Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 104
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(14): e7397, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39030995

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interventions aimed at upstream factors contributing to late-stage diagnoses could reduce disparities and improve breast cancer outcomes. This study examines the association between measures of housing stability and contemporary mortgage lending bias on breast cancer stage at diagnosis among older women in the United States. METHODS: We studied 67,588 women aged 66-90 from the SEER-Medicare linked database (2010-2015). The primary outcome was breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Multinomial regression models adjusted for individual and neighborhood socio-economic factors were performed using a three-category outcome (stage 0, early stage, and late stage). Key census tract-level independent variables were residence in the same house as the previous year, owner-occupied homes, and an index of contemporary mortgage lending bias. RESULTS: In models adjusted for individual factors, higher levels of mortgage lending bias were associated with later stage diagnosis (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20; RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.49; RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.24-1.60 for least to high, respectively). In models adjusted for individual and neighborhood socio-economic factors, moderate and high levels of mortgage lending bias were associated with later stage diagnosis (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33 for moderate and RR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37 for high). Owner occupancy and tenure were not associated with later stage diagnosis in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary mortgage lending bias demonstrated a significant gradient relationship with later stage at diagnosis of breast cancer. Policy interventions aimed at reducing place-based mortgage disinvestment and its impacts on local resources and opportunities should be considered as part of an overall strategy to decrease late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and improve prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Vivienda , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Programa de VERF , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores Socioeconómicos , Características del Vecindario , Medicare
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 176(11): ITC161-ITC176, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956433

RESUMEN

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among U.S. women and its incidence increases with age. Endogenous estrogen exposure, proliferative benign breast disease, breast density, and family history may also indicate increased risk for breast cancer. Early detection with screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality, but the net benefits vary by age. Assessing a patient's individual breast cancer risk can guide decisions regarding breast cancer screening. All women benefit from healthy behaviors which may reduce breast cancer risk. Some women at increased risk for breast cancer may benefit from risk-reducing medications. Use of screening measures remains suboptimal, especially for uninsured women.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Mamografía/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/efectos adversos , Mama , Tamizaje Masivo/efectos adversos
4.
Am J Med Qual ; 38(5): 229-237, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37678301

RESUMEN

Despite the widespread adoption of early warning systems (EWSs), it is uncertain if their implementation improves patient outcomes. The authors report a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation of a commercially available EWS on patient outcomes at a 700-bed academic medical center. The EWS risk scores were visible in the electronic medical record by bedside clinicians. The EWS risk scores were also monitored remotely 24/7 by critical care trained nurses who actively contacted bedside nurses when a patient's risk levels increased. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were rapid response team calls and activation of cardiopulmonary arrest (code-4) response teams. The study team conducted a regression discontinuity analysis adjusting for age, gender, insurance, severity of illness, risk of mortality, and hospital occupancy at admission. The analysis included 53,229 hospitalizations. Adjusted analysis showed no significant change in inpatient mortality, rapid response team call, or code-4 activations after implementing the EWS. This study confirms the continued uncertainty in the effectiveness of EWSs and the need for further rigorous examinations of EWSs.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco , Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida , Humanos , Hospitalización , Cuidados Críticos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Signos Vitales
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(11): 2067-2075, 2023 04 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603178

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Poor women with breast cancer have worse survival than others, and are more likely to undergo surgery in low-volume facilities. We leveraged a natural experiment to study the effectiveness of a policy intervention undertaken by New York (NY) state in 2009 that precluded payment for breast cancer surgery for NY Medicaid beneficiaries treated in facilities performing fewer than 30 breast cancer surgeries annually. METHODS: We identified 37,822 women with stage I-III breast cancer during 2004-2008 or 2010-2013 and linked them to NY hospital discharge data. A multivariable difference-in-differences approach compared mortality of Medicaid insured patients with that of commercially or otherwise insured patients unaffected by the policy. RESULTS: Women treated during the postpolicy years had slightly lower 5-year overall mortality than those treated prepolicy; the survival gain was significantly larger for Medicaid patients (P = .018). Women enrolled in Medicaid had a greater reduction than others in breast cancer-specific mortality (P = .005), but no greater reduction in other causes of death (P = .50). Adjusted breast cancer mortality among women covered by Medicaid declined from 6.6% to 4.5% postpolicy, while breast cancer mortality among other women fell from 3.9% to 3.8%. A similar effect was not observed among New Jersey Medicaid patients with breast cancer treated during the same years. CONCLUSION: A statewide centralization policy discouraging initial care for breast cancer in low-volume facilities was associated with better survival for the Medicaid population targeted. Given these impressive results and those from prior research, other policymakers should consider adopting comparable policies to improve breast cancer outcomes.[Media: see text].


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Femenino , Medicaid , New York
6.
WMJ ; 122(5): 319-324, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180917

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Evidence suggests that inpatients who develop delirium experience worse outcomes. Although there is reason to believe that COVID-positive patients may be at a higher risk for developing delirium, little is known about the association between COVID-19 and delirium among hospitalized patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to examine (1) the independent association between COVID-19 infection and the development of delirium among all non-ICU patients and (2) the risk factors associated with developing delirium among patients admitted with COVID-19, with a special focus on presenting symptoms. METHODS: Using electronic health record (EHR) data of adults admitted to any general medical unit at a large academic medical center from July 2020 through February 2021, we used a cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression to estimate the associations, while adjusting for patients' sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, delirium-free length of stay, as well as time fixed effects. RESULTS: Multivariable regression estimates applied to 20 509 patients hospitalized during the study period indicate that COVID-19-positive patients had 72% higher relative risk (odds ratio 1.72; 95% CI, 1.31 - 2.26; P < 0.001) of developing delirium than the COVID-19-negative patients. However, among the subset of patients admitted with COVID-19, having any COVID-19-specific symptoms was not associated with elevated odds of developing delirium compared to those who were asymptomatic, after controlling for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 positivity was associated with higher odds of developing delirium among patients during their non-ICU hospitalization. These findings may be helpful in targeting the use of delirium prevention strategies among non-ICU patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Delirio , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Pacientes Internos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Delirio/epidemiología
7.
WMJ ; 122(5): 346-348, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180922

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit is a preventive visit that is largely underutilized, a problem further compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We implemented a digital outreach intervention to improve Annual Wellness Visit scheduling in our health system. Using a bulk outreach functionality in the electronic medical record, we sent a message to patients due for an Annual Wellness Visit and analyzed the efficacy of this message on scheduling rates while also assessing its impact by race. RESULTS: Patients who read the message were 40% more likely to schedule an Annual Wellness Visit (OR 1.42; 95% CI, 1.34 - 1.50) compared to those who did not read the message. DISCUSSION: After this intervention, Annual Wellness Visit scheduling rates increased by 50% for White patients and 325% for Black patients versus prepandemic rates in 2019.


Asunto(s)
Salud Digital , Promoción de la Salud , Medicina Preventiva , Sistemas Recordatorios , Anciano , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Medicare , Pandemias , Estados Unidos , Negro o Afroamericano , Blanco
8.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 31(10): 716-724, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35428684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unrecognised changes in a hospitalised patient's clinical course may lead to a preventable adverse event. Early warning systems (EWS) use patient data, such as vital signs, nursing assessments and laboratory values, to aid in the detection of early clinical deterioration. In 2018, an EWS programme was deployed at an academic hospital that consisted of a commercially available EWS algorithm and a centralised virtual nurse team to monitor alerts. Our objective was to understand the nursing perspective on the use of an EWS programme with centralised monitoring. METHODS: We conducted and audio-recorded semistructured focus groups during nurse staff meetings on six inpatient units, stratified by alert frequency (high: >100 alerts/month; medium: 50-100 alerts/month; low: <50 alerts/month). Discussion topics included EWS programme experiences, perception of EWS programme utility and EWS programme implementation. Investigators analysed the focus group transcripts using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: We conducted 28 focus groups with 227 bedside nurses across all shifts. We identified six principal themes: (1) Alert timeliness, nurses reported being aware of the patient's deterioration before the EWS alert, (2) Lack of accuracy, nurses perceived most alerts as false positives, (3) Workflow interruptions caused by EWS alerts, (4) Questions of actionability of alerts, nurses were often uncertain about next steps, (5) Concerns around an underappreciation of core nursing skills via reliance on the EWS programme and (6) The opportunity cost of deploying the EWS programme. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study of nurses demonstrates the importance of earning user trust, ensuring timeliness and outlining actionable next steps when implementing an EWS. Careful attention to user workflow is required to maximise EWS impact on improving hospital quality and patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Deterioro Clínico , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Investigación Cualitativa , Signos Vitales
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(8): e2120622, 2021 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383060

RESUMEN

Importance: Continuity in primary care is associated with improved outcomes, but less information is available on the association of continuity of care in the hospital with hospital complications. Objective: To assess whether the number of hospitalists providing care is associated with subsequent hospital complications and length of stay. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used multilevel logistic regression models to analyze Medicare claims for medical admissions from 2016 to 2018 with a length of stay longer than 4 days. Admissions with multiple charges on the same day from a hospitalist or an intensive care unit (ICU) stay during hospital days 1 to 3 were excluded. The data were accessed and analyzed from November 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Exposures: The number of different hospitalists who submitted charges during hospital days 1 to 3. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall length of stay and transfer to ICU or a new diagnosis of drug toxic effects on hospital day 4 or later. Results: Among the 617 680 admissions, 362 376 (58.7%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 80.2 (8.4) years. In 306 037 admissions (49.6%), the same hospitalist provided care on days 1 to 3, while 2 hospitalists provided care in 274 658 admissions (44.5%), and 3 hospitalists provided care in 36 985 admissions (6.0%). There was no significant association between the number of different hospitalists on days 1 to 3 and either length of stay or subsequent ICU transfers. Admissions seeing 2 or 3 hospitalists had a slightly greater adjusted odds of subsequent new diagnoses of drug toxic effects (2 hospitalists: odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; 3 hospitalists: OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12). Conclusions and Relevance: There was little evidence that receiving care from multiple hospitalists was associated with worse outcomes for patients receiving all their general medical care from hospitalists.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas , Estados Unidos
11.
Surgery ; 170(6): 1815-1821, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34167822

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantify disparities in the utilization of outpatient pediatric surgical care and to examine the extent to which neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with access to care among children. METHODS: Clinic "no-shows" were examined among children scheduled from 2017 to 2019 at seven pediatric surgery clinics associated with a tertiary care children's hospital. The association between Area Deprivation Index, a neighborhood-level measure of socioeconomic disadvantage, and other patient factors with clinic no-shows was examined using multivariable logistic regression models. Difficulties in accessing postoperative care in particular were explored in a subgroup analysis of postoperative (within 90 days) clinic visits after appendectomy or inguinal/umbilical hernia repairs. RESULTS: Among 10,162 patients, 16% had at least 1 no-show for a clinic appointment. Area Deprivation Index (most deprived decile adjusted odds ratio 3.17, 95% confidence interval 2.20-4.58, P < .001), Black race (adjusted odds ratio 3.30, 95% confidence interval 2.70-4.00, P < .001), and public insurance (adjusted odds ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval 2.38-3.31, P < .001) were associated with having at least 1 no-show. Similar associations were identified among 2,399 children scheduled for postoperative clinic visits after undergoing appendectomy or inguinal/umbilical hernia repair, among whom 20% were a no-show. CONCLUSION: Race, insurance type, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage are associated with disparities in utilization of outpatient pediatric surgical care. Challenges accessing routine outpatient care among disadvantaged children may be one mechanism through which disparate outcomes result among children requiring surgical care.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(25): 2749-2757, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129388

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The objective was to examine the relationship between contemporary redlining (mortgage lending bias on the basis of property location) and survival among older women with breast cancer in the United States. METHODS: A redlining index using Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data (2007-2013) was linked by census tract with a SEER-Medicare cohort of 27,516 women age 66-90 years with an initial diagnosis of stage I-IV breast cancer in 2007-2009 and follow-up through 2015. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between redlining and both all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, accounting for covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of non-Hispanic White, 57% of Hispanic, and 79% of non-Hispanic Black individuals lived in redlined tracts. As the redlining index increased, women experienced poorer survival. This effect was strongest for women with no comorbid conditions, who comprised 54% of the sample. For redlining index values of 1 (low), 2 (moderate), and 3 (high), as compared with 0.5 (least), hazard ratios (HRs) (and 95% CIs) for all-cause mortality were HR = 1.10 (1.06 to 1.14), HR = 1.27 (1.17 to 1.38), and HR = 1.39 (1.25 to 1.55), respectively, among women with no comorbidities. A similar pattern was found for breast cancer-specific mortality. CONCLUSION: Contemporary redlining is associated with poorer breast cancer survival. The impact of this bias is emphasized by the pronounced effect even among women with health insurance (Medicare) and no comorbid conditions. The magnitude of this neighborhood level effect demands an increased focus on upstream determinants of health to support comprehensive patient care. The housing sector actively reveals structural racism and economic disinvestment and is an actionable policy target to mitigate adverse upstream health determinants for the benefit of patients with cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Racismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Medicare , Pronóstico , Características de la Residencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
J Pharm Health Serv Res ; 12(1): 69-77, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33717229

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To adapt the two-step floating catchment area approach to account for urban-rural differences in pharmacy access in the United States. METHODS: The urban-rural two-step floating catchment area method was described mathematically. To calculate urban-rural-two-step floating catchment area measure, census tracts and pharmacies within the study area (Southeastern Wisconsin) were classified as urban, suburban or rural, and then different catchment area sizes (2, 5 and 15 miles) were applied, based on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)' criteria for Medicare Part D service access within urban, suburban and rural areas. The urban-rural-two-step floating catchment area measures were compared to traditional two-step floating catchment area measures computed using three fixed catchment area sizes (2, 5, and 15 miles) by visually examining their spatial distributions. Associations between the four pharmacy accessibility measures and selected socio-demographics are calculated using Spearman's rank-order correlation and further compared. KEY FINDINGS: The urban-rural two-step floating catchment area measure outperforms all the fixed catchment size measures and has the strongest Spearman correlations with the selected census variables. It also reduces the number of census tracts characterized as 'no access' when compared to the original measures. The spatial distribution of urban-rural two-step floating catchment area pharmacy access exhibits a more granular variation across the study area. CONCLUSIONS: The results support our hypothesis that spatial access to pharmacies should account for urbanicity/rurality patterns within a region.

14.
Breast Cancer ; 28(3): 698-709, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33398775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this large nationwide study was to validate two novel composite treatment scores that address guideline-concordant locoregional and systemic breast cancer care. We examined the relationship between these two scores and their association with survival. METHODS: Women with Stage I-III unilateral breast cancer were identified within the National Cancer Database. For each woman, a locoregional and a systemic treatment score (0, 1, 2) was assigned based on receipt of guideline-concordant care. Multivariable Cox regression models evaluated the association between the scores and survival. RESULTS: 623,756 women were treated at 1,221 different American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) facilities. Overall, 86% had a locoregional treatment score of 2 (most guideline-concordant), 75% had a systemic treatment score of 2, and 72% had both scores of 2. Median follow-up was 4.5 years. Compared to women with a locoregional treatment score of 2, those with a score of 1 or 0 had a 1.7-fold and 2.0-fold adjusted greater risk of death. Compared to women with a systemic treatment score of 2, those with a score of 1 or 0 had a 1.5-fold and 2.1-fold adjusted greater risk of death. Risk-adjusted 5-year overall survival was 91.6% when both scores were 2 compared to 73.4% when both scores were 0. CONCLUSIONS: In this large national study of CoC facilities, two composite scores capturing guideline-concordant breast cancer care had independent and combined robust effects on survival. These clinically constructed novel scores are promising tools for health services research and quality-of-care studies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
WMJ ; 120(4): 301-304, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35025178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Poverty and high viral load are associated with worse outcomes among COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We included patients admitted to Froedtert Health between March 16 and June 1, 2020. SARS-CoV-2 viral load was proxied by cycle-threshold values. To measure poverty, we used Medicaid or uninsured status and residence in socially disadvantaged areas. We assessed the association between viral load and length of stay and discharge disposition, while controlling for demographics and confounders. RESULTS: Higher viral load was associated with longer length of stay (coefficient -0.02; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.01; P = 0.006) and higher likelihood of death (coefficient -0.11; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.06; P < 0.001). Poverty, residence in disadvantaged areas, and race were not. DISCUSSION: This study confirms a relationship of viral load with in-hospital death, even after controlling for race and poverty.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Pobreza , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
WMJ ; 120(4): 305-308, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35025179

RESUMEN

The Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) COVID-19 Vaccination Program facilitated early vaccination efforts in metro Milwaukee, Wisconsin from December, 2020 through April, 2021. Goals of the program were to work with clinical partners to ensure rapid vaccination availability for the institution's frontline workforce, to support state public health agencies in offering a vaccination opportunity for underserved and higher education community members, and to train vaccinators. A key component of the program was the MCW COVID-19 Vaccination Clinic, and 88% of MCW's workforce was fully immunized against COVID-19 with the 2-dose, mRNA vaccine by April 30, 2021. Within the MCW clinic, 219 pharmacy and medical students learned to administer vaccinations, and 12,450 community vaccinations were administered.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Vacunas Sintéticas , Wisconsin , Vacunas de ARNm
17.
Med Care ; 59(1): 77-81, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33201083

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) have worse survival than more affluent women and are also more likely to undergo surgery in low-volume facilities. Since breast cancer patients treated in high-volume facilities have better survival, regionalizing the care of low SES patients toward high-volume facilities might reduce SES disparities in survival. OBJECTIVE: We leverage a natural experiment in New York state to examine whether a policy precluding payment for breast cancer surgery for New York Medicaid beneficiaries undergoing surgery in low-volume facilities led to reduced SES disparities in mortality. RESEARCH DESIGN: A multivariable difference-in-differences regression analysis compared mortality of low SES (dual enrollees, Medicare-Medicaid) breast cancer patients to that of wealthier patients exempt from the policy (Medicare only) for time periods before and after the policy implementation. SUBJECTS: A total of 14,183 Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer in 2006-2008 or 2014-2015. MEASURES: All-cause mortality at 3 years after diagnosis and Medicaid status, determined by Medicare administrative data. RESULTS: Both low SES and Medicare-only patients had better 3-year survival after the policy implementation. However, the decline in mortality was larger in magnitude among the low SES women than others, resulting in a 53% smaller SES survival disparity after the policy after adjustment for age, race, and comorbid illness. CONCLUSION: Regionalization of early breast cancer care away from low-volume centers may improve outcomes and reduce SES disparities in survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , New York , Estados Unidos
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(9): e2021892, 2020 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975575

RESUMEN

Importance: Initial public health data show that Black race may be a risk factor for worse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objective: To characterize the association of race with incidence and outcomes of COVID-19, while controlling for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 2595 consecutive adults tested for COVID-19 from March 12 to March 31, 2020, at Froedtert Health and Medical College of Wisconsin (Milwaukee), the largest academic system in Wisconsin, with 879 inpatient beds (of which 128 are intensive care unit beds). Exposures: Race (Black vs White, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Native American or Alaska Native, Asian, or unknown). Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes included COVID-19 positivity, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and death. Additional independent variables measured and tested included socioeconomic status, sex, and comorbidities. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay was used to test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Results: A total of 2595 patients were included. The mean (SD) age was 53.8 (17.5) years, 978 (37.7%) were men, and 785 (30.2%) were African American patients. Of the 369 patients (14.2%) who tested positive for COVID-19, 170 (46.1%) were men, 148 (40.1%) were aged 60 years or older, and 218 (59.1%) were African American individuals. Positive tests were associated with Black race (odds ratio [OR], 5.37; 95% CI, 3.94-7.29; P = .001), male sex (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.21-2.00; P = .001), and age 60 years or older (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.53-2.73; P = .001). Zip code of residence explained 79% of the overall variance in COVID-19 positivity in the cohort (ρ = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91). Adjusting for zip code of residence, Black race (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.00-3.65; P = .04) and poverty (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.20-12.30; P = .02) were associated with hospitalization. Poverty (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.08-11.80; P = .04) but not Black race (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.75-3.07; P = .24) was associated with intensive care unit admission. Overall, 20 (17.2%) deaths associated with COVID-19 were reported. Shortness of breath at presentation (OR, 10.67; 95% CI, 1.52-25.54; P = .02), higher body mass index (OR per unit of body mass index, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35; P = .006), and age 60 years or older (OR, 22.79; 95% CI, 3.38-53.81; P = .001) were associated with an increased likelihood of death. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of adults tested for COVID-19 in a large midwestern academic health system, COVID-19 positivity was associated with Black race. Among patients with COVID-19, both race and poverty were associated with higher risk of hospitalization, but only poverty was associated with higher risk of intensive care unit admission. These findings can be helpful in targeting mitigation strategies for racial disparities in the incidence and outcomes of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Infecciones por Coronavirus/etnología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neumonía Viral/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , Índice de Masa Corporal , COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Estudios Transversales , Disnea/epidemiología , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios , Oportunidad Relativa , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/virología , Pobreza , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Wisconsin/epidemiología
19.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 4: 521-528, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32530708

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Family and friends often provide informal care for patients with cancer, coordinating care and supporting patients at home. Stress, depression, and burnout are increasingly recognized among these informal caregivers. Although past research has described a range of needs, including the need for information, details about unmet informational needs for caregivers have not been fully described. We sought to assess unmet information management needs for informal caregivers in the digital era. METHODS: This was a qualitative research study with semistructured interviews and focus groups of nonprofessional caregivers for patients with cancer, facilitated using a discussion guide. Eligible caregivers supported patients in the community who were in treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) or completed treatment within 3 years. Participants were recruited using informational flyers at an academic cancer center and in the local community of metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Sessions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively to identify themes. RESULTS: Thirteen caregivers participated, the majority between 41 and 60 years of age: seven of 13, 53.8%, were predominantly women; 10 of 13 (76.9%) were educated, 10 of 13 (76.9%) had graduated from college; and of modest means, six of 13 (46.2%) had household incomes < $35,000. Four themes emerged: (1) the information overload paradox, where caregivers felt overloaded by information yet had unmet informational needs; (2) navigating volatility as a caregiver, with changing or unknown expectations; (3) caregivers as information brokers, which placed new burdens on caregivers to seek, share, and protect information; and (4) care for the caregiver, including unmet information needs related to self-care. CONCLUSION: This study identified several informational challenges affecting caregivers. Caregivers have dynamic and evolving informational needs, and strategies that support caregivers through just-in-time information availability or dedicated caregiver check-ins may provide relief within the stress of caregiving.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Neoplasias , Femenino , Humanos , Gestión de la Información , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/terapia , Investigación Cualitativa
20.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(1): e1919132, 2020 01 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31922563

RESUMEN

Importance: Clostridioides difficile infection is the most frequent health care-associated infection in the United States. However, exposure to this organism might occur outside the health care setting. Objective: To examine whether exposure to environmental factors, such as livestock farms, is associated with a higher probability of being colonized with C difficile at hospital admission. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from May 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, at a teaching-affiliated hospital in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All consecutive patients underwent C difficile screening using a nucleic acid amplification test at hospital admission. Data analyses were performed from July 2018 to October 2019. Exposures: The distances from patient residence to the nearest livestock farms, meat processing plants, raw materials services, and sewage facilities were measured in addition to risk factors previously evaluated in other studies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was a positive result on C difficile screening tests performed within 72 hours of hospital admission. Results: A total of 3043 patients admitted to the hospital were included in the final analysis. Of those, 1564 (51.4%) were women and 2074 (68.9%) were white, with a mean (SD) age of 62.0 (15.9) years; 978 patients (32.1%) were admitted to hematology-oncology units. At first admission, 318 patients (10.4%) were detected through testing as C difficile carriers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on a stratified sample of patients based on hematology-oncology admission status. These analyses indicated that although patients admitted to hematology-oncology units were 35% more likely to be colonized with C difficile, no significant association existed between their sociodemographic and economic characteristics or health care and environmental exposures and the likelihood of a positive C difficile test result. In contrast, among patients admitted to non-hematology-oncology units, comorbidities increased the likelihood for colonization by more than 4 times; women had 60% greater colonization than men, and a history of recent hospitalization (ie, within the preceding 6 months) increased the likelihood of colonization by 70%. Residential proximity to livestock farms were all significantly associated with a higher likelihood of a positive C difficile test result. Residential proximity to livestock farms more than doubled the probability of C difficile colonization in patients admitted to non-hematology-oncology units. Conclusions and Relevance: A shorter distance between residence and livestock farms was associated with C difficile colonization. Knowledge of the epidemiology of C difficile in the community surrounding the hospital is important, as it has potential implications for the incidence of hospital-onset C difficile infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Granjas , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...