Treatment and outcomes of patients in the Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Network Registry.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) have a major impact on life expectancy and quality of life for many breast cancer patients. Knowledge about treatment patterns and outcomes is limited. METHODS: We analysed clinical data of 1712 patients diagnosed with BMs from breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2016 at 80 institutions. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis of BMs was 56 years (22-90 years). About 47.8% (n = 732) of patients had HER2-positive, 21.4% (n = 328) had triple-negative and 30.8% (n = 471) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative (luminal-like) primary tumours. The proportion of patients with HER2-positive BMs decreased comparing the years 2000-2009 with 2010-2015 (51%-44%), whereas the percentage of patients with luminal-like tumours increased (28%-34%; p = 0.0331). Patients with BMs in the posterior fossa were more often HER2 positive (n = 169/314, 53.8%) than those diagnosed with triple-negative (n = 65/314, 20.7%) or luminal-like primary breast cancer (n = 80/314, 25.5%), (p < 0.0001). Median overall survival (OS) time after development of BMs for the overall cohort was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-8.0 months). One-year survival rate was 37.7% (95% CI: 35.2-40.1). Patients with HER2-positive tumours had the longest median OS of 11.6 months (95% CI: 10.0-13.4) compared with 5.9 months (95% CI: 5.0-7.2) for patients with luminal-like and 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.9-5.4) for patients with triple-negative tumours. Patients with HER2-positive tumours who received anti-HER2 treatment had longer median OS than those without (17.1 months versus 7.2 months, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of patients after developing BMs varies significantly according to the subtype. The outcome in this cohort is similarly poor in triple-negative and HR-positive/HER2-negative patients. Our results underline the high medical need for improvement of treatment and prevention strategies for BMs in breast cancer patients.

Tissue and plasma antioxidant status in response to dietary methionine concentration and source in broilers.

This study hypothesized that plasma and tissue antioxidant status of broilers is positively influenced when dietary Met concentrations exceed, and negatively when they go below NRC recommendations. In addition, different Met sources are hypothesized to affect the antioxidant defence system differently. Day-old male Cobb-500 broilers (n = 336) were allotted to seven groups and phase-fed three wheat-soya bean meal-based basal diets during days 1-10, 11-21 and 22-35. The basal diets (Met- group, Met + Cys concentration 15% below NRC recommendations) were supplemented with 0.10%, 0.25% or 0.40% Met either as DL-Met (DLM) or DL-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid (DL-HMTBA) (equimolar comparison). Growth performance and carcass weights were lower in the Met- group compared to the groups whose diets met or exceeded Met requirements. The antioxidant defence system was not influenced by the Met source. However, in the liver, concentrations of glutathione increased with increasing dietary Met concentrations. Tocopherol concentrations in the liver at days 10 and 21 were lower in the Met- group than in the groups supplemented with Met. However, liver concentrations of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBA-RS) and protein carbonyls (PC) were largely not influenced by dietary Met concentration. Plasma tocopherol concentrations at day 35 were lower, and those of TBA-RS and PC at day 35 were higher in Met- group than in the groups fed the Met-supplemented diets. In jejunum, but not in liver, relative mRNA abundances and activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase were higher in the Met- group than in the groups fed Met-supplemented diets. These data indicate that suboptimum supply of Met results in decreased antioxidant concentrations in plasma and body tissues, and increases oxidative stress in the jejunum mucosa. However, supplementation of Met in excess of the requirements (based on NRC) compared to diets adequate in Met + Cys did not influence the antioxidant defence system.

Comparison of prognostic and predictive impact of genomic or central grade and immunohistochemical subtypes or IHC4 in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: WSG-AGO EC-Doc Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Potential prognostic and predictive markers in early, intermediate-risk breast cancer (BC) include histological grade, Ki-67, genomic signatures, e.g. genomic grade index (GGI), and intrinsic subtypes. Their prognostic/predictive impact in hormone receptor (HR: ER and/or PR) positive/HER2- BC is controversial. WSG-AGO EC-Doc demonstrated superior event-free survival (EFS) in patients with 1-3 positive lymph node receiving epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-docetaxel (EC-Doc) versus 5-fluoruracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC). METHODS: In a representative trial subset, we quantify concordance among factors used for clinical chemotherapy indication. We investigate the impact of central histology (n = 772), immunohistochemistry for intrinsic subtyping and IHC4, and dichotomous (GG) or continuous (GGI) genomic grade (n = 472) on patient outcome and benefit from taxane chemotherapy, focusing on HR+/HER2- patients (n = 459). RESULTS: Concordance of local grade (LG) with central (CG) or genomic grade was modest. In HR+/HER2- patients, low (GG-1: 16%), equivocal (GG-EQ: 17%), and high (GG-3: 67%) GG were associated with respective 5-year EFS of 100%, 93%, and 85%. GGI was prognostic for EFS within all LG subgroups and within CG3, whereas IHC4 was prognostic only in CG3 tumors.In unselected and HR+/HER2- patients, CG3 and luminal-A-like subtype entered the multivariate EFS model, but not IHC4 or GG. In the whole population, continuous GGI entered the model [hazard ratio (H.R.) of 75th versus 25th = 2.79; P = 0.01], displacing luminal-A-like subtype; within HR+/HER2- (H.R. = 5.36; P < 0.001), GGI was the only remaining prognostic factor.In multivariate interaction analysis (including central and genomic grade), luminal-B-like subtype [HR+ and (Ki-67 ≥20% or HER2+)] was predictive for benefit of EC-Doc versus FEC in unselected but not in HR+/HER2- patients. CONCLUSION: In the WSG-AGO EC-Doc trial for intermediate-risk BC, CG, intrinsic subtype (by IHC), and GG provide prognostic information. Continuous GGI (but not IHC4) adds prognostic information even when IHC subtype and CG are available. Finally, the high interobserver variability for histological grade and the still missing validation of Ki-67 preclude indicating or omitting adjuvant chemotherapy based on these single factors alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The WSG-AGO/EC-Doc is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02115204.

Final analysis of the prospective WSG-AGO EC-Doc versus FEC phase III trial in intermediate-risk (pN1) early breast cancer: efficacy and predictive value of Ki67 expression.

BACKGROUND: Taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy is standard in node-positive (N+) early breast cancer (BC). The magnitude of benefit in intermediate-risk N+ early BC is still unclear. WSG-AGO epiribicine and cyclophosphamide (EC)-Doc is a large trial evaluating modern taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes (LNs) only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2011 BC patients (18-65 years, pN1) were entered into a randomized phase III trial comparing 4 × E90C600 q3w followed by 4 × docetaxel 100 q3w (n = 1008) with the current standard: 6 × F500E100C500 q3w (n = 828) or C600M40F600 d1, 8× q4w (n = 175). Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS); secondary end points were overall survival (OS), toxicity, translational research, and quality of life. Central tumor bank samples were evaluable in a representative collective (n = 772; 40%). Ki-67 was assessed centrally in hormone receptor-positive disease as a surrogate marker for the distinction of luminal A/B-like tumors. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between study arms in both main study and central tumor bank subset. At 59-month median follow-up, superior efficacy of EC-Doc [versus FEC (a combination of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide)] was seen in EFS and OS: 5-year EFS: 89.8% versus 87.3% (P = 0.038); 5-year OS: 94.5% versus 92.8% (P = 0.034); both tests one-tailed. EC-Doc caused more toxicity. In hormone receptor-positive (HR)+ disease, only high-Ki-67 tumors (≥ 20%) derived significant benefit from taxane-based therapy: hazard ratio = 0.39 (95% CI 0.18-0.82) for EC-Doc versus FEC (test for interaction; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: EC-Doc significantly improved EFS and OS versus FEC in intermediate-risk BC (1-3 LNs) within all subgroups as defined by local pathology. In HR+ disease, patients with luminal A-like tumors may be potentially over-treated by taxane-based chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02115204.

Arterial spin labelling perfusion MRI of breast cancer using FAIR TrueFISP: initial results.

AIM: To assess the feasibility of an unenhanced, flow-sensitive, alternating inversion recovery-balanced steady-state free precession (FAIR TrueFISP) arterial spin labelling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for quantification of breast cancer perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen untreated breast tumour patients (mean age 53 ± 17 years, range 30-68 years) and four healthy controls (mean age 51 ± 14 years, range 33-68 years) were enrolled in this study and were imaged using a clinical 1.5 T MRI machine. Perfusion measurements were performed using a coronal single-section ASL FAIR TrueFISP technique in addition to a routine breast MRI examination. T1 relaxation time of normal breast parenchyma was determined in four healthy volunteers using the variable flip angle approach. The definitive diagnosis was obtained at histology after biopsy or surgery and was available for all patients. RESULTS: ASL perfusion was successfully acquired in 13 of 18 tumour patients and in all healthy controls. The mean ASL perfusion of invasive ductal carcinoma tissue was significantly higher (88.2 ± 39.5 ml/100 g/min) compared to ASL perfusion of normal breast parenchyma (24.9 ± 12.7 ml/100 g/min; p < 0.05) and invasive lobular carcinoma (30.5 ± 4.3 ml/100 g/min; p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the mean ASL perfusion of normal breast parenchyma and invasive lobular carcinoma tissue (p = 0.97). CONCLUSION: ASL MRI enables quantification of breast cancer perfusion without the use of contrast material. However, its impact on diagnosis and therapy management of breast tumours has to be evaluated in larger patient studies.

Term and role of tumor centres in oncology healthcare in Germany.

Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease among women in Germany. There are more than 50,000 new cases of breast cancer diagnosed each year in the country. As breast cancer is a complex disease it necessitates an interdisciplinary treatment, therefore it is very likely that patients with breast cancer will benefit from treatment in special centers, either a "breast cancer centre" or "tumor centre". In recent years certifying programs for the above mentioned centers have been introduced, which guarantee standards of the quality of treatment for breast cancer all over the country. In this article we report on the development and role of tumor centers in oncology healthcare in Germany, which nowadays have a very good international reputation. Moreover, they may be a good example to other countries to found similar centers in order to improve standards of the management in oncology healthcare.

Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial.

BACKGROUND: This paper evaluates the prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression of various molecular markers in high-risk breast cancer (HRBC) patients with >9 involved lymph nodes, who received different chemotherapy dose-intensification strategies within a prospective randomized WSG AM-01 trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tumors from 236 patients, who were randomly assigned to dose-dense conventional chemotherapy with four cycles of E(90)C(600) followed by three cycles of C(600)M(40)F(600) every 2 weeks (DD) or a rapidly cycled tandem high-dose regimen with two cycles of E(90)C(600) every 2 weeks followed by two cycles of E(90)C(3000)Thiotepa(400) every 3 weeks (HD), were available for retrospective central pathological review (116 HD/120 DD). Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), MIB-1, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Her-2/neu was evaluated immunohistochemically using tissue microarrays. Results were correlated with follow-up data and treatment effects by proportional hazard Cox regression models (including interaction analysis). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 61.7 months, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) as well as overall survival (OS) rates for the 236 patients were significantly better in the HD arm: EFS: 62% versus 41% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.43-0.85, P = 0.004]; OS: 76% versus 61% (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87, P = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, HD, tumor size <3 cm, positive PR, negative MIB-1 staining, and grade 1/2 were associated with favorable outcome. Interaction analysis showed that regarding predictive effects, triple negative (ER/PR/Her-2/neu) and G3 tumors derived most benefit from HD. CONCLUSION: Tandem HD improves both EFS and OS in HRBC. This therapy effect may be partly attributable to superior efficacy in the subgroup of triple-negative tumors and/or G3 with their poor prognostic marker profile.

[Prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiling in high risk breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy]. / Prognostische und prädiktive Bedeutung von Proteinexpressions-Profilen in einer Hochrisiko-Mammakarzinomsubgruppe aus der WSG AM01 phase III-Studie (Hochdosis-Chemotherapie versus konventionelle dosis-dichte Chemotherapie).

The prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiles was analyzed in high-risk breast cancer patients who had previously been shown to benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in comparison to dose-dense chemotherapy (DDCT). Using tissue microarrays, the expression of 34 protein markers was evaluated in 236 patients who had received either HDCT or DDCT (in the WSG AM01 trial). 1) 24 protein markers of the initial panel of 34 markers were sufficient to identify five profile clusters by K-means clustering: luminal A (27%), luminal B (12%), HER-2 (21%), basal-like (13%) cluster and a so called 'multiple marker negative'=MMN cluster (27%) characterized by the absence of specifying markers. 2) After DDCT, HER-2 and basal-like groups had significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) (HR 3.6 (95% CI, 1.65-8.18; p = 0.001) and HR 3.7 (95% CI, 1.68-8.48); p < 0.0001), respectively) when compared to both luminal groups. 3) After HDCT, the hazard ratio was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.76-3.05) for EFS in the HER-2 subgroups and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.37-3.32) in the basal-like subgroups which indicates a better outcome for patients in the HER-2 and basal-like subgroups who received HDCT. Protein expression profiling in high-risk breast cancers identified 5 subtypes, which differed with respect to survival and response to chemotherapy: In contrast to luminal A and B subtypes, HER-2 and basal-like subgroups had a significant predictive benefit from HDCT when compared to DDCT.

C-kit expression in high-risk breast cancer subgroup treated with high-dose or conventional dose-dense chemotherapy.

The proto-oncogene c-kit is known to be expressed in poorly differentiated breast cancer. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the prognostic and predictive impact of c-kit in a high risk subgroup of breast cancer patients (>9 axillary node metastases) who received high-dose (HDCT) or dose-dense (DDCT) conventional chemotherapy and correlated these findings with the expression of the basal-type markers CK5 and CK 17, estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor, Her-2/neu and MIB 1. C-kit, CK5, CK17, ER, PR, Her-2/neu and MIBI expression was evaluated immunohistochemically using tissue microarrays containing breast cancer samples from 236 patients who were randomized to the WSG AM01 trial (median follow-up of 60 months). There was a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for patients receiving HDCT compared to DDCT (p = 0.027). C-KIT expression was found in 12 % of all breast cancers and correlated with a poorer OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.051). Furthermore, c-kit correlated with high grade (p = 0.019), CK5- and CK17-positivity (p <0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively) and ER- and PR-negativity (p = 0.04 and p = 0.008, respectively). In contrast to CK5 and CK17, patients with c-kit positive breast cancers revealed no benefit from high-dose chemotherapy. These findings underline that c-kit expression represents an independent negative prognostic marker in high-risk breast cancer. Correlation with CK5 +/CK17+ and ER-/PR-suggests that c-kit positive carcinomas are at least partly of basal-type.

Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda(")) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine is a rationally designed oral, tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate with high activity in metastatic breast cancer. This multicenter phase II study was designed to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with a taxane-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had to have documented progression after paclitaxel- or docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. Treatment comprised 3-week cycles of oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice-daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest period. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled. Disease stabilization occurred in 63 patients (46%) and the overall response rate was 15% (95% confidence interval 10% to 23%), providing an overall tumor control rate of 62%. Median time to progression was 3.5 months, median duration of response was 7.5 months and median overall survival was 10.1 months. Capecitabine was generally well-tolerated: most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1/2 in intensity; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (13%), diarrhea (8%), vomiting (4%) and nausea (3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that capecitabine achieves a high tumor control rate in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Due to its favorable safety profile and convenient oral administration, capecitabine can be given as an outpatient therapy. Capecitabine should be considered the reference treatment in this setting based on consistently high efficacy and good tolerability.

[Surgical procedure after primary chemotherapy of breast carcinoma--an unresolved clinical problem]. / Operatives Vorgehen nach primärer Chemotherapie des Mammakarzinoms--eine unsichere klinische Situation.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has more and more become clinical routine during the past years. Results from large randomized trials like NSABP-B18 show that survival parameters are not affected if sequence of therapy is changed. Survival parameters have been intensively studied, but surgical standards after primary chemotherapy are much less well defined. Results from the early trials comparing lumpectomy or quadrantectomy with mastectomy are generally transposed to the neoadjuvant situation. In this context the "result of downstaging" is surgically treated like otherwise the primary tumor would have been treated. Though local recurrence rates reported after primary chemotherapy are not increased within the whole population this may not be correct for subgroups. E.g. within the NSABP-B18 trial significantly higher local recurrence rates are reported for those patients who initially were proposed to have mastectomy and who actually received lumpectomy after effective primary chemotherapy. Another unresolved problem is surgery after complete remission, which as histopathology demonstrates corresponds often not to pathological complete remission. Therefore in most cases the initially involved area is resected, which may result in a more radical surgical approach to complete remission than to partial remission. Further standardisation of surgical approach to patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be evaluated within phase III trials.

[Studies with high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation in breast carcinoma]. / Studien zur Hochdosischemotherapie (HDC) und nachfolgender autologer Stammzelltransplantation beim Mammakarzinom.

Survival rates for several subgroups of patients with breast cancer treated with conventional therapy remain poor. Only about 30% of patients with primary breast cancer involving more than 9 axillary lymph nodes remain disease-free at 5 years from diagnosis despite surgery, conventional-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Metastatic breast cancer with 5 year survival rates of about 3% generally represents incurable disease. Chemotherapeutic agents are conventionally limited by side effects. The easy procurement of haematopoietic stem cell support through mobilization of peripheral blood progenitors has spurred the development of new strategies employing high-dose treatment for treatment of high risk breast cancer. Autologous stem cell support antagonizes chemotherapy-induced myelotoxicity and thereby allows dose escalation by a factor of 1.5 to about 20. Pilot studies evaluating significant dose escalation in adjuvant treatment of patients with advanced disease have resulted in an apparent improvement in event-free survival rates to over 70%. Repetitive applications of chemotherapy at myeloablative doses are now increasingly being used. Data from prospectively randomized phase III trials will not be available before the end of 1998. For metastatic breast cancer one prospective, randomized clinical trial has been published. Results are significantly better for patients who have been treated by high-dose chemotherapy compared to patients who received conventional polychemotherapy (median survival 90 vs. 45 weeks). For methodological reasons (small patient numbers, patient selection, weak standard therapy etc.) results from the trials cited above are under discussion. Until publication of further results from ongoing phase III trials HDC for breast cancer remains experimental and should not be given outside of clinical trials.