Comparison of laparoscopic-guided versus ultrasound-guided TAP block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a widely used anesthetic technique of the abdominal wall, where ultrasound guidance is considered the gold standard. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted TAP (LTAP) block with ultrasound-assisted TAP (UTAP) block for post-operative pain, nausea, vomiting, duration of the block, and bowel function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 60 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups to undergo either the LTAP or UTAP block technique after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The time taken for administering the block, post-operative nausea and vomiting, post-operative pain, respiratory rate, bowel movements, and analgesia requirements were reported. RESULTS: The time taken for the LTAP block was shorter (p < 0.001). Post-operative mean tramadol consumption, paracetamol consumption, and analgesic requirement were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.76, p = 0.513, and p = 0.26, respectively). The visual analog scale at 6, 24, and 48 h was statistically not significant (p = 0.632, p = 0.802, and p = 0.173, respectively). Nausea with vomiting and the necessity of an antiemetic medication was lower in the UTAP group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: The LTAP block is an easy and fast technique to perform in patients as an alternative method where ultrasound guidance or an anesthesiologist is not available.

ANTECEDENTES: El bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen (TAP) es una técnica anestésica de la pared abdominal ampliamente utilizada, en la cual la guía ecográfica se considera el método de referencia. OBJETIVO: Comparar la efectividad del bloqueo TAP asistido por laparoscopia (LTAP) con el bloqueo TAP asistido por ultrasonido (UTAP) para el dolor posoperatorio, las náuseas y los vómitos, y la función intestinal. MÉTODO: El estudio incluyó 60 pacientes que fueron asignados aleatoriamente a dos grupos para someterse a la técnica de bloqueo LTAP o UTAP después de una colecistectomía laparoscópica. Se informaron el tiempo de administración del bloqueo, las náuseas y los vómitos posoperatorios, el dolor posoperatorio, la frecuencia respiratoria, las evacuaciones y los requerimientos de analgesia. RESULTADOS: El tiempo de bloqueo LTAP fue menor (p < 0.001). El consumo medio de tramadol, el consumo de paracetamol y el requerimiento de analgésicos posoperatorios fueron comparables entre los dos grupos (p = 0.76, p = 0.513 y p = 0.26, respectivamente). El dolor en la escala analógica visual a las 6, 24 y 48 horas no fue estadísticamente significativo (p = 0.632, p = 0.802 y p = 0.173, respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: El bloqueo PATL es una técnica fácil y rápida de realizar en pacientes como método alternativo cuando no se dispone de guía ecográfica o anestesióloga.

[Short term olfactory memory and olfactory function after inhalation anesthetic agents: a randomized clinical trial]. / Memória olfativa de curta duração e função olfativa após anestésicos inalatórios: estudo clínico randomizado.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of two different inhalation anesthetic agents on postoperative olfactory memory and olfactory function in patients who underwent micro laryngeal surgery. METHODS: This randomized prospective controlled study consisted of 102 consecutive patients with a voice disorder. The patients underwent micro laryngeal surgery for voice disorders under general anesthesia. Patients who did not meet inclusion criteria and/or declined to participate (n=34) were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups. Four patients from Group 1 and four patients from Group 2 were lost to follow-up. Group 1 (n=30) received sevoflurane, and Group 2 (n=30) received desflurane during anesthesia. We compared the results by performing the pre-op and post-op Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Olfactory test. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (55%) were male and 27 (45%) were female. The mean age was 48.18±13.88 years (range: 19-70 years). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory functions did not show a significant difference within the groups postoperatively (p> 0.05). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory memory showed a significant decrease 3hours after the surgery (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory functions and memory were not affected by desflurane in the early postoperative period. Although sevoflurane did not affect olfactory functions, it had a temporary negative effect on olfactory memory in the early postoperative period.

Short term olfactory memory and olfactory function after inhalation anesthetic agents: a randomized clinical trial / Memória olfativa de curta duração e função olfativa após anestésicos inalatórios: estudo clínico randomizado

Abstract Background and objectives: This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of two different inhalation anesthetic agents on postoperative olfactory memory and olfactory function in patients who underwent micro laryngeal surgery. Methods: This randomized prospective controlled study consisted of 102 consecutive patients with a voice disorder. The patients underwent micro laryngeal surgery for voice disorders under general anesthesia. Patients who did not meet inclusion criteria and/or declined to participate (n = 34) were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups. Four patients from Group 1 and four patients from Group 2 were lost to follow-up. Group 1 (n = 30) received sevoflurane, and Group 2 (n = 30) received desflurane during anesthesia. We compared the results by performing the pre-op and post-op Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Olfactory test. Results: Thirty-three patients (55%) were male and 27 (45%) were female. The mean age was 48.18 ± 13.88 years (range: 19‒70 years). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory functions did not show a significant difference within the groups postoperatively (p > 0.05). Preoperative and postoperative olfactory memory showed a significant decrease 3 hours after the surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Olfactory functions and memory were not affected by desflurane in the early postoperative period. Although sevoflurane did not affect olfactory functions, it had a temporary negative effect on olfactory memory in the early postoperative period.

Resumo Introdução e objetivos: O estudo avaliou o efeito pós-operatório de dois agentes anestésicos inalatórios distintos na memória olfativa de curta duração e na função olfativa em pacientes submetidos à microcirurgia de laringe. Método: O estudo prospectivo controlado randomizado avaliou, consecutivamente, 102 pacientes com alteração vocal submetidos à microcirurgia de laringe sob anestesia geral. Trinta e quatro pacientes não obedeceram aos critérios de inclusão e/ou não aceitaram participar do estudo e foram excluídos. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos. Quatro pacientes do Grupo 1 e quatro do Grupo 2 foram perdidos durante o seguimento. O Grupo 1 (n = 30) recebeu sevoflurano durante a anestesia e o Grupo 2 (n = 30), desflurano. Comparamos resultados pré e pós-operatórios de memória olfativa e funções olfativas, realizando o Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Olfactory test. Resultados: Foram incluídos um total de 33 (55%) homens e 27 (45%) mulheres. A idade média foi 48,18 ± 13,88 anos (variação: 19-70 anos). As funções olfativas pré e pós-operatórias não apresentaram diferença estatisticamente significante dentro dos grupos no pós-operatório (p > 0,05). A memória olfativa pré e pós-operatória não mostrou diminuição estatisticamente significante quando avaliada três horas após a cirurgia (p< 0,05). Conclusões: Memória e funções olfativas não foram alteradas pelo desflurano no pós-operatório imediato. Embora o sevoflurano não tenha alterado as funções olfativas, causou efeito temporário negativo na memória olfativa no pós-operatório imediato.