Adherence to Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations in Women with Gestational Diabetes and Associations with Maternal and Infant Health-A Cohort Study.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is managed by dietary advice, but limited evidence exists about the impact of adherence on health. We assessed whether adherence to the New Zealand Ministry of Health dietary recommendations is associated with maternal and infant health in women with GDM. Data from 313 women with GDM were used. Adherence to food-related recommendations was scored from 0 (no adherence) to 10 (adhered to all recommendations) and analysed in tertile groups (high, moderate, low adherence). Adherence to visiting a dietitian and appropriate weight gain were assessed as yes or no. Chi-square, ANOVA, and odds ratios were used to compare groups. High dietary adherence compared to low adherence was associated with reduced oral hypoglycaemic and insulin use (OR = 0.55, CI = 0.30-1.00). Visiting a dietitian compared to not was associated with increased oral hypoglycaemic and insulin use (OR = 2.96, CI = 1.12-7.80), decreased odds of a large-for-gestational-age infant (OR = 0.32, CI = 0.14-0.73) and neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia (OR = 0.27, CI = 0.08-0.95). Greater than recommended compared with recommended weight gain was associated with increased oral hypoglycaemic and insulin use (OR = 2.51, CI = 1.26-5.01), while lower than recommended weight gain was associated with decreased postpartum haemorrhage (OR = 0.45, CI = 0.23-0.91) and increased breastfeeding (OR = 1.96, CI = 1.04-3.70). Adherence to dietary recommendations for women with GDM likely improves health outcomes.

Dietary recommendations for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

CONTEXT: Dietary advice is the cornerstone of care for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) to improve maternal and infant health. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare dietary recommendations made in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of GDM, evaluate their evidence base, identify research gaps, and assess CPG quality. The PRISMA guidelines were used. DATA SOURCES: Six databases were searched for CPGs, published between 2000 and 2019, that included dietary advice for the management of GDM. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently assessed CPG quality (using the AGREE II tool) with respect to dietary recommendations (their strength, evidence base, and research gaps). DATA ANALYSIS: Of the 31 CPGs, 68% were assessed as low quality, mainly due to lack of editorial independence. Dietary advice was recommended as the first-line treatment by all CPGs, although the dietary recommendations themselves varied and sometimes were contradictory. Most dietary recommendations were strongly made (70%), but they were often based on very low-quality (54%), or low-quality (15%) evidence. Research gaps were identified for all diet-related recommendations. CONCLUSION: High-quality research is needed to improve the evidence base and address the research gaps identified. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019147848.