Whole blood for old blood: Use of whole blood for resuscitation in older trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients are expected to comprise 40 % of trauma admissions in the next 30 years. The use of whole blood (WB) has shown promise in improving mortality while lowering the utilization of blood products. However, the use of WB in older trauma patients has not been examined. The objective of our study is to determine the safety and efficacy of a WB first transfusion strategy in injured older patients. METHODS: Older trauma patients, defined as age ≥55 years old, were reviewed from March 2016-November 2021. Patients that received a WB first resuscitation strategy were compared to those that received a ratio based component strategy. Demographics as well as complications rates, blood product transfusion volumes, and mortality were evaluated. Univariate and multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: There were 388 older trauma patients that received any blood products during the study period. A majority of patients received a WB first resuscitation strategy (83 %). Compared to patients that received component therapy, patients that received WB first were more likely female, less likely to have a penetrating mechanism, and had a slightly lower injury severity score. The-30 day mortality rate was comparable (WB 36% vs component 37 %, p = 0.914). While rates of AKI were slightly higher in those that received WB, this did not result in increased rates of renal replacement therapy (3 % vs 2 %, p = 1). Further, compared to patients that received components, patients that were resuscitated with a WB first strategy significantly utilized lower median volumes of platelets (0 mL vs 197 mL, p < 0.001), median volumes of plasma (0 mL vs 1253 mL, p < 0.001, and median total volume of blood products (1000 mL vs 2859 mL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of WB in the older trauma patient appears safe, with mortality and complication rates comparable to component therapy. Blood product utilization is significantly less in those that are resuscitated with WB first.

Evaluation of a Novel Emergency General Surgery Handover: A Prospective Feasibility Study.

INTRODUCTION: High-quality health information handovers are critical to optimal patient care and trainee education. The purposes of this study were to assess the feasibility of implementing an emergency general surgery (EGS) morning handover and to explore its impact upon markers of clinical care. METHODS: This prospective feasibility study was conducted at a single academic tertiary-care medical center following implementation of a novel EGS morning handover process. We assessed organizational perspective through a two-part anonymous survey delivered to the EGS service staff (n = 29) and collected feasibility metrics daily at the morning handover meetings. Exploratory clinical metrics of quality improvement were compared between parallel 5-month periods preimplementation and postimplementation of the handover. Data were compared by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen patients from March 1, 2022, to July 31, 2022, and 185 patients from March 1, 2023, to July 31, 2023, were identified prehandover and posthandover implementation, respectively, with an increase in time to operating room posting by 49% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.14) and no statistically significant change in length of stay. The average duration of the formalized EGS morning handover was 14 min (95% CI: 12:18-15:42) having an average of 12 questions asked (95% CI: 9.98-14.02) and an average attendance of 70% from essential personnel. Eighty-four percent of postimplementation survey responses indicated positive regard toward the new EGS handover. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an EGS morning handover is feasible, necessitating further studies to define the impact of the EGS morning handover upon clinical outcomes.

Multisociety research collaboration: timing of cholecystectomy following cholecystostomy drainage for acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) presenting with unfavorable systemic or local conditions are often managed with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) as a temporary measure. The clinical outcomes of interval cholecystectomy following PC remain unclear. The aim of the study was to identify the association between the timing of cholecystectomy following PC for AC and perioperative complication rates at interval cholecystectomy. We hypothesized that there would be a specific time interval to cholecystectomy associated with lower risk for adverse events. METHODS: This was a retrospective (2018-2020) multicenter study at 8 participating hospital systems of adult patients with AC, managed with PC and interval cholecystectomy. Demographics, comorbidities, treatment details, and outcomes were examined. Patients were grouped based on quartiles for timing of surgery after PC (< 7, 7-9, 10-13, > 13 weeks). The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of bile duct injury, reoperation, readmission, image-guided intervention, endoscopic intervention, conversion to open surgery, or death. RESULTS: There were 188 patients with a median age of 66 years with AC classified as mild (41%), moderate (47%), and severe (12%). Median days from PC to surgery were 65 (Q1 = 48, Q3 = 91). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (89.9%) was the most commonly planned approach (robotic 6.4%, 3.7% open) and 28 (14.9%) were converted to open. The composite endpoint was reported in 51 patients (27.1%). A biliary injury occurred in 7 (3.7%) patients. Time to surgery and intraoperative drain placement were independently associated with the composite outcome. Cholecystectomy within 7 weeks of PC was associated with decreased risk (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.13-0.97) of the composite endpoint, compared to patients undergoing surgery > 13 weeks after PC. CONCLUSION: Timing of surgery following PC was associated with procedural outcomes. Patients undergoing surgery before 7 weeks experienced significantly less morbidity than patients having delayed cholecystectomy. These results should be considered in patient selection and management after PC.

Standardizing quality utilization of interventional radiology treatments of blunt splenic injury: SQUIRTS study.

OBJECTIVES: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is well accepted in appropriate patients. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) in higher-grade injuries likely plays an important role in increasing the success of NOM. We previously implemented a protocol requiring referral of all BSI grades III-V undergoing NOM for SAE. It is unknown the risk of complications as well as longitudinal outcomes. We aimed to examine the splenic salvage rate and safety profile of the protocol. We hypothesized the splenic salvage rate would be high and complications would be low. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at our Level 1 trauma center over a 9-year period. Injury characteristics and outcomes in patients sustaining BSI grades III-V were collected. Outcomes were compared for NOM on protocol (SAE) and off protocol (no angiography or angiography but no embolization). Complications for angiographies were examined. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and February 2019, 570 patients had grade III-V BSI. NOM was attempted in 359 (63 %) with overall salvage rate of 91 % (328). Of these, 305 were on protocol while 54 were off protocol (41 no angiography and 13 angiography but no SAE). During the study period, for every grade of injury a pattern was seen of a higher salvage rate in the on-protocol group when compared to the off-protocol group (Grade III, 97 %(181/187) vs. 89 %(32/36), Grade IV, 91 %(98/108) vs. 69 %(9/13) and Grade V, 80 %(8/10 vs. 0 %(0/5). The overall salvage rate was 94 %(287) on protocol vs. 76 %(41) off protocol (p < 0.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications occurred in only 8 of the 318 who underwent angiography (2 %). These included 5 access complications and 3 abscesses. CONCLUSION: The use of a protocol requiring routine splenic artery embolization for all high-grade spleen injuries slated for non-operative management is safe with a very low complication rate. NOM with splenic angioembolization failure rate is improved as compared to non-SAE patients' at all higher grades of injury. Thus, SAE for all hemodynamically stable patients of all high-grade types should be considered as a primary form of therapy for such injuries.

Eliminating the benzos: A benzodiazepine-sparing approach to preventing and treating alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) represents significant cost to the hospitalized trauma population from a clinical and financial perspective. Historically, AWS has been managed with benzodiazepines. Despite their efficacy, benzodiazepines carry a heavy adverse effect profile. Recently, benzodiazepine-sparing protocols for the prophylaxis and treatment of AWS have been used in medical patient populations. Most existing benzodiazepine-sparing protocols use phenobarbital, while ours primarily uses gabapentin and clonidine, and no such protocol has been developed and examined for safety and efficacy specifically within a trauma population. METHODS: In December of 2019, we implemented our benzodiazepine-sparing protocol for trauma patients identified at risk for alcohol withdrawal on admission. Trauma patients at risk for AWS admitted to an academic Level 1 trauma center before (conventional) and after (benzodiazepine-sparing [BS]) protocol implementation were compared. Outcomes examined include morphine milligram equivalent dosing rates and lorazepam equivalent dosing rates as well as the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) scores, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and ventilator days. RESULTS: A total of 387 conventional and 134 benzodiazepine sparing patients were compared. Injury Severity Score (13 vs. 16, p = 0.10) and admission alcohol levels (99 vs. 149, p = 0.06) were similar. Patients in the BS pathway had a lower maximum daily CIWA-Ar (2.7 vs. 1.5, p = 0.04). While mean morphine milligram equivalent per day was not different between groups (31.5 vs. 33.6, p = 0.49), mean lorazepam equivalents per day was significantly lower in the BS group (1.1 vs. 0.2, p < 0.01). Length of stay and vent days were not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a benzodiazepine-sparing pathway that uses primarily clonidine and gabapentin to prevent and treat alcohol withdrawal syndrome in trauma patients is safe, reduces the daily maximum CIWA-Ar, and significantly decreases the need for benzodiazepines. Future studies will focus on outcomes affected by avoiding AWS and benzodiazepines in the trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Sigh Ventilation in Patients With Trauma: The SiVent Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Among patients receiving mechanical ventilation, tidal volumes with each breath are often constant or similar. This may lead to ventilator-induced lung injury by altering or depleting surfactant. The role of sigh breaths in reducing ventilator-induced lung injury among trauma patients at risk of poor outcomes is unknown. Objective: To determine whether adding sigh breaths improves clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pragmatic, randomized trial of sigh breaths plus usual care conducted from 2016 to 2022 with 28-day follow-up in 15 academic trauma centers in the US. Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, mechanical ventilation because of trauma for less than 24 hours, 1 or more of 5 risk factors for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, expected duration of ventilation longer than 24 hours, and predicted survival longer than 48 hours. Interventions: Sigh volumes producing plateau pressures of 35 cm H2O (or 40 cm H2O for inpatients with body mass indexes >35) delivered once every 6 minutes. Usual care was defined as the patient's physician(s) treating the patient as they wished. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was ventilator-free days. Prespecified secondary outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality. Results: Of 5753 patients screened, 524 were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 43.9 [19.2] years; 394 [75.2%] were male). The median ventilator-free days was 18.4 (IQR, 7.0-25.2) in patients randomized to sighs and 16.1 (IQR, 1.1-24.4) in those receiving usual care alone (P = .08). The unadjusted mean difference in ventilator-free days between groups was 1.9 days (95% CI, 0.1 to 3.6) and the prespecified adjusted mean difference was 1.4 days (95% CI, -0.2 to 3.0). For the prespecified secondary outcome, patients randomized to sighs had 28-day mortality of 11.6% (30/259) vs 17.6% (46/261) in those receiving usual care (P = .05). No differences were observed in nonfatal adverse events comparing patients with sighs (80/259 [30.9%]) vs those without (80/261 [30.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In a pragmatic, randomized trial among trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation with risk factors for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, the addition of sigh breaths did not significantly increase ventilator-free days. Prespecified secondary outcome data suggest that sighs are well-tolerated and may improve clinical outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02582957.

Reclaiming the management of common duct stones in acute care surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) is well positioned to manage choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but barriers to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) include experience and the perceived need for specialized equipment. The technical complexity of this pathway is generally seen as challenging. As such, LCBDE is historically relegated to the "enthusiast." However, a simplified, effective LCBDE technique as part of a "surgery first" strategy could drive wider adoption in the specialty most often managing these patients. To determine efficacy and safety, we sought to compare our initial ACS-driven experience with a simple, fluoroscopy-guided, catheter-based LCBDE approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to LC with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We reviewed ACS patients who underwent LCBDE or LC + ERCP (pre-/postoperative) at a tertiary care center in the 4 years since starting this surgery first approach. Demographics, outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) were compared on an intention to treat basis. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed via using wire/catheter Seldinger techniques under fluoroscopic guidance with flushing or balloon dilation of the sphincter as needed. Our primary outcomes were LOS and successful duct clearance. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients were treated for choledocholithiasis with 71 undergoing LCBDE. The success rate of catheter-based LCBDE was 70.4%. Length of stay was significantly reduced for the LCBDE group compared with the LC + ERCP group (48.8 vs. 84.3 hours, p < 0.01). Of note, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in the LCBDE group. CONCLUSION: A simplified catheter-based approach to LCBDE is safe and associated with decreased LOS when compared with LC + ERCP. This simplified step-up approach may help facilitate wider LCBDE utilization by ACS providers who are well positioned for a timely surgery first approach in the management of uncomplicated choledocholithiasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury: contribution of Timothy C Fabian MD and investigators from the University of Tennessee at Memphis to our understanding of the injury.

Our understanding of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) has evolved considerably over recent decades. It was once seen as a rare injury that was difficult or impossible to predict and had no useful prevention or treatment measures available. In the late 20th century, work by physicians caring for these injuries began to show that this was not the case. There were distinct risk factors for the injury and the often seen interval between injury and stroke provided an opportunity for stroke prevention. Timothy Fabian and the investigators at Memphis have been one of the groups at the forefront of this type of inquiry for >30 years. The contributions of this group has advanced the care of BCVI immensely. This review examines some of the work done by Dr Fabian and his colleagues and its importance in the care of injured patients.