Centralised multidisciplinary re-evaluation of diagnostic procedures in patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is highly curable when treated accurately. The challenge is to cure patients with the minimal risk of long-term complications. For that, optimal initial diagnostics are required to determine the optimal treatment plan. We offer non-academic hospitals in our Regional Comprehensive Cancer Centre network a centralised review of all diagnostic procedures from patients with newly diagnosed HL. We report our experience on concordances and discrepancies between local findings and central review results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A haematologist and radiation oncologist at the Hodgkin Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre outpatient clinic examined all patients with newly diagnosed HL between February 2006 and May 2010. In a multidisciplinary lymphoma conference, diagnostic information is reviewed and treatment advice formulated. Discordant findings in pathology, staging and therapy were recorded as 'minor', no therapeutic consequences or 'major', adapted therapy advice. RESULTS: Altogether, 125 patients were included. Pathology review showed 86% concordance, with 4% major discordance, mainly nodular lymphocyte predominant sub-type. Revision of initial staging was concordant in 77%; however 15% major discordance of which most were upstaged. This resulted in 19% treatment adaption. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the discrepancies in interpretation of diagnostic tests. We advocate centralised review process for all newly diagnosed patients with HL.

Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging relative to mammography and ultrasonography (US) for assessing the extent of breast tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histologic results and preoperative imaging findings (mammography, US, MR imaging) were analyzed regarding tumor size and multifocality of 61 tumors in 60 women undergoing mastectomy for carcinoma. RESULTS: In 10% of cases, the index tumor was not seen at mammography. With US, 15% of the index tumors were not recognized, while MR imaging missed 2% of the index tumors. On mammographic and US images, tumor size was underestimated significantly (P < .005), by 14% and 18%, respectively, while MR imaging showed no significant difference in size compared with that found in a pathologic evaluation. Mammography showed 31% of the additional invasive lesions, while US showed 38% and MR imaging showed 100%. CONCLUSION: MR imaging was the most accurate of the three preoperative imaging modalities in assessing the size and number of malignant lesions in the breast.

MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with turbo fast low-angle shot (TurboFLASH) technique in the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast material-enhanced MR images were obtained at intervals of 2.3 seconds for 2 minutes. After the first four images were obtained, contrast medium was intravenously injected within 10 seconds. Lesions that enhanced within 11.5 seconds after the aorta opacified were regarded as malignant. Lesions that enhanced more than 11.5 seconds after the aorta were regarded as benign. A centrifugal pattern of enhancement was regarded as a sign that a lesion was benign. RESULTS: Eighty-seven lesions were evaluated. Histologic examination showed 65 lesions were malignant and 22 were benign. Gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH imaging had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 86%, and an overall accuracy of 93% in differentiating benign from malignant lesions. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH imaging is a valuable method in the examination of breast lesions suspected of being malignant.