Compartment-specific gene regulation of the CAR inducer efavirenz in vivo.

Nuclear receptors such as the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) are central factors that link drug exposure to the activities of drug metabolism and elimination. In order to determine the in vivo effects of efavirenz, a CAR activator, the expression of target genes was determined in duodenal biopsies obtained from 12 healthy volunteers before treatment and after 10 days of treatment with efavirenz; concomitant administration of the cholesterol inhibitor ezetimibe produced no significant difference. However, in in vitro studies, efavirenz significantly increased CYP2B6 expression in several cell types, suggesting that the drug transactivates CAR. This hypothesis is supported by our findings that there is significant induction of CAR target genes in in vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from healthy volunteers treated with multiple doses of efavirenz. The impact of efavirenz on hepatic metabolism in vivo was confirmed by significant changes in plasma 4ß-hydroxycholesterol and bilirubin levels and the area under the curve (AUC) of efavirenz. Induction of CYP2B6 mRNA expression correlated with the decrease in the AUC of efavirenz (r = 0.61; P = 0.036). Taken together, our results provide evidence that efavirenz exerts compartment-specific inductive capacity in vivo.

Impact of efavirenz on intestinal metabolism and transport: insights from an interaction study with ezetimibe in healthy volunteers.

Hypercholesterolemia frequently occurs in patients treated with efavirenz who cannot be treated adequately with statins because of drug interactions. These patients may benefit from cholesterol-lowering therapy with ezetimibe. This study determined the influence of single-dose and multiple-dose efavirenz (400 mg/day for 9 days) on the pharmacokinetics and sterol-lowering of ezetimibe (10 mg) in 12 healthy subjects. In addition, the influence of efavirenz on genome-wide intestinal expression and in vitro function of ABCB1, ABCC2, UGT1A1, and OATP1B1 was studied. Efavirenz (multiple dose) had no influence on the pharmacokinetics and lipid-lowering functions of ezetimibe. Intestinal expression of enzymes and transporters (e.g., ABCB1, ABCC2, and UGT1A1) was not affected by chronic efavirenz. Efavirenz (single dose) slightly increased ezetimibe absorption and markedly decreased exposure to ezetimibe-glucuronide (single dose and multiple dose), which may be explained by inhibition of UGT1A1 and ABCB1 (in vitro data). Ezetimibe had no effect on the disposition of efavirenz. Consequently, ezetimibe may be a safe and efficient therapeutic option in patients with HIV infection.

Drug interactions between the immunosuppressant tacrolimus and the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe in healthy volunteers.

Immunosuppressive therapy is frequently associated with hypercholesterolemia, calling for lipid-lowering treatment without adverse drug interactions. One option is treatment with the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe. We have shown in vitro that ezetimibe and tacrolimus may interact in competition for intestinal UGT1A1 and ABCB1 at concentrations reached in gut lumen after oral administration. However, this clinical study in healthy volunteers showed that the expected pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and tacrolimus is not of clinical relevance.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between the immunosuppressant sirolimus and the lipid-lowering drug ezetimibe in healthy volunteers.

Organ transplant recipients who have dyslipidemia related to immunosuppression may benefit from cholesterol-lowering therapy with ezetimibe, a substrate of ABCB1, ABCC2, and OATP1B1. Adverse pharmacokinetic interactions are hypothesized with sirolimus, which is a substrate of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 and an inhibitor of ABCB1, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 but not of ABCC2. However, competition between sirolimus and ezetimibe for ABCB1 and OATP1B1 is not of major clinical relevance, as confirmed in our randomized, controlled, single-dose study in healthy subjects.

Replacement therapy with levothyroxine plus triiodothyronine (bioavailable molar ratio 14 : 1) is not superior to thyroxine alone to improve well-being and cognitive performance in hypothyroidism.

OBJECTIVES: There is evidence from recent controlled clinical studies that replacement therapy of hypothyroidism with T4 in combination with a small amount of T3 may improve the well-being of the patients. As the issue is still the subject of controversial discussion, our study was assigned to confirm the superiority of a physiological combination of thyroid hormones (absorbed molar ratio 14 : 1) over T4 alone with regard to mood states and cognitive functioning. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: After a run-in period with the T4 study medication for 4 weeks, a controlled, randomized, double-blind, two-period (each 12 weeks), cross-over study without washout between the treatment periods was performed in 23 hypothyroid patients (three males, 20 females, age 23-69 years, 21 subjects after surgery/radioiodine, two with autoimmune thyroiditis) to compare the effects of the previous individual T4 dose (100-175 micro g) with a treatment in which 5% of the respective T4 dose was substituted by T3. MEASUREMENTS: Standard hormonal characteristics and standardized psychological tests to quantify mood and cognitive performance were measured after the run-in period and at the end of each treatment period. In 12 subjects, the concentration-time profiles of fT3 and fT4 were compared after the last administration of the respective study medication. TSH, fT3 and fT4 were measured with immunological assays. CLINICAL RESULTS: Replacement therapy with T4 and T4/T3 was not different in all steady-state hormonal, metabolic and cardiovascular characteristics except for TSH, which was more suppressed after T4/T3. The efficacy of replacement therapy with the T4/T3 combination was not different from the T4 monotherapy with regard to all psychological test scores describing mood and cognitive functioning of the patients. Mood was even significantly impaired by the T4/T3 combination in eight subjects, with TSH < 0.02 mU/l, compared to patients with normal TSH (Beck Depression Inventory: 8.25 +/- 5.01 vs. 4.07 +/- 5.60, P = 0.026). PHARMACOKINETIC RESULTS: The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-8h)) of fT3 was significantly higher after T4/T3 compared to the T4 monotherapy (42.8 +/- 9.03 pmol x h/l vs. 36.3 +/- 8.50 pmol x h/l, P < 0.05) and was significantly correlated to serum TSH (r(s) = -0.609, P < 0.05). After T4/T3, patients with a history of Graves' disease or autoimmune thyroiditis had significantly higher serum trough levels of fT3 whereas the fT4 concentrations were significantly lower in patients with a nonautoimmune background. CONCLUSION: Replacement therapy of hypothyroidism with T4 plus T3 does not improve mood and cognitive performance compared to the standard T4 monotherapy. There is even a higher risk of signs of subclinical hyperthyroidism associated with impaired well-being of the patients, which is clearly caused by significant fluctuations in the steady-state fT3 serum concentrations.