Hyaluronidases and hyaluronan synthases expression is inversely correlated with malignancy in lung/bronchial pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions, affecting prognosis

We collected a series of 136 lung/bronchial and 56 matched lung parenchyma tissue samples from patients who underwent lung/bronchial biopsies and presented invasive carcinoma after lung surgery. The lung/bronchial samples included basal cell hyperplasia, squamous metaplasia, moderate dysplasia, adenomatous hyperplasia, severe dysplasia, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Matched lung parenchyma tissue samples included 25 squamous cell carcinomas and 31 adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemistry was performed to analyze for the distribution of hyaluronidase (Hyal)-1 and −3, and hyaluronan synthases (HAS)-1, −2, and −3. Hyal-1 showed significantly higher expression in basal cell hyperplasia than in moderate dysplasia (P=0.01), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (P=0.0001), or severe dysplasia (P=0.03). Lower expression of Hyal-3 was found in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia than in basal cell hyperplasia (P=0.01) or moderate dysplasia (P=0.02). HAS-2 was significantly higher in severe dysplasia (P=0.002) and in squamous metaplasia (P=0.04) compared with basal cell hyperplasia. HAS-3 was significantly expressed in basal cell hyperplasia compared with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (P=0.05) and severe dysplasia (P=0.02). Lower expression of HAS-3 was found in severe dysplasia compared with squamous metaplasia (P=0.01) and moderate dysplasia (P=0.01). Epithelial Hyal-1 and −3 and HAS-1, −2, and −3 expressions were significantly higher in pre-neoplastic lesions than in neoplastic lesions. Comparative Cox multivariate analysis controlled by N stage and histologic tumor type showed that patients with high HAS-3 expression in pre-neoplastic cells obtained by lung/bronchial biopsy presented a significantly higher risk of death (HR=1.19; P=0.04). We concluded that localization of Hyal and HAS in lung/bronchial pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions was inversely related to malignancy, which implied that visualizing these factors could be a useful diagnostic procedure for suspected lung cancer. Finalizing this conclusion will require a wider study in a randomized and prospective trial.

Hyaluronidases and hyaluronan synthases expression is inversely correlated with malignancy in lung/bronchial pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions, affecting prognosis.

We collected a series of 136 lung/bronchial and 56 matched lung parenchyma tissue samples from patients who underwent lung/bronchial biopsies and presented invasive carcinoma after lung surgery. The lung/bronchial samples included basal cell hyperplasia, squamous metaplasia, moderate dysplasia, adenomatous hyperplasia, severe dysplasia, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Matched lung parenchyma tissue samples included 25 squamous cell carcinomas and 31 adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemistry was performed to analyze for the distribution of hyaluronidase (Hyal)-1 and -3, and hyaluronan synthases (HAS)-1, -2, and -3. Hyal-1 showed significantly higher expression in basal cell hyperplasia than in moderate dysplasia (P=0.01), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (P=0.0001), or severe dysplasia (P=0.03). Lower expression of Hyal-3 was found in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia than in basal cell hyperplasia (P=0.01) or moderate dysplasia (P=0.02). HAS-2 was significantly higher in severe dysplasia (P=0.002) and in squamous metaplasia (P=0.04) compared with basal cell hyperplasia. HAS-3 was significantly expressed in basal cell hyperplasia compared with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (P=0.05) and severe dysplasia (P=0.02). Lower expression of HAS-3 was found in severe dysplasia compared with squamous metaplasia (P=0.01) and moderate dysplasia (P=0.01). Epithelial Hyal-1 and -3 and HAS-1, -2, and -3 expressions were significantly higher in pre-neoplastic lesions than in neoplastic lesions. Comparative Cox multivariate analysis controlled by N stage and histologic tumor type showed that patients with high HAS-3 expression in pre-neoplastic cells obtained by lung/bronchial biopsy presented a significantly higher risk of death (HR=1.19; P=0.04). We concluded that localization of Hyal and HAS in lung/bronchial pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions was inversely related to malignancy, which implied that visualizing these factors could be a useful diagnostic procedure for suspected lung cancer. Finalizing this conclusion will require a wider study in a randomized and prospective trial.

Value of the mesothelium-associated antibodies thrombomodulin, cytokeratin 5/6, calretinin, and CD44H in distinguishing epithelioid pleural mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma metastatic to the pleura.

Until recently, the standard approach of most laboratories in distinguishing epithelioid pleural mesothelioma from metastatic adenocarcinoma has been a negative result from a panel of adenocarcinoma-associated antibodies. However, several "mesothelium-associated" antibodies have been proposed as useful in this situation, and we have applied four of these putative mesothelioma markers--thrombomodulin, cytokeratin 5/6, calretinin, and CD44H--to a series of 61 epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas and 63 metastatic adenocarcinomas with known primary sites (lung = 19; breast = 21; ovary = 6; colon = 10; kidney = 4; uterus, epididymis, pancreas = 1 case each). Of the mesotheliomas, 55 of 61 (90%) stained for thrombomodulin, 56 of 61 (92%) for cytokeratin 5/6, 47 of 51 cases (92%) were positive for calretinin, and 39 of 43 (91%) were positive for CD44H. Of the metastatic adenocarcinomas, 12 of 63 (19%) cases were positive for thrombomodulin, 9 of 63 (14%) were positive for CK5/6, and 27 of 60 (45%) were positive for CD44H. With calretinin, only 1 case of 59 (2%) showed positive nuclear staining. All four antibodies stained reactive mesothelium; thrombomodulin also stained endothelium; and CD44H variably stained lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts. We conclude that all four antibodies show high sensitivity for epithelioid mesothelioma, but only calretinin (98%), cytokeratin 5/6 (86%), and thrombomodulin (81%) show sufficient specificity for practical use in this situation.

The use of histological and immunohistochemical markers to distinguish pleural malignant mesothelioma and in situ mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia and reactive pleural fibrosis.

Distinguishing malignant mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia and reactive fibrosis can be a diagnostic problem in small pleural biopsies, made more difficult by the recent recognition of mesothelioma-in-situ. Antibodies to epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), p53, and bcl-2 have all been advocated for differentiating reactive from neoplastic conditions, but reports are inconsistent. These antibodies have therefore been applied to 31 cases of malignant mesothelioma, 34 cases of reactive pleural disease (20 reactive mesothelial hyperplasia and 14 reactive pleural fibrosis) and four small biopsies that were initially coded as suspicious, from patients who later developed frank mesothelioma. Thirty out of 31 (97 per cent) cases of mesothelioma showed positive nuclear staining for p53, with a higher incidence of positivity in epithelioid than in sarcomatoid elements and 30/31 (97 per cent) showed diffuse linear membrane staining for EMA, again more intense in the epithelioid elements. No mesothelioma was positive for bcl-2. In seven cases that contained both in situ and invasive mesothelioma, the in situ elements showed similar staining patterns to the invasive epithelioid elements. Thirteen out of 20 (65 per cent) cases of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia showed occasional nuclear positivity for p53 and 5/20 (25 per cent) cases showed focal weak membrane staining for EMA. Three out of 14 (21 per cent) cases of reactive pleural fibrosis showed positive nuclear staining for p53 and 6/14 (43 per cent) cases showed focal membrane staining with EMA. No reactive cases stained for bcl-2. All four suspicious cases showed diffuse linear staining with EMA and three showed focal staining for p53. It is concluded that strong diffuse linear staining for EMA is a good marker of malignancy when differentiating epithelioid malignant mesothelioma and mesothelioma-in-situ from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, although weak focal staining may occur in reactive conditions. Nuclear staining for p53 is also suggestive of epithelioid mesothelioma, but should be regarded as no more than suspicious. The antibodies used in this investigation are less helpful in differentiating sarcomatoid mesothelioma from reactive pleural fibrosis.