Association of Clinical Events With Everolimus Exposure in Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Low Doses of Tacrolimus.

A key objective in the use of immunosuppression after kidney transplantation is to attain the optimal balance between efficacy and safety. In a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, the incidences of clinical events, renal dysfunction, and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed at 12 months in 309 de novo renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus (EVR), low-dose tacrolimus (LTac), and prednisone. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to estimate the probability of clinical events at specified combinations of time-normalized EVR and Tac trough concentrations. At 12 months, the highest incidence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR) and graft loss occurred most often in patients with EVR trough concentration <3 ng/mL (64.7% and 10.5%, respectively). At 1 month and 12 months, increasing EVR levels were associated with fewer tBPAR events (both p < 0.0001). Low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and decreased eGFR occurred more often in patients with lower EVR and higher Tac levels. AEs were most often observed in patients with EVR levels <3 ng/mL. This study supports maintaining an EVR trough concentration of 3-8 ng/mL, when combined with LTac, to achieve balanced efficacy and safety in renal transplant recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01025817.

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Data.

In this 12-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, de novo renal transplant recipients (RTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive everolimus plus low-dose tacrolimus (EVR+LTac) or mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose Tac (MMF+STac) with induction therapy (basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin). Noninferiority of composite efficacy failure rate (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection [tBPAR]/graft loss/death/loss to follow-up) in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac was missed by 1.4%, considering the noninferiority margin of 10% (24.6% vs. 20.4%; 4.2% [-3.0, 11.4]). Incidence of tBPAR (19.1% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.05) was significantly higher, while graft loss (1.3% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.05) and composite of graft loss/death/lost to follow-up (6.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was similar between EVR+LTac and MMF+STac groups (63.1 [22.0] vs. 63.1 [19.5] mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and safety was comparable. In conclusion, EVR+LTac missed noninferiority versus MMF+STac based on the 10% noninferiority margin. Further studies evaluating optimal immunosuppression for improved efficacy will guide appropriate dosing and target levels of EVR and LTac in RTxRs.

Characteristics and Evaluation of Geographically Distant vs Geographically Nearby Living Kidney Donors.

BACKGROUND: Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) can be impeded by multiple barriers. One possible barrier to LDKT is a large physical distance between the living donor's home residence and the procuring transplant center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of living kidney donors in the United States who were geographically distant (residing ≥150 miles) from our transplant center. Each distant donor was matched to 4 geographically nearby donors (<150 miles from our center) as controls. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2010, of 429 live kidney donors, 55 (12.8%) were geographically distant. Black donors composed a higher proportion of geographically distant vs nearby donors (34.6% vs 15.5%), whereas Hispanic and Asian donors composed a lower proportion (P = .001). Distant vs nearby donors had similar median times from donor referral to actual donation (165 vs 161 days, P = .81). The geographically distant donors lived a median of 703 miles (25% to 75% range, 244 to 1072) from our center and 21.2 miles (25% to 75% range, 9.8 to 49.7) from the nearest kidney transplant center. The proportion of geographically distant donors who had their physician evaluation (21.6%), psychosocial evaluation (21.6%), or computed tomography angiogram (29.4%) performed close to home, rather than at our center, was low. CONCLUSIONS: Many geographically distant donors live close to transplant centers other than the procuring transplant center, but few of these donors perform parts of their donor evaluation at these closer centers. Black donors comprise a large proportion of geographically distant donors. The evaluation of geographically distant donors, especially among minorities, warrants further study.

Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended release tacrolimus (LCPT): the phase III randomized MELT trial.

Phase III noninferiority trial examining efficacy and safety of converting stable renal transplant recipients from twice-daily tacrolimus to a novel extended-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation (LCPT) with a controlled agglomeration technology. Controls maintained tacrolimus twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients with efficacy failures (death, graft failure, locally read biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss to follow-up) within 12 months. Starting LCPT dose was 30% lower (15% for blacks) than preconversion tacrolimus dose; target trough levels were 4-15 ng/mL. A total of 326 patients were randomized; the mITT population (n = 162 each group) was similar demographically in the two groups. Mean daily dose of LCPT was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower than preconversion tacrolimus dose at each visit; mean trough levels between groups were similar. There were four efficacy failures in each group; safety outcomes were similar between groups. Frequency of premature study drug discontinuation was LCPT: 12% versus tacrolimus twice daily: 5% (p = 0.028). LCPT demonstrated noninferiority to tacrolimus twice daily in efficacy failure rates. LCPT may offer a safe and effective alternative for converting patients to a once-daily formulation. Compared to currently available tacrolimus formulation, LCPT requires lower doses to achieve target trough levels.

Chain transplantation: initial experience of a large multicenter program.

We report the results of a large series of chain transplantations that were facilitated by a multicenter US database in which 57 centers pooled incompatible donor/recipient pairs. Chains, initiated by nondirected donors, were identified using a computer algorithm incorporating virtual cross-matches and potential to extend chains. The first 54 chains facilitated 272 kidney transplants (mean chain length = 5.0). Seven chains ended because potential donors became unavailable to donate after their recipient received a kidney; however, every recipient whose intended donor donated was transplanted. The remaining 47 chains were eventually closed by having the last donor donate to the waiting list. Of the 272 chain recipients 46% were ethnic minorities and 63% of grafts were shipped from other centers. The number of blood type O-patients receiving a transplant (n = 90) was greater than the number of blood type O-non-directed donors (n = 32) initiating chains. We have 1-year follow up on the first 100 transplants. The mean 1-year creatinine of the first 100 transplants from this series was 1.3 mg/dL. Chain transplantation enables many recipients with immunologically incompatible donors to be transplanted with high quality grafts.

The PROMISE study: a phase 2b multicenter study of voclosporin (ISA247) versus tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation.

Voclosporin (VCS, ISA247) is a novel calcineurin inhibitor being developed for organ transplantation. PROMISE was a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label study of three ascending concentration-controlled groups of VCS (low, medium and high) compared to tacrolimus (TAC) in 334 low-risk renal transplant recipients. The primary endpoint was demonstration of noninferiority of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) rates. Secondary objectives included renal function, new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), hypertension, hyperlipidemia and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation. The incidence of BPAR in the VCS groups (10.7%, 9.1% and 2.3%, respectively) was noninferior to TAC (5.8%). The incidence of NODAT for VCS was 1.6%, 5.7% and 17.7% versus 16.4% in TAC (low-dose VCS, p = 0.03). Nankivell estimated glomerular filtration rate was respectively: 71, 72, 68 and 69 mL/min, statistically lower in the high-dose group, p = 0.049. The incidence of hypertension and adverse events was not different between the VCS groups and TAC. VCS demonstrated an excellent correlation between trough and area under the curve (r(2) = 0.97) and no difference in mycophenolic acid exposure compared to TAC. This 6-month study shows VCS to be as efficacious as TAC in preventing acute rejection with similar renal function in the low- and medium-exposure groups, and potentially associated with a reduced incidence of NODAT.

Urologic complications in more than 2500 kidney transplantations performed at the Saint Barnabas healthcare system.

We report our urologic complications based on one urologist's experience during a 17-year period on more than 2500 ureteral reimplantation operations performed at the time of kidney transplant. Among 2548 ureteroneocystostomies performed by the transplant urologist, a 5.5% urologic complication rate was observed. This included vesicoureteral reflux (3%), ureteral strictures (1.3%), urine leak (0.9%), and uteropelvic junction obstruction (0.3%). The factors for low urologic complication rates include the use of a shorter segment of ureter using the Lich-Gregoir technique (compared to the Politano-Leadbetter technique) and the routine use of indwelling stents. In addition, having one transplant urologist performing all ureteral reimplantations and managing all urologic complications provided consistency in results.

Sotrastaurin, a novel small molecule inhibiting protein-kinase C: randomized phase II study in renal transplant recipients.

Sotrastaurin, a selective protein-kinase-C inhibitor, blocks early T-cell activation through a calcineurin-independent mechanism. In this study, de novo renal transplant recipients with immediate graft function were randomized 1:2 to tacrolimus (control, n = 44) or sotrastaurin (300 mg b.i.d.; n = 81). All patients received basiliximab, mycophenolic acid (MPA) and steroids. The primary endpoint was the composite of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or lost to follow-up at month 3. The main safety assessment was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) at month 3. Composite efficacy failure at month 3 was higher for the sotrastaurin versus control regimen (25.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.001), driven by higher BPAR rates (23.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.003), which led to early study termination. Median (± standard deviation [SD]) eGFR was higher for sotrastaurin versus control at all timepoints from day 7 (month 3: 59.0 ± 22.3 vs. 49.5 ± 17.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p = 0.006). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (control: 63.6%; sotrastaurin: 88.9%) which led to study-medication discontinuation in two sotrastaurin patients. This study demonstrated a lower degree of efficacy but better renal function with the calcineurin-inhibitor-free regimen of sotrastaurin+MPA versus the tacrolimus-based control. Ongoing studies are evaluating alternative sotrastaurin regimens.

Calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression based on the JAK inhibitor CP-690,550: a pilot study in de novo kidney allograft recipients.

This randomized, pilot study compared the Janus kinase inhibitor CP-690,550 (15 mg BID [CP15] and 30 mg BID [CP30], n = 20 each) with tacrolimus (n = 21) in de novo kidney allograft recipients. Patients received an IL-2 receptor antagonist, concomitant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. CP-690,550 doses were reduced after 6 months. Due to a high incidence of BK virus nephropathy (BKN) in CP30, MMF was discontinued in this group. The 6-month biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 1 of 20, 4 of 20 and 1 of 21 for CP15, CP30 and tacrolimus groups, respectively. BKN developed in 4 of 20 patients in CP30 group. The 6-month rates of cytomegalovirus disease were 2 of 20, 4 of 20 and none of 21 for CP15, CP30 and tacrolimus groups, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was >70 mL/min at 6 and 12 months (all groups). NK cells were reduced by

Fixed- or controlled-dose mycophenolate mofetil with standard- or reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitors: the Opticept trial.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was developed with cyclosporine as a fixed-dose immunosuppressant. More recent data indicate a relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure in individuals and clinical endpoints of rejection and toxicity. This 2-year, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled MMF (MMF(CC)) dosing with a fixed-dose regimen in 720 kidney recipients. Patients received either (A) MMF(CC) and reduced-level calcineurin inhibitor (MMF(CC)/CNI(RL)); (B) MMF(CC) and standard-level CNI (MMF(CC)/CNI(SL)); or (C) fixed-dose MMF and CNI(SL) (MMF(FD)/CNI(SL)). Antibody induction and steroid use were according to center practice. The primary endpoint was noninferiority (alpha= 0.05) of group A versus group C for treatment failure (including biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss and death) at 1 year. Although mean CNI trough levels in group A did not reach the prespecified targets, they were statistically lower than those in groups B and C (p < or = 0.01 for each comparison). BPAR rates (8.5%) were low across groups. Group A had 19% fewer treatment failures (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.18). MMF doses were highest (p < 0.05), with withdrawals for adverse events the fewest (p = 0.02), in group A. Of the 80% of subjects taking tacrolimus (Tac), those with higher MPA exposure had significantly less rejection (p < 0.001) and diarrhea correlated with Tac, but not with MPA levels. Thus, MMF(CC) with low-dose CNI resulted in outcomes not inferior to those with standard CNI exposure and MMF(FD), indicating potential utility of MMF(CC) in CNI-sparing regimens.

Establishing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of valganciclovir oral solution versus the tablet formulation.

Dosing with valganciclovir tablets may not be appropriate in some patients, such as those on hemodialysis or children. A "tutti-frutti" flavored oral valganciclovir solution has been developed to provide flexibility in dosage needed to accommodate these patients. An adult, multicenter, open-label randomized trial was conducted to establish bioequivalence between valganciclovir oral solution and valganciclovir tablets. Pharmacokinetic profiles and safety of the oral solution versus the tablet formulation were determined in 23 renal transplant recipients with estimated creatinine clearance>or=60 mL/min who had been receiving cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir for >or=4 days prior to the administration of the study drug. Patients received two doses of 900 mg valganciclovir either by tablet or oral solution in random order once daily over 6 days. Plasma concentrations of ganciclovir were assessed on days 2, 4, and 6 predose and at 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 12 hours after the dose. Maximum mean plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 6.73 microg/mL and 6.39 microg/mL for the valganciclovir tablet and oral solution, respectively, with identical mean AUC0-24 of 51.2 microg.h/mL. For both the AUC0-24 and Cmax ratio, the 90% Cl of the mean ratios of the oral solution relative to the tablet formulation lies within the acceptance region (80% to 125%) required by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. With the demonstration of bioequivalence and no differences in the incidence of adverse effects, it will be possible to interchangeably use the oral formulation.

Renal transplantation in patients with pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies and negative flow cytometry crossmatches.

The clinical significance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), despite negative cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXMs), is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 living donor renal transplant recipients, all with pre-transplant cytotoxicity and T-cell and B-cell FCXMs that were negative. Twenty recipients had pre-transplant DSA detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and/or microbead methods. Forty contemporaneous DSA-negative controls were selected. In the DSA-positive group, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months (25-75% range, 5.4-22.8 months), patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 95.0%. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) developed in four patients (20.0%). Three of the AHR episodes occurred within the first month post-transplant. Median serum creatinine at last follow-up was 1.3 mg/dL (25-75% range, 1.0-1.6 mg/dL), versus 1.1 mg/dL (25-75% range, 0.9-1.4 mg/dL) in the DSA-negative controls (p = 0.29). Only one of the 40 controls developed AHR (2.5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with a significantly increased incidence of AHR (p = 0.02 by log-rank test). In conclusion, despite negative pre-transplant cytotoxicity and FCXMs, renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant DSA detected by solid-phase methods may have an increased incidence of AHR and require close monitoring post-transplant.

FTY720/cyclosporine regimens in de novo renal transplantation: a 1-year dose-finding study.

FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator being investigated for rejection prophylaxis in renal transplantation when combined with full-dose cyclosporine (CsA; FDC). This 1-year phase II study compared FTY720 plus FDC (Neoral) with FTY720 plus reduced-dose CsA (RDC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC in de novo renal transplant patients. Patients were randomized 2:2:2:1 to FTY720 5 mg plus RDC (n = 72); FTY720 2.5 mg plus RDC (n = 74); FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC (n = 76); or MMF plus FDC (n = 39) for 12 months. CsA exposure in the RDC group was reduced on average by 50% as assessed by C(2) monitoring. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation. The incidences for this composite endpoint were 24% and 22%, respectively, for FTY720 5 mg plus RDC and FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC versus 39% for MMF plus FDC. Patients receiving FTY720 2.5 mg plus RDC were discontinued from treatment due to risk of under-immunosuppression. FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC and FTY720 5 mg plus RDC were safe and effective in de novo renal transplant patients over 12 months.

Stress dose steroids in renal transplant patients undergoing lymphocele surgery.

The requirement for perioperative stress dose steroids (SDS) in patients on long-term steroid therapy is controversial, but SDS are given during perioperative care. Studies focusing on surrogate outcomes like cortisol levels indicate a possible requirement for SDS, but clinical results are sparse. We retrospectively compared outcomes of renal or pancreas/kidney transplant patients undergoing surgical lymphocele drainage who did (n=20) or did not (n=38) receive SDS. Patients had similar demographic characteristics (P=NS). No patient developed hypotension (SBP < 80 mmHg), mental status change, unexplained arthralgias, or ileus. Impaired wound healing occurred in one patient in each group (P=NS), and lymphocele recurrence occurred in 25% of the SDS group and 10.5% of the other group (P=.25). SBP decreased from baseline in both groups (P <.001) but did not differ between groups, and maximum blood glucose was higher in the SDS group (P=.04). No difference was observed in other measured parameters. These data indicate that SDS increased the risk of hyperglycemia and provided no apparent benefit. A prospective study is warranted to confirm these findings.

Urologic complications in over 1000 kidney transplants performed at the Saint Barnabas healthcare system.

We report the complication rate based on one urologist's experience over a 9-year period including over 1000 ureteral reimplants performed at the time of kidney transplantation. Among 1083 ureteral reimplant operations, there was a 4.3% urologic complication rate, including a 2.7% ureteral stricture rate and a less than 1% rate each of urine leak ureteropelvic junction obstruction, vesicoureteral reflux and clot obstruction. The factors that lead to a low urologic complication rate are believed to be the use of short ureteral segment using the Lich (compared to the Politano-Leadbetter) technique and the routine use of indwelling stents. In addition, a consistency in results was attributed to one transplant urologist performing all ureteral reimplants and managing all urologic complications.

Hypercoagulable states in renal transplant candidates: impact of anticoagulation upon incidence of renal allograft thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Although multiple studies of demographic variables have been associated with allograft thrombosis, these results are not routinely reproducible. Are ESRD patients with hypercoagulable states (HCS) (antithrombin III deficiency, protein S or C deficiency, activated protein C resistance, and anticardiolipin antibodies) at predictably greater risk for allograft thrombosis? METHODS: Between 1996 and 1999, all renal transplant candidates were screened for hypercoagulability risk factors [HRF] (multiple arteriovenous access thromboses, prior deep vein thrombosis, prior allograft thrombosis, collagen vascular disease, multiple miscarriages, diabetes, autoimmune disease, and Fabry's disease). HRF(+) candidates were then tested for HCS status. We administered preemptive posttransplant i.v. Heparin in HCS(+) patients and observed the impact of this intervention upon the incidence of allograft thrombosis. We compared demographic data and incidence of allograft thrombosis in an historic control (346 patients transplanted between June 31, 1992, and March 5, 1996) not tested for HCS and a study cohort (502 patients transplanted between March 6, 1996, and June 31, 1999) prospectively screened for HRF. HRF(+) patients who were HCS(+) in the study cohort received i.v. heparin immediately after transplant and p.o. warfarin as outpatients. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics previously implicated in allograft thrombosis were equivalently distributed in both cohorts with the exceptions that more living-donor transplants (33.1% vs. 15.3%) were performed in study cohort, CIT>24 hr occurred in more control patients (37.3% vs. 22.1%) and more study patients (16.7% vs. 0%) received tacrolimus. Hypercoagulable states were found upon reevaluating five of seven controls (71.4%), who lost prior allografts to thrombosis. Hypercoagulable states were prospectively detected in 10 study patients with hypercoagulability risk factors. Most (9 of 10) study patients receiving anticoagulation have achieved long-term allograft function. Study group allograft thrombosis incidence was reduced (1.59% vs. 4.05%). Hypercoagulable states were demonstrated in most episodes of allograft thrombosis. Control patients who lost prior allografts to thrombosis were anticoagulated after retransplantation and 100% achieved long-term allograft function. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term allograft function has been achieved in 90% of study patients when prophylactically anticoagulating study patients with hypercoagulable states. A 2.6-fold reduction in the expected incidence of allograft thrombosis was observed in anticoagulated patients with hypercoagulable states.

The effect of Daclizumab in a high-risk renal transplant population.

INTRODUCTION: African-American (AA) renal transplant recipients have a higher incidence of acute rejection when compared to Caucasian renal transplant recipients. This higher rejection rate holds true even with the addition of several of the newer immunosuppressive agents (e.g. mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and Rapamycin). Acute rejection rates among Hispanic (H) renal transplant recipients are higher in some settings, while lower or the same as in Caucasians in other settings. IL-2 receptor antibodies have been shown to decrease rejection rates when added to a regimen of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine and prednisone. Limited data are available on these agents in conjunction with triple CsA, MMF and prednisone therapy, particularly in higher risk group patients. We studied the effect of the addition of the IL-2 receptor antibody Daclizumab to a CsA, MMF, prednisone regimen in a group of African American and high-risk Hispanic renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This was a non-randomized, prospective study. A total of 49 renal transplant recipients (29 African American and 20 Hispanic) were studied and followed. A simultaneous cohort of 56 (31 African-American and 25 Hispanic) renal transplant recipients receiving CsA, MMF and prednisone with no standard induction agent served as the control group. The study cohort received the same regimen with the addition of Daclizumab at 1 mg/kg for five doses over 10 wk. Multivariate analysis was performed to isolate independent factors influencing the study's results. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients in the control group and 49 patients in the Daclizumab group received an average follow-up of 17.1 +/- 6.9 and 12.7 +/- 5.1 months, respectively. Acute rejection rates were lower in the Daclizumab group as compared to the control group 26.4% versus 49.3% per patient years, respectively. A total of eight recurrent rejections in 6 patients occurred in the control group and none in the Daclizumab arm. Graft loss at this follow-up was no different between the groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of Daclizumab to a regimen of CsA, MMF and prednisone decreases acute rejection episodes in a high-risk group of African American and Hispanic renal transplant recipients.

Withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been demonstrated to decrease episodes of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation. The utility of MMF after 1 year is less clear. METHODS: Forty-five stable renal transplant recipients on maintenance therapy of cyclosporine microemulsion, MMF, and prednisone had MMF withdrawn at approximately 1 year after transplantation. A matching concurrent group of 45 stable renal transplant recipients served as the case control group. RESULTS: Two of 45 patients in the MMF withdrawal group suffered an acute rejection episode as opposed to 1 of 45 in the control group. Both patients who rejected in the withdrawal group had adequate cyclosporine levels and had no recent decrease in prednisone dose. There was no evidence of an increased incidence of proteinuria or increased creatinine levels in the MMF withdrawal group. CONCLUSION: In general, withdrawal of MMF in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated. No increased risk of rejection could be demonstrated in this patient group. A larger study will be needed to confirm our result.

Efficacy of Daclizumab in an African-American and Hispanic renal transplant population.

Current immunosuppressive regimens have decreased acute rejection rates during the 1st year after renal transplantation. However, this decrease has not been as marked in high-risk groups, such as African-American and Hispanic renal transplant recipients. We compared two simultaneous cohorts of altogether 36 African-American and Hispanic renal transplant recipients. Cohort one received a regimen of mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and a calcineurin inhibitor. The second cohort received the same protocol with the addition of Daclizumab (1 mg/kg for five doses given every 2 weeks). The median follow-up was 15.2 months (range 11.8-19.9 months). One patient in the Daclizumab-treated group and seven patients in the control group experienced an acute rejection episode. The rejection-free survival was significantly higher in the Daclizumab-treated group (94.4 %) as compared to the control group (66.7 %, Log-rank < 0.05) at 17 months after transplantation. A Cox Proportional Hazard model revealed lack of Daclizumab therapy as the only significant risk factor for acute rejection. (hazard ratio 7.0, 95 % CI = 1.1-48). The addition of the IL-2 receptor blocker Daclizumab to a triple therapy regimen may decrease early acute rejection in the high-risk groups of African-American and Hispanic patients.