RESUMEN
Objectives. Studies have shown that healthcare personnel hesitate to perform defibrillation due to individual or organisational attitudes. We aimed to assess trainers' attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation (CPR-D), Current Care Guidelines, and associated training. Methods. A questionnaire was distributed to CPR trainers attending seminars in Finland (N = 185) focusing on the updated national Current Care Guidelines 2011. The questions were answered using Likert scale (1 = totally disagree, 7 = totally agree). Factor loading of the questionnaire was made using maximum likelihood analysis and varimax rotation. Seven scales were constructed (Hesitation, Nurse's Role, Nontechnical Skill, Usefulness, Restrictions, Personal, and Organisation). Cronbach's alphas were 0.92-0.51. Statistics were Student's t-test, ANOVA, stepwise regression analysis, and Pearson Correlation. Results. The questionnaire was returned by 124/185, 67% CPR trainers, of whom two-thirds felt that their undergraduate training in CPR-D had not been adequate. Satisfaction with undergraduate defibrillation training correlated with the Nontechnical Skills scale (p < 0.01). Participants scoring high on Hesitation scale (p < 0.01) were less confident about their Nurse's Role (p < 0.01) and Nontechnical Skills (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Quality of undergraduate education affects the work of CPR trainers and some feel uncertain of defibrillation. The train-the-trainers courses and undergraduate medical education should focus more on practical scenarios with defibrillators and nontechnical skills.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the most common symptoms in the Emergency Department (ED) and is the cause of more than half of the visits to the ED. Several attempts to improve pain management have been done by using, for example, standards/guidelines and education. To our knowledge no one has investigated if and how different actions over a longitudinal period affect the frequency of pain documentation in the ED. Therefore the aim of this study was to describe the frequency of documented pain assessments in the ED. METHOD: A cross-sectional study during 2006-2012 was conducted. The care of patients with wrist/arm fractures or soft tissue injuries on upper extremities was evaluated. RESULT: Despite various actions our result shows that mandatory pain assessment in the patient's computerized medical record was the only successful intervention to improve the frequencies of documentation of pain assessment during care in the ED. During the study period, no documentation of reassessment of pain was found despite the fact that all patients received pain medication. CONCLUSION: To succeed in increasing the frequency of documented pain assessment, mandatory pain rating is a successful action. However, the re-evaluation of documented pain assessment was nonexisting.
Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Dimensión del Dolor/normas , Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Fracturas Óseas/enfermería , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/enfermeríaAsunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/psicología , Miedo/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Finlandia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , SueciaRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: National resuscitation guidelines were published in Finland in 2002 and updated in 2006. The purpose of this study was to analyse the effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education on attitudes towards defibrillation during arrests (CPR-D) and the guidelines. METHODS: In 2003 (before CPR-D education) and in 2007 (after the education), 48-item questionnaires (using a 7-point Likert scale: 1=totally disagree, 7=totally agree) were sent to nurses in a secondary hospital. Factor loadings were applied using maximum likelihood factor analyses with a varimax rotation. Five scales were built from the items of the questionnaire: attitudes towards CPR-D, positive attitudes, negative attitudes towards guidelines, implementation and nurses' role. RESULTS: A total of 297 and 199 responded in 2003 and 2007, respectively. Education increased positive attitudes towards CPR-D (scale mean: 4.40 vs. 3.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9-4.2, P<0.001). Nevertheless, 27% of nurses hesitated to perform defibrillation because of fear of injuring patient and 64% because of anxiety. After education, negative attitudes towards guidelines increased (scale mean 2.94 vs. 3.92, 95% CI: 3.2-3.6, P<0.001) and nurses were more unsure about their role than before education (scale mean: 4.84 vs. 3.42, 95% CI: 4.1-4.4, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive education increased self-confidence regarding CPR-D skills but did not reduce anxiety. CPR-D education should include a focus on reducing anxiety, and negative attitudes within organisations need to be explored.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Desfibriladores , Paro Cardíaco/enfermería , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Análisis de Varianza , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/educación , Educación Continua en Enfermería , Análisis Factorial , Finlandia , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine is team work from the field to the hospital and therefore it is also important for physicians to understand the work of paramedics, and vice versa. Interprofessional emergency medicine education for medical and paramedic students in Helsinki was started in 2001. It consisted of a 15 European credit transfer system (ECTS) credits programme combining 22 students in 2001. In 2005, the number of students had increased to 25. The programme consisted of three parts: acute illness in childhood and adults (AI), advanced life support (ALS) and trauma life support (TLS). In this paper, we describe the concept of interprofessional education of medical students and paramedics in emergency medicine. METHODS: After finishing the programmes in 2001 and in 2005, the students' opinions regarding the education were collected using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: There were good ratings for the courses in AI (2001 vs. 2005, whole group; 4.3 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.4, P = 0.44) ALS (4.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.5, P = 0.06) and TLS (3.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.5, P = 0.01) in both years. Most of the medical students considered that this kind of co-education should be arranged for all medical students (2001 vs. 2005; 4.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.5, P = 0.02) and should be obligatory (3.5 +/- 1.5 vs. 3.1 +/- 1.3, P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Co-education was well received and determined by the students as an effective way of improving their knowledge of emergency medicine and medical skills. The programme was rated as very useful and it should be included in the educational curriculum of both student groups.
Asunto(s)
Educación Basada en Competencias , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina , Finlandia , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Construction of an effective in-hospital resuscitation programme is challenging. To document and analyse resuscitation skills assessment must provide reliable data. Benchmarking with a hospital having documented excellent results of in-hospital resuscitation is beneficial. The purpose of this study was to assess the resuscitation skills to facilitate construction of an educational programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nurses working in a university hospital Jorvi, Espoo (n=110), Finland and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg (n=40), Sweden were compared. The nurses were trained in the same way in both hospitals except for the defining and teaching of leadership applied in Sahlgrenska. Jorvi nurses are not trained to be, nor do they act as, leaders in a resuscitation situation. Their cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills using an automated external defibrillator (AED) were assessed using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) which was build up as a case of cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the initial rhythm. The subjects were tested in pairs, each pair alone. Group-working skills were registered. RESULTS: All Sahlgrenska nurses, but only 49% of Jorvi nurses, were able to defibrillate. Seventy percent of the nurses working in the Sahlgrenska hospital (mean score 35/49) and 27% of the nurses in Jorvi (mean score 26/49) would have passed the OSCE test. Statistically significant differences were found in activating the alarm (P<0.001), activating the AED without delay (P<0.01), setting the lower defibrillation electrode correctly (P<0.001) and using the correct resuscitation technique (P<0.05). The group-working skills of Sahlgrenska nurses were also significantly better than those of Jorvi nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of CPR-D skills gave valuable information for further education in both hospitals. Defining and teaching leadership seems to improve resuscitation performance.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/educación , Desfibriladores , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Liderazgo , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Enseñanza , Evaluación Educacional , Finlandia , Humanos , SueciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Because of the importance of airway management in emergency care, alternative methods with shorter learning curves for inexperienced personnel have been looked for as a substitute for endotracheal intubation (ETI). METHODS: We compared the success of insertion, oxygenation and ventilation of the intubating laryngeal mask (ILMA), laryngeal tube (LT) and CobraPLA (COB) in anaesthetized patients when used by paramedical students. After informed consent, 96 patients were monitored and anaesthetized for general surgery without the use of a muscle relaxant. After the induction of anaesthesia, 32 paramedical students inserted the ILMA, LT or COB in a random order and ventilated the patient for a 60-s period. The number of insertion attempts, the time needed for insertion, and oxygenation and ventilation parameters were recorded. The students gave a subjective evaluation of the airway devices after the test. RESULTS: Twenty-four of the 32 students (75%) successfully inserted ILMA at the first attempt, compared with 14 of 32 (44%) for LT and seven of 32 (22%) for COB (P<0.001, ILMA vs. COB). One student failed to insert ILMA after all three attempts, compared with seven of 32 (21%) using LT and seven of 32 (21%) using COB (P=not significant). Oxygenation and ventilation parameters did not differ between the groups after successful insertion. CONCLUSION: Clinically inexperienced paramedical students can successfully use ILMA in anaesthetized patients. Further investigations are warranted to study whether ILMA or LT can replace ETI in emergency airway management when used by inexperienced medical or paramedical staff.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Intubación , Laringe , Equipos Desechables , Humanos , Intubación/instrumentación , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Máscaras Laríngeas , Persona de Mediana Edad , EstudiantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Every member of healthcare personnel should be able to perform basic life support including defibrillation (CPR-D). The biggest cost of implementation is training and these costs need to be reduced. The purpose of this randomized study was to evaluate the applicability of distance learning as a method to teach CPR-D. METHODS: Nurses (n = 56) working in a geriatric hospital were randomized into three groups. The first group was given the Internet-based CPR-D course and the second was given a traditional, small-group CPR-D course. A third group without specific training in CPR-D served as a control group. An objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was performed 2 weeks after the courses with a manikin patient having a cardiac arrest. RESULTS: The median score of all participants was 31/49 (range 21-38). The reliability of the checklist was adequate (Cronbach alpha 0.77). Nurses receiving traditional CPR-D performed better than those receiving the Internet-based course (median score 34 vs. 28, P < 0.05) and the control group (median score 34 vs. 26, P < 0.0001). Nurses receiving Internet-based course performed similarly as the control group (median score 28 vs. 26, ns). CONCLUSIONS: Distance learning cannot substitute for traditional small-group learning.
Asunto(s)
Educación a Distancia/métodos , Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Internet , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/métodos , Humanos , Enseñanza/métodosRESUMEN
Little is known about how other than cancer pain related issues are represented in medical education. A standardised questionnaire was mailed to all medical students who graduated from the five Finnish medical schools in 2001. A total of 387 students received the questionnaire and 41% responded. The students had to evaluate the quantity and the quality of pain teaching. The availability and the participation in the advanced courses or research in pain medicine were asked. The students reported how the IASP curriculum on pain had been covered during the studies. Two clinical cases were presented for diagnosis and treatment. In addition to integrated pain teaching, specific pain education was received by 27% of the students. The departments of anaesthesiology were reported as the major deliverers of teaching of pain. The overall ratings of the pain-related teaching of the faculties varied from 3.4 to 4.6 on a scale of 10. Anatomy, biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology of pain were covered well. The definitions of pain, pain research, sociological issues, paediatric, geriatric and mentally retarded patients' pain were taught most poorly. Only 34% of the students had been offered advanced studies and 15% had been offered research projects in pain medicine. The lack of teaching about the concept of a multidisciplinary pain clinic was recognised by almost all students. The clinical problems were excellently solved. In conclusion, the IASP curriculum is well covered in the present programmes in the Finnish medical faculties. However, the quality and the methods of teaching still need improvement.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Dolor , Estudiantes de Medicina , Finlandia , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bromage scale (0-3) is used to measure the degree of motor block during spinal anaesthesia. However, an estimation of motor block is difficult during surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of surface EMG describing spontaneous muscular activity in the lower extremities during spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: In part I of the study, 13 patients undergoing day case surgery were studied. They received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine at interspace L3-4. EMG, sensory and muscular block were measured at 5-min intervals during the first 30 min and then every 15 min until the patient was able to flex the knee. In part II of the study, 16 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty received 10 mg bupivacaine through spinal catheter at interspace L3-4 (Group CSA). An additional bolus of 2.5 mg was administered using EMG-guidance, if needed. Another group, 15 patients, received a single bolus of bupivacaine (15-20 mg) at L3-4 (Group Bolus). EMG, muscular and sensory block were monitored as described above. The epidural catheter was used as rescue. RESULTS: Part I: EMG compared to modified Bromage scale showed a significant correlation (P < 0.01, Spearman rank correlation). Part II: The amount of bupivacaine was significantly reduced with EMG guidance when compared with the single bolus group (14.0 mg vs. 17.0 mg) (P < 0.05 Mann-Whitney U). Motor block started to recover before the sensory block in 7/15 CSA patients vs. 1/15 Bolus patient. CONCLUSION: Stable maximal sensory block does not necessarily correlate with adequate motor block in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia induced with small bolus doses. In spite of electrical noise, EMG-guided administration of spinal anaesthesia significantly reduced the amount of bupivacaine compared to the hospital routine. Further studies are needed to develop the method.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Electromiografía/métodos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Método Doble Ciego , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Survival improves in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest if the victim receives bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and rapid defibrillation (BLS/AED). The European Resuscitation Council has a simple programme to teach these life-saving skills that require no previous experience of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). To be able to implement the use of AEDs widely, many instructors are needed, and therefore, lay persons may also be used as trainers. The purpose of this randomized study was to compare lay volunteers trained by a lay person with those trained by a health care professional using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). METHODS: Eight instructors, including four lay persons and four health care professionals, were given a basic course and an instructor course in CPR-D by the same instructor. All newly trained instructors trained 38 lay volunteers (19 pairs) who had no previous training in the use of a defibrillator. The lay volunteers performed the OSCE 2-3 weeks after the course. The OSCE comprised two scenarios with a manikin: the first, a patient in cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation, and the second, an imminent cardiac arrest with asystole as the initial rhythm. The same OSCE was performed by a group of lay first aiders practicing every 2 weeks who served as the control group. RESULTS: No statistical difference was present between the two groups of lay volunteers in the OSCE. All were able to use the AED and follow instructions. They identified patients with ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest, but had difficulties identifying cases with imminent cardiac arrest. The control group of trained first aiders performed significantly more effectively than the newly trained lay persons. CONCLUSIONS: No significant benefit exists in the trainer being a health care professional, but thorough training and subsequent rehearsing of the skills learned are crucial.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/educación , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Educación en Salud , Voluntarios/educación , Personal de Salud/educación , Humanos , EnseñanzaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Regional anaesthesia has not been recommended as an anaesthetic method for penetrating eye injuries because it is suspected to aggravate the injury already present. After having successfully managed the treatment of a penetrating eye injury under combined peri- and retrobulbar block in an ASA IV patient, it was decided to evaluate this anaesthetic method further in the treatment of such emergency cases. METHODS: Twenty adult patients with penetrating eye injuries with a maximum wound length of 8 mm extending up to 4 mm posteriorly from the limbus were operated on under combined peri- and retrobulbar anaesthesia. Eighteen patients receiving general anaesthesia served as controls. RESULTS: The mean (range) volume injected for a satisfactory peribulbar retrobulbar block was 7.4 (6.5-8.0) mL, six patients needed an additional retrobulbar injection before surgery (2.9, range 2-4, mL). All patients receiving regional anaesthesia were satisfied with the anaesthetic method and the surgeons considered the surgical conditions as good. No problems relating to local anaesthesia were observed or reported by any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the hands of an experienced anaesthesiologist and under certain conditions, regional anaesthesia appears to be suitable for adult patients having penetrating eye injuries.