The Burden of the "False-Negatives" in Clinical Development: Analyses of Current and Alternative Scenarios and Corrective Measures.

The "false-negatives" of clinical development are the effective treatments wrongly determined ineffective. Statistical errors leading to "false-negatives" are larger than those leading to "false-positives," especially in typically underpowered early-phase trials. In addition, "false-negatives" are usually eliminated from further testing, thereby limiting the information available on them. We simulated the impact of early-phase power on economic productivity in three developmental scenarios. Scenario 1, representing the current status quo, assumed 50% statistical power at phase II and 90% at phase III. Scenario 2 assumed increased power (80%), and Scenario 3, increased stringency of alpha (1%) at phase II. Scenario 2 led, on average, to a 60.4% increase in productivity and 52.4% increase in profit. Scenario 3 had no meaningful advantages. Our results suggest that additional costs incurred by increasing the power of phase II studies are offset by the increase in productivity. We discuss the implications of our results and propose corrective measures.

Intra-Target Microdosing - A Novel Drug Development Approach: Proof of Concept, Safety, and Feasibility Study in Humans.

Intra-Target Microdosing (ITM) is a novel drug development approach aimed at increasing the efficiency of first-in-human (FIH) testing of new molecular entities (NMEs). ITM combines intra-target drug delivery and "microdosing," the subpharmacological systemic exposure. We hypothesized that when the target tissue is small (about 1/100th of total body mass), ITM can lead to target therapeutic-level exposure with minimal (microdose) systemic exposure. Each of five healthy male volunteers received insulin microdose into the radial artery or full therapeutic dose intravenously in separate visits. Insulin and glucose levels were similar between systemic administration and ITM administration in the ipsilateral hand, and glucose levels demonstrated a reduction in the ipsilateral hand but not in the contralateral hand. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake demonstrated differences between the ipsilateral and contralateral arms. The procedures were safe and well-tolerated. Results are consistent with ITM proof-of-concept (POC) and demonstrate the ethical, regulatory, and logistical feasibility of the approach.

Human endotoxin administration as an experimental model in drug development.

Linking human physiology to inflammatory mechanisms discovered in vitro or in animal models is essential to determine their importance. Innate immunity underlies many of these inflammatory responses in health and disease. Bacterial endotoxin is the quintessential trigger of innate immune responses. When administered to humans, endotoxin has been an important means of demonstrating key inflammatory mechanisms in vivo. Furthermore, endotoxin challenges have provided opportunities to test the effects of novel inflammation-modifying agents in humans.

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of telithromycin and clarithromycin in older subjects with renal impairment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of multiple impairments in drug elimination on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (effect on QTc interval), using clarithromycin as a comparator. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects aged > or = 60 years with renal impairment who were otherwise medically stable were recruited into this parallel-group study. Following stratification according to creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), subjects were randomized to a five-day treatment with ketoconazole (400 mg once daily) alone, or a five-day treatment with ketoconazole (400 mg once daily) and telithromycin (800 mg once daily) given concomitantly or a five-day treatment with ketoconazole (400 mg once daily) and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) given concomitantly. Steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety, including serial electrocardiograms, were assessed. RESULTS: In subjects with CL(CR) 30 - 80 ml/min, the mean maximal telithromycin concentration at steady state (C(max),ss) was 3.6 mg/l and the steady state area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(0-24 h) ss) was 33.4 mg x h/l. The mean C(max), ss and AUC(0-12 h)ss for clarithromycin were 6.2 mg/l and 56.1 mg x h/l, respectively. The increases in telithromycin C(max) ss and AUC(0-24 h) ss compared to corresponding data for healthy young subjects were 1.6- and 2.7-fold, respectively, whereas corresponding increases for clarithromycin were 2.2- and 3.3-fold, respectively. In the telithromycin plus ketoconazole group deltaQTc values were equal or < 60 ms. All QTc values were equal or < 450 ms in males and equal or < 470 ms in females. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in telithromycin plasma concentrations during ketoconazole-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 in subjects aged 60 years or older with renal impairment was similar to that for clarithromycin under the same conditions. Telithromycin was well tolerated and produced no clinically significant prolongations in the QTc interval.

Pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in patients with moderate and severe hepatic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with impaired hepatic function usually require gastric acid-suppressant therapy but are at increased risk for drug interactions and may require dosage adjustments. The proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole is rapidly absorbed and eliminated, primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 isozymes. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine whether dosage adjustment of pantoprazole is required in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment by comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of pantoprazole in such patients with that in healthy slow metabolizers of pantoprazole, in whom no dosage adjustment is required. METHODS: Patients with moderate (Child-Pugh class B) and severe (Child-Pugh class C) hepatic impairment received oral pantoprazole 40 mg once daily on days 1 through 4 and then on alternate days (days 6 and 8). Serial blood samples were collected on days 4 and 8 for analyses of plasma pantoprazole concentrations. Pharmacokinetic data were compared between the 2 groups with hepatic impairment and against historical data from 17 healthy subjects who were genetically slow CYP2C19 metabolizers of pantoprazole. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the study, 13 in the Child-Pugh class B group and 9 in the Child-Pugh class C group. No clinically significant differences in pantoprazole pharmacokinetics were noted between the patients with hepatic impairment and the healthy slow metabolizers of pantoprazole on days 4 and 8. Pantoprazole was well tolerated. Four Child-Pugh class B patients and 3 Child-Pugh class C patients reported > or = 1 adverse event. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate, and were similar to those reported in healthy subjects. Two patients discontinued the study because of severe events related to their underlying disease. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of pantoprazole were similar in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, patients with severe hepatic impairment, and healthy slow metabolizers of pantoprazole, in whom no dosage adjustment is required. Thus, no dosage adjustment of pantoprazole is required in patients with hepatic impairment, regardless of its severity. However, caution should be exercised when giving pantoprazole to patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Percutaneous absorption and pharmacokinetics of eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream in women with unwanted facial hair.

This article reports the results of an open-label, multiple-dose study to determine percutaneous absorption and pharmacokinetics of eflornithine following topical treatment with eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream (Vaniqa). Ten women with excessive facial hair were treated with two 0.5 g single doses of [14C]-labeled eflornithine HCl 13.9% (w/w) cream (periods A and C) separated by twice-daily application of 0.5 g unlabeled eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream for 7 days (period B). Analysis of radioactivity excreted in urine and feces indicated that percutaneous absorption was minimal. Comparison with urinary excretion of eflornithine in period A suggested that most of absorbed eflornithine was excreted in urine without being metabolized. Radioactivity was not detectable in blood or plasma, but eflornithine concentrations were measurable, with peak concentrations of 4.96 ng/ml in period A and 10.44 ng/ml in period C. Eflornithine was eliminated from plasma with a mean terminal half-life of 11 hours (first application) and 8 hours (final application). Trough plasma concentrations reached steady state (4.61-5.50 ng/ml) after 4 days of twice-daily topical treatment, and multiple dosing had no apparent effect on disposition kinetics. The low degree of percutaneous absorption and low systemic exposure to eflornithine offer a favorable clinical safety profile of eflornithine HCl 13.9% cream.

Switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA is well tolerated and effective in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Environmental imperatives to eliminate the use of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants in metered-dose inhalers have led to the development of metered-dose inhalers with the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA-134a) propellants. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effect of switching from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA and to compare the efficacy and safety of Ventolin CFC, Ventolin HFA, and placebo in patients with asthma. METHODS: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized safety and efficacy trial comparing regular use of Ventolin CFC versus Ventolin HFA versus placebo for 12 weeks in 313 patients with asthma aged 12 years and older who received Ventolin CFC during a 3-week run-in period. RESULTS: Patients who were switched from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA maintained pulmonary function and other measures of asthma control at levels comparable with run-in baseline. Serial pulmonary function testing demonstrated that both Ventolin treatments had significantly greater mean improvement in FEV1 over baseline than the placebo group at treatment day 1 and weeks 6 and 12 (P < .001). Both Ventolin groups had comparable pulmonary function at every visit. Predose FEV1 values were maintained or improved over time with all treatments. Treatments were well-tolerated. The adverse event profile for both Ventolin treatments was comparable with placebo. No clinically relevant effects on ECG, vital signs, or clinical laboratory tests were noted. Asthma exacerbation rates were 4% to 5% in the Ventolin groups and slightly higher (8%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were switched from Ventolin CFC to Ventolin HFA maintained comparable asthma control with a similar safety profile.

Dose-proportional and stereospecific pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate delivered using an osmotic, controlled-release oral delivery system.

Methylphenidate hydrochloride (HCl) is frequently used for the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A study was conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the dose-ranging pharmacokinetics of 18, 36, and 54 mg methylphenidate HCl delivered using an oral, osmotic, controlled-release formulation (OROS). Plasma concentrations of l-methylphenidate were 40-fold lower than those of d-methylphenidate, whereas plasma concentrations of d-alpha-phenyl-2-piperidine acetic acid (d-PPA) and l-PPA, the major metabolite of methylphenidate, were comparable. Mean AUCinf values for d-methylphenidate were 42.2, 80.9, and 120 ng.h/mL for the 18, 36, and 54 mg doses, respectively, increasing dose proportionally. AUCinf values for l-methylphenidate were only approximately 1% of d-methylphenidate (0.43, 0.96, and 1.82 ng.h/mL for the 18, 36, and 54 mg dose groups, respectively). In contrast, AUCinf values of d- and l-PPA were comparable. The dose-normalized d- and l-methylphenidate plasma concentration-time profiles for the three treatment groups were superimposable. Similarly, dose-normalized plasma concentrations of d- and l-PPA were superimposable. Methylphenidate metabolism, measured as the ratio of d-methylphenidate AUCinf to d-PPA AUCinf and as l-methylphenidate AUCinf to l-PPA AUCinf, was similar for the three dose groups, indicating that methylphenidate metabolism was not affected by increasing dose. OROS (methylphenidate HCl) exhibits dose-proportional and linear pharmacokinetics.

Randomized safety studies of intravenous perflubron emulsion. I. Effects on coagulation function in healthy volunteers.

Previous perfluorocarbon (PFC) emulsions have been associated with transient adverse events (i.e., platelet activation, decreased platelet count, febrile responses, changes in hemodynamic function). The Phase I studies described in this report were parallel, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies conducted in 48 healthy volunteers (n = 24 per study) with perflubron emulsion (Oxygent; Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp., San Diego, CA). Because of the decreased platelet counts observed with previous PFC emulsions and the intended use of perflubron emulsion in surgical patients, these studies assessed postdosing coagulation responses and hemostasis. PFC pharmacokinetic variables were also evaluated. The primary endpoint for examination of coagulation effects was prospectively defined as bleeding time. Subjects received either saline (3 mL/kg) control, or perflubron emulsion at 1.2 g PFC/kg or 1.8 g PFC/kg, and were evaluated for a 14-day period. No postinfusion changes in bleeding time or differences in ex vivo agonist-induced platelet aggregation were observed. A 17% reduction in platelet count was observed 3 days after dosing in the 1.8-g PFC/kg group; levels recovered to baseline by Day 7. The intravascular half-life of perflubron for the first 24 h was dose dependent: 9.4+/-2.2 h and 6.1+/-1.9 h in the 1.8- and 1.2-g PFC/kg groups, respectively. Results indicate that this perflubron emulsion did not affect coagulation function in healthy volunteers.

Randomized safety studies of intravenous perflubron emulsion. II. Effects on immune function in healthy volunteers.

Particle size distribution is a major determinant of particle clearance by the mononuclear phagocytic system and the potential for concomitant activation of resident macrophages. To test the safety of a second-generation perflubron-based emulsion (60% perfluorocarbon [PFC] wt/vol; Oxygent [Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp., San Diego, CA]) with a small mean particle size, two parallel, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies were conducted in 48 healthy volunteers (n = 24 per study). The study described herein focuses on safety concerning immune function. The primary endpoint was defined prospectively as delayed hypersensitivity skin test responses with lymphocyte proliferative responses to mitogenic stimulation providing a secondary measure for changes in cell-mediated immunity. Subjects received either perflubron emulsion IV (1.2 g PFC/kg or 1.8 g PFC/kg) or saline (3 mL/kg) control. Perflubron emulsion had no effect on delayed hypersensitivity skin reactions, lymphocyte proliferative potential, circulating immunoglobulins, complement activation, or plasma levels of the inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 alpha, and interleukin-1 beta. Perflubron emulsion was generally well tolerated, although there was a dose-dependent increase in minor flu-like symptoms in the perflubron treatment groups at 24 h after dosing. Increased serum levels of interleukin-6 were observed in those subjects exhibiting febrile responses. The clinical safety profile of perflubron emulsion supports its continued investigation as a temporary oxygen carrier in surgical patients to reduce exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of gatifloxacin in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral gatifloxacin 400 mg in subjects with and without hepatic impairment, and the need to modify doses in patients with hepatic dysfunction. DESIGN: Single-dose, nonrandomized, open-label, parallel-group study. SETTING: Clinical Research Center, New Orleans, Louisiana. PATIENTS: Eight subjects with grade B or C hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh classification) and eight age-, weight-, and gender-matched subjects with normal hepatic function. INTERVENTIONS: After a single oral dose of gatifloxacin 400 mg, blood and urine samples were collected at specified times or intervals over 48 hours to determine drug concentrations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All 16 subjects (7 with grade B and 1 with grade C hepatic impairment, 8 with normal hepatic function) completed the study. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) for gatifloxacin were 32% and 22% higher, respectively, in subjects with hepatic impairment. Except for Cmax, the ratio of means for AUC satisfied the specified criterion (0.67-1.50) for lack of effect. There were no statistically significant differences in any other pharmacokinetic values except apparent oral clearance (ClT/F). All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity and resolved before subjects were discharged from the study. CONCLUSION: Modest increases in Cmax and AUC0-infinity are not anticipated to have a negative effect on the outcome of therapy in hepatically impaired subjects, nor are they anticipated to result in adverse drug reactions. Patients with moderate to severe (Child-Pugh grade B or C) hepatic dysfunction do not require gatifloxacin dose adjustments. In addition, the similarity in half-life (t1/2) for the groups (8.9 hrs for hepatically impaired subjects, 9.3 hrs for controls) suggests that no difference would be anticipated in the extent of drug accumulation after multiple doses. The overall safety and tolerability of a single oral dose of gatifloxacin 400 mg were excellent in both healthy subjects and those with hepatic impairment.

Differential effects of morning and evening dosing of nisoldipine ER on circadian blood pressure and heart rate.

The time of administration of once-daily antihypertensive agents may have a significant impact on blood pressure control during awake and sleep periods. Using 24-h ambulatory monitoring, we compared the effects of morning and evening dosing of the long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, nisoldipine extended-release (ER), on circadian blood pressure (BP) and heart rate in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After completing a 3-week placebo run-in period, 85 patients were randomized to morning versus evening nisoldipine ER treatment at a fixed 20-mg dose. Patients were treated for 4 weeks, followed by crossover to the alternate dosing regimen for 4 additional weeks. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory monitoring was performed at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks after randomization. Awake and sleep times were determined by electronic activity recorders (Actigraphy). Similar least-squares (+/-SE) mean changes from baseline in 24-h BP (systolic BP/diastolic BP: -11.9/-7.4 +/- 0.6/0.5 v -11.6/-6.5 +/- 0.6/0.5 mm Hg) and heart rate (1.0/1.7 +/- 0.4/0.4 beats/min) occurred with morning and evening administration, respectively. A significantly greater effect on awake diastolic BP (systolic BP/diastolic BP: -12.6/-8.1 +/- 0.7/0.4 v -11.3/-6.4 +/- 0.7/0.4 mm Hg; P = .16/.01) was observed with morning dosing compared with evening dosing. In addition, small increases in sleep and early morning heart rate were seen with evening compared with morning administration of nisoldipine (sleep, 3.1 +/- 0.4 v 0.4 +/- 0.4 beats/min; P < .001; early morning, 3.5 +/- 0.7 v 0.5 +/- 0.7 beats/min; P = .002). These differential effects on awake BP and sleep heart rate were also observed in patients who had normal (dippers) and elevated (nondippers) BP values during sleep. Appropriate evaluation of the efficacy and safety of long-acting antihypertensive agents is essential when evening administration is being considered. In the present study, the timing of nisoldipine ER administration had no effect on mean changes in BP and heart rate over a 24-h period. However, nisoldipine ER had some differential effects during sleep and awake periods with morning relative to evening dosing.

Are there differences in the effects of long-acting calcium antagonists on ambulatory blood pressure? Extended-release nisoldipine versus amlodipine as a model.

BACKGROUND: Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), which provides important information regarding mean 24 h efficacy, variability of effect during sleeping-awake cycles, and effects on the early morning surge in blood pressure, is a sensitive method for evaluating efficacy of antihypertensive agents. Extended-release nisoldipine and amlodipine are long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonists used for the treatment of hypertension. Because these agents have different pharmacokinetic profiles, 24 h ABPM could provide clues regarding their different effects on blood pressure. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of extended-release nisoldipine and amlodipine on 24 h ambulatory blood pressure control and heart rate. METHODS: After completion of a 3-4 week placebo run-in period, 100 patients were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with 10-40 mg extended-release nisoldipine or 2.5-10 mg amlodipine for 8 weeks, starting at the lowest dose. Medications were titrated at 2-week intervals on the basis of office blood pressures in seated patients. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was performed at placebo baseline and at the end of double-blind therapy. RESULTS: Extended-release nisoldipine and amlodipine provided equivalent mean 24 h changes in blood pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure decreases by 9.8/7.1 and 8.0/6.0 mmHg, respectively] and heart rate. These two treatments also provided similar changes in blood pressure at trough (22-24 h after dosing; decreases by 10.4/7.2 and 10.1/7.3 mmHg, respectively). The antihypertensive effects of amlodipine during the awake and sleeping intervals were similar (decreases by 9.6/5.9 and 9.9/5.8 mmHg, respectively, NS); whereas the effect of nisoldipine during the awake interval was significantly greater than its effect during the sleeping interval (decreases by 12.4/8.0 and 8.9/4.3 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.08/0.01). Furthermore, extended-release nisoldipine, but not amlodipine, blunted the rate of rise in early morning SBP. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-release nisoldipine and amlodipine have similar effects on mean 24 h and trough blood pressures. However, different effects during the sleeping and awake intervals and on the rate of rise in early morning SBP were observed with nisoldipine.

Oxaprozin and piroxicam, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with long half-lives: effect of protein-binding differences on steady-state pharmacokinetics.

The nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) oxaprozin and piroxicam have long elimination half-lives (t 1/2 approximately 55 hours), permitting once-daily dose regimens. The protein-binding characteristics of these drugs, however, vary widely. This study examines the effect of these binding differences on the drugs' disposition kinetics at steady state. A total of 52 participants (26 young healthy volunteers, and 26 elderly osteoarthritic patients, 15 men and 37 women (2 of them poor metabolizers of debrisoquine [CYP2D6]) completed the two-period, two-treatment, randomized, single-dose and 21-day, once-daily multiple-dose, cross-over study. Doses of oxaprozin and piroxicam were 1,200 mg once daily and 20 mg once daily, respectively. Mean single-dose kinetic parameters of oxaprozin versus piroxicam did not differ more than +/-14% (t1/2, 53.0 versus 57.4 hours; apparent oral clearance adjusted for 70-kg body weight [Clpo], 0.139 versus 0.121 L/hr; apparent volume of distribution adjusted for 70-kg body weight [Vd/F]; 10.2 L versus 9.13 L). Protein binding was plasma-concentration dependent with oxaprozin (range, 10-400 mg/L) but not with piroxicam (range, 1-30 mg/ L). Steady-state conditions were established within 3 days with oxaprozin but took almost 12 days with piroxicam. Compared with the single-dose values, steady-state Clpo (Clpo,ss) and Vd/F of total drug increased with oxaprozin by almost 127% but remained within +/-10% with piroxicam. Post-steady-state apparent t 1/2 of the total and unbound drugs of approximately 62 hours were similarly prolonged with piroxicam but differed substantially with oxaprozin (50.6 hours [total drug] versus 23.8 hours [unbound drug]). Single dose Clpo (Clpo,sd) values of both NSAIDs were significantly correlated in the study populations. With both NSAIDs, Clpo in the two poor metabolizers of debrisoquine was within +/-20% of mean values for the population. Clinically important age- and gender-dependent decreases were not observed in the weight-adjusted, Clpo,sd or Vd/F values of the total drug for either NSAID. Clearances of the two NSAIDs were significantly correlated, suggesting that a common P450 isozyme (most likely CYP2C9, in that piroxicam is a known substrate of this isozyme) may be at least partly involved in the oxidative metabolism of these NSAIDs.

The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 1200 mg/d of oxaprozin and 1500 mg/d of nabumetone in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

This 6-week, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the recommended starting dose of oxaprozin (1200 mg/d) and a 1500-mg/d dose of nabumetone in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. A total of 347 patients with a mean age of 61.1 years were randomized to receive oxaprozin (116 patients), nabumetone (115 patients), or placebo (116 patients). Adults of either sex who were older than 18 years of age were eligible for entry into the study, if they had had OA of the knee for at least 6 months. Efficacy variables included knee pain on weight bearing, knee pain on motion, patients' and physicians' global assessments of OA, pain intensity as measured on a visual analog scale, and time to walk 50 feet as quickly as possible. Efficacy variables were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. Between-group differences in efficacy variables were evident by week 1. Mean improvements were significantly greater with oxaprozin than with placebo for all efficacy variables at all time periods, except knee pain on motion at weeks 2 and 4 and time to walk 50 feet at weeks 1, 2, and 4. Mean improvements were significantly greater with nabumetone than with placebo for all efficacy variables at all time periods, except the following: knee pain on weight bearing at weeks 2, 4 and 6; knee pain on motion at weeks 2 and 4; patients' global assessment at week 4; and pain intensity as measured on a visual analog scale at weeks 2 and 4. There were, however, no significant differences between oxaprozin and nabumetone in any of these efficacy variables. Adverse events were reported by 83 (71.6%) patients who took oxaprozin, by 80 (69.6%) patients who took nabumetone, and by 57 (49.1%) patients who took placebo. Adverse events were reported for significantly more patients taking oxaprozin or nabumetone than placebo. However, adverse events tended to be mild or moderate and rarely resulted in patients withdrawing from the study. Combined with the results of an earlier study, the results of this study showed that a 1500-mg/d dose of nabumetone, which is higher than the recommended starting dose of 1000 mg/d, is required for efficacy equivalent to that of the recommended starting dose of oxaprozin, 1200 mg/d, in relieving the symptoms of OA. Thus nabumetone may require dosage titration from the recommended starting dose. Oxaprozin and nabumetone were found to have similar tolerability profiles, as shown by adverse-event monitoring and withdrawal rates, as well as clinically similar safety profiles, as demonstrated by physical examinations, hematologic and biochemical laboratory testing, hemoccult testing, and adverse-event monitoring and symptom assessment.

Inhibition of platelet production induced by an antiplatelet drug, anagrelide, in normal volunteers.

Administration of anagrelide, an antiplatelet agent, to ten normal male subjects was accompanied by an asymptomatic fall in platelet count. The drop was gradual and usually occurred within two weeks. Only a slight shortening of platelet survival was seen. Bone marrow morphology appeared normal. Measurement of platelet production rates showed a reduced response to thrombocytopenia. A substantial increase in the percentage of large platelets was observed in drug treated subjects. These observations are compatible with a selective inhibition of platelet production. Based upon these findings, the use of anagrelide will probably be best limited to short-term applications or to conditions where selective lowering of platelet count may be desired such as in polycythemia rubra vera or idiopathic thrombocytosis.

Extrarenal contributions to indapamide's antihypertensive mechanism of action.

Autonomic responses in heart rate and blood pressure to Valsalva maneuvers and changes in vascular reactivity to pressor doses of phenylephrine and angiotensin II were studied before and after treatment with indapamide, a new antihypertensive diuretic. Six healthy male volunteers, placed on a daily diet consisting of 100 mEq of sodium, 80 mEq of potassium, and a fluid intake of 2500 ml, participated in this single-blind, placebo-controlled study. During active treatment, 5 mg of indapamide was administered once daily for 14 days. On the mornings of hemodynamic testing, samples of blood, 24-hour urine, and plasma were obtained and analyzed for hematocrit, catecholamines and their metabolites, plasma renin activity, and aldosterone levels. Since each subject served as his own control, the results were analyzed by the paired t-test method. Plasma renin activity and 24-hour urinary aldosterone levels increased (p less than 0.05), and serum potassium and chloride levels decreased (p less than 0.05). No other significant laboratory changes were noted after treatment, including changes in the plasma and urinary catecholamine levels. Following treatment, responses in heart rate and blood pressure to Valsalva maneuvers were unaltered. During the control period the doses of phenylephrine and angiotensin II required to raise the systolic pressure 25 to 35 mm Hg and the diastolic pressure 20 to 30 mm Hg were 5.03 +/- 0.72 micrograms/kg and 16.7 +/- 2.1 ng/kg, respectively. After treatment, the doses of phenylephrine and angiotensin II were significantly (p less than 0.05) greater: 10.72 +/- 1.02 micrograms/kg and 31.7 +/- 4.8 ng/kg, respectively. Dose-response relationships to these pressor agents were shifted in parallel to the right after treatment. A small but significant decrease in body weight, which may have reflected a decrease in plasma volume, was observed. However, no orthostatic changes between the supine and erect mean arterial blood pressures or incremental increases in heart rates were noted between the two periods. An increase in hematocrit and blunting of the diastolic overshoot during the Valsalva maneuvers that were used as indexes of plasma volume contraction were also not observed. In summary, our results indicate that changes in vascular responsiveness occurred by mechanisms independent of changes in the autonomic nervous system, since plasma norepinephrine levels did not change and responsiveness to Valsalva maneuvers was unaltered. Furthermore, it appears that this effect on the vasculature was probably not related to changes in plasma volume.

Clonidine-chlorthalidone combination once and twice daily in essential hypertension.

The antihypertensive effects of a clonidine-chlorthalidone combination (Combipres) as a single daily dose at bedtime and the same amount in twice-daily doses were compared in an open-label, crossover study in 14 patients. An analysis of the blood pressure and pulse data in nine patients who completed the study revealed no statistically significant differences between the two regimens, and no difference in the incidence of side effects was noted.