardness on head posture and pitching of head during masticatory movement.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between mastication and head posture using foods with different degrees of hardness. A total of 12 healthy, dentulous volunteers participated in the study. Each participant was required to chew two types of gummy candy with two levels of hardness while sitting upright. Measurements were conducted using an optoelectric jaw-tracking system with 6 degrees of freedom (Gnatho-Hexagraph II JM-2000®). The horizontal plane perpendicular to the direction of gravitational force served as the reference plane. Analysis of the gradient of the Frankfurt plane (head posture) and pitching of the head during masticatory movement was conducted. The influence of the type of test food on these parameters was evaluated during mastication. During stable mastication, the gradient of the Frankfurt plane was 4.66 degrees on average, close to the horizontal plane. The time course of the Frankfurt plane gradient revealed a tendency toward dorsal flexion during the first to middle phases of mastication, and a tendency toward ventral flexion during the middle to last phases, regardless of the hardness of the test food. The participants were divided into two groups based on change in head posture during chewing. The results showed while there was no change in head posture in the group with marked pitching of the head, head posture did change in the group with little pitching.

Influence of proximal supportive design of zirconia framework on fracture load of veneering porcelain.

The purpose of the present study is to examine the relationship between the supportive designs of proximal region of zirconia framework on the fracture load. The zirconia frameworks with four different supportive designs on the proximal region were fabricated and classified with their radiuses of curvature (R): R=0.5 mm, R=1.0 mm, R=1.5 mm, and R=2.0 mm. The zirconia frameworks were conditioned with sandblast and veneering porcelain was fired. Subsequently, fracture tests were performed at 3 different load points: right above the lowest point of the boundary between veneering porcelain and zirconia framework; 0.5 mm inside from right above point; and 0.5 mm outside from right above point. The fracture load increased with an increase in the radius of curvature of supportive design when loading was applied from above and inside. This suggested that supportive design influenced the fracture load.

Effect of connector design on fracture resistance of zirconia all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between cross-sectional design and fracture load using a static load bearing test in yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic frameworks on a molar fixed partial denture. The test framework was designed as a 3-unit bridge with two abutment teeth at the second premolar and second molar of the mandible. The cross-sectional area of the connector was 9.0, 7.0, or 5.0mm(2). In terms of shape, the cross-section was either circular or oval, with a height/width ratio of 1:1, 3:4, or 2:3. For each of the 9 combinations of cross-sectional area and shape, 5 frameworks were prepared (45 in total). Frameworks were cemented to a metallic test model with adhesive resin cement. After fracture load was measured, the percentage of fracture sites was determined and the fracture surfaces observed. In terms of cross-sectional area, there was a statistically significant difference in fracture load between 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0mm(2). No significant difference in fracture load was observed between any two shapes of connector (p>0.05). The fracture load of all frameworks with a cross-sectional area of 9.0 or 7.0mm(2) was over 880 N, which was recognized as parafunctional occlusal force. Fracture occurred at the distal connector in 82.2% of all frameworks on average. Fracture load decreased as cross-sectional area of the connector became smaller. The cross-sectional shape used in the present study was less influential on fracture load. It appears to be clinical possible to apply a connector with a cross-sectional area of 7.0mm(2). Fracture often occurred at the distal connector between the pontic and the abutment, corresponding to the second molar.

Long-term observation of porous sapphire dental implants.

We used porous sapphire dental implants made of alumina clinically for 4 years 1 month, commencing September, 1984 until September, 1988. Subjects consisted of 18 men and 42 women 20-71 years old (mean age: 35 years). Sixty-five implants were inserted in 60 patients. Of these, 20 were clinical cases of an implant connected with natural teeth and 45 were free-standing cases. We conducted a follow-up study on these patients over a 23-year period. One implant in 1 patient had to be removed because of postoperative infection and 8 implants in 7 patients had to be removed because of fracturing or detachment of the porous-part. This paper reports 3 cases where implants remained in place for 21-23 years. These cases have all shown good long-term clinical progress.