Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in sputum of intubated patients: Optimized intravenous delivery vs. inhaled therapy.

AIMS: Intubated patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia, fail optimized treatment with intravenous (IV) vancomycin (serum trough 15-20 µg/mL) in 38-79% of cases. Airway blood flow is diminished compared to alveoli and we hypothesized that vancomycin concentrations achieved in airway secretions are suboptimal and nonbactericidal. Targeted therapy by inhalation may overcome this deficit. METHODS: Airway pharmacokinetics of optimized IV and inhaled vancomycin in infected clinically stable prolonged mechanically ventilated patients were measured. First, IV vancomycin was given until optimized concentrations were achieved (15-20 µg/mL), and, at the same time point, sputum vancomycin concentrations were measured. Then, sputum concentrations were re-assessed after 4 treatments of inhaled vancomycin (120 mg/2 mL) via a previously characterized nebulizing system that deposited 18 ± 2 mg in the lungs. Vancomycin post-distribution phase serum peak and trough concentrations were also obtained. Serum albumin was measured to assess binding to vancomycin. RESULTS: Mean serum trough concentration was 18.4 ± 6.5 µg/mL. Sputum concentrations were affected by serum albumin. Only patients with severe hypoalbuminaemia had penetration of drug leading to therapeutic (15.7-17 µg/mL) sputum concentrations. Following inhaled vancomycin, sputum concentrations increased significantly to 199 ± 37.0 µg/mL (P = .002) exceeding minimum inhibitory concentration by 2 orders of magnitude. CONCLUSION: Despite optimized serum concentrations, patients with albumin near normal had suboptimal concentrations of vancomycin in their sputum. Inhaled therapy may be clinically important for successful treatment of ventilator-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Further studies of inhaled therapy are needed to define their role as adjunctive therapy in ventilator-associated pneumonia and as single therapy in tracheobronchitis.

Clinical Outcome of Cefiderocol for Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms.

Cefiderocol is a novel cephalosporin recently approved by the FDA to aid clinicians in the fight against multidrug-resistant (including carbapenem-resistant) gram-negative organisms. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the 14- and 28-day mortality associated with cefiderocol. We performed a retrospective chart review of all adult patients admitted at Stony Brook University Hospital between October 2020 and December 2021 and received cefiderocol for at least 3 days. Patients were excluded if they received more than one course of cefiderocol therapy or remained hospitalized at the time of this study. A total of 22 patients met the inclusion criteria. The all-cause mortality on day 28 for all patients was 13.6%, whereas this rate for patients with BSI was 0%, with cUTI was 0% and with LRTI was 16.7%. The all-cause mortality on day 28 for patients who received the dual antibiotics (in conjunction with cefiderocol) was 0%, compared to 25% for patients who only received cefiderocol (p = 0.25). We noted treatment failure in two patients (9.1%). Our findings suggest that cefiderocol could possibly be associated with lower all-cause mortality than previously thought. In our study, we did not find any significant difference between cefiderocol's use in combination with another antibacterial agent and its use as a monotherapy.

Tocilizumab in the treatment of critical COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with critical COVID-19 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation who were treated with tocilizumab DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study SETTING: Stony Brook University Hospital, a 600-bed academic tertiary medical center in Suffolk County, New York PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with COVID-19 confirmed by nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) who were admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital between March 10 and April 2 2020 and required mechanical ventilation in any intensive care unit during their hospitalization EXPOSURE: Treatment with tocilizumab while intubated MAIN OUTCOME: Overall mortality 30 days from the date of intubation RESULTS: Forty-five patients received tocilizumab compared to seventy controls. Baseline demographic characteristics, inflammatory markers, treatment with corticosteroids, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were similar between the two cohorts. Patients who received tocilizumab had significantly lower Charlson co-morbidity index (2.0 vs 3.0,P = 0.01) than controls. There was a trend towards younger mean age in the tocilizumab exposed group (56.2 vs 60.6; P = 0.09). In logistic regression analysis there was no reduction in mortality associated with receipt of tocilizumab (odds ratio (OR) 1.04; 95% CI, 0.27-3.75). There was no observed increased risk of secondary infection in patients given tocilizumab (28.9 vs 25.7; OR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.51-2.71). CONCLUSION: When controlling for age, severity of illness, and co-morbidities, tocilizumab was not associated with reduction in mortality in this retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Further studies are needed to determine the role of tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID-19.

Aerosolized antibiotics and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in the intensive care unit.

CONTEXT: In critically ill intubated patients, signs of respiratory infection often persist despite treatment with potent systemic antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether aerosolized antibiotics, which achieve high drug concentrations in the target organ, would more effectively treat respiratory infection and decrease the need for systemic antibiotics. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study performed from 2003 through 2004. SETTING: The medical and surgical intensive care units of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Critically ill intubated patients were randomized if: 1) > or = 18 yrs of age, intubated for a minimum of 3 days, and expected to survive at least 14 days; and 2) had ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis defined as the production of purulent secretions (> or = 2 mL during 4 hrs) with organism(s) on Gram stain. Of 104 patients monitored, 43 consented for treatment and completed the study. No patients were withdrawn from the study for adverse events. INTERVENTION: Aerosol antibiotic (AA) or aerosol saline placebo was given for 14 days or until extubation. The responsible clinician determined the administration of systemic antibiotics (SA). Patients were followed for 28 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infection Survey diagnostic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and clinical pulmonary infection score. Secondary: white blood cell count, SA use, acquired antibiotic resistance, and weaning from mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Most patients had VAP at randomization. With treatment, the AA group had reduced signs of respiratory infection: reduced Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infection Survey VAP (14/19; 73.6%) to (5/14; 35.7%) vs. placebo (18/24; 75%) to (11/14; 78.6%), reduction in clinical pulmonary infection score, lower white blood cell count at day 14, reduced bacterial resistance, reduced use of SA, and increased weaning (all p < or = .05). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, AA decrease VAP and other signs and symptoms of respiratory infection, facilitate weaning, and reduce bacterial resistance and use of systemic antibiotics.