Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in chronic atrial fibrillation: impact on left atrial size and reversal to sinus rhythm.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of long term cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) on left atrial and left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling and reversal to sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with heart failure with atrial fibrillation (AF). PATIENTS: 74 consecutive patients (age 68 (8) years; 67 men) with advanced heart failure and AF (20 persistent and 54 permanent) were implanted with a CRT device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were evaluated clinically (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life, six minute walk test) and echocardiographically (LV ejection fraction, LV diameters, and left atrial diameters) before and after six months of CRT. Additionally, restoration of SR was evaluated after six months of CRT. RESULTS: NYHA class, quality of life score, six minute walk test, and LV ejection fraction had improved significantly after six months of CRT. In addition, left atrial and LV end diastolic and end systolic diameters had decreased from 59 (9) to 55 (9) mm, from 72 (10) to 67 (10) mm, and from 61 (11) to 56 (11) mm, respectively (all p < 0.01). During implantation 18 of 20 (90%) patients with persistent AF were cardioverted to SR. At follow up 13 of 18 (72%) patients had returned to AF and none had spontaneously reverted to SR; thus, only 5 of 74 (7%) were in SR. CONCLUSION: Six months of CRT resulted in significant clinical benefit with significant left atrial and LV reverse remodelling. Despite these beneficial effects, 93% of patients had not reverted to SR.

Myocardial tissue Doppler echocardiography and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a promising technique for patients with end-stage, drug-refractory heart failure. Still 20-30% of the patients treated with CRT do not respond. Accordingly, the current selection criteria need to be refined, and it appears that demonstration of left ventricular dyssynchrony may be mandatory for response to CRT. Novel echocardiographic methods are currently investigated to detect left ventricular dyssynchrony and thereby improve the selection of candidates for CRT. In this brief review, these techniques will be discussed.

Eligibility for biventricular pacing in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)-therapy prevents sudden death in patients at high risk, but incidence of death due to heart failure remains unaltered. Recent data suggest that biventricular (BV) pacing is useful in patients with heart failure. It is unclear, how many patients with an ICD indication may have an indication for BV pacing. Therefore all patients who received an ICD were analyzed for eligibility of BV pacing using the following criteria: NYHA class III or IV, QRS duration >120 ms, depressed LVEF. Three hundred and ninety consecutive patients received an ICD from June 1996 to March 2001. Underlying disease was ischemic heart disease in 66%. In the 390 patients the mean LVEF was 36+/-17%, 20% were in NYHA class III-IV and 16% were in NYHA class II with an LVEF <30%. Of these 140 patients, 79 had a QRS duration >120 ms. Thus, 79 (20%) patients were eligible for BV pacing in addition to ICD-therapy. Patients who received a BV pacemaker in addition to ICD-therapy had a superior survival, improved in NYHA class and showed a significantly lower hospitalization rate as compared to patients who received an ICD only. Screening for eligibility of BV pacing may be considered in patients with CHF scheduled for ICD implantation.