Prenatal detection of placenta accreta spectrum using a sonographic checklist.

INTRODUCTION: The European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta proposed a checklist of ultrasound features for the antenatal detection of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). This study aims to assess the performance of the checklist in identifying histopathologically confirmed PAS cases in a cohort with a high pre-test probability of PAS, and identify if particular features are associated with PAS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective multi-site cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2023. Consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound assessment for suspicion of PAS were included, and the sonographic checklist was completed at the time of ultrasound. Cases were defined as PAS where they had intraoperative findings as described by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading, and histopathological findings for hysterectomy and myometrial resection cases. All non-PAS cases in this study had placenta previa and at least one prior cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Seventy-eight participants met inclusion criteria, of whom 63 (80.7%) were diagnosed with PAS. Cesarean hysterectomy was performed in 49 cases (62.8%). Overall, third-trimester ultrasound performed at a median gestational age of 32 weeks (IQR 30-34 weeks) had a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.92) and specificity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.92) for detecting PAS, with a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 3.15 (95% CI 1.35 to 7.35) and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.41), respectively. Features most associated with PAS were abnormal placental lacunae (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.40 [95% CI 1.61 to 18.03] and myometrial thinning OR 6.87 [95% CI 1.93 to 24.4]). While many of the ultrasound features seen in PAS were also present in cases of placenta previa with prior Cesarean section, the median (IQR) number of features present in PAS cases was significantly higher than in the non-PAS placenta previa group (six features [3-8] vs. two features [0-3] p = 0.001). No case of non-PAS placenta previa had more than five features present. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a standardized sonographic checklist had a high sensitivity and good specificity for the detection of PAS in this prospective cohort of well-classified PAS cases.

Placenta accreta spectrum ultrasound stage and fetal growth.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate fetal growth in pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to compare fetal growth between cases stratified by ultrasound stage of PAS. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter cohort study of women diagnosed with PAS between January 2018 and December 2021. We grouped participants into cases by ultrasound stage (PAS stage 1-3) and controls (PAS0). Fetal growth centiles at three timepoints with median gestational ages of 21 ± 1 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 20 ± 1-22 ± 0 weeks), 28 ± 0 weeks (IQR, 27 ± 0-28 ± 5 weeks), and 33 ± 0 weeks (IQR, 32 ± 1-34 ± 0 weeks) and birth weight centiles were compared between cases and controls and between those with PAS stratified by ultrasound stage. RESULTS: A total of 53 women met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 37 years (standard deviation, ±4.0 years) and body mass index of 27 kg/m2 (standard deviation, ±5.8 kg/m2 ). Median (IQR) fetal weight centiles were around the 50th centile at each timepoint, with no difference between groups. The incidence of small for gestational age (birth weight ≤ 10th percentile) and large for gestational age (birth weight ≥ 90th percentile) was 11.3% (n = 6) and 15.1% (n = 8), respectively, with no differences by ultrasound stage. The median birth weight centile was 64 (IQR, 26-85), with no differences between cases and controls or by ultrasound stage. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, a diagnosis of PAS was not associated with fetal growth restriction.

Maternal morbidity in placenta accreta spectrum following introduction of a multi-disciplinary service compared to standard care: an Irish perspective.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare maternal outcomes in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) when managed as part of a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) compared to standard care. METHODS: Patients in the standard care group were retrospectively identified from pathology records, with patients in the MDT group prospectively collected on an electronic database. Data on maternal demographics, delivery, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion requirements, and morbidity were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty patients were diagnosed with PAS between 2006 and 2019, of whom 32 were part of the standard care group and 28 in the MDT group. Compared to standard care, MDT care was associated with an increase in antenatal diagnosis from 56.3 to 92.9% (p < 0.0001), a significant reduction in EBL (4150 mL (800-19500) vs 1975 (495-8500), p < 0.0001), and transfusion requirements (median 7 (0-30) units of RCC vs 1 (0-13), p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: PAS is associated with significant maternal morbidity and warrants management in an MDT setting with specialist input, which is associated with improved outcomes.