Novel Role of 5-Methyl-(6S)-Tetrahydrofolate in Mediating Endothelial Cell Tetrahydrobiopterin in Pregnancy and Implications for Gestational Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Folate intake during pregnancy is essential for fetal development and maternal health. However, the specific effects of folic acid (FA) and 5-methyl-(6S)-tetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) on the prevention and treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain unclear. We investigated whether FA and 5-MTHF have different effects on endothelial cell tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) metabolism in pregnancy and the possible consequences for endothelial NO generation, maternal blood pressure, and fetal growth. METHODS: We analyzed the maternal blood pressure in pregnant wild-type (Gch1fl/fl) and Gch1fl/fl Tie2cre mice treated with either FA or 5-MTHF starting before pregnancy, mid-pregnancy or late pregnancy. BH4, superoxide, and NO bioavailability were determined in mouse and human models of endothelial cell BH4 deficiency by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: In vitro studies in mouse and human endothelial cells showed that treatment with 5-MTHF, but not FA, elevated BH4 levels, reduced superoxide production, and increased NO synthase activity. In primary endothelial cells isolated from women with hypertensive pregnancies, exposure to 5-MTHF, but not FA, restored the reduction in BH4 levels and NO synthase activity. In vivo studies in mice revealed that oral treatment with 5-MTHF, but not FA, prevented and treated hypertension in pregnancy when administered either before or during pregnancy, respectively, and normalized placental and fetal growth restriction if administered from mid-gestation onward. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these studies identify a critical role for 5-MTHF in endothelial cell function in pregnancy, related to endothelial cell BH4 availability and NO synthase activity. Thus, 5-MTHF represents a novel therapeutic agent that may potentially improve endothelial function in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy by targeting endothelial cell BH4.

Folates as adjuvants to anticancer agents: Chemical rationale and mechanism of action.

Folates have been used with cytotoxic agents for decades and today they are used in hundreds of thousands of patients annually. Folate metabolism is complex. In the treatment of cancer with 5-fluorouracil, the administration of folates mechanistically leads to the formation of [6R]-5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate, and the increased concentration of this molecule leads to stabilization of the ternary complex comprising thymidylate synthase, 2'-deoxy-uridine-5'-monophosphate, and [6R]-5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate. The latter is the only natural folate that can bind directly in the ternary complex, with other folates requiring metabolic activation. Modulation of thymidylate synthase activity became central in the study of folate/cytotoxic combinations and, despite wide use, research into the folate component was neglected, leaving important questions unanswered. This article revisits the mechanisms of action of folates and evaluates commercially available folate derivatives in the light of current research. Better genomic insight and availability of new analytical techniques and stable folate compounds may open new avenues of research and therapy, ultimately bringing increased clinical benefit to patients.

Supplementation with [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate or folic acid equally reduces plasma total homocysteine concentrations in healthy women.

BACKGROUND: Increased plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) is a risk factor for vascular disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Health authorities recommend periconceptional supplementation with 400 micro g folic acid to prevent neural tube defects. Several countries have implemented food fortification with folic acid. However, excessive intake of folic acid could mask an undiagnosed vitamin B-12 deficiency. The biologically active [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate ([6S]-5-MTHF) may be an alternative to folic acid because it is unlikely to mask vitamin B-12 deficiency symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We compared the tHcy-lowering potential of 2 dosages of [6S]-5-MTHF with that of 400 micro g folic acid during 24 wk of supplementation. DESIGN: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled intervention trial, 144 female participants were supplemented daily with 400 micro g folic acid, 416 micro g [6S]-5-MTHF, 208 micro g [6S]-5-MTHF, or placebo. Concentrations of tHcy and plasma folate were measured at baseline and at 4-wk intervals. RESULTS: After supplementation, there was a significant interaction between time and treatment with respect to changes in tHcy and plasma folate (both P < 0.001 by two-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance). The decrease in tHcy did not differ significantly between the 3 supplemented groups (P > 0.05; Tukey's post hoc test). The increase in plasma folate in the group receiving 208 micro g [6S]-5-MTHF was significantly lower than that in the groups receiving 400 micro g folic acid (P < 0.001) or 416 micro g [6S]-5-MTHF (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: [6S]-5-MTHF was shown to be an adequate alternative to folic acid in reducing tHcy concentrations. Supplementation with 416 micro g [6S]-5-MTHF was no more effective than that with 208 micro g [6S]-5-MTHF.

Comparison of the effect of low-dose supplementation with L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate or folic acid on plasma homocysteine: a randomized placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Food fortification with folic acid has been introduced in several countries for the prevention of neural tube defects. Fortification has lowered total homocysteine (tHcy) concentrations in the US population, a consequence that may have health benefits. However, folic acid fortification could mask vitamin B-12 deficiency. Synthetic L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-MTHF) may be more appropriate than folic acid as a fortificant because it is unlikely to mask the hematologic indicators of vitamin B-12 deficiency. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of 100 micro g folic acid/d with that of equimolar L-MTHF in lowering tHcy in healthy volunteers. DESIGN: The study was designed as a 24-wk, randomized, placebo-controlled intervention. Free-living healthy volunteers (n = 167) were randomly assigned to receive a daily supplement containing folic acid (100 microg), L-MTHF (113 microg), or placebo. Blood collected at baseline and at 8, 16, and 24 wk was analyzed for tHcy, plasma folate, and red blood cell folate (RCF) concentrations. RESULTS: At 24 wk, after adjustment for baseline values, mean (95% CI) tHcy was 14.6% (9.3, 19.5%) and 9.3% (3.7, 14.6%) lower, mean plasma folate was 34% (14, 56%) and 52% (30, 78%) higher, and mean RCF was 23% (12, 35%) and 31% (19, 44%) higher in the L-MTHF and folic acid groups, respectively, than in the placebo group. L-MTHF was more effective than was folic acid in lowering tHcy (P < 0.05). At 24 wk, the increases in plasma folate and RCF concentrations did not differ significantly between the 2 supplemented groups. CONCLUSION: Low-dose L-MTHF is at least as effective as is folic acid in reducing tHcy concentrations in healthy persons.

Increases in blood folate indices are similar in women of childbearing age supplemented with [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate and folic acid.

The natural diastereoisomer [6S]-5-methyltetrahydrofolate ([6S]-5-MTHF) may be a safer fortificant than folic acid for neural tube defect (NTD) prevention because it is unlikely to mask vitamin B-12 deficiency. An inverse relationship between NTD risk and blood folate concentrations has been reported. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, we compared the effects of [6S]-5-MTHF and folic acid supplementation for 24 wk on plasma folate and red cell folate (RCF) in women of childbearing age (18-49 y). Women (n = 104) were randomly assigned to receive a supplement containing [6S]-5-MTHF (113 micro g/d), folic acid (100 micro g/d) or placebo. The mean estimated linear increase in plasma folate concentration was 0.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1, 0.5], and 0.4 (0.2, 0.6) nmol/(L. wk) in the [6S]-5-MTHF and folic acid groups, respectively. The mean estimated linear increase in RCF was 7.4 (95% CI: 4.5, 10.3), and 8.3 (4.4, 12.3) nmol/(L. wk) in the [6S]-5-MTHF and folic acid groups, respectively. There were no differences in the slopes between the [6S]-5-MTHF group and the folic acid group in either plasma folate (P = 0.48) or RCF (P = 0.70). At 24 wk, estimated mean increases in plasma folate concentrations were 6.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 12.2) and 9.2 (3.3, 15.1) nmol/L, and in RCF, 251 (143, 360) and 275 (148, 402) nmol/L, in the [6S]-5-MTHF and folic acid groups, respectively, relative to the placebo group. These data suggest that low dose [6S]-5-MTHF and folic acid supplementation increase blood folate indices to a similar extent. A steady state in the blood indices had not been reached by 24 wk.