Oncological similarities between large type 3 and type 4 tumors in patients with resectable gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional dataset.

BACKGROUND: Large type 3 (diameter ≥ 8 cm) and type 4 gastric cancers have been arbitrarily combined in Japan as a single entity. However, whether these two types are oncologically similar remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify this issue. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed a database of 3,575 patients from nine institutions who underwent gastrectomy between 2010 and 2014. Using propensity scores to balance significant variables, we compared prognoses and tumor recurrences. RESULTS: Of patients with clinical T3/T4 who underwent R0 resection, 75 and 73 had large type 3 and 4 tumors, respectively. Patients with type 4 tumors had significantly lower overall survival rates than those of patients with large type 3 tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.74). However, among the large type 3 tumors, a remarkable difference in prognosis was observed between the differentiated and undifferentiated histological types. A comparison was made between large type 3 with undifferentiated phenotype and type 4, each with 39 patients after propensity score matching. Outcomes in both groups were similar in terms of overall survival (HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.73-2.25) and relapse-free survival (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.80-2.27). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of peritoneal recurrence (35.9% vs. 46.1%, P = 0.36) and lymph node recurrence (25.6% vs. 12.8%, P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Large type 3 tumors with undifferentiated phenotype and type 4 tumors were oncologically similar. This subgroup could be considered as a new entity for future clinical trials.

Proposal of the Second Cutoff of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels to Stratify Patients into Low, Intermediate, and High Risks at Recurrences after Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 are widely used for treating various cancers, with cutoff values of 5.0 ng/mL and 37.0 IU/mL, respectively. However, these cutoff values are not for specific diseases or purposes but are uniformly used for any disease and any purpose. It is also unclear as to whether patients are at equal risk of recurrence if they are below the cutoff values. This study aimed to investigate the optimal cutoff of serum tumor markers in the stratification of recurrence risk after curative resection of gastric cancer. METHODS: We constructed a nine-center integrated database of patients who received gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2014 with a 5-year follow-up period. We determined the cutoff value of preoperative serum tumor marker levels correlated with postoperative recurrences and evaluated its performance in risk stratification for recurrences in 948 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who underwent radical resection. RESULTS: The hazard ratio for postoperative recurrences increased at two points of preoperative CEA levels, 3.6 ng/mL and 5.0 ng/mL, which were set as cutoffs. These two cutoffs stratified relapse-free survival into three levels. CONCLUSIONS: By adding a second cutoff value for preoperative serum CEA, which was proposed specifically for the prediction of recurrences, patients can be stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk recurrences after curative resection of gastric cancer.

Modified Albumin-Bilirubin Grade optimized for risk stratification of patients with stage II-III gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade is calculated using albumin and bilirubin values. We determined the optimal cutoff value of the ALBI grade for predicting the postoperative prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a multicenter database of 3571 patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC between January 2010 and December 2014. The modified ALBI (mALBI) grade was determined using cutoff values: grade 1 (mALBI ≤ - 2.70), 2 (mALBI - 2.70 to - 2.10), and 3 (mALBI > - 2.10). We used a validation cohort to evaluate reproducibility. RESULTS: The entire cohort (n = 956) was randomly assigned to the learning or validation cohorts (n = 478 each). The former was categorized into the following groups by the preoperative mALBI grade: grade 1 (n = 235), grade 2 (n = 162), and grade 3 (n = 81). The disease-specific survival (DSS) rates of the learning and validation cohorts were significantly shortened in association with higher mALBI grade (learning, p = 0.0068; validation, p = 0.0100). A multivariate analysis revealed that mALBI grade 3 served as an independent prognostic factor for DSS. Furthermore, mALBI grade 2 or 3 was associated with a greater risk of disease-specific death in most subgroups. CONCLUSION: The mALBI grade accurately predicted the long-term postoperative prognosis of locally advanced GC.

Risk score for predicting death from other causes after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients who die from causes other than gastric cancer after R0 resection is increasing in Japan, due in part to the aging population. However, few studies have comprehensively investigated the clinicopathological risks associated with deaths from other causes after gastrectomy. This study aimed to build a risk score for predicting such deaths. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data for 3575 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer at nine institutions in Japan between January 2010 and December 2014. RESULTS: The final study population of 1758 patients were assigned to Group A (n = 187): patients who died from other causes within 5 years of surgery, and Group B (n = 1571): patients who survived ≥ 5 years after surgery. Multivariate analysis identified nine characteristics as risk factors for poor survival: age ≥ 75 years, male sex, body mass index < 22 kg/m2, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (≥ 1), diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease, other malignant diseases, preoperative albumin level < 3.5 g/dL, and total gastrectomy. Patients with risk scores of 0-2, 3-4, or 5-9 (based on 1 point per characteristics) were classified into Low-risk, Intermediate-risk, and High-risk groups, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 96.5%, 85.3%, and 56.5%, for the Low-, Intermediate-, and High-risk groups, respectively, and the hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) was 16.33 (10.85-24.58, p < 0.001) for the High-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The risk score defined here may be useful for predicting deaths from other causes after curative gastrectomy.

Preoperative neutrophil-to-platelet ratio as a potential prognostic factor for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology in the absence of other non-curative factors: a multi-institutional dataset analysis.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal dissemination is the key to the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) and can be detected early with peritoneal lavage cytology. No studies have examined preoperative prognostic factors in GC patients who have positive cytology but no other non-curative factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using a multicenter database of 3575 patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2010 and 2014. Patients with positive peritoneal lavage cytology as a sole non-curative factor were retrieved, and correlations between parameters and the prognosis were compared. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were identified as eligible. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR) had the greatest area under the curve value and was selected. We divided the NPR into two groups based on the optimal cutoff value of the NPR (2.000), as determined by the ROC curve analysis. A high preoperative NPR was the only prognostic factor. The NPR-high group had shorter overall survival than the NPR-low group (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.05-3.28, P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicated that the preoperative NPR serves as a prognostic factor in GC patients with positive peritoneal lavage cytology in the absence of other non-curative factors.

Prognostic impact of a microscopic positive margin in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score­matched analysis of a multi­institutional dataset.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the effect of a microscopic positive margin on survival outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional dataset to study patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. We used propensity score matching to strictly balance the patients' oncological features, backgrounds, and postoperative treatment to compare the survival outcomes of those with microscopic positive margins and those with negative margins. RESULTS: Among 3029 patients, 32 (1.1%) had positive margins. After matching, we enrolled 128 patients in this retrospective analysis: 32 with a positive margin and 96 with a negative margin. The recurrence-free survival of the positive-margin group was significantly shorter than that of the negative-margin group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.63, p = 0.0485). Consistent results were observed for patients with pStages I-III disease (HR, 1.65, p = 0.0835), whereas the survival curves overlapped in those with pStage IV disease (HR, 1.29, p = 0.5934). The prevalence of overall recurrence in the positive-margin group was higher than that in the negative-margin group (75% vs 58%, p = 0.0917). This trend was consistent with locoregional recurrence (9% vs 3%) and distant recurrence (69% vs 55%). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer was worse in those with microscopic positive margins than in those with negative margins.

E-PASS scoring system serves as a predictor of short- and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer surgery.

PURPOSES: This study aimed to evaluate the estimation of the physiological ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system for predicting the short- and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer (GC) surgery. METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional dataset to study patients who underwent gastrectomy with a curative intent between 2010 and 2014. This study evaluated the associations between the optimal E-PASS score cutoff value and the following outcomes: (1) the incidence of postoperative complications in stage I-III GC patients and (2) the prognosis in stage II-III GC patients. RESULTS: A total of 2495 GC patients were included. A cutoff value of 0.419 was determined using the ROC curve analysis. Postoperative complications were observed more frequently in the E-PASS-high group than that in the E-PASS-low group (30% vs. 17%, p < 0.0001). Among pStage II-III GC patients (n = 1009), the overall survival time of the E-PASS-high group was significantly shorter than that of the E-PASS-low group (hazard ratio 2.08; 95% confidence interval 1.64-2.65; p < 0.0001). A forest plot revealed that E-PASS-high was associated with a greater prognostic factor for overall survival in most subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The E-PASS scoring system may therefore be a useful predictor of the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with GC who have undergone radical gastrectomy.

Efficacy of Splenectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer with Greater Curvature Invasion or Type 4 Tumor: a Propensity Score Analysis of a Multi-Institutional Dataset.

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy for proximal gastric cancer was found to have no survival benefit in a randomized trial clarifying the role of splenectomy (JCOG0110 study). However, since tumor with invasion to the greater curvature and Type 4 tumor were excluded in JCOG0110, the benefit of splenectomy for these tumors is not known. METHODS: A multicenter dataset of patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 2010 and 2014 was created. From the dataset, 114 eligible patients with proximal advanced gastric cancer with invasion to the greater curvature or Type 4 tumor were enrolled. There were 60 patients in the gastrectomy with splenectomy (Spx) group and 54 patients in the spleen-preserving (Prs) group. To balance the essential variables, propensity score analysis was performed, estimating the propensity score with a logistic regression model. Adjusted overall survival (OS) and adjusted disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. RESULTS: There were significant differences in age, performance status, comorbidity, macroscopic type, and clinical T stage between the Spx and Prs groups. The model for estimating the propensity score was well adapted (c-statistic: 0.830, 95%CI: 0.754-0.906). Adjusted OS was identical between the two groups (HR = 1.089, 95%CI: 0.759-1.563; p = 0.644). The DFS curve of Prs group was consistently tended to be lower than Spx, but the difference was not significant (HR = 0.813, 95%CI: 0.572-1.156; p = 0.249). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of splenectomy was minimal for proximal advanced gastric cancer even with invasion to the greater curvature or Type 4 tumor.

Accurate Prediction of Prognosis After Radical Resection of Gastric Cancer by the Modified Systemic Inflammation Score; a Multicenter Dataset Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The presence of chronic inflammation and nutritional status in cancer patients affects its prognosis. There is a clinical need for a prognostic predictor that is objective and accurate, and that can be easily evaluated by preoperative screening. We evaluated the importance and usefulness of the preoperative modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) to predict the long-term outcome of patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Of the 3571 patients who underwent curative resection for GC in nine institutions between January 2010 and December 2014, 1764 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The mSIS was formulated according to the serum albumin level (ALB) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) as follows: mSIS 0 (ALB ≥ 4.0 g/dL and LMR ≥ 3.4), mSIS 1 (ALB < 4.0 g/dL or LMR < 3.4), and mSIS 2 (ALB < 4.0 g/dL and LMR < 3.4). RESULTS: Patients were categorized into preoperative mSIS 0 (n = 955), mSIS 1 (n = 584), and mSIS 2 (n = 225) groups. The overall survival times and the disease-free survival times of patients in preoperative mSIS 0,1 and 2 sequentially shortened (P < 0.0001), and mSIS 1 and 2 were identified as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.272, P = 0.0125 and HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.21-2.19, P = 0.0012). A stepwise increase in the prevalence of hematogenous recurrences was directly proportional to the mSIS. A forest plot revealed that mSIS 0,1 was associated with a greater risk of overall survival in most subgroups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative mSIS can be easily calculated, and it is suggested that it is useful as a prognostic predictor of patients with different disease stages, for stratifying and evaluating clinical outcomes.

Short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage III gastric cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional database.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer may be effective from the standpoint of compliance, although there is insufficient evidence of its efficacy. We analyzed a multicenter database to clarify whether preoperative chemotherapy influenced the short-term outcomes of gastrectomy. METHODS: We analyzed, retrospectively, 3571 patients who underwent gastrectomy between January, 2010 and December, 2014. Patients with clinical stage-III gastric adenocarcinoma were divided into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and a non-NAC group. We performed propensity-matched comparative analysis to stratify the groups according to age, sex, tumor region, tumor type, preoperative stage, procedure, lymph node dissection, and tumor differentiation. Preoperative blood data, surgical findings, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Analysis of the matched NAC (n = 64) and non-NAC (n = 128) groups revealed that the preoperative values of neutrophils, platelets, and Hb were significantly lower in the NAC group. Blood loss during surgery was significantly higher, surgical times were longer, and the rate of repeat surgery was significantly lower in the NAC group; however, the rates of rehospitalization did not differ between the groups and mortality was 0% in both groups. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: NAC did not increase the complication rate of gastrectomy for gastric cancer.