Association of cardiometabolic risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND: Although cardiovascular disease causes substantial morbidity and mortality, how individual and groups of risk factors contribute to cardiovascular outcomes is incompletely understood. This study evaluated cardiometabolic risk factors and their relationship to prevalent diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. METHODS: We used retrospective data from 3 integrated health-care systems that systematically collect and store detailed patient-level data. Adult enrollees were eligible for inclusion if they had all of the following clinical measurements: weight, height, blood pressure, high density lipoproteins, triglycerides, and fasting blood glucose or evidence of diabetes from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005. We used National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines to determine qualifying levels for cardiometabolic risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 170,648 persons met the inclusion/exclusion criteria; 11,757 had no qualifying risk factors, 25,684 had 1, 38,176 had 2, and 95,031 had 3 or more risk factors. Compared to those without risk factors, persons with any 1 risk factor were 2.21 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-2.74) times more likely to have had a diagnosis of AMI or stroke. The risk increased to 2.79 (95% CI, 2.26-3.42) for persons with 2, 3.45 (95% CI, 2.80-4.24) for persons with 3, 4.35 (95% CI, 3.54-5.35) for persons with 4, and 5.73 (95% CI, 4.65-7.07) for persons with 5 risk factors. The highest risk was conferred by having the combination of risk factors of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, with or without weight risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a direct association between an increasing number of cardiometabolic risk factors and prevalent diagnosis of AMI and stroke. The combination of risk factors conferring the highest risk was diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.

Cardiometabolic risk and health care utilization and cost for Hispanic and non-Hispanic women.

Cardiometabolic risk (CMR) is a specific set of risk factors that are associated with an increased chance of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We conducted a retrospective study of female members of a health maintenance organization in the southwestern United States to: determine the prevalence of CMR for 4 different groupings of CMR factors, identify differences between Hispanics and non-Hispanics, and quantify differences in 2-year health care utilization and costs of CMR. Subjects were females who had bone mineral density tests during 2003-2004, and thus a measure of height and weight, allowing body mass index (BMI) calculation (n = 2578; 27.6% Hispanic). Risk factors used to define CMR groupings were: obesity (BMI), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting glucose. Results showed that Hispanics had higher prevalence rates than non-Hispanics (65.8% versus 52.3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and ethnicity, total costs for CMR patients in the groupings that required the presence of diabetes were twice the costs of those without CMR (approximately $11,500 versus $5500, respectively; P < 0.0001). In all other groupings, costs for patients with and without CMR were approximately $7000 versus $5500, respectively (P < 0.0001). Non-Hispanics had significantly higher visit costs than Hispanics. There were no differences in pharmacy costs. Higher utilization and costs associated with CMR suggest the need to identify and monitor patients with CMR. Our findings suggest diabetes prevention could yield substantial cost savings. Higher costs for non-Hispanics, despite higher prevalence among Hispanics, may indicate underutilization of health care resources by Hispanics. Future research in CMR should explore ethnic differences in access to care and disease management programs.

Outcomes and humanistic issues related to treatment of acute bronchospasm.

Because of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, the economic costs associated with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and bronchospasm are a significant portion of total overall treatment costs. A small proportion of patients account for most of the costs, due to disease severity and acute exacerbations. Disease management programs, sponsored by insurance groups and employers, are lowering health and disability costs and reducing days missed from work and school because of exacerbations. Quality-of-life patient assessments are available to assist practitioners in evaluating disease status. Evidenced-based medicine analysis can show that less expensive therapies are not necessarily cost-effective. A study of the rate of hospital admissions from the emergency department showed that although levalbuterol therapy in the emergency department was more costly than racemic albuterol therapy, total overall treatment costs were reduced because of decreased hospitalizations in the levalbuterol-treated patients. Thus, providers, payers, and patients should examine all the scientific evidence (safety, efficacy or effectiveness, economics, and humanistic benefits) to make the most informed health care decision.