Atazanavir plasma concentrations are impaired in HIV-1-infected adults simultaneously taking a methadone oral solution in a once-daily observed therapy setting.

OBJECTIVE: The human immundeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor atazanavir is often used in once-daily observed therapy of methadone substituted former opiate drug users. We performed a matched-pairs analysis on 24 patients (12 men/women) taking atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg daily plus reverse transcriptase inhibitors, with (n = 12) or without (n = 12) methadone co-administration. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic profiles of atazanavir/ritonavir were assessed at steady-state and measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean (GM, t test) minimum and maximum plasma drug concentrations (C(min), C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and total clearance (CL(total)) were compared between the groups of pairs, which were matched for age, sex, weight, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The GM [90% confidence interval (CI)] of the atazanavir C(min), C(max), and AUC of patients taking the methadone oral solution at doses of 20-175 mg/day simultaneously with antiretroviral therapy were impaired compared to patients not taking methadone oral solution: C(min) = 315 (range 197-448) vs. 519 (279-793) ng/mL [GM ratio (GMR) = 0.61, p = 0.229]; C(max) = 1714 (1238-2262) vs. 3190 (2412-4076) ng/mL (GMR = 0.54, p = 0.018); AUC = 21,987 (15,870-29,327) vs. 35,572 (26,211-46,728) ng h/mL (GMR = 0.62, p = 0.074). Methadone dose, which is proportional to the amount of methadone oral solution (10 mg/mL), was significantly correlated to atazanavir C(max) (r (2) = 0.40, p = 0.001) and AUC (r (2) = 0.32, p = 0.006). Ritonavir pharmacokinetics was similar between the groups with C(min), C(max), and AUC GMR of 1.01, 0.80, and 0.96, respectively. CONCLUSION: The partial decrease in atazanavir plasma concentrations in patients concomitantly taking racemic methadone oral solution in this daily observed therapy setting deserves further attention, and therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered.

Comparing QuantiFERON-tuberculosis gold, T-SPOT tuberculosis and tuberculin skin test in HIV-infected individuals from a low prevalence tuberculosis country.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interferon-gamma-releasing assays QuantiFERON-tuberculosis (TB) Gold and T-SPOT.TB in addition to tuberculin skin test (TST) for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV patients. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cross-sectional study for asymptomatic HIV-infected outpatients from a large University hospital. INTERVENTION: Simultaneous performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold, T-SPOT.TB and TST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and risk factors for a positive test reaction and the concordance (kappa) between the tests were investigated. RESULTS: Of 286 enrolled patients, 81% were men; median age was 44 years, the median CD4 cell count 408/microl (range 7-1510) with a median nadir of 126/microl (range 0-749). A number of patients (63.8%) had undetectable HIV RNA (<50 copies/ml). Both T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB showed more positive test results than TST: 25.2 and 20.0% (P = 0.133) compared with 12.8% (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Agreement between T-SPOT.TB and TST (kappa = 0.201) respectively QuantiFERON-TB and TST (kappa = 0.335) was fair, but only poor between the serological assays (kappa = 0.146). T-SPOT.TB provided more indeterminate results than QuantiFERON-TB (8 vs. 1/256, P < 0.01). Patients with a positive QuantiFERON-TB result had higher median CD4 cell counts (457 vs. 405 cells/microl for patients with negative result, P = 0.044); the amount of released interferon-gamma correlated with CD4 cell counts (rho = 0.199; P < 0.002). T-SPOT.TB results were independent from CD4 cell counts. CONCLUSION: In HIV-infected patients from a low prevalence TB country, both interferon-gamma assays are more sensitive than TST, but seem to be less sensitive than in immunocompetent patients. The blood tests show poor agreement and differ in their dependence on the CD4 cell count.