Role of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Severe Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Artery Endarterectomy within Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Background-Coronary endarterectomy (CEA) has been introduced to allow revascularization in end-stage coronary artery disease (CAD). After CEA, the injured remnants of the vessel's media could result in fast neo intimal tissue ingrowth, which require an anti-proliferation agent (antiplatelet therapy (APT). We aimed to review outcomes of patients undergoing CEA within bypass surgery who received either single-APT (SAPT) or dual-APT (DAPT). Methods-We retrospectively evaluated 353 consecutive patients undergoing CEA within isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the period 01/2000-07/2019. After surgery, patients received either SAPT (n = 153), or DAPT (n = 200) for six months then lifelong SAPT. Endpoints included early, late survival, and freedom from major-adverse-cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which were defined as incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, need for coronary intervention (PCI or CABG) or death for any cause. Results-Patients' mean age was 67 ± 9.3 years; they were predominantly male 88.1%. Both DAPT- and SAPT-groups had the same extent of CAD (mean SYNTAX-Score-II: 34.1 ± 11.6 vs. 34.4 ± 17.2, p = 0.91). Postoperatively, no difference between DAPT- and SAPT-groups was reported in the incidence of low-cardiac-output syndrome (5% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.16), revision for bleeding (5% vs. 6.5% p = 0.64), 30-day mortality (4.5% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.8) or MACCE (7.5% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.19). Imaging follow-up reported significantly higher CEA and total grafts patency (90% vs. 81.5% and 95% vs. 81%, p = 0.017) in DAPT patients. Late outcomes within 97.4 ± 67.4 months show lower incidence of overall mortality (19 vs. 51%, p < 0.001) and MACCE (24.5 vs. 58.2%, p < 0.001) in the DAPT patients when compared with SAPT patients. Conclusions-Coronary endarterectomy allows revascularization in end-stage CAD when the myocardium is still viable. The use of dual APT after CEA for at least six months seems to improve mid-to-long-term patency rates and survival, and reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Early Results of Total Coronary Revascularization via Left Anterior Thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Avoidance of sternotomy while preserving complete revascularization remains challenging in multivessel coronary disease. Technical issues and in-hospital outcomes of total coronary revascularization via a small left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) in nonselected patients with multivessel disease are reported. METHODS: From November 2019 to September 2021, coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior minithoracotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic cardiac arrest was performed in 102 patients (92 males; 67 ± 10 [42-87] years). Slings were placed around ascending aorta, left pulmonary veins, and inferior vena cava for exposure of lateral and inferior ventricular wall. All patients had multivessel coronary disease (three-vessel disease: n = 72; two-vessel disease: n = 30; left main stenosis: n = 44). We included patients at old age (> 80 years, 14.7%), with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 30%, 6.9%), massive obesity (body mass index > 35, 11.6%), and at increased risk (EuroSCORE II > 4, 15.7%). RESULTS: Left internal thoracic artery (n = 101), radial artery (n = 83), and saphenous vein (n = 39) grafts were used for total (61.8%) or multiple (19.6%) arterial grafting. A total of 323 distal anastomoses (3.2 ± 0.7 [2-5] per patient) were performed to revascularize left anterior descending (100%), circumflex (91.2%), and right coronary artery (67.7%). Complete revascularization was achieved in 95.1%. In-hospital mortality was 2.9%, stroke rate was 1.0%, myocardial infarction rate was 2.9%, and repeat revascularization rate was 2.0%. CONCLUSION: This novel surgical technique allows complete coronary revascularization in the broad majority of multivessel disease patients without sternotomy. TCRAT can be introduced into clinical routine safely. Long-term results remain to be investigated.

Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Closed Traction CoronaryEndarterectomy: A Long-Term Single Center Study.

Background-Coronary endarterectomy (CEA) is an option for treating severely diffused coronary artery diseases; however, many surgeons avoid performing it due to its complexity and reported controversial results. Therefore, we aimed to review the results of patients undergoing CEA within coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods-This is a retrospective observational study evaluating the results of patients undergoing CEA within CABG surgery between March 2003 and February 2018. Follow-up via active personal and/or telephone interviews was performed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes. The study endpoints included early postoperative incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiac mortality, long-term survival, and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results-A total of 326 patients were included in this study for evaluation. The patients' mean age was 67 years; 88% were male, and most presented with three-vessel disease, reporting a mean SYNTAX score of 33.1 ± 12. Approximately 5.5% (n = 18) of the patients had undergone previous CABG surgery. A total of 394 CEAs within a mean of 4.3 ± 1.1 grafts per patient were performed. The indication for CEA was either totally (n = 111, 28.2%) or sub-totally (n = 283, 71.8%) occluded coronary arteries. Early results included perioperative myocardial infarction in eight (2.4%), stroke in eight (2.4%), and in-hospital mortality in thirteen (4.0%) patients. Long-term clinical follow-up reported mortality in 27.6% and overall incidence of MACCE in 41.4% of the patients at the ten-year follow-up. Conclusions-Patients with severe and diffuse CAD are difficult candidates for surgical revascularization. CEA offers an option to allow complete revascularization, even in the case of chronic occlusion, when the myocardium is still viable. The closed traction CEA technique presented here is our preferred method; it achieves satisfactory short- and long-term results.

NEO E-vita-NEO era!

In this review article, the history of the first commercially available thoracic aortic hybrid graft, the E-vita Open, later modified to the blood-impermeable E-vita Open Plus, is reported from its beginning in 2005 until its newest variation, the E-vita Open NEO, European conformity (CE) marked in 2020. Besides the background of its design and clinical experience in Essen, concomitant evolutionary steps in surgery as well as in strategic approaches like the hybrid operating room concept are displayed, finally leading to a well-rounded surgical package with a device that can be applied in all elective as well as emergency situations with complex arch involving aortic pathologies. With the E-vita Open NEO, now, surgery has been facilitated to convenient anastomosing in any of the arch zones, with the opportunity to use the island technique with a straight graft variation as well as individual head vessel anastomosing with either a trifurcated graft for zone 0 or the branched graft for zone 2 or 3 implantation. With its proven long-term stability, the surgical armamentarium to cope with complex multisegmental thoracic aortic pathologies has been significantly improved.

Impact of Non-Valvular Non-Coronary Concomitant Procedures on Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients.

INTRODUCTION: advanced age and concomitant procedures could increase the risk of perioperative complications during surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We aimed to evaluate results of elderly patients undergoing SAVR and evaluate the impact of concomitant non-valvular, non-coronary procedures on the outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre study, evaluating 464 elderly patients (mean age = 75.6 ± 4 years) undergoing either isolated-SAVR (I-SAVR = 211) or combined-SAVR (C-SAVR = 253) between 01/2007 and 12/2017. Combined-SAVR involved non-valvular, non-coronary procedures. Study endpoints are postoperative results concerning the VARC-II criteria, valve dysfunction, long-term freedom from redo-AVR and survival. RESULTS: males were 52.8%. Patients had an intermediate risk profile (mean EuroSCORE-II (%) 5.2 ± 5). Postoperative results reported no significant differences in incidence of re-exploration for bleeding (6.6% vs. 6.7%, p = 1.0), stroke (0.9% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.59), dialysis (6.2% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.23) and pacemaker implantation (3.3% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.79) between I-SAVR and C-SAVR groups. Thirty-day (2.4% vs. 7.1% p = 0.03), one-year (5.7% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.003) and overall mortality (24.6% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.002) were lower in the isolated-SAVR group. Re-AVR was indicated in 1.7% of patients due to endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR in elderly patients offers good outcomes with increased life quality and rare re-operation for structural valvular deterioration. Mortality rates were significantly higher when SAVR was combined with another "non-valvular, non-coronary" procedure.

Aortic valve construction using new nitinol templates and pericardial tissue.

The use of pericardial tissue has been widely adopted in a range of cardiac surgery procedures involving the reconstruction of heart valves. Its use in aortic valve construction has been discussed in recent years by Ozaki et al. A key parameter in the optimal functioning of a fabricated valve is the sizing of the new cusps. This video tutorial demonstrates aortic valve construction using newly designed templates and forceps to facilitate sizing and enhance the symmetrical coaptation of the new cusps.

A new simplified technique for artificial chordae implantation in mitral valve repair with its early results.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques in mitral valve repair (MVR) have been reported with successful long-term results. The aim of this study is to present our simplified technique in artificial chordae replacement for MVR, and reporting its short-term outcomes. METHODS: We present a prospective single-surgeon experience. A new simplified artificial chordae implantation technique has been used to repair mitral valves. Postoperative echocardiography at 0, 6, then every 12 months is used to control the results. Endpoints involved freedom from mitral regurgitation (MR), reoperation and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Between 01/2016 and 01/2018, 57 consecutive patients undergo MVR using this technique are evaluated. Mean age was 63.6±10.1 years and 68.4% were male. Mitral valve pathology was mainly degenerative (52, 91.2%) or healed endocarditis (5, 8.8%). Besides chordae replacement (3.6±1.1 per patient), annuloplasty was used in all patients to correct annulus dilation and stabilize the repair. Mean cross-clamping time was 53±13.4 minutes in isolated MVR and 69.4±31.1 minutes in concomitant procedures. Postoperative outcomes reported two mortalities. Discharge echocardiography reported mild MR in 4 patients and the rest of patients had non-to trace regurgitation. Follow-up results within a mean of 19.3±8.5 months reported no significant MR or need for reoperation and three more (non-valve related) mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: Our simplified technique allows to reduce the number of used chordae and re-correction if needed, which consequently reduces cross-clamping and bypass time especially in endoscopic MVR. Good intraoperative and short-term results are reported. These results are still under investigation to prove long-term stability of the repair.

An in vitro comparison of flow dynamics of the Magna Ease and the Trifecta prostheses.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the in vitro flow dynamics of the Perimount Magna Ease™ (PME) and the Trifecta™ (TF) bioprostheses.Material and methods: A new flow chamber was designed to compare the flow patterns of the PME (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and the TF (SJM, St. Paul, MN, USA) aortic valve prostheses. This new channel offered the possibility of 2D-particle-image-velocimetry (2D-PIV) to completely evaluate the flow field downstream from the aortic valve to the middle of the aortic arch. Maximum average velocities, vorticity, shear strength, maximum orifice diameters and jet flow diameters were analyzed. Valve sizes of 21, 23 and 25 mm were evaluated.Results: Average velocity values, shear strength and vorticities were smaller in the flow field of the TF (maximum average velocity: 0.81 ± 0.03m/s, PME 23 mm vs. 0.7 ± 0.02m/s TF 23 mm, P < .001) under pulsatile flow conditions (70 Hz, 70 mL stroke volume). The evaluation of the upper orifice area revealed bigger maximum diameters during the peak flow phase for the TF, but more leaflet-flutter.Conclusions: Our flow chamber allowed a precise and highly sensitive characterization and comparison of complex fluid dynamics of different aortic valve prostheses. Both the Trifecta™ and the Perimount Magna Ease™ showed a good performance on a high level.

Modified implantation height of the Sapien3™ transcatheter heart valve.

Objectives: During transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), ideal positioning is crucial. The latest-generation balloon expandable Sapien3™ transcatheter heart valve (THV) comes with a marker, which is recommended to be exactly centered at the aortic annular level. We aimed to evaluate a higher "aortic" marker positioning.Material and methods: A total of 119 high-risk patients presenting with aortic stenosis were treated with the Sapien3™ THV. After having placed the THV more "aortic", clinical and hemodynamic data, especially postoperative pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leakages, were evaluated at 30-days according to VARC-2.Results: The Sapien3™ THV was implanted in 92 patients via the transapical, in 13 patients via the transaortic and in 14 patients via the tranfemoral access. Mean age was 80.6 ± 5.7 years. Aortic valve area increased significantly (0.9 ± 0.3 vs. 1.80 ± 0.35cm2, p < .0001) and mean pressure gradients decreased from 41.0 ± 15.0 to 10.4 ± 3.5 mmHg (p < .0001). The majority of patients showed no or mild paravalvular aortic regurgitation (99.1%, 112/113), confirmed by transthoracic echocardiography at 30-days: PVL was absent or trace in 91.2% (103/113), mild in 7.9% (9/113) and moderate in 0.9% (1/113), whereas no patient developed severe PVL. Thirty days mortality was 5.0% (6/119). All patients (n = 113) were in NYHA functional class I or II at 30 days and three patients (2.5%) needed pacemaker implantation.Conclusions: In conclusion, a modified higher "aortic" implantation of the Sapien3™ THV holds promise to further reduce paravalvular leakage as well as permanent pacemaker implantation in TAVI. This trial showed an extremely low postoperative pacemaker implantation rate of 2.5%.

Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Endarterectomy in Patients With Complete Imaging Follow-Up.

Coronary endarterectomy (CEA) within coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is controversially discussed; however, CEA is considered as a last option for severely diseased coronary arteries. We therefore aimed to evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing CABG with CEA. We present a retrospective single surgeon's experience. Between 05/1999 and 12/2017, 426 patients underwent CABG with CEA. Follow-up imaging was proposed to all surviving patients, and only patients accepting were considered for this study. This resulted in a cohort of 112 patients within a mean postoperative interval of 53 ± 49 months. Study endpoints are graft patency, overall survival, and incidence of major-adverse-events. Mean patients' age was 65.5 ± 9.4 years; 90.2% were male. A total of 139 CEAs were performed (24 patients had more than 1 CEA-graft). Most of patients (91.1%) presented with 3-vessel disease. Mean syntax score was 29.8 ± 8.5. Four ± 1.3 grafts were constructed per patient; CEA target coronaries were either totally (31.9%) or subtotally (68.1%) occluded. CEA was performed at LAD- or RCA-territory (42.4% each) or LCX-territory (15.1%). Early postoperative outcomes reported stroke in 2 patients, myocardial infarction in 4 patients with 2 patients dying. Imaging follow-up reported 119 (out of 139) patent vs 20 occluded CEA-grafts (17 venous and 3 arterial). Long-term survival was 77.7% and freedom from major-adverse-events was 63.3% within mean follow-up time of 83 ± 67 months. Although CEA is a complex and second-line procedure, it offers a surgical option to allow myocardial revascularization in patients with diffuse or severe coronary artery disease. Good short- and long-term results can be achieved.

Long-Term Single-Center Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Renal Dialysis Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of dialysis-dependent chronic renal failure (DD-CRF) is growing worldwide. Such patients are exposed to a higher cardiovascular risk because of severe calcification and congestive heart failure caused by volume overload, with poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of patients with DD-CRF who were undergoing cardiac surgery in a single institution (West German Heart and Vascular Centre Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany). METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 241 consecutive patients who presented with DD-CRF and were undergoing cardiac-surgery between January 2000 and December 2017 was conducted. End points were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and long-term survival. Additionally, Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed to detect independent predictors of mortality. Follow-up was 98.3% complete through August 2018. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 63 ± 12.2 years, and 65.1% of these patients were male. Congestive heart failure (CHF) was present in 41.5% of patients, 30.7% had a previous myocardial infarction, 9.1% had previous cardiac surgery, and 22.4% needed urgent or emergency surgery. These patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (44.8%), isolated procedures other than coronary artery bypass grafting (17.8%), or concomitant procedures (37.3%). Early outcomes reported in-hospital mortality in 10.4%, low cardiac output syndrome in 7.1%, and stroke in 2.1% of patients, respectively. Overall mortality was recorded in 61% of patients at last follow-up. Cox regression multivariate analysis reported age 60 years or older (hazard ratio [HR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62 to 3.45; P < .001) and CHF (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.78; P < .001) as positive predictors of death and subsequent kidney transplantation (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P < .001) as a negative predictor of death. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac surgery in patients with DD-CRF is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, overall mortality was mainly not cardiac related, and older patients or those who presented with CHF had the worst life expectancy. However, subsequent kidney transplantation positively affected long-term survival in these patients.

Hedinger syndrome: first experience and two-year follow-up in patients with carcinoid heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) (Hedinger syndrome) is a rare manifestation, it has been described in up to 60% of patients with both neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and carcinoid syndrome (CS) which, typically inducing right heart-sided abnormalities. METHODS: Between 07/15 and 10/18, six patients (mean age 63±12 years; 3 females) presented with manifested (NYHA III-IV) Hedinger syndrome's related valvular(s) lesion and were operated at our center. Clinical data, adverse events and patient outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: The tricuspid valve was involved in all patients. Tricuspid valve repair was possible in four patients and two needed replacement. In two patients, operation was performed on beating heart without cross-clamping. Concomitant pulmonary valve replacement in two patients and aortic valve replacement in another two patients. A mean cross-clamp time of 61±50 minutes was observed. One patient with severely impaired right ventricular function needed ECMO support, and died 3 days later due to neuroendocrine enzyme storm. At 13 months, one patient developed severe tricuspid stenosis and underwent re-operation with replacement. Another patient died 18 months after surgery related to the underlying tumour. At mean of 30 months follow-up, four patients were alive and asymptotic. CONCLUSIONS: Hedinger syndrome is a challenging entity in cardiac surgery characterized by aggressive valve lesions combined with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasia affecting the systemic circulation. We advise a multidisciplinary collaboration to early diagnose cardiac involvement to offer an early and proper treatment regime.

Outcomes of mitral valve repair in acute native mitral valve infective endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve repair (MVR) is considered the treatment of choice for mitral valve (MV) regurgitation. However, MVR in acute native MV infective endocarditis is technically challenging and not commonly performed. Our goal was to report our outcomes of MVR in acute native MV infective endocarditis. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2017, 35 patients presenting with acute native MV infective endocarditis underwent MVR. Primary end points were successful MVR and freedom from recurrent endocarditis. Secondary end point was the postoperative incidence of major adverse events. RESULTS: The mean age was 58 ± 13 years (74% men) and the median logistic EuroSCORE was 17.1%. Twenty patients underwent isolated MVR; the other 15 patients underwent concomitant procedures. MVR was performed with removal of the vegetation (vegectomy), limited resection of the infected tissue, direct closure of the defect, besides annuloplasty in all patients. Mean intensive care and hospital stays were 5 and 17 days, respectively. All-cause mortality was 11% (4/35) at 30 days and a total of 23% (8/35) within a follow-up period of 10 ± 7.7 months. Endocarditis recurred in 2 patients 15 and 8 months after surgery, respectively. Both underwent successful MV re-repair. Follow-up echocardiography indicated none-to-trace, mild or moderate regurgitation in 15, 10 and 2 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although MVR in acute native MV infective endocarditis is a complex procedure, it offers a treatment option for such patients with acceptable short-term results. Limited resection in addition to annuloplasty is our preferred method of repair. Nevertheless, long-term results in a larger cohort are still mandatory.

Transit time flow measurement and high frequency ultrasound epicardial imaging to guide coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) should be routinely used in CABG surgery to verify graft function. Most recently, a 2D high-frequency-ultrasound (HF-US) epicardial imaging probe has been released (MiraQ™, Medistim, Oslo, Norway), which allows to evaluate the cannulation/clamping site of the aorta morphologically and to evaluate the completed anastomosis. We aimed to evaluate the use of TTFM and HF-US on surgical strategy during CABG surgery. METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive patients undergoing CABG surgery were evaluated. The target vessels, the clamping/cannulation site and the anastomosis were evaluated by HF-US. TTFM was performed on all grafts and the mean flow (mL/min) and pulsatility indices (PI) were recorded. Troponin-I levels (ng/L) were obtained within the first 4 postoperative days. RESULTS: A total of 3.3±0.9 grafts were performed, with 98.5% LIMA use and a sequential graft was performed in 55.4%. The mean PI and flow (mL/min) were 2.3±2.7 and 70.8±50.6 for the right coronary artery system, 2.4±2.2 and 82.0±47.6 for the circumflex system, and 2.1±1.2 and 78.0±35.0 for the LAD system, respectively. Postoperative troponin-I levels showed a maximum on postoperative day 1. A surgical strategy change, based on imaging, was done in 15%. Moreover, we observed a correlation of PI and flow with maximum postoperative troponin-I levels. CONCLUSIONS: The present study evaluated the combination of TTFM and HF-US in CABG surgery. Epicardial scanning was helpful to evaluate the potential opening site of the vessel, to evaluate the completed anastomosis or to evaluate the clamping or cannulation site. Troponin-I levels were directly correlated to mean graft flow and PI levels.

Aortic valve construction using pericardial tissue: short-term single-centre outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve construction using pericardial tissue has been known since the late 1960s. The procedure was re-introduced by Ozaki in 2010 and is currently used to treat specific aortic valve diseases. The exact sizing of the neo-cusps and the insertion of the commissures remain the keys to success when performing this procedure. We evaluated our experience using modified custom-made templates. METHODS: In this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 52 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve construction between September 2015 and March 2017 using either autologous (16 patients, 30.8%) or tissue-engineered pericardium (36 patients, 69.2%). Most patients (34, 65.4%) presented with aortic stenosis or endocarditis (5, 9.6%). Twenty patients had bicuspid and 5 had unicuspid valves. A modified sizing technique with specially designed templates was used. The primary end point was early death; the secondary end points were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, freedom from reoperation and overall mortality rate. Echocardiographic follow-up was performed intraoperatively and at 12-month intervals. RESULTS: The mean age was 60 ± 14 years; 63.5% were men; and 34 (65.4%) patients had combined procedures. The mean cross-clamp time was 99 ± 17 min. Early outcomes included 1 stroke, 2 patients needing short-term dialysis and 1 death. During follow-up (mean 11.2 ± 4.8 months), trace aortic regurgitation was observed in 4 patients; the mean pressure gradient was 6.8 ± 2.9 mmHg. Three patients died later (of non-cardiac reasons), and 5 patients needed reoperation due to endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve construction using pericardial tissue could be an alternative in middle-age patients presenting with aortic valve disease in whom valve repair was not possible. The newly designed templates allow exact sizing of the neo-cusps and optimal commissure implantation; however, long-term follow-up in a larger cohort is warranted to assess the durability of the neo-valves.

Modified sizing technique with newly designed tools to facilitate the valve sparing aortic root replacement "David" procedure with mid-term results.

BACKGROUND: Valve sparing root replacement differs in specific points. The main target remains to achieve a perfect intraoperative result and long-term stability. We aimed in this study to present our modified sizing technique for valve-sparing "David" procedure and its mid-term results. METHODS: We present a retrospective single-center study. A newly designed sizing ring in addition to triple-armed forceps (Trifeet®) was used to measure the proper size of the Valsalva® prosthesis for patients undergoing David-procedure. Primary endpoints are intraoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) and early postoperative outcomes. Secondary endpoints included freedom from aortic regurgitation or reoperation and overall mortality. RESULTS: A total of 63 consecutive patients who underwent David procedure between 09/2012 and 12/2016 were evaluated. Mean age was 52±15 years and 76.2% were male. Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was reported in 60 (95.2%) patients. Four (6.3%) patients presented with type-A aortic dissection, 20 (31.7%) patients had bicuspid and 3 (4.8%) had a unicuspid aortic valve, 2 (3.2%) patients had a prior aortic valve repair. Intraoperative echocardiography revealed no 34 (54%), trace 26 (41.2%) or moderate 3 (4.8%) AR. Stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality occurred in 1 patient (1.6%). During follow-up 5 (7.9%) patients needed reoperation due to recurrent AR within a mean of 35±18 months. One could be re-repaired, and the other four underwent aortic valve replacement. A second patient died in the late follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified sizing technique simplifies the "David-procedure" and allows to achieve a good intraoperative and mid-term results. However, these results have to be confirmed in a larger cohort with a long-term follow-up.

Infections after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: mid-term results of 200 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the standard therapy for high-risk patients with aortic stenosis (AS). TAVI-outcomes are widely investigated in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), but less is known about infectious complications after TAVI. We aimed to compare early and mid-term infectious outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI or SAVR. METHODS: The present study is a prospective single-centre study including 200 consecutive patients between 06/2014-03/2015 undergoing TAVI (either transfemoral or transapical and transaortic, n=47+53=100) or SAVR (either isolated or concomitant with CABG, n=52+48=100). The mean age and log. EuroSCORE were significantly different between both groups (81±6 versus 69±11 years, P<0.001 and 23.1%±13.8% versus 8.7%±9.5%, P<0.001). Primary endpoints included wound healing disorders, respiratory and urinary tract infections and incidence of endocarditis or sepsis within hospital stay. Secondary endpoints included infectious parameters, infectious related rehospitalisation and 2-year mortality. RESULTS: Primary endpoints showed no difference in overall TAVI- versus SAVR-groups regarding respiratory- (14% versus 19%, P=0.45), urinary-tract (7% versus 4%, P=0.54) infections, sepsis (5% versus 6%, P=1.0), endocarditis (0% versus 1%, P=1.0) or 30-day mortality (10% versus 4%, P=0.09), except for wound disorders, which were significantly lower in the TAVI-group (1% versus 8%, P=0.035), respectively. Secondary endpoints reported no difference regarding infectious related rehospitalisation (4% versus 4%, P=1.0), but significantly higher 2-year mortality (28% versus 16%, P=0.048) in the TAVI-group. CONCLUSIONS: So far, little has been studied about infectious complications after TAVI. This study reports no difference between the overall TAVI and SAVR groups regarding infectious complications. However, SAVR group show more wound healing disorders but less mortality than TAVI group.

Endoscopy in aortic valve repair: does it worth it?

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve repair (AVR) is a technically challenging procedure. Usually, the repaired valve is checked after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We aimed to evaluate intraoperative and clinical outcomes of AVR patients in whom intraoperative aortic root endoscopy was applied. METHODS: The present study was a retrospective single-center study. An autoclavable video-scope was used to evaluate aortic valve. During endoscopy, crystalloid cardioplegia was administered to pressurize the aortic root. Primary endpoints were: need for Re-CPB after weaning from bypass and early postoperative aortic valve regurgitation. Secondary endpoints included: 30-day mortality and freedom from aortic regurgitation/reoperation during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 66 consecutive patients who underwent AVR (05/2014-03/2017) were evaluated. Patients mean age was 53.5±14.5 years and 74.2% were male. Seventy-three percent of the patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV. The main underlying aortic valve pathology was aortic valve regurgitation in 83.3%, 9.1% aortic stenosis and combination of both in 7.6%. A tricuspid or bicuspid aortic valve was observed in 48.5% and 43.9%, respectively, whereas 7.6% showed a functional unicuspid aortic valve. Intraoperative results revealed endoscopy as a helpful tool, where second time cross-clamp was avoided in most (58, 87.9%) of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 3.0%. During follow-up (28±10 months), 2 patients required re-operation due to recurrent aortic valve regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis showed, that intraoperative aortic valve endoscopy is a helpful tool to evaluate AVR before weaning from bypass. This easy-to-use tool gives real-time information about the intraoperative result and might provide additional guidance to achieve optimal results after AVR.