RESUMEN
The ability to recognize previously encountered conspecifics is crucial for social interaction. This social recognition ability is well characterized in adult rodents of both sexes but remains largely unexplored in juveniles. Using the social discrimination test of social recognition with short intervals (30 min and 1 h), we first found that juvenile female rats do not display a difference in investigation directed toward a novel vs. familiar stimulus rat. Using the social discrimination test with a 30-minute interval, we then showed that social recognition is established by the time of adolescence in female rats. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that social recognition is dependent on the initiation of ovarian hormone release during puberty. To test this, we ovariectomized females prior to puberty and found that prepubertal ovariectomy prevented the development of social recognition ability in adulthood. Administration of estradiol benzoate, 48 h prior to testing, to juvenile females or prepubertally ovariectomized adult females did not restore social recognition, suggesting that ovarian hormones organize the neural circuitry regulating this behavior during adolescence. These findings provide the first evidence of an effect of pubertal development on social recognition ability in female rats and highlight the importance of considering sex and age when interpreting results from behavioral paradigms initially designed for use in adult males.
Asunto(s)
Estradiol , Maduración Sexual , Masculino , Humanos , Ratas , Femenino , Animales , Maduración Sexual/fisiología , Estradiol/farmacología , Ovariectomía , Reconocimiento en Psicología , Habilidades Sociales , Interacción SocialRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate a newly implemented infectious disease (ID) consultation service in terms of patient care, outcome and antibiotic prescription and to describe factors influencing adherence to recommendations. METHODS: Data from consultations during the first 6 months of the ID consultation program were collected and evaluated. Consultation requests, diagnostic results, treatment outcomes and antibiotic recommendations were categorised. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations were assessed and rated for adherence and outcome. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing adherence and treatment outcome. RESULTS: A total of 251 consultations were assessed. In most cases, ID specialists were asked for further advice regarding a previously initiated anti-infective treatment (N = 131, 52 %). In 54 of 195 (28 %) first consultations, the ID specialist proposed a differential diagnosis that differed from that of the working diagnoses submitted with the consultation request, and which was subsequently confirmed in 80 % of these cases. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations were made in 190 (76 %) and 240 (96 %) of the consultations, respectively. A change in the current treatment was recommended in 66 % of consultations; 37 % of recommendations were cost-saving and 26 % were cost-neutral. Compliance with diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations was rated as good by pre-specified criteria in 65 and 86 % of consultations, respectively. Treatment outcome was correlated with adherence to diagnostic recommendations (P = 0.012). Twenty-nine patients (16 %) died during the same hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Infectious disease consultations may help to establish the correct diagnosis, resulting in the appropriate treatment being provided to a severely sick patient population. Treatment outcome was improved in cases of good diagnostic adherence to the recommendations of the ID specialist.