The quality of pharmacist-led community warfarin management across 2 provinces in Canada: A cross-sectional observational study.

Background: Guidelines for anticoagulation management services recommend personnel be specially trained in warfarin management and suggest using tools such as decision-support software. To date, there have been no Canadian studies documenting the quality of warfarin management using a similar guideline recommended approach. Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective observational study was conducted to measure the quality of pharmacist-led warfarin management using point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) testing and decision-support software in various ambulatory settings in Canada. Settings included 4 family health teams in Ontario and 40 community pharmacies across Nova Scotia. Quality was measured using time in therapeutic range (TTR) and was reported in 3 manners: mean TTR, median TTR and time-weighted mean TTR. Results: The primary outcome included 963 patients. The combined mean and median TTR for the 2019 Ontario family health teams and Nova Scotia pharmacies was 74.2% and 77.3% (interquartile range 64%-87.9%), respectively. The time-weighted mean TTR was 76.3%. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, the TTR achieved by this model of care is the highest reported in Canadian general practice. Since Thrombosis Canada defines good-quality warfarin management as a TTR of 60% or greater, and many studies have reported an association between higher TTR values and lower rates of thrombosis and hemorrhage, this model of care may have significant benefits for patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the high quality of anticoagulation management provided by specially trained pharmacists using point-of-care INR testing and decision-support software. These results support expanded access to this service for all Canadians. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024;157:xx-xx.

Variation in bleeding risk estimates among online calculators: Cross-sectional study of apps used by and for patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation in bleeding risk estimates and risk stratification among Web and mobile applications for patients with atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Simulated patient population. PARTICIPANTS: Hypothetical patient cohorts that encompassed all possible binary risk factor combinations for each clinical prediction model. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-five bleeding risk calculators (18 Web and 7 mobile apps), each of which used 1 of 4 clinical prediction models to predict an individual's 12-month bleed risk: ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation), HAS-BLED (hypertension [systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg], abnormal renal or liver function, stroke [caused by bleeding], bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly [age >65 years], drugs [acetylsalicylic acid or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs] or alcohol [≥8 drinks per week]), HEMORR2HAGES (hepatic or renal disease, ethanol abuse, malignancy, older [age >75 years], reduced platelet count or function, rebleeding risk [history of past bleeding], hypertension [uncontrolled], anemia, genetic factors, excessive fall risk, and stroke), and mOBRI (modified Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Four simulated cohorts were constructed. The coefficient of variation, relative difference (RD), and 95% CI for annual bleeding risk estimates were calculated for all hypothetical patient cohorts. Additionally, pairwise agreement between calculators across low- (<10%), moderate- (10% to 20%), and high-risk (>20%) categories of patients was determined. RESULTS: The risk estimates the calculators generated were imprecise, with coefficients of variation ranging from 14% for HEMORR2HAGES to 64% for mOBRI. Wide variation was observed in annual risk estimates for calculators using the mOBRI (maximum RD=4.3) and HAS-BLED (maximum RD=3.1) models. The 95% CI of mean annual bleeding risk varied among models; 1 calculator using the HAS-BLED model had a 95% CI of mean annual risk estimates of 5.4% to 6.2%, while another HAS-BLED calculator reported a 95% CI of 17.7% to 18.5%. Concordance for risk category stratification among calculators was high for those based on mOBRI and ATRIA (=1 for both). Poor agreement was observed in 1 calculator using HEMORR2HAGES (=0.54) and another using HAS-BLED ( range=-0.11 to 0.35). CONCLUSION: Inconsistencies and a lack of precision were observed in annual risk estimates and risk stratification produced by Web and mobile bleeding risk calculators for patients with atrial fibrillation. Clinicians should refer to annual bleeding risks observed in major randomized controlled trials to inform risk estimates communicated to patients.

Using a course pilot in the development of an online problem-based learning (PBL) therapeutics course in a post-professional PharmD program.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess whether the traditional problem-based learning (PBL) process can be replicated in an online environment, and to identify any barriers and facilitators to learning using a course pilot. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Eight alumni and one experienced tutor participated in a two-week simulated PBL course comprised of two three-hour synchronous online tutorials. Blackboard Collaborate® software was used to permit audio and visual interaction. The PBL tutorials were recorded and observed by the researchers. Participants completed satisfaction surveys after the pilot, and were invited to take part in a focus group to debrief about their experience. FINDINGS: Once the steep learning curve with the technology was overcome, the quality of the PBL process was similar in the online course as it was in the face-to-face course. Several key factors for success were identified through analysis of the videotaped sessions, and interviews with the participants in the course pilot. SUMMARY: Conducting a course pilot study demonstrated that an online PBL course is feasible, and identified some considerations to facilitate success.

Evaluation of a Unique Interprofessional Education Program Involving Medical and Pharmacy Students.

Objective. To measure changes in interprofessional competencies among pharmacy and medical students following a half-day event focusing on interprofessional learning. Methods. There were 118 pharmacy students and 28 medical students who participated in the Healthcare Interprofessional Education Day (HIPED) which consisted of three stations (communication, patient interviewing, and prescribing) in which pharmacy and medical students had to work collaboratively. The standardized Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. Results. There were 133 surveys completed for a response rate of 91%. All 20 items measured by the ICCAS showed a significant improvement. The strongest effect sizes were in the collaboration, roles & responsibilities, and collaborative practice/family-centered approach categories. The least robust effects were in the conflict management/resolution category. Conclusion. The HIPED activity was an effective IPE experience. The strong and consistent improvement in all ICCAS scores suggest a framework for pharmacy and medical school training to move from siloed educational experiences to synergistic learning opportunities.

Evaluation of an initiation protocol of 4 mg of warfarin for atrial fibrillation in the outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the efficacy and safety of an initiation algorithm for 4 mg of warfarin in ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Prospectively planned retrospective chart review. SETTING: Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team in Kitchener, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory patients requiring anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were prescribed 4 mg of warfarin to be taken once daily for 3 days. An international normalized ratio (INR) measured on the morning of the fourth day was used to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin. Subsequent INR measurements were obtained biweekly until patients reached their actual maintenance dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of INR values greater than or equal to 4.0 before the warfarin maintenance dose was achieved. Secondary outcome measures included thromboembolic and bleeding events, number of days required to reach therapeutic INR, and correlation between predicted and actual warfarin maintenance dose. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included in the study. The average age was 76.0 years (range 56.0 to 89.0), and 17 patients were women. The average CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years,diabetes mellitus, and stroke or transient ischemic attack) score was 2.0.Only 1 patient had an INR greater than 4.0 during the study period. The mean time to achieve a therapeutic INR was 11.0 days. The day 4 INR was moderately predictive of the maintenance dose (r2 = 0.47). There were no adverse events that required medical attention during the study period. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, an initiation algorithm for 4 mg of warfarin was safe and achieved a therapeutic INR within a reasonable time frame in outpatients with atrial fibrillation.

Chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension in older adults: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Some evidence suggests that chlorthalidone may be superior to hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in older adults. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched observational cohort study with up to 5 years of follow-up. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: All individuals aged 66 years or older who were newly treated with chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide and were not hospitalized for heart failure, stroke, or myocardial infarction in the prior year were eligible for inclusion. Each chlorthalidone recipient was matched to up to 2 hydrochlorothiazide recipients on the basis of age, sex, year of treatment initiation, and propensity score. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of death or hospitalization for heart failure, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Safety outcomes included hospitalization with hypokalemia or hyponatremia. RESULTS: A total of 29 873 patients were studied. During follow-up, chlorthalidone recipients (n = 10 384) experienced the primary outcome at a rate of 3.2 events per 100 person-years of follow-up, and hydrochlorothiazide recipients experienced 3.4 events per 100 person-years of follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.06]). Patients treated with chlorthalidone were more likely to be hospitalized with hypokalemia (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.06 [CI, 2.04 to 4.58]) or hyponatremia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.68 [CI, 1.24 to 2.28]). In 9 post hoc analyses comparing patients initially prescribed 12.5, 25, or 50 mg of chlorthalidone per day with those prescribed 12.5, 25, or 50 mg of hydrochlorothiazide per day, the former were more likely to be hospitalized with hypokalemia for all 6 comparisons in which a statistically significant association was found. The results of other effectiveness and safety outcomes were also consistent with those of the main analysis. LIMITATION: Unmeasured differences in baseline characteristics or physician treatment approaches or an insufficiently large sample may have limited the ability to detect small differences in the comparative effectiveness of the drugs. CONCLUSION: As typically prescribed, chlorthalidone in older adults was not associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular events or deaths than hydrochlorothiazide. However, it was associated with a greater incidence of electrolyte abnormalities, particularly hypokalemia. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

Pharmacist medication assessments in a surgical preadmission clinic.

BACKGROUND: In the hospital setting, postoperative admission is a key vulnerable moment when patients are at increased risk of medication discrepancies. This study measures the reduction of medication discrepancies associated with a combined intervention of structured pharmacist medication history interviews with assessments in a surgical preadmission clinic and a postoperative medication order form. METHODS: In the Surgical Pharmacist in Preadmission Clinic Evaluation (SPPACE) study, patients who had a preadmission clinic appointment before undergoing surgical procedures were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they were scheduled for discharge the same day as their surgery. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the intervention arm (structured pharmacist medication history interview with assessment and generation of a postoperative medication order form) or to the standard care arm (nurse-conducted medication histories and surgeon-generated medication orders). The primary end point was the number of patients with at least 1 postoperative medication discrepancy related to home medications. RESULTS: Between April 19, 2005, and June 3, 2005, a total of 464 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 227 and 237 patients were randomized to the intervention and standard care arms, respectively. In the intervention arm, 41 (20.3%) of 202 patients had at least 1 postoperative medication discrepancy related to home medications, compared with 86 (40.2%) of 214 patients in the standard care arm (P<.001). In the intervention arm, 26 (12.9%) of 202 patients had at least 1 postoperative medication discrepancy with the potential to cause possible or probable harm, compared with 64 (29.9%) of 214 patients in the standard care arm (P<.001). These were mostly omissions of reordering home medications. CONCLUSION: A combined intervention of pharmacist medication assessments and a postoperative medication order form can reduce postoperative medication discrepancies related to home medications.

Acute profound thrombocytopenia associated with eptifibatide therapy.

An 80-year-old woman and a 79-year-old man underwent urgent percutaneous coronary intervention and received adjunctive eptifibatide. Platelet counts in both patients fell to below 20 x 10(3)/mm3 within 4 hours of eptifibatide administration. Reports in the medical literature reinforce the importance of recognizing that eptifibatide can cause acute profound thrombocytopenia. All three available glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors--abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban--have been associated with the development of this disorder. Thus, clinicians should routinely monitor platelet counts in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors within 2-4 hours of the start of the infusion.

Is impaired renal function a contraindication to the use of low-molecular-weight heparin?

BACKGROUND: Because of the risk of accumulation of anticoagulant effect, it has been suggested that patients with a creatinine clearance of 30 mL/min or less (< or =0.50 mL/s) should be excluded from treatment with low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin, or have anti-factor Xa heparin level monitoring performed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the appropriateness of this recommendation. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts to identify prospective articles comparing differences in the pharmacokinetics of LMW heparins in nondialyzed patients with varying degrees of renal function. Reference lists of retrieved reports were checked for additional articles. RESULTS: Three single-dose pharmacokinetic trials and 2 multiple-dose deep vein thrombosis (treatment trials met our selection criteria. The 3 trials that could address our primary objective did not support the use of a 30-mL/min (0.50-mL/s) cutoff of creatinine clearance to select individuals at risk of accumulation when LMW heparin is used. Four of the 5 trials support the notion that anti-factor Xa activity of some LMW heparin preparations accumulates in patients with impaired creatinine clearance. Tinzaparin sodium, an LMW heparin with a higher-than-average molecular weight distribution, appears to be the exception, since it did not exhibit accumulation in patients with creatinine clearances as low as 20 mL/min (0.33 mL/s). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 30-mL/min (0.50-mL/s) cutoff is not justified, on the basis of currently available evidence, to select individuals at increased risk of accumulation when LMW heparin is used. The pharmacokinetic response to impaired renal function may differ among LMW heparin preparations.