Safety, Tolerability, and EEG-Based Target Engagement of STP1 (PDE3,4 Inhibitor and NKCC1 Antagonist) in a Randomized Clinical Trial in a Subgroup of Patients with ASD.

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of STP1, a combination of ibudilast and bumetanide, tailored for the treatment of a clinically and biologically defined subgroup of patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), namely ASD Phenotype 1 (ASD-Phen1). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 1b study with two 14-day treatment phases (registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04644003). Nine ASD-Phen1 patients were administered STP1, while three received a placebo. We assessed safety and tolerability, along with electrophysiological markers, such as EEG, Auditory Habituation, and Auditory Chirp Synchronization, to better understand STP1's mechanism of action. Additionally, we used several clinical scales to measure treatment outcomes. The results showed that STP1 was well-tolerated, with electrophysiological markers indicating a significant and dose-related reduction of gamma power in the whole brain and in brain areas associated with executive function and memory. Treatment with STP1 also increased alpha 2 power in frontal and occipital regions and improved habituation and neural synchronization to auditory chirps. Although numerical improvements were observed in several clinical scales, they did not reach statistical significance. Overall, this study suggests that STP1 is well-tolerated in ASD-Phen1 patients and shows indirect target engagement in ASD brain regions of interest.

Health Related Quality of Life in Autistic Youth and Their Families.

PURPOSE: The construct Quality of Life (QoL) involves a range of factors related to one's well-being. Individuals on the autism spectrum have been previously reported to have lower QoL. The purpose of the present study is to examine QoL in autistic individuals and their families and to evaluate associations between QoL and measures of functioning using the PedsQL 4.0. METHOD: Thirty-six autistic youth (ages 9-21 years) and their caregivers completed the PedsQL. Caregivers completed additional measures of their children's adaptive, social, behavioral, and emotional functioning. RESULTS: Parents and youth generally agreed on the PedsQL, with the exception of the Social Functioning domain, which youth rated higher. The parent rated PedsQL did not correlate with most areas of caregiver-rated functioning; however, there were significant negative correlations between irritability and family functioning. CONCLUSION: Limitations of this study included small sample size; broad range of intellectual functioning; lack of sample diversity; and likely recruiting bias for a drug treatment study. Despite limitations, HRQoL is an important feature that should be measured in addition to features of autism or symptoms of co-occurring symptoms.

High Specificity of HPV Cell-Free DNA Tests in Persons With HIV for the Detection of HPV-Related Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Persons with HIV (PWH) experience high rates of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers compared with the general population. Plasma HPV cell-free DNA (cfDNA) tests are sensitive in patients with known HPV-associated cancers. It is not known whether these tests can screen for invasive cancers in populations with high burdens of nonmalignant HPV disease such as PWH. It was not known whether HPV infection and/or noninvasive anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) alone in this population would result in detectable HPV cfDNA, which would result in a high number of false positives if HPV cfDNA is used to screen for invasive cancers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of PWH in 2 cohorts: 20 without anal HSIL and 20 with anal HSIL. We tested anal and vaginal swabs for HPV infection, and HPV genotyped the biopsies of anal HSIL. Finally, we performed HPV cfDNA droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to test for HPV16/18/33 from plasma samples. RESULTS: In the combined cohorts, the median age was 56 years, 12.5% were cisgender women, and none had detectable HIV. In total, 84.6% had prevalent anovaginal HPV infection, including 10 participants with HPV16, 13 with HPV18, and 2 with HPV33 infections. Five and 2 participants had HPV16 and HPV33 detected in anal HSIL, respectively. Despite the high prevalence of HPV infection and anal HSIL, no participant had HPV16/18/33 detectable cfDNA by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a strong rationale for investigating the use of HPV cfDNA in a screening setting for suspected HPV-related invasive cancers in PWH.

Local iontophoretic administration of cytotoxic therapies to solid tumors.

Parenteral and oral routes have been the traditional methods of administering cytotoxic agents to cancer patients. Unfortunately, the maximum potential effect of these cytotoxic agents has been limited because of systemic toxicity and poor tumor perfusion. In an attempt to improve the efficacy of cytotoxic agents while mitigating their side effects, we have developed modalities for the localized iontophoretic delivery of cytotoxic agents. These iontophoretic devices were designed to be implanted proximal to the tumor with external control of power and drug flow. Three distinct orthotopic mouse models of cancer and a canine model were evaluated for device efficacy and toxicity. Orthotopic patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts treated biweekly with gemcitabine via the device for 7 weeks experienced a mean log2 fold change in tumor volume of -0.8 compared to a mean log2 fold change in tumor volume of 1.1 for intravenous (IV) gemcitabine, 3.0 for IV saline, and 2.6 for device saline groups. The weekly coadministration of systemic cisplatin therapy and transdermal device cisplatin therapy significantly increased tumor growth inhibition and doubled the survival in two aggressive orthotopic models of breast cancer. The addition of radiotherapy to this treatment further extended survival. Device delivery of gemcitabine in dogs resulted in more than 7-fold difference in local drug concentrations and 25-fold lower systemic drug levels than the IV treatment. Overall, these devices have potential paradigm shifting implications for the treatment of pancreatic, breast, and other solid tumors.