Health care costs and utilization prior to diagnosis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis in Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis (AV) is a complex group of autoimmune disorders affecting blood vessels in multiple organ systems. Delays in diagnosis are common because AV symptoms can be nonspecific and present heterogeneously. This may result in increased health care utilization in the months preceding diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether Medicare beneficiaries with AV experienced increased health care utilization and costs in the year before the first diagnosis recorded in claims, relative to beneficiaries without AV. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used 2015-2016 Medicare Part A/B claims and Part D prescription drug data. Beneficiaries with newly diagnosed AV were identified by having 1 or more inpatient claims or 2 or more noninpatient claims 7 or more days apart in 2016 with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code for AV, with no AV claims in the year prior. Beneficiaries with AV were matched 1:1 on age and sex to beneficiaries without any diagnoses for any type of systemic vasculitis in 2016. Beneficiaries with Part A/B coverage (AB, n = 1,460) and Part A/B/D coverage (ABD, n = 3,252) were analyzed separately. We estimated generalized linear mixed models with a negative binomial distribution to compare health care costs and utilization by AV status. RESULTS: Beneficiaries with AV had approximately 3 times higher Medicare Part A/B payments (incidence rate ratio [95% CI]: AB: 2.94 [2.44-3.53]; ABD: 2.95 [2.64-3.29]) and 2.5 times higher beneficiary Part A/B payments (AB: 2.47 [2.14-2.84]; ABD: 2.62 [2.40-2.87]) vs beneficiaries without AV. Beneficiaries with AV experienced significantly higher utilization across all categories, with the largest differences observed in hospital outpatient visits (AB: 2.69 [2.22-3.27]; ABD: 3.08 [2.73-3.47]). CONCLUSIONS: In the year prior to AV diagnosis, Medicare beneficiaries have significantly higher health care costs and utilization than beneficiaries without AV. DISCLOSURES: Dr Huang was supported by the University of North Carolina and GlaxoSmithKline Health Outcomes Fellowship during the time of the study and reports current employment at Horizon Therapeutics, Deerfield, IL. Dr Nguyen received predoctoral funding through a fellowship appointment sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb during the time of the study and reports current employment at GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA. Dr Derebail receives personal fees from Travere Therapeutics, Bayer, and UpToDate, outside of the submitted work. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Department of Veteran Affairs. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Postoperative Use of Biologics was Less Common among Patients with Crohn's Disease With Emergent/Urgent Versus Elective Intestinal Resection.

Background & Aims: Given the risk of intestinal resection for Crohn's disease, postoperative treatment may be informed by several risk factors, including resection type. We compared postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's disease between emergent/urgent versus elective resection. Methods: We identified patients with intestinal resection for Crohn's disease between 2002-2018 using the MarketScan databases. We classified emergent/urgent resections as those occurring after emergency department admission or after the second day of admission. We estimated adjusted risk differences for the association between resection type (emergent/urgent versus elective) and 6-month postoperative medication strategy (biologic monotherapy, biologic combination therapy with an immunomodulator, immunomodulator monotherapy, other non-biologic medication for Crohn's [5-aminosalicylates, antibiotics, corticosteroids], or no medications for Crohn's). Results: During 6 months after resection among 4,187 patients, 23% received biologic monotherapy, 6% received combination therapy, 16% received immunomodulator monotherapy, and 36% received other non-biologics. Compared to elective resection, emergent/urgent resection was associated with more common use of "other non-biologic" medications (risk difference 6.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8%, 10.0%), but less common use of biologic monotherapy (risk difference -3.2%; 95% CI -6.2%, -0.1%) and no medications (risk difference -3.6%; 95% CI -6.6%, -0.6%). Conclusions: Although patients with emergent/urgent resection may benefit from more aggressive postoperative therapy, there was evidence that emergent/urgent resection was more associated than elective resection with postoperative use of non-biologics for Crohn's disease. Future studies of treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness of postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's patients should consider these differences between resection types, which may be important drivers of longer-term outcomes.

Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy Initiation Strategies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: Overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase is not significantly different by treatment with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but emerging evidence reveals differences in costs and safety profiles. We evaluated the 1-year cost-effectiveness of TKI initiation with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib among a hypothetical cohort of incident patients with CML from a US payer's perspective. METHODS: We constructed a decision analytic model to assess quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare costs, net monetary benefit, and incremental cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies. We used published studies and data from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan database for model parameters. To calculate TKI costs, we used the 2018 Federal Supply Schedule estimates for generic imatinib and branded second-generation TKIs. We evaluated cost-effectiveness under various willingness-to-pay thresholds. We accounted for uncertainty with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, imatinib was favored over dasatinib and nilotinib at a lower cost per QALY gained. Imatinib remained the favored strategy after 1-way variations in TKI costs, TKI switching, QALYs, adverse event risk, and CML progression. When we assessed model uncertainty with prespecified parameter distributions, imatinib was cost-saving compared with dasatinib in 40% of 100 0000 simulations and was favored over all simulations compared with nilotinib. First-line treatment with second-generation TKIs was cost-effective in 50% of simulations at a $200 000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Generic availability of imatinib provides a more cost-effective treatment approach in the first year compared with other available TKIs for newly diagnosed patients with CML.

Economic and objective burden of caregiving on informal caregivers of patients with systemic vasculitis.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic vasculitis (SV) is associated with substantial economic impact to patients and the healthcare system but little is known about the burden of SV on informal caregivers. We evaluated the objective caregiving burden experienced by informal caregivers of patients with SV. METHODS: We surveyed adult patients and their informal caregivers on the physical, emotional, social and economic impacts of SV. We asked patients about the extent to which they felt they were a burden to their identified caregivers. Caregivers reported the direct and indirect economic impact of SV, including employment disturbance, income loss and relative time investment of caregiving for their care recipient's SV. We used the Inventory of Caregiving Activities Questionnaire to compute the objective caregiving burden. RESULTS: We analysed data from 68 SV patient-caregiver dyads. Patients reported moderate levels of subjective burden to their caregivers. Over one-quarter of caregivers reported ever having lost some income owing to caregiving for SV. Caregivers reported spending a median of 19 weekly hours on various caregiving tasks, including a median 17 weekly hours on household activities. DISCUSSION: Given the extended hours that caregivers spend caring for their care recipient, intervention targets should aim to reduce caregiver burnout in the SV population. Future research should examine the relationship between the objective burden of caregiving for SV and the overall physical health, mental health and quality of life of caregivers.