Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and the relationships of physical fitness to plasma lipoprotein-lipid levels in men and women.

PURPOSE: A high level of cardiovascular fitness is generally associated with a plasma lipoprotein-lipid profile predictive of a low cardiovascular disease risk. We have investigated whether apolipoprotein (apo) E polymorphism could alter the relationships of physical fitness to plasma lipoprotein-lipid levels in a sample of healthy untrained subjects (64 premenopausal women and 65 men). METHODS: Subjects were grouped according to gender and apo E phenotype determined by isoelectric focusing electrophoresis. RESULTS: In both genders, VO2max expressed in mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) was negatively correlated with plasma triglyceride levels in apo E2 carriers and apo E3 homozygotes (-0.55< or =r< or =0.31; P<0.05), whereas these associations were not found in apo E4 groups. Plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C levels were negatively associated with VO2max (r = -0.39; P<0.05) only in women homozygotes for apo E3 whereas VO2max was positively correlated with plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL)2-C levels only in men (r = 0.51; P<0.001) and women (r = 0.65; P<0.001) who were apo E3 homozygotes. A control for concomitant association with body fat mass and glucose intolerance performed by partial correlation analyses revealed that, with the exception of the plasma HDL2-C levels in the apo E3 homozygotes, most of the significant associations between VO2max (mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and plasma lipoprotein-lipid levels were mediated by concomitant variation in body fatness and glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the magnitude of the relationships between VO2max and plasma lipoprotein-lipid levels is influenced by the apo E polymorphism. Thus, apo E2 carriers may be particularly responsive to improved fitness, thereby preventing the development of hypertriglyceridemia and type III dyslipoproteinemia.

Contribution of receptor negative versus receptor defective mutations in the LDL-receptor gene to angiographically assessed coronary artery disease among young (25-49 years) versus middle-aged (50-64 years) men.

Elevated plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a monogenic trait due to mutations in the LDL-receptor (R) gene is characterized by raised plasma LDL-C levels and premature CAD. The aim of the present investigation, derived from the study of a population of 1465 unrelated men aged 25 to 64 years, was to compare the expression of CAD assessed by coronary angiography in young (aged 25-49 years) versus middle-aged (50-64 years) heterozygous FH patients of French Canadian descent. Furthermore, the relationship of binding-defective versus receptor negative mutations in the LDL-R to premature CAD ( < 50 years) was examined and compared with men displaying a normal plasma lipoprotein-lipid profile. From the original study sample, a total of 100 men met the clinical criteria of heterozygous FH. Among them, 30 were carriers of a receptor negative mutation (deletion > 15 kb or point mutations Y468X or R329X) whereas 64 were carriers of a receptor defective mutation (W66G, E207K or C646Y). As expected, in both age groups (25-49 years vs. 50-64 years), carriers of a receptor negative mutation had higher plasma cholesterol and LDL-C levels than carriers of a defective allele or men with a normal plasma lipoprotein-lipid profile. In addition, the mean number of diseased vessels (with > 50% stenosis) was higher in men aged 50-64 years compared to those aged 25 49 years. In the two age groups, FH patients were characterized by a higher number of stenosed coronary vessels than the normal phenotype group. Within each group (either receptor negative, receptor defective or normal phenotype) plasma cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglyceride and apolipoprotein B levels were similar irrespective of age (25 49 years vs. 50-64 years). Finally, multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that compared to non-FH men, the relative odds of being affected by CAD before the age of 50 years was 7.3-fold higher for carriers of a receptor negative mutation and 2.7-fold higher for men with a receptor defective mutation at the LDL-R locus. These results suggest that CAD could be an earlier event among heterozygous FH subjects bearing a receptor negative mutation compared to LDL-R defective patients. It also suggest that the selective screening for mutations in the LDL-R gene may allow a better assessment of the individual risk and facilitate the development of family-based preventive strategies or intervention programs in FH.

Relative contribution of low-density lipoprotein receptor and lipoprotein lipase gene mutations to angiographically assessed coronary artery disease among French Canadians.

Men with low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations causing familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at high risk of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). The dyslipidemic state found among patients who are heterozygous for mutations in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene may also increase the risk of CAD. In the present study, the association of the heterozygous forms of low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations causing FH as well as of LPL gene mutations causing (P207L and G188E) or not causing (D9N and N291S) complete loss of LPL activity with angiographically assessed CAD was estimated in a cohort of 412 French Canadian men aged <60 years who consecutively underwent coronary angiography for the investigation of retrosternal pain. The frequency of FH as well as of LPL gene mutations tended to increase with the number of narrowed coronary arteries. However, CAD occurred earlier in FH patients than in partly LPL-deficient patients. Indeed, the proportion of men affected by FH was of 16.4% in those <45 years of age, and solely 4.3% among those between 56 and 60 years of age (p <0.0001). In contrast, the LPL gene defect was found in only 4.0% of men aged <45 years, whereas this prevalence reached 8.3% among those aged 56 to 60 years. In multivariate analyses, the association of LPL with CAD was not independent of age, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, and other covariates included at baseline, and was not affected by the type of mutation in the LPL gene. In contrast, FH was associated with CAD with minimal contribution of other cardiovascular risk factors. However, the relation between FH and CAD was at least partly dependent on plasma apolipoprotein B concentrations. In the different regression models, fasting insulin and plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were important covariates of CAD, whether or not patients were affected by FH or LPL deficiency. In conclusion, the association of LPL gene mutations with CAD was delayed compared with FH, appeared to be markedly exacerbated by the presence of additional risk factors, and was not affected by the type of mutation in the LPL gene.

Leptinemia is not a risk factor for ischemic heart disease in men. Prospective results from the Quebec Cardiovascular Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility that leptin levels may be predictive of the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) through the relationship of leptin to body fat. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Quebec Cardiovascular Study cohort consisted of 2,103 French-Canadian men without IHD in 1985 who were followed until 1990, by which time 114 had experienced an IHD event. These 114 men were then individually matched for age, BMI, cigarette smoking, and alcohol intake with 114 subjects who were free of IHD at follow-up. After exclusion of diabetic patients and those in whom leptin levels could not be measured, we were able to compare the initial metabolic profiles of 86 men in the IHD group and of 95 control subjects. RESULTS: Plasma leptin concentrations were positively correlated with BMI (r = 0.67, P < 0.0001) and with fasting insulin concentrations (r = 0.46, P < 0.0001) in the overall sample. These significant associations were also observed when men with IHD and the control subjects were examined separately (control subjects: r = 0.68 for BMI and r = 0.45 for insulin; IHD subjects: r = 0.65 for BMI and r = 0.50 for insulin). With the exception of plasma triglyceride (r = 0.25, P < 0.001), no significant association was found between leptin and plasma lipoprotein and lipid concentrations. Furthermore, plasma insulin remained significantly associated with leptin levels even after adjustment for BMI (r = 0.22, P < 0.005). There was no difference in baseline leptin levels among men who developed IHD versus men who remained IHD-free during the 5-year follow-up (5.56 +/- 3.12 vs. 5.36 +/- 2.90 ng/ml, respectively). Thus, although significantly correlated with the BMI and fasting insulin levels, plasma leptin concentration was not a significant predictor of the 5-year incidence of IHD. This lack of a relationship to IHD was noted when leptin levels were analyzed as tertiles and when leptin concentration was analyzed as a continuous variable. CONCLUSIONS: These prospective results suggest that leptinemia, despite being a strong correlate of obesity, does not appear to be an independent risk factor for the development of IHD in men.

Relationships of abdominal obesity and hyperinsulinemia to angiographically assessed coronary artery disease in men with known mutations in the LDL receptor gene.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a mutation in the LDL receptor gene (familial hypercholesterolemia, or FH) are characterized by substantial elevations in plasma LDL cholesterol and are at higher risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD). Correlates of abdominal obesity may also contribute to the risk of ischemic cardiac events. Whether the hyperinsulinemic-insulin-resistant state of abdominal obesity affects coronary atherosclerosis among FH patients has not been determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relation of abdominal adiposity and hyperinsulinemia to angiographically assessed CAD was evaluated in a sample of 120 French Canadian men aged <60 years who were heterozygotes for FH and in a group of 280 men without FH. In the present study, the risk of CAD associated with abdominal obesity, as estimated by the waist circumference, was largely dependent on the concomitant variation in plasma lipoprotein and insulin concentrations. In contrast, the association between fasting insulin and CAD was independent of variations in waist girth, triglyceride, HDL, and apolipoprotein B concentrations (odds ratio, 1.86; P=.0005). However, the most substantial increase in the risk of CAD was observed among abdominally obese (waist circumference >95 cm) and hyperinsulinemic FH patients (odds ratio, 12.9; P=.0009). This increase in risk remained significant even after adjustment for LDL cholesterol or apolipoprotein B concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present study provide support for the notion that the hyperinsulinemic-insulin-resistant state of abdominal obesity is a powerful predictor of CAD in men, even in a group of patients with raised LDL cholesterol concentrations due to FH.

Is lipoprotein(a) an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease in men? The Quebec Cardiovascular Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine whether lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and to establish the relation of Lp(a) to the other lipid fractions. BACKGROUND: Several, but not all, studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with IHD; very few have been prospective. METHODS: A 5-year prospective follow-up study was conducted in 2,156 French Canadian men 47 to 76 years old, without clinical evidence of IHD. Lipid measurements obtained at baseline included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apoprotein B and Lp(a). During the follow-up period, there were 116 first IHD events (myocardial infarction, angina, death). Adjusted proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk for the different variables. The cohort was also classified according to Lp(a) levels and other lipid risk factor tertiles to evaluate the relation of elevated Lp(a) levels to these risk factors. A cutoff value of 30 mg/dl was used for Lp(a). Risk ratios were calculated using the group with low Lp(a) levels and the first tertile of lipid measures as a reference. RESULTS: Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but seemed to increase the deleterious effects of mildly elevated LDL cholesterol and elevated total cholesterol and apoprotein B levels and seemed to counteract the beneficial effects associated with elevated HDL cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but appeared to increase the risk associated with other lipid risk factors.

Geographic distribution of French-Canadian low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations in the Province of Quebec.

A total of 35 homozygous and 1320 heterozygous patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) was screened for the presence of six low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene mutations previously reported among French-Canadians. The geographic distribution of patients' birthplaces and the relative prevalence of these six mutations in the LDLR gene in the province of Quebec were compared. For this purpose, the 16 administrative regions of the province of Quebec were grouped into seven geographic regions. The relative frequency of the six mutations differed in the seven regions: the > 15 kb deletion (delta > 15 kb) had the highest relative frequency in the Bas St-Laurent/Gaspésie region, and the point mutation in exon 3 had the highest relative frequency in the Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean/Côte-Nord region. In the Montreal area, the delta > 15 kb and the mutation in exon 3 had prevalence rates of 71.2% and 13.0%, respectively, whereas the relative frequencies of the delta > 15 kb and the point mutation in exon 3 in the Quebec city region were 57.5 and 21.8%, respectively. Finally, in Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean/Côte-Nord, the relative frequency of the delta > 15 kb only reached 31.5% and the point mutation in exon 3, 59.2%. Thus, on the north shore of the St. Lawrence River, the prevalence of the delta > 15 kb decreases from west to north-east, whereas the relative frequency of the mutation in exon 3 appears to increase. These observations provide a better characterization of FH among French-Canadians of Quebec, a Canadian province with a high prevalence of this inherited disease.

Associations of HDL2 and HDL3 subfractions with ischemic heart disease in men. Prospective results from the Québec Cardiovascular Study.

Individuals with elevated plasma concentrations of HDL cholesterol are at lower risk for ischemic heart disease (IHD). Whether the cardioprotective effects of HDL can be attributed to one or both HDL subfractions (HDL2 and HDL3) remains, however, controversial. The relationship of HDL subfractions to the incidence of IHD was investigated in a sample of 1169 French-Canadian men younger than 60 years and living in the Quebec City suburbs. Between 1980 to 1981 and 1990, 83 of the 944 men with complete follow-up in 1990 (80.8%) had a first IHD. Men who developed IHD had lower HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 cholesterol concentrations at baseline than men who remained free from IHD. Adjusted relative risk (RR) of IHD was calculated among quartiles of HDL cholesterol and HDL subfractions with the use of Cox survival models. Men in the fourth quartile of HDL2 (RR = 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.56) and HDL3 cholesterol distributions (RR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.94) were at lower risk for IHD than men in the first quartile. Despite the fact that the respective contributions of HDL2 and HDL3 to IHD risk were of the same magnitude in a multivariate model that included both subfractions, the contribution of the HDL2 subfraction was statistically significant (standardized RR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95), whereas it did not reach significance for HDL3 (standardized RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.11). Neither the linear combination of HDL2 and HDL3 nor their ratio provided further information on the risk of IHD compared with HDL cholesterol alone or with the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol. From a statistical standpoint, the present data suggest that the HDL2 subfraction may be more closely related to the development of IHD than the HDL3 subfraction. However, the qualitative difference in the relative predictive value of each subfraction was trivial, since it only corresponded to a modest quantitative difference. Thus, the possibility that a significant proportion of the cardioprotective effect of elevated HDL cholesterol levels may be mediated by the HDL3 subfraction still cannot be excluded. Finally, from a clinical point of view and within the limits of resolution provided by these data, the measurement of HDL subfractions does not appear to provide any additional information on the risk of IHD than HDL cholesterol alone or the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol.