Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 33(1): 20-29, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32988717

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate how common radiation therapy techniques perform in the setting of the new European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) delineation recommendations for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven Danish radiation therapy centres and six international European centres participated in this project. Two breast cancer cases (one left-sided and one right-sided) with a retropectoral implant were chosen for radiation therapy planning using deep-inspiration breath-hold. Target volumes were delineated according to ESTRO-ACROP delineation recommendations. The centres were asked to plan the cases using any radiation therapy technique according to the Danish Breast Cancer Group plan objectives. RESULTS: In total, 35 treatment plans were collected. Half of the submitted plans, for both the left-sided and the right-sided case, used the field-in-field (FiF) technique (nine for each), a quarter used volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT; five for right-sided, four for left-sided) and the remaining quarter was a mix of inverse intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), helicoidal therapy and hybrid (combined open fields and VMAT) techniques. Mean clinical target volume doses were in the range 99-102% of the prescribed dose. The median FiF mean heart dose (MHD) for right-sided radiation therapy was 1 Gy (range 0.8-3.7) and 5.2 Gy for left-sided radiation therapy (range 2.2-6.5). For right-sided radiation therapy, the median VMAT MHD was 3.42 Gy, for IMRT was 2.3 Gy and for helicoidal therapy was 5.1 Gy. For left-sided radiation therapy, the median VMAT MHD was 6.3 Gy, for IMRT was 7.8 Gy and for helicoidal therapy was 7.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Different radiation therapy techniques could be used to plan radiation therapy in the setting of IBR. FiF provided good coverage with acceptable organ at risk doses. The best dose distribution results as a trade-off between the objectives of target volume coverage and high-dose organ at risk inclusion. The radiation therapy technique affects the interplay between these objectives.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/normas , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Oncología por Radiación/normas , Dosificación Radioterapéutica/normas , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Mastectomía/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
2.
Z Kardiol ; 77(7): 407-12, 1988 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2975096

RESUMEN

In this study plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide and of the catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine were investigated in hypertensive patients (HT) (n = 30). 22 normotensive patients (NT) served as controls. Hypertensives showed an elevated ANP-level in comparison with controls (46.8 +/- 3.3 vs. 36.8 +/- 3.3 pg/ml, M +/- SEM, p less than 0.01). When patients with myocardial infarction or with reduced ejection fraction were excluded, the same relation was demonstrated (49.3 +/- 3.2 vs. 33.6 +/- 2.0 pg/ml, p less than 0.01). Plasma norepinephrine was 230.8 +/- 52.3 pg/ml in HT compared with 138.0 +/- 19.6 pg/ml in NT (p less than 0.05). Epinephrine was 70.8 +/- 10.5 vs. 54.8 +/- 9.7 pg/ml in HT and NT. To exclude an increased left ventricular enddiastolic - and hence left atrial - pressure as the cause for the elevation of ANP and norepinephrine, HT and NT were matched for the same levels of enddiastolic pressure (LVEDP) (n = 18). For each level of LVEDP ANP was higher in HT than in NT (p less than 0.01). The same held true for norepinephrine (p less than 0.05) and to a lesser extent for epinephrine (p = 0.09). Our results demonstrate that patients with essential hypertension exhibit markedly elevated levels for ANP and catecholamines which is not due to myocardial failure. We propose that the increased secretion of the vasodilatory hormone ANP serves as counterregulation against the vasoconstrictor norepinephrine. The endocrine function of the heart may play a pivotal role in the modulation of sympathetic activity.


Asunto(s)
Factor Natriurético Atrial/sangre , Epinefrina/sangre , Hipertensión/sangre , Norepinefrina/sangre , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Gasto Cardíaco , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vasoconstricción
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...