Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 19(8): 1489-97, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25967725

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In the current prospective, randomized study, we aimed to compare the effects of low dose selective spinal anesthesia with 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine and single-shot femoral nerve block combination with conventional dose selective spinal anesthesia in terms of intraoperative anesthesia characteristics, block recovery characteristics, and postoperative analgesic consumption. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After obtaining institutional Ethics Committee approval, 52 ASA I-II patients aged 25-65, undergoing arthroscopic meniscus repair were randomly assigned to Group S (conventional dose selective spinal anesthesia with 10 mg bupivacaine) and Group FS (low-dose selective spinal anesthesia with 5mg bupivacaine +single-shot femoral block with 0.25% bupivacaine). Primary endpoints were time to reach T12 sensory block level, L2 regression, and complete motor block regression. Secondary endpoints were maximum sensory block level (MSBL); time to reach MSBL, time to first urination, time to first analgesic consumption and pain severity at the time of first mobilization. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). MSBL and time to reach T12 sensory level were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Time to reach L2 regression, complete motor block regression, and time to first micturition were significantly shorter; time to first analgesic consumption was significantly longer; and total analgesic consumption and severity of pain at time of first mobilization were significantly lower in Group FS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study suggest that addition of single-shot femoral block to low dose spinal anesthesia could be an alternative to conventional dose spinal anesthesia in outpatient arthroscopic meniscus repair. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02322372.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Artroscopía/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/métodos , Nervio Femoral , Adulto , Anciano , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 47(5): 583-7, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12699517

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rocuronium (ORG 9426) has been shown to have an onset of action more rapid than other nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and to provide intubating conditions similar to those of succinylcholine 60-90 s after administration. We compared the intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes after the administration of rocuronium 0.6 mg kg(-1) and lidocaine 1.5 mg kg(-1) with rocuronium alone and succinylcholine 60 and 90 s after administration. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five adult patients of ASA physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into five groups. After propofol administration in all patients, patients in group Su (succinylcholine), group R60 (rocuronium) and group RL60 (rocuronium-lidocaine) were intubated within 60 s, while groups RL90 and R90 were intubated 90 s after the administration of rocuronium and succinylcholine. Laryngoscopy was performed and intubating conditions were graded by an experienced anesthetist blind to the muscle relaxant allocation. RESULTS: In this study, groups Su, RL60, R90 and RL90 had similar intubation scores, which were significantly better than that for group R60. Heart rate did not increase after intubation in groups Su, RL60 and RL90. CONCLUSION: The combination of lidocaine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) and low-dose rocuronium (0.6 mg kg(-1)) along with propofol is clinically equivalent to succinylcholine, improves intubating conditions in 60 s and effectively blocks increases in heart rate after intubation.


Asunto(s)
Androstanoles , Anestésicos Locales , Intubación Intratraqueal , Lidocaína , Fármacos Neuromusculares no Despolarizantes , Adulto , Anestesia General , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Laringoscopía , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Fármacos Neuromusculares Despolarizantes , Rocuronio , Succinilcolina
5.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 13(6): 606-11, 1996 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8958493

RESUMEN

Ketamine 3-6 mg kg-1 given by mouth to paediatric patients for anaesthetic premedication was evaluated. Forty-three children, ages 2-9 years were randomly allocated to receive either ketamine (3 or 6 mg kg-1) or placebo (cola 0.2 mL kg-1). Oral use of ketamine made separation from the families easier, gave an increased level of sedation, made acceptance of mask application easier and improved the emotional state in the recovery phase. These improvements were present with ketamine 3 mg kg-1 and 6 mg kg-1 in comparison with the placebo. We conclude that 3 mg kg-1 ketamine given by mouth to premedicate paediatric patients is as effective as 6 mg kg-1 but has a decreased incidence of side effects such as nystagmus and vomiting.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Disociativos/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Medicación Preanestésica , Administración Oral , Anestésicos Disociativos/efectos adversos , Niño , Conducta Infantil , Preescolar , Sedación Consciente , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Medicación Preanestésica/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...