Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 896978, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35846761

RESUMEN

The formation of a biofilm on the implant surface is a major cause of intractable implant-associated infection. To investigate the antibiotic concentration needed to eradicate the bacteria inside a biofilm, the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) has been used, mostly against in vitro biofilms on plastic surfaces. To produce a more clinically relevant environment, an MBEC assay against biofilms on stainless-steel implants formed in a rat femoral infection model was developed. The rats were implanted with stainless steel screws contaminated by two Staphylococcus aureus strains (UAMS-1, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; USA300LAC, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and euthanized on days 3 and 14. Implants were harvested, washed, and incubated with various concentrations (64-4096 µg/mL) of gentamicin (GM), vancomycin (VA), or cefazolin (CZ) with or without an accompanying systemic treatment dose of VA (20 µg/mL) or rifampicin (RF) (1.5 µg/mL) for 24 h. The implant was vortexed and sonicated, the biofilm was removed, and the implant was re-incubated to determine bacterial recovery. MBEC on the removed biofilm and implant was defined as in vivo MBEC and in vivo implant MBEC, respectively, and the concentrations of 100% and 60% eradication were defined as MBEC100 and MBEC60, respectively. As for in vivo MBEC, MBEC100 of GM was 256-1024 µg/mL, but that of VA and CZ ranged from 2048-4096 µg/mL. Surprisingly, the in vivo implant MBEC was much higher, ranging from 2048 µg/mL to more than 4096 µg/mL. The addition of RF, not VA, as a secondary antibiotic was effective, and MBEC60 on day 3 USA300LAC biofilm was reduced from 1024 µg/mL with GM alone to 128 µg/mL in combination with RF and the MBEC60 on day 14 USA300LAC biofilm was reduced from 2048 µg/mL in GM alone to 256 µg/mL in combination with RF. In conclusion, a novel MBEC assay for in vivo biofilms on orthopedic implants was developed. GM was the most effective against both methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, in in vivo biofilms, and the addition of a systemic concentration of RF reduced MBEC of GM. Early initiation of treatment is desired because the required concentration of antibiotics increases with biofilm maturation.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas , Gentamicinas/farmacología , Meticilina/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ratas , Rifampin/farmacología , Roedores , Vancomicina/farmacología
2.
J Orthop Res ; 39(2): 449-457, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33325059

RESUMEN

Treatment of implant-associated orthopedic infections remains challenging, partly because antimicrobial treatment is ineffective after a mature biofilm covers the implant surface. Currently, the relative efficacy of systemic mono- and combination standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotic therapies over the course of mature biofilm formation is unknown. Thus, we assessed the effects of cefazoline (CEZ), gentamicin (GM), and vancomycin, with or without rifampin (RFP), on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation during the establishment of implant-associated osteomyelitis in a murine tibia model. Quantitative scanning electron microscopy of the implants harvested on Days 0, 3, and 7 revealed that all treatments except CEZ monotherapy significantly reduced biofilm formation when antibiotics started at Day 0 (0.46- to 0.25-fold; p < 0.05). When antibiotics commenced 3 days after the infection, only GM monotherapy significantly inhibited biofilm growth (0.63-fold; p < 0.05), while all antibiotics inhibited biofilm formation in combination with RFP (0.56- to 0.44-fold; p < 0.05). However, no treatment was effective when antibiotics commenced on Day 7. To confirm these findings, we assessed bacterial load via colony-forming unit and histology. The results showed that GM monotherapy and all combination therapies reduced the colony-forming unit in the implant (0.41- to 0.23-fold; p < 0.05); all treatments except CEZ monotherapy reduced the colony-forming unit and staphylococcus abscess communities in the tibiae (0.40- to 0.10-fold; p < 0.05). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that systemic SOC antibiotics can inhibit biofilm formation within 3 days but not after 7 days of infection. The efficacy of SOC monotherapies, CEZ particularly, is very limited. Thus, combination treatment with RFP may be necessary to inhibit implant-associated osteomyelitis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno/efectos de los fármacos , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Huesos/efectos de los fármacos , Huesos/ultraestructura , Cefazolina/farmacología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...